2
|
Slavov S, Mattes W, Beger RD. Determination of structural factors affecting binding to mu, kappa and delta opioid receptors. Arch Toxicol 2020; 94:1215-1227. [PMID: 32107589 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02684-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Addiction is a complex behavioral phenomenon in which naturally occurring or synthetic chemicals modulate the response of the reward system through their binding to a variety of neuroreceptors, resulting in compulsive substance-seeking and use despite harmful consequences to the individual. Among these, the opioid receptor (OR) family and more specifically, the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) subtype plays a critical role in the addiction to powerful prescription and illicit drugs such as hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine (Contet et al. in Curr Opin Neurobiol 14(3):370-378, 2004). Conversely, agonists binding to kappa (KOR) and antagonists binding to delta opioid receptors (DOR) have been reported to induce negative reinforcing effects. As more than 700 new psychoactive substances were illegally sold between 2009 and 2016 (DEA-DCT-DIR-032-18), most of them lacking basic toxicological and pharmacological profiles, molecular modeling approaches that could quickly and reliably fill the gaps in our knowledge would be highly desirable tools for determining the effects of these synthetics. Here, we report accurate 3D-spectrometric data-activity relationship classification models for large and diverse datasets of MOR, KOR and DOR binders with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the "blind" prediction sets exceeding 0.88. Structural features associated with (selective) binding to MOR, KOR and/or DOR were identified. These models could assist regulatory agencies in evaluating the health risks associated with the use of unprofiled substances as well as to help the pharmaceutical industry in its search for new drugs to combat addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetoslav Slavov
- Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
| | - William Mattes
- Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA
| | - Richard D Beger
- Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Rd., Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sakkiah S, Guo W, Pan B, Kusko R, Tong W, Hong H. Computational prediction models for assessing endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH. PART C, ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENESIS & ECOTOXICOLOGY REVIEWS 2019; 36:192-218. [PMID: 30633647 DOI: 10.1080/10590501.2018.1537132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) mimic natural hormones and disrupt endocrine function. Humans and wildlife are exposed to EDCs might alter endocrine functions through various mechanisms and lead to an adverse effects. Hence, EDCs identification is important to protect the ecosystem and to promote the public health. Leveraging in-vitro and in-vivo experiments to identify potential EDCs is time consuming and expensive. Hence, quantitative structure-activity relationship is applied to screen the potential EDCs. Here, we summarize the predictive models developed using various algorithms to forecast the binding activity of chemicals to the estrogen and androgen receptors, alpha-fetoprotein, and sex hormone binding globulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sugunadevi Sakkiah
- a Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics , National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA
| | - Wenjing Guo
- a Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics , National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA
| | - Bohu Pan
- a Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics , National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA
| | - Rebecca Kusko
- b Immuneering Corporation , Cambridge , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Weida Tong
- a Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics , National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA
| | - Huixiao Hong
- a Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics , National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson , Arkansas , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mansouri K, Grulke CM, Richard AM, Judson RS, Williams AJ. An automated curation procedure for addressing chemical errors and inconsistencies in public datasets used in QSAR modelling. SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2016; 27:939-965. [PMID: 27885862 DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2016.1253611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The increasing availability of large collections of chemical structures and associated experimental data provides an opportunity to build robust QSAR models for applications in different fields. One common concern is the quality of both the chemical structure information and associated experimental data. Here we describe the development of an automated KNIME workflow to curate and correct errors in the structure and identity of chemicals using the publicly available PHYSPROP physicochemical properties and environmental fate datasets. The workflow first assembles structure-identity pairs using up to four provided chemical identifiers, including chemical name, CASRNs, SMILES, and MolBlock. Problems detected included errors and mismatches in chemical structure formats, identifiers and various structure validation issues, including hypervalency and stereochemistry descriptions. Subsequently, a machine learning procedure was applied to evaluate the impact of this curation process. The performance of QSAR models built on only the highest-quality subset of the original dataset was compared with the larger curated and corrected dataset. The latter showed statistically improved predictive performance. The final workflow was used to curate the full list of PHYSPROP datasets, and is being made publicly available for further usage and integration by the scientific community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Mansouri
- a Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) , Oak Ridge , TN , USA
- b US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , National Center for Computational Toxicology , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA
| | - C M Grulke
- b US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , National Center for Computational Toxicology , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA
| | - A M Richard
- b US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , National Center for Computational Toxicology , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA
| | - R S Judson
- b US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , National Center for Computational Toxicology , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA
| | - A J Williams
- b US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , National Center for Computational Toxicology , Research Triangle Park, NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mansouri K, Abdelaziz A, Rybacka A, Roncaglioni A, Tropsha A, Varnek A, Zakharov A, Worth A, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Trisciuzzi D, Fourches D, Horvath D, Benfenati E, Muratov E, Wedebye EB, Grisoni F, Mangiatordi GF, Incisivo GM, Hong H, Ng HW, Tetko IV, Balabin I, Kancherla J, Shen J, Burton J, Nicklaus M, Cassotti M, Nikolov NG, Nicolotti O, Andersson PL, Zang Q, Politi R, Beger RD, Todeschini R, Huang R, Farag S, Rosenberg SA, Slavov S, Hu X, Judson RS. CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2016; 124:1023-33. [PMID: 26908244 PMCID: PMC4937869 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Revised: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Humans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. OBJECTIVES We describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing. METHODS CERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies. RESULTS Individual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing. CONCLUSION This project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points. CITATION Mansouri K, Abdelaziz A, Rybacka A, Roncaglioni A, Tropsha A, Varnek A, Zakharov A, Worth A, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Trisciuzzi D, Fourches D, Horvath D, Benfenati E, Muratov E, Wedebye EB, Grisoni F, Mangiatordi GF, Incisivo GM, Hong H, Ng HW, Tetko IV, Balabin I, Kancherla J, Shen J, Burton J, Nicklaus M, Cassotti M, Nikolov NG, Nicolotti O, Andersson PL, Zang Q, Politi R, Beger RD, Todeschini R, Huang R, Farag S, Rosenberg SA, Slavov S, Hu X, Judson RS. 2016. CERAPP Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project. Environ Health Perspect 124:1023-1033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510267.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamel Mansouri
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ahmed Abdelaziz
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Alessandra Roncaglioni
- Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico)-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexander Tropsha
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alexandre Varnek
- Laboratoire de Chemoinformatique, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alexey Zakharov
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrew Worth
- Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (IHCP), Joint Research Centre of the European Commission in Ispra, Ispra, Italy
| | - Ann M. Richard
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher M. Grulke
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Denis Fourches
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dragos Horvath
- Laboratoire de Chemoinformatique, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Emilio Benfenati
- Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico)-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Eugene Muratov
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eva Bay Wedebye
- Division of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Francesca Grisoni
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppina M. Incisivo
- Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico)-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
| | - Huixiao Hong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USDA), Jefferson, Arizona, USA
| | - Hui W. Ng
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USDA), Jefferson, Arizona, USA
| | - Igor V. Tetko
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
- BigChem GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Ilya Balabin
- High Performance Computing, Lockheed Martin, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jayaram Kancherla
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jie Shen
- Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, USA
| | - Julien Burton
- Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (IHCP), Joint Research Centre of the European Commission in Ispra, Ispra, Italy
| | - Marc Nicklaus
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Matteo Cassotti
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Nikolai G. Nikolov
- Division of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Orazio Nicolotti
- Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Qingda Zang
- Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Regina Politi
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard D. Beger
- Division of Systems Biology, National Center for Toxicological Research, USDA, Jefferson, Arizona, USA
| | - Roberto Todeschini
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruili Huang
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sherif Farag
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sine A. Rosenberg
- Division of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Svetoslav Slavov
- Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Xin Hu
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard S. Judson
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Address correspondence to R.S. Judson, U.S. EPA, National Center for Computational Toxicology, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3085. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|