MIS approach for diverticula of the esophagus

A Multidisciplinary Minimally Invasive Approach Is Necessary for the Contemporary Management of Esophageal Diverticula

Background: Esophageal diverticula were traditionally treated with open surgery, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Management has shifted to minimally invasive approaches with several advantages. We examine outcomes in patients with esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive techniques by a multidisciplinary surgical team at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula at our institution from June 2010 to December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were symptom resolution, length of stay (LOS), readmission, and need for reintervention. Results: A total of 28 patients were identified. Twelve patients had pharyngeal diverticula, 7 patients had midesophageal diverticula, and 9 patients had epiphrenic diverticula. Thirty-day morbidity and readmission rates were 10.7% (3 patients), 1 pharyngeal (sepsis), 1 midesophageal (refractory nausea), and 1 epiphrenic (poor oral intake). There were no esophageal leaks. Average LOS was 2.3 days, with the pharyngeal group experiencing a significantly shorter LOS (1.3 days versus 3.4 days for midesophageal, P < .01 versus 2.8 days for epiphrenic, P < .05). Symptom resolution after initial operation was 78.6%. Reintervention rate was 17.9%, and symptom resolution after reintervention was 100%. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that esophageal diverticula can be repaired safely and efficiently when performed by a multidisciplinary team utilizing advanced minimally invasive endoscopic and robotic surgical techniques. We advocate for the management of this rare condition at a high-volume center with extensive experience in foregut surgery.

Laparoscopic Approach to Epiphrenic Diverticula Under Endoscopic Assistance: A Technical Report

Introduction: Epiphrenic diverticulum is a rare disease caused by mucosa and submucosa herniation through the muscular layers of the esophageal wall. This study presents a case of a patient with a symptomatic epiphrenic diverticulum treated with surgery under endoscopic assistance. A review of the literature on this unusual condition was conducted, focusing on the pathogenesis, presentation, and surgical challenges. Methods: A 75-year-old woman who underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) after experiencing worsening dysphagia for food and liquids. The EGD revealed a large epiphrenic diverticulum 36 cm from the upper incisor teeth. The presence of a diverticulum was verified by barium swallow, which revealed a 6 cm diameter epiphrenic diverticulum on the right side of the esophagus. Results: Patient underwent laparoscopic diverticulectomy associated with Heller's myotomy and anterior partial fundoplication. A gastroscope was placed intraoperatively to calibrate the esophagus to prevent stenosis during diverticulectomy, and it was also used to check the integrity of the esophageal wall. The patient tolerated clear liquids on postoperative day 2. Postoperative course was complicated by right pleural effusion and fever managed with antibiotics and pleural drainage. Conclusion: Epiphrenic diverticulectomy in conjunction with management of the underlying motor dysfunction and avoidance of gastroesophageal reflux disease is an effective procedure. Laparoscopy is considered the approach of choice for the majority of patients. Endoscopic assistance during surgery can help the identification of the diverticulum and verify the integrity of the staple line.

Three-dimensional laparoscopic approach to distal oesophageal diverticula: Single-centre experience

Background

Epiphrenic oesophageal diverticula are rare and often asymptomatic. When symptoms are present, minimally invasive diverticulectomy is considered the gold standard of treatment. While there is an agreement on the pre-operative assessment, no consensus is achieved when it comes to surgical technique. In the present study, we report our experience and propose a standardised approach to manage this rare oesophageal disorder.

Materials and Methods

We prospectively analysed data of all consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic distal oesophageal diverticulum resection during 2015-2020 at Upper gastrointestinal surgical department, St Thomas' Hospital, regarding pre-operative assessment, surgical technique, peri-and post-operative outcomes.

Results

Six patients were submitted to 3D laparoscopic diverticulectomy, five of which with additional anterior myotomy and fundoplication and one with additional hiatal hernia repair only. Three patients followed a specific diet in preparation for surgery. Median pre-operative Eckardt symptom score was five. Two patients had normal manometry. Median operative time was 180 min, median estimated blood loss was <100 ml, neither intraoperative complications nor conversions to open approach occurred. All patients reported a complete resolution of symptoms directly after surgery. Median follow-up was 66 months. Five patients have none or minimal residual symptoms. One had recurrence requiring a revision operation for intermittent dysphagia.

Conclusions

3D laparoscopic diverticulectomy offers a reasonable chance of treatment in patients with epiphrenic diverticula. Optimal selection of patients, optimisation for surgery, gaining the surgical experience of carrying out these techniques and impact on short- and long-term results are issues that still remain under debate.

MicroRNA target prediction: theory and practice

The present study is one of the few that includes tissue samples in the evaluation of target prediction algorithms designed to detect microRNA (miRNA) sequences that might interact with particular messenger RNA (mRNA) sequences. Twelve different target prediction tools were used to find miRNA sequences that might interact with CCL20 gene expression. Different algorithms predicted controversial miRNA sequences for CCL20 regulation due to a different weighting of parameters. Hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-145 suggested by four or more programs were chosen for further investigation. Possible real interaction of these miRNA sequences with CCL20 gene expression was monitored using luciferase assays and expression analyses of tissue samples of colorectal adenocarcinoma by either qRT-PCR or ELISA. Folding status of seed-binding sites in complete mRNA and 3'UTR of CCL20 was predicted. Prediction of miRNA expression was attempted based on CCL20 expression data. Eight of the target prediction tools forecasted a role for hsa-miR-21 and four mentioned hsa-miR-145 in CCL20 gene regulation. Laboratory experimentation showed that CCL20 may serve as a target of hsa-miR-21 but not hsa-miR-145. Expression of the molecules resulted in no clear assertion. Folding of seed-binding sites was predicted to be relatively constant for the complete mRNA and 3'UTR. Predicting miRNA expression based on target gene expression was impossible. This might be attributable to the fact that effects of miRNA activity may oscillate between gene product repression and activation. Additional systematic studies are needed to address this issue.

Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer

Of the 13.7 million cancer survivors living in the United States as of January 2012, 1.2 million, or 9 %, were colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. Determining an optimal surveillance for CRC survivors is necessary because of the significant burden follow-up poses to patients, physicians, and the health care system. Currently, there is no consensus regarding optimal follow-up in CRC patients. Current literature and published guidelines related to CRC follow-up were reviewed to examine the evidence for the surveillance strategies and specific tools demonstrated to improve outcome after curative CRC resection. An intensive surveillance strategy results in increased identification of recurrences amenable to curative resection but does not result in reduced overall or CRC-specific mortality. Patients most likely to benefit from surveillance include younger patients, those with earlier tumors, locoregional recurrences, longer time to recurrence, lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels before reoperation, and those with isolated recurrence. Complete resection of recurrence is the only factor consistently associated with improved survival. CEA, colonoscopy, and liver-focused imaging surveillance appear to have the greatest impact on mortality after curative CRC resection. A CRC surveillance strategy is recommended that includes tumor risk stratification, that provides a focus on identifying recurrences amenable to complete resection, and that utilizes those modalities demonstrated to be most effective at improving outcome after CRC resection.

Pulsion Diverticulum of the Oesophagus: More than just an Out Pouch

Oesophageal diverticulum is divided into two types based on the aetiology: the pulsion and the traction diverticula. Pulsion diverticulum occurs due to increased intraluminal pressure. This can be of three types based on the location along the oesophagus: the Zenker's diverticulum (ZD), the mid-oesophageal diverticulum (MD) and the epiphrenic diverticulum (ED). A PubMed search was conducted for the words 'pulsion', 'diverticulum' and 'oesophagus' for all studies published from January 1980 to March 2013 in the English language. A total of 31 studies were identified, and out of which, five were not included in the review. The pulsion diverticulum of the oesophagus is an uncommon disorder. Its aetiology is related to the motility disorders of the oesophagus. Patients usually present with chest-related symptoms or oesophageal symptoms, which are related to the underlying motility disorder. Evaluation includes barium studies, gastrointestinal endoscopy, CT scan and oesophageal manometry. Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic and large diverticula, although the outcome in asymptomatic patients is unknown. The surgical options include diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy with an adequate myotomy. Most patients with ZD are now treated by using endoscopic techniques, although no randomised trial has shown its superiority over the open technique. Minimally invasive surgery has also been used for patients with MD and ED. Although isolated case series has shown good improvement in symptoms and reduction in mortality with minimally invasive techniques in patients with ED, its role in thoracic oesophageal diverticulum is debated.

How often should we perform surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE

Surveillance colonoscopy is undertaken after resection of colorectal cancer to detect and treat local recurrence and metachronous lesions, with the aim of improving survival. This study aimed to clarify the current timing of surveillance colonoscopies and evaluate the rates of local recurrence and metachronous tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 459 patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy at our institution after curative resection of colorectal cancer. The number and timing of surveillance colonoscopies, incidence of local recurrence and metachronous lesions, pathological findings of lesions, treatment of lesions, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The first surveillance colonoscopy was undertaken at 6-18 months after surgery in 73 % of patients. Local recurrence was detected in three cases (0.7 %), all during the first surveillance colonoscopy, which was performed >1 year after surgery. These three patients all underwent additional surgery and were alive 5 years later. Invasive metachronous cancers were detected in six patients (1.3 %) at 18-57 months after surgery, and advanced adenomas were detected in 30 patients.

CONCLUSION

Considering the low incidence of postoperative lesions and the timing of lesion detection, reducing the number of surveillance colonoscopies after surgery for colorectal cancer may be appropriate.

Giant midoesophageal diverticulum--case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Midoesophageal diverticula >4cm in size are a medical rarity with a dozen reported cases so far. Usually, midoesophageal diverticula tend to be of small size and asymptomatic.

CASE REPORT

We herein present a case of a woman suffering from a midoesophageal diverticulum in a very large dimension--never described in the current literature before--who successfully underwent surgical resection via thoracotomy.

DISCUSSION

If symptomatic, common symptoms are dysphagia and regurgitation. The risk of malignant transformation is low. Treatment of midoesophageal diverticula is based on size and symptoms of the patient. Asymptomatic or small diverticula detected during routine endoscopy can be followed-up without further therapy, whereas symptomatic or large diverticula should be treated surgically by resection. Myotomy should be performed if any motility disorder is evident. Open as well as minimal invasive approach by thoracoscopical surgery is both feasible.

Modern pathophysiology and treatment of esophageal diverticula

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal diverticula are rare. They may occur in the pharyngoesophageal area (Zenker's), midesophagus, or distally (epiphrenic). A motility disorder (either at the level of the esophageal sphincters or body) is frequently associated with esophageal diverticula. The risk of malignant transformation is low.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline/PubMed database.

RESULTS

The treatment of esophageal diverticula must be based on the pathophysiology and natural history of the disease: (a) asymptomatic diverticula do not need a specific treatment, (b) small diverticula may be left in place and not resected, (c) medium-size diverticula may be either treated by diverticulectomy, diverticulopexy, or esophagodiverticulostomy in case of pharyngoesophageal diverticula, (d) resection is probably the ideal therapy for larger diverticula, and (e) a myotomy should always be included to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to its rarity, esophageal diverticula must be treated by esophageal surgeons since even in experienced hands the complication rate can be significant.