Medical emergencies on board commercial airlines: is documentation as expected?

The frequency and characteristics of epinephrine use during in-flight allergic events

BACKGROUND

Allergic reactions account for 2% to 4% of medical events in-flight and 5.5% of all medical events in passengers 18 years and under.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of in-flight allergic events including availability, use of epinephrine, and final patient outcome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of the ground-based medical service (GBMS) database from January 2017 to December 2019 for all allergic events and epinephrine utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 140,579 in-flight medical events (IFMEs) were initially retrieved from the period between January, 2017 and December, 2019, of which 4230 (3.0%) unique cases were identified as allergic events. Epinephrine administration was recommended in 398 passengers by GBMS. Of those, 328 (82.4%) ultimately received at least 1 dose of epinephrine. In multivariate analysis, there was a significant difference in the involvement of volunteers (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; P value < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.43-4.16), availability of autoinjectors (OR, 2; P value < .001; 95% CI, 1.55-2.58), flight diversion (OR, 11.21; P value < .001; 95% CI, 3.60-34.89), and hospital transport (OR, 6.58; P value < .001; 95% CI, 4.62-9.38) between the 2 groups. Passengers older than 12 years of age were at a higher risk for epinephrine administration. In the secondary analysis of 51 airlines that consistently use GBMS for all IFMEs, the incidence of allergic events was found to be 0.91 cases per million passengers. The incidence of severe in-flight allergic emergencies requiring epinephrine administration was 0.08 cases per million passengers or 12.5 million passengers for 1 event.

CONCLUSION

IFME requiring epinephrine administration is rare with an incidence rate of 1 event in 12.5 million passengers. The risk for epinephrine administration is higher in passengers more than 12 years of age and is associated with significantly higher flight diversion, hospital transport, and involvement of medical volunteers.

Medical Legal Implications When Providing Emergency Care on a Commercial Flight

INTRODUCTION: U.S. airlines often request a healthcare professional to volunteer to assist an ill passenger. Litigation from a Good Samaritans care of an in-flight medical emergency (IME) is considered improbable. The 1998 Aviation Medical Assistance Act (AMAA) encourages health care professionals to volunteer with indemnity for standard and good medical care. It does not offer legal or financial assistance. Our review explored the legal support malpractice companies and U.S. airlines provide if litigation is initiated for IME care. Malpractice insurance policies can differ on IME coverage. We found most private practice physicians policies include IME. Medical institutions may have policies restricting their physicians coverage to the institutions location. Those without malpractice coverage will need to retain and pay for a legal defense to demonstrate no gross negligence and no willful misconduct. The physicians, airline crews, and on-ground IME documentation support should be retained by the Good Samaritan especially for a pediatric or adolescent ill passenger. U.S. airlines consider a Good Samaritan medical volunteer as a passenger and do not extend legal assistance. This contrasts with some foreign airlines that do provide liability protection. Knowledge of the malpractice policy IME coverage is essential prior to traveling by air. After completing care for an ill passenger, physicians should generate their medical documentation and request the IME documentation generated by the airline and on-ground medical expert. We also believe U.S. airlines should assume responsibility to provide legal assistance to a Good Samaritan physician in the event of IME litigation.de Caprariis PJ, Di Maio A. Medical legal implications when providing emergency care on a commercial flight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(7):588592.

Medical Events on Board Aircraft: Reducing Confusion and Misinterpretation in the Scientific Literature

INTRODUCTION: A topic in aviation medicine that attracts much attention from the scientific community as well as from the media concerns medical incidents on board commercial airline flights. It was noticed that many papers on the subject were written by authors whose specialization was outside that of aviation medicine and that they sometimes made basic errors concerning the application of scientific principles of the subject. A review was undertaken to determine if there were any patterns to the observed errors and, if so, to consider whether recommendations might be provided that could reduce their frequency.METHOD: A literature search was undertaken of MEDLINE using PubMed for English-only articles published between January 1, 1974, and February 1, 2019, employing the following search terms: air emergency, air emergencies, air passenger, air travel, aircraft, airline, aviation, commercial air, flight, and fitness to fly. In addition, other relevant papers held in the personal collection of the authors were reviewed.RESULTS: Many cases of misinterpretation or misunderstanding of aviation medicine were found, which could be classified into eight main categories: references; cabin altitude; pressure/volume relationship; other technical aspects of aircraft operations; regulations; medical events; in-flight deaths; and automated external defibrillator.CONCLUSION: Papers were identified as having questionable statements of fact or of emphasis. Such instances often appeared to result from authors being unfamiliar with the subject of aviation medicine and/or the commercial aviation environment. Simple steps could be taken by authors to reduce the future rate of such instances and recommendations are provided.Thibeault C, Evans AD. Medical events on board aircraft: reducing confusion and misinterpretation in the scientific literature. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(4):265273.

In-Flight Medical Events and Cabin Crew First Aid Response

INTRODUCTION: In-flight medical events (IMEs), although rare, are challenging due to the limited onboard resources and the time needed to reach an airport. Cabin crewmembers (CCMs) are trained to provide first aid, but their effectiveness has not been appropriately studied.METHODS: IMEs occurring in the biggest airline of Greece were prospectively recorded during a 5-yr period (20142018) and categorized according to a symptom-based taxonomy.RESULTS: During the study period 990 IMEs were recorded corresponding to 16 IMEs for each million passengers or 1.8 IMEs for every thousand flights. The most frequent events were loss of consciousness (38.4%) followed by injuries (8.6%), gastrointestinal problems (8.3%), respiratory symptoms (7.3%), anxiety (5.7%), and burns (5.9%). Diversion was decided in 3% of the cases while death on board was rare (0.3% of events). CCMs responded in 33.5% of IMEs without assistance by a volunteer health professional, achieving a 97% success rate.DISCUSSION: IMEs are rare events and the majority can be treated with simple first aid measures. CCMs acting according to a simplified algorithm were very efficient in providing first aid. A standardized symptom-based IME form will assist in creating a reliable registry for further studies.Paxinos O, Savourdos P, Alexelis V, Anastasopoulos A, Karantoni E, Grigoropoulos P, Konstantinou X. In-flight medical events and cabin crew first aid response. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(1):3238.

A Systematic Review of Pediatric and Adult In-Flight Medical Emergencies

In-flight medical emergencies (IMEs) are acute onboard events of illnesses or injuries with potential immediate risk to a passenger's short- or long-term health, or life. IMEs are significant events that are related to public safety concerns. With the increasing amount of annual air travel every year, it is expected that the number of encountered IMEs will continue to grow. Thus, it will be critical to develop and implement appropriate measures to manage IMEs with the best possible outcome. Despite the fact that most IMEs are self-limited with no serious adverse events, serious IME can lead to death, disability, or other unfavorable health outcomes, particularly as a result of suboptimal medical care. In this article, we systematically reviewed the published up-to-date evidence on the subject of in-flight emergencies with a specific focus on pediatric population.

Medical issues in flight and updating the emergency medical kit

Airline travel is more affordable than ever and likely safer than ever too. Within half a day, a passenger can be on the other side of the world. However, medical care in-flight has been an issue for those with medical conditions and for those who fall sick during a journey. While airlines have the advice of multiple recognized organizations on needs and standards of care, in-flight emergencies occur at various levels. An emergency medical kit (EMK) together with trained cabin crew can be very effective at resolving the minor problems that arise and reducing the risk of escalation. On occasion, an overhead plea may be announced for additional medical expertise. Having the right content in a medical kit is more important in modern day travel, coupled with advances in equipment and passenger expectations. The authors address current issues of illness and other relevant conditions and suggest a content enhancement for an onboard EMK.

International Flight Considerations

Combined with the rising number of passengers, and increased capacity of larger airplanes with more long-distance domestic and international flights, with long-haul aircrafts—such as the Airbus A380 and Boeing 777 LR now capable of extending flight times to 18–20 h—it is likely that the incidence of in-flight medical emergencies will continue to increase in the coming years. International air travel in particular combines long-haul, extended flight times with unique exposures and an even more austere, secluded environment for passengers with acute and/or chronic illnesses, and suggests unique medical challenges for recognition, stabilization, treatment, diagnosis, and disposition.

In-flight allergic emergencies

Allergic and hypersensitivity reactions such as anaphylaxis and asthma exacerbations may occur during air travel. Although the exact incidence of in-flight asthma and allergic emergencies is not known, we have concerns that this subject has not received the attention it warrants. There is a need to provide passengers at risk and airlines with the necessary measures to prevent and manage these emergencies. A review of the epidemiology, management and approaches to prevention of allergic and asthma emergencies during air travel is presented with the goal of increasing awareness about these important, potentially preventable medical events.

Air travel and pneumothorax

The number of medical emergencies onboard aircraft is increasing as commercial air traffic increases and the general population ages, becomes more mobile, and includes individuals with serious medical conditions. Travelers with respiratory diseases are at particular risk for in-flight events because exposure to lower atmospheric pressure in a pressurized cabin at cruising altitude may result in not only hypoxemia but also pneumothorax due to gas expansion within enclosed pulmonary parenchymal spaces based on Boyle's law. Risks of pneumothorax during air travel pertain particularly to those patients with cystic lung diseases, recent pneumothorax or thoracic surgery, and chronic pneumothorax. Currently available guidelines are admittedly based on sparse data and include recommendations to delay air travel for 1 to 3 weeks after thoracic surgery or resolution of the pneumothorax. One of these guidelines declares existing pneumothorax to be an absolute contraindication to air travel although there are reports of uneventful air travel for those with chronic stable pneumothorax. In this article, we review the available data regarding pneumothorax and air travel that consist mostly of case reports and retrospective surveys. There is clearly a need for additional data that will inform decisions regarding air travel for patients at risk for pneumothorax, including those with recent thoracic surgery and transthoracic needle biopsy.

Lessons learned during an in-flight medical emergency: case report and discussion

The following case report details an in-flight medical emergency (IFME) that occurred during a trans-continental flight while the authors were en route to a medical conference. The report highlights the necessity for an improved approach to the prevention and management of IFMEs.