Increased B-type natriuretic peptide and decreased proteinuria might reflect decreased capillary leakage and is associated with a better outcome in patients with severe burns

The prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in major burn patients with sepsis

The aim is to examine the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with major burns and sepsis. We collected the data of major burn patients who were admitted to our department. We compared the age, sex, burn area, burn depth, length of hospitalization, and mortality rate between the sepsis group and non-sepsis group and compared NT-proBNP, procalcitonin (PCT), platelet count, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and quick SOFA (qSOFA) score between the survivors and nonsurvivors in the sepsis group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used in sepsis patients to evaluate the prognostic value of NT-proBNP, PCT, SOFA score, qSOFA score, et al.. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the 90-day survival curves of patients. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the risk factors that affect the prognosis of sepsis patients. There were 90 major burn patients with sepsis and 114 major burn patients without sepsis. The mortality rate for the major burn sepsis group was significantly higher than that for the non-sepsis group. The NT-proBNP level in sepsis patients in the nonsurvivor group was 2900 pg/mL, which was significantly higher than that in patients in the survivor group. Survival analysis showed that the mean survival time for the NT-proBNP >2000 pg/mL group was 15.08 days. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that NT-proBNP was an independent risk factor for mortality in burn patients with sepsis. NT-proBNP can be used as a prognostic marker in patients with major burns and sepsis.

Cardiac Dysfunction in Severely Burned Patients: Current Understanding of Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment

Patients who experience severe burn injuries face a massive inflammatory response resulting in hemodynamic and cardiovascular complications. Even after immediate and appropriate resuscitation, removal of burn eschar and covering of open areas, burn patients remain at high risk for serious morbidity and mortality. As a result of the massive fluid shifts following the initial injury, along with large volume fluid resuscitation, the cardiovascular system is critically affected. Further, increased inflammation, catecholamine surge, and hypermetabolic syndrome impact cardiac dysfunction, which worsens outcomes of burn patients. This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge about the effect of burns on the cardiovascular system.A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Embase databases and manual review of articles involving effects of burns on the cardiovascular system was conducted.Many burn units use multimodal monitors (e.g., transpulmonary thermodilution) to assess hemodynamics and optimize cardiovascular function. Echocardiography is often used for additional evaluations of hemodynamically unstable patients to assess systolic and diastolic function. Due to its noninvasive character, echocardiography can be repeated easily, which allows us to follow patients longitudinally.The use of anabolic and anticatabolic agents has been shown to be beneficial for short- and long-term outcomes of burn survivors. Administration of propranolol (non-selective β-receptor antagonist) or oxandrolone (synthetic testosterone) for up to 12 months post-burn counteracts hypermetabolism during hospital stay and improves cardiac function.A comprehensive understanding of how burns lead to cardiac dysfunction and new therapeutic options could contribute to better outcomes in this patient population.

N-Terminal Brain Natriuretic Peptide First Week After Burn Injury

B-type natriuretic peptide has shown promising results as a biomarker for acute kidney injury in general intensive care patients. It may also indirectly reflect fluid balance of the circulation. Among burn patients, it has been observed to indicate excessive fluid resuscitation and organ dysfunction, although its clinical use to indicate acute kidney injury or guide fluid resuscitation has not been validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values are related to the amount of fluids given after severe burn injury and whether it can act as a novel biomarker for acute kidney injury in these patients. Nineteen consecutive burn patients were included. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was measured daily during 1 week from admission. Other variables such as laboratory values and intravenous infusions were also recorded. The association between acute kidney injury and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values was analyzed with a multivariable panel regression model, adjusted for burned total body surface area, age, body mass index, and laboratory values. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values varied between single patients, and even more between the patients who developed acute kidney injury. Older age, lower body mass index, and cumulative infusions were independently associated with higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values, whereas acute kidney injury was not. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values correlated with cumulative infusions given during the first week. The authors could not validate the role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for acute kidney injury in burns.

Effect and mechanism of hydrocortisone on organ function in patients with severe burns

INTRODUCTION

In patients with severe burns, resuscitation with large volumes of fluid is needed, partly because of an increase in capillary leakage. Corticosteroids might be beneficial by diminishing capillary leakage. This study aimed to assess in severely burned nonseptic patients whether hydrocortisone (HC) improved outcome and diminished capillary leakage.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of a prospectively collected database were performed, including 39 patients (age 52 [35-62] years, 72% male). Patients were divided based on HC therapy. First, in patients in whom HC was started late, that is when deteriorating (late; 5-12 days postburn) data before and after start of HC were compared. Second, patients in whom HC was started day 0 or 1 postburn (upfront; within 48 hours) were compared with patients who did not receive HC (control). Outcome was assessed as organ dysfunction by Denver Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. As markers for capillary leakage and hydration state, proteinuria, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and fluid administration were assessed. Follow-up was 20 days postburn. Possible adverse effects including mortality were recorded. Repeated measurement regression analyses were performed using MLwiN.

RESULTS

In the late group, Denver MOF and SOFA scores significantly decreased after HC (P<.001). Proteinuria tended to decrease (P=.13), BNP increased on the days HC was used (P<.001), and amounts of fluids diminished (P<.001). In the upfront vs control group, Denver MOF and SOFA scores (P<.001) decreased more quickly. Proteinuria (P=.006) and administered fluids decreased more rapidly (P<.001). Mortality rate, numbers of positive blood cultures, incidence of pneumonia, and graft loss were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrocortisone treatment in severe burned patients without sepsis might improve organ dysfunction possibly because of a reduction in capillary leakage, as reflected by a decrease of proteinuria, an increase of BNP, and diminished fluid resuscitation volumes.

Fluid overload at start of continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with poorer clinical condition and outcome: a prospective observational study on the combined use of bioimpedance vector analysis and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide measurement

Introduction

It is unclear whether the fluid status, as determined by bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) combined with serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-pro-BNP) measurement, is associated with treatment outcome among patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Our objective was to answer this question.

Methods

Patients who were in the intensive care units of a university teaching hospital and who required CRRT were screened for enrollment. For the enrolled patients, BIVA and serum NT-pro BNP measurement were performed just before the start of CRRT and 3 days afterward. According to the BIVA and NT-pro BNP measurement results, the patients were divided into four groups according to fluid status type: type 1, both normal; type 2, normal BIVA results and abnormal NT-pro BNP levels; type 3, abnormal BIVA results and normal NT-pro BNP levels; and type 4, both abnormal. The associations between fluid status and outcome were analyzed.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were enrolled, 58 were males, and the mean age was 49.0 ± 17.2 years. The mean score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) was 18.8 ± 8.6. The fluid status before CRRT start was as follows: type 1, 21.3% (19 out of 89); type 2, 16.9% (15 out of 89); type 3, 11.2% (10 out of 89); and type 4, 50.6% (45 out of 89). There were significant differences between fluid status types before starting CRRT on baseline values for APACHE II scores, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, platelet count, urine volume, and incidences of oliguria and acute kidney injury (P <0.05). There were significant differences between patients with different fluid status before CRRT start on hospital mortality—type 1, 26.3% (5 out of 19); type 2, 33.3% (5 out of 15); type 3, 40% (4 out of 10); and type 4, 64.4% (29 out of 45) (P = 0.019)—as well as renal function recovery rates: type 1, 57.1% (4 out of 7); type 2, 67.7% (6 out of 9); type 3, 50% (3 out of 6); and type 4, 23.7% (9 out of 38) (P = 0.051).

Conclusions

Fluid status abnormalities were common among patients receiving CRRT. Different types of fluid status distinguished by BIVA combined with serum NT-pro BNP measurements corresponded to different clinical conditions and treatment outcomes, which implies a value of this method for evaluation of fluid status among patients receiving CRRT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0871-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Increased B-type natriuretic peptide levels in early-onset versus late-onset preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

We compared B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, clinical and laboratory findings in early-onset preeclampsia (EOP), late-onset preeclampsia (LOP) and healthy pregnant groups.

METHODS

We studied 40 healthy pregnant and 40 preeclamptic patients. Preeclamptics were divided in two groups, the EOP group (n=20) and LOP group (n=20), according to gestational age at the onset of disease. The distinction criterion for early- vs. late-onset was set as week 34 of gestation. The concentration of the BNP levels was measured by a sandwich fluorescence immunoassay. For statistical analysis of the clinical and laboratory findings non-parametric methods were applied.

RESULTS

BNP levels were higher in EOP [61.35 (36.95-93.25) pg/mL] and LOP patients [32.4 (19.15-39.2) pg/mL] than in healthy pregnant women [10.05 (6.08-16.03) pg/mL] (both p<0.001). Furthermore, EOPs had significantly higher BNP levels as compared to LOP patients (p<0.001). A BNP cut-off <24.5 pg/mL had a negative-predictive value of 85.1% excluding preeclampsia. There was a significant inverse correlation between plasma BNP levels of EOP patients and sodium (p<0.05) and total protein concentrations (p<0.05). In the EOP group, a significant positive correlation was observed between plasma levels of BNP and hematocrit (p<0.05), serum potassium (p<0.05), urea (p<0.05) and 24-h proteinuria (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BNP levels were significantly higher in EOP than in LOP patients. The cut-off value <24.5 pg/mL seems to be a powerful discriminative indicator excluding preeclampsia. The amount of proteinuria and total protein levels correlate with the elevation of the BNP levels. In EOP the extent of proteinuria is higher than in the LOP.

Year in review 2011: Critical Care--Cardiology

We review key research papers in cardiology and intensive care published during 2011 in Critical Care and quote related studies published in other journals whenever appropriate. Papers are grouped into the following categories: cardiovascular therapies, mechanical therapies, biomarkers, prognostic markers, hemodynamic monitoring, cardiovascular diseases, microcirculation, hypertension in critically ill patients, and miscellaneous.

The year in burns 2011

For 2011, approximately 1746 original research articles in burns were published in English in scientific journals. This article reviews those with the most potential impact on for burn therapeutics and outcomes according to the Editor of one of the major journals (Burns) and his colleague. As done previously, articles were found and divided into these topic areas: epidemiology of injury and burn prevention, wound and scar characterisation, acute care and critical care, inhalation injury, infection, psychological considerations, pain and itching management, rehabilitation and long-term outcomes, and burn reconstruction. Each selected article is mentioned briefly with editorial comment.

Natriuretic peptide proANP (1-98), a biomarker of ALI/ARDS in burns

INTRODUCTION

Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels (proANP (1-98)), a parameter of myocardial dysfunction, have been reported to be increased in critically ill patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS). The aim of the study was to examine if proANP is a biomarker of ALI/ARDS as assessed by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA Lung ≥2) in burn patients, and how it compares to the corresponding values for age, total body surface area percent (TBSA%) and inhalation injury for mortality prediction.

METHODS

A group of 22 burn patients with a mean TBSA of 30% (10-75%) and a mean age of 52 years (25-84 years) was investigated during 2010. Organ dysfunction/failure was classified according to the SOFA score. The criteria for ALI/ARDS were based on SOFA Lung ≥2. ProANP (1-98) concentrations (nmoll(-1)) were measured by commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) immunoassays (Biomedica Austria) on post-burn days 2 and 7.

RESULTS

ProANP levels on day 7 post-burn positively correlated with a SOFA score day 7 post-burn, c=0.91. The receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis proved a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 75% for ALI/ARDS at cut-off values >3.35 nmoll(-1). The ROC value of proANP for ALI/ARDS (SOFA Lung ≥2) was significantly larger than that of age, TBSA% and inhalation injury: 0.90, 0.71, 0.74, and 0.69 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ProANP levels, as a biomarker of ALI/ARDS, in critically burn patients correlated with SOFA scoring. The inhalation injury did not lead to increase in proANP values.