An evaluation of methods used to teach quality improvement to undergraduate healthcare students to inform curriculum development within preregistration nurse education: a protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis

Using the AHEC Scholars Program to Enhance Health Professions Learners' Self-Efficacy for Practice Transformation

The Indiana Area Health Education Centers Scholars program is a 2-year leadership program designed to supplement health professions students' academic training and enhance practice readiness around 6 core topic areas including practice transformation. The study was a retrospective cohort study assessing learners' reported level of self-efficacy on a set of 6 competencies around practice transformation and quality improvement. A total of 68 students graduating in the first cohort responded to the competency questions. Area Health Education Center Scholars reported a significant increase in self-efficacy on the competencies Identify issues emerging in health care delivery such as accountable care organizations, medical homes, and health insurance exchanges; understand how to practice effectively within the organization and culture of the interprofessional team, practice setting, and local health care system, and use an electronic health record to retrieve relevant information and to document care. This study found that learners reported a significant increase in self-efficacy related to implementing practiced transformation.

Developing a framework for evaluating the impact of Healthcare Improvement Science Education across Europe: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Frontline healthcare professionals are well positioned to improve the systems in which they work. Educational curricula, however, have not always equipped healthcare professionals with the skills or knowledge to implement and evaluate improvements. It is important to have a robust and standardized framework in order to evaluate the impact of such education in terms of improvement, both within and across European countries. The results of such evaluations will enhance the further development and delivery of healthcare improvement science (HIS) education. We aimed to describe the development and piloting of a framework for prospectively evaluating the impact of HIS education and learning.

METHODS

The evaluation framework was designed collaboratively and piloted in 7 European countries following a qualitative methodology. The present study used mixed methods to gather data from students and educators. The framework took the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation as a theoretical reference.

RESULTS

The framework was found to be feasible and acceptable for use across differing European higher education contexts according to the pilot study and the participants' consensus. It can be used effectively to evaluate and develop HIS education across European higher education institutions.

CONCLUSION

We offer a new evaluation framework to capture the impact of HIS education. The implementation of this tool has the potential to facilitate the continuous development of HIS education.

An evaluation of approaches used to teach quality improvement to pre-registration healthcare professionals: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Improving the quality of healthcare remains central to UK and international policy, practice and research. In 2003, The Institute of Medicine's 'Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality', advocated quality improvement as a core competency for all healthcare professionals. As a result, developing capacity and capability of those applying improvement methodologies in the pre-registration population has risen, yet, little is known about the teaching approaches employed for this purpose.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyse educational approaches used to teach quality improvement to pre-registration healthcare professionals and identify enabling and impeding factors.

DESIGN

Integrative review.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, PsychINFO, MEDLINE, ERIC, ASSIA, SCOPUS and Google Scholar were accessed for papers published between 2000 and 2016.

REVIEW METHODS

Publications where quality improvement education was delivered to pre-registration healthcare professionals were eligible. One author independently screened papers, extracted data using a modified version of the Reporting of Primary Studies in Education Guideline and evaluated methodological quality using the Weight of Evidence Framework. The Kirkpatrick Education Evaluation Model was used to explore the impact of teaching approaches. Enabling and impeding factors were thematically analysed. A narrative synthesis of findings is presented.

RESULTS

Ten papers were included, representing nursing, pharmacy and medicine from UK, Norway and USA. Studies comprised four quantitative, four mixed method, one qualitative and one cluster randomised trial, all allocated medium Weight of Evidence. Teaching approaches included experiential learning cited in all studies, didactics in seven, group work in four, seminars in three, self-directed learning in three and simulation in one. Most studies measured Level 1 of the Kirkpatrick Model (reaction), all but one measured Level 2 (skills, knowledge or attitudes), none measured Level 3 (behaviour) and one measured Level 4 (patient outcomes). Enabling and impeding themes included: Teaching Approaches, Clinical/Faculty support, Information Provision, Curriculum Balance and Data.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating quality improvement education is complex. Experiential learning combined with didactics is the favoured approach; however, attributing causality to educational intervention proves difficult in light of poor methodological rigour, lack of validated tools and complex clinical settings. Clarity regarding which quality improvement competencies are priority for this population would be useful to streamline future educational development and evaluation. Stronger collaboration between educators and clinicians is recommended to explore the multiple components and contextual factors associated with quality improvement education in practice. Ethnographic enquiry may be a logical next step to advance knowledge within the field.

Subjective Cognitive Impairment and Affective Symptoms: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) has been argued to reflect affective symptoms (i.e., depression and anxiety) rather than actual cognitive issues. Although a number of studies exist that look at the associations between SCI and affective symptoms, no review is available to aggregate this disparate literature. We addressed this gap by conducting a systematic review to better understand the relationships among SCI and affective symptoms among older adults in both community and clinical settings.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed available literature per the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Weight of evidence (WoE) ratings and narrative synthesis were completed for 58 articles.

RESULTS

A majority of studies focused on community-based samples (n = 40). Approximately half (53%) of the articles reviewed met high WoE criteria for the current review. Cross-sectional findings consistently identified a positive relationship among SCI and affective symptoms. Findings from available longitudinal studies (n = 9) were mixed but suggested a possible reciprocal relationship among SCI and depression. The relationship between SCI and anxiety appeared to be driven by fears over loss of function. Following consultation with health professionals, the association between SCI and anxiety was diminished or eliminated.

IMPLICATIONS

Although SCI is consistently related to affective symptoms in older adults cross-sectionally, more longitudinal work is needed to understand their temporal relationship. Improved measurement of SCI would support a deeper understanding of the impact of SCI on psychological well-being.