Effects of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine patients with and without daily headache at baseline: results from the COMPEL Study

Review of Interventional Therapies for Refractory Pediatric Migraine

This is a review of the latest and seminal evidence in pediatric migraine. It covers the etiology and pathophysiology known today, and then will review treatment options, efficacy and safety, quality of data and indications. Though migraine is usually regarded as an infliction in adults, it is not uncommon in the pediatric population and affects up to 8% of children. Children may experience migraine differently than adults, and present not only with headache but also frequent gastrointestinal symptoms. They are frequently shorter in duration than in adults. Traditional migraine treatment in adults is less effective in children. In this population, adjunct therapies - such as interventional techniques - should be considered when traditional treatment fails, including Botulinum Toxin A (BTA) injections, peripheral nerve and ganglion blocks. BTA injections are FDA approved for migraine prophylaxis in adults, but currently not in children; however, recent evidence shows efficacy and safety in pediatric migraine management. Nerve blocks stop nociceptive afferent fibers through injection of local anesthetics, and it may be associated with the local injection of corticosteroids. Although more common in adults, recent data suggests they are safe and effective in children and adolescents. Blocking the sphenopalatine ganglion can be achieved through nasal approach, and achieves a similar action by blocking the entire ganglion. Interventional techniques may provide a key component in the alleviation of this otherwise debilitating chronic migraine pain. Though most studies have been performed in adults, new studies provide encouraging results for treatment in children.

OnabotulinumtoxinA: Still the Present for Chronic Migraine

OnabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) is one of the few drugs approved for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM). Despite this, some aspects of its mechanism of action are still a matter of debate, and the precise magnitude of BT-A effects needs to be completely elucidated. BT-A acts primarily upon trigeminal and cervical nerve endings, by inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators such as calcitonin gene-related peptide, as well as reducing the insertion of ionotropic and metabotropic receptors into the neuronal membrane. These actions increase the depolarization threshold of trigeminal and cervical nerve fibers, thus reducing their activation. The central actions of BT-A are still a matter of debate: a retrograde axonal transport has been postulated, but not clearly assessed in humans. Clinically, the efficacy of BT-A in CM has been assessed by large, randomized placebo-controlled trials, such as the Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) trials. Those results were also confirmed in a wide range of open-label studies, even for long-term periods. Recently, novel findings have led to a better understanding of its pharmacological actions and clinical usefulness in migraine prevention. This narrative review summarizes, updates and critically revises the available data on BT-A and its possible implementation in chronic migraine. Moreover, the current role of BT-A in CM treatment has been discussed.

The efficacy of botulinum toxin type-A for intractable chronic migraine patients with no pain-free time

AIM

This is a retrospective report of the efficacy of botulinum toxin-A, Botox^® (Allergan), in intractable chronic migraine patients non-responsive to previous pharmacological management and with largely no pain-free time, including those with new onset daily persistent headache.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients, all with severe Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 scores at baseline, received 3-monthly injections of Botox^® as per Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PRE-EMPT) protocol over a maximum 33-month period. Response criteria were a sustained reduction of HIT-6 scores below 60.

RESULTS

Four patients had headache on at least 20 days a month; the remaining patients had daily headache with no pain-free time, including nine patients with new onset persistent migraine. There was a significant reduction in HIT-6 scores following Botox^® therapy (x̅ = -5.45, p = 0.000920). Twenty-one percent of the cohort exhibited a sustained reduction in HIT-6 scores below 60. The number of headache days and pain-free time did not change in five of the six responders, but disability improved. There was no difference between patients with episodic migraine evolving to chronic as opposed to those with chronic migraine from onset.

CONCLUSION

This report suggests that Botox^® treatment is efficacious in intractable chronic migraine without pain-free time. The HIT-6 is a reliable and practical parameter to assess disability in this patient group. Use of such validated parameters should be considered with greater weight in future International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) guidelines for controlled clinical trials.

Real-Life Response to Erenumab in a Therapy-Resistant Case Series of Migraine Patients From the Province of Québec, Eastern Canada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Erenumab is the first migraine-specific preventive therapy approved by Health Canada since the approval of onabotulinumtoxinA 10 years ago. It is one of four calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist monoclonal antibodies that have been commercialized worldwide for use in the headache pipeline. The objective of our study was to determine real-life efficacy of monthly erenumab for the prevention of migraine in a small case series of difficult-to-treat patients followed at a tertiary headache clinic from the Canadian province of Québec.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart audit of patients having failed four or more conventional migraine oral preventive therapies and who were treated with monthly self-administered subcutaneous erenumab (70 or 140 mg/mL dose) over a 1-year period. We assessed the patients' baseline characteristics, response to treatment, and tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients with a diagnosis of high-frequency episodic migraines or chronic migraine met criteria (83.3% female; mean age: 48.7 years; mean duration of migraine condition: 32.9 years). Patients self-administered erenumab using a prefilled disposable autoinjector on a monthly basis; 16 patients received a 140 mg/mL dosage, two patients received a 70 mg/mL dosage. At 1 year follow-up, 50% of patients reported ≥ 50% reduction in migraine frequency and were deemed responders. Patients attempted six doses of erenumab therapy prior to discontinuation for non-response, except for two patients with other concomitant chronic pain conditions, who required ten doses to reach a 50% response. For the overall cohort, there was a decrease of 5.2 monthly migraine days; 9 days for responders and 1.3 days for non-responders (t-test (df = 16) = - 2.77, p = 0.014). There was an additional decrease of 7 monthly non-migraine days amongst patients with unremitting daily headaches; 8 days for responders and 5 days for non-responders (p > 0.05). There was a decrease of 5.4 monthly days using acute analgesics; 8.9 days for responders and 2 days for non-responders (T(16) = - 2.33, p = 0.033). The overall mean reduction in disability using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score was 5.6 points; only responders showed a reduction in HIT-6 severity category (p > 0.05). The most commonly reported adverse event was constipation (16.7%), which did not lead to treatment discontinuation and was successfully managed in all patients with early counselling and intervention.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the efficacy of erenumab in a case series of therapy-resistant migraine patients from the region of Québec. A high rate of previously failed preventive oral agents and medication overuse did not predict response in our patient cohort. In the presence of real-world complexity factors, such as psychological distress, regular opioid consumption and concomitant chronic pain conditions, a longer therapy trial may be warranted in obtaining optimal response.

Patients and general practitioners assessment of the main outcomes employed in the acute and preventive treatment of migraine: a cross sectional study

Background

We aim to describe and compare patients and general practitioners’ opinions about the different variables related to acute and preventive treatment for migraine.

Patients and methods

An observational descriptive study was performed. Patients with episodic migraine and general practitioners, from our healthcare area, were invited to answer a survey about the different variables related to migraine treatment. They were asked for their opinions on the different variables, and to consider the desired efficacy in percentage terms and the desired action times of treatment.

Results

Fifty-five patients and fifty-five general practitioners were selected. Effectiveness was considered the most important variable for symptomatic and preventive treatment. Cost was considered the least important variable. Patients desired percentage of efficacy was 84.0% (±16.7%) for symptomatic treatment and 79.9% (±17.1%) for preventive treatment. General practitioners desired percentage of efficacy was 75.0% (±14.0) for symptomatic treatment and 70.4% (±14.3) for preventive treatment. For symptomatic treatment the desired action time for pain cessation was selected as 27.5 min (±13.8) for patients and 24.0 min (±18.3) for GPs. For preventive treatment the desired action time for effect was 7.1 days (±4.5) for patients and 13.9 days (±8.9) for general practitioners.

Conclusion

The most important endpoints were, for acute: effectiveness, a short action time and a persistent effect. For prophylactic: effectiveness, sustained effect and tolerability. Both patients and general practitioners agreed on the most and least preferred endpoints. Desired percentage of efficacy was above 75% for both symptomatic and preventive treatment; and the desired action time was below 30 min for acute treatment and 2 weeks for preventive treatment.

Cerebrovascular Function in Hormonal Migraine: An Exploratory Study

Background: Migraineurs, particularly young premenopausal women, are at increased risk of cerebrovascular disease; however, there is currently limited evidence as to whether hormonal migraine is associated with poor cerebrovascular function.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to: (1) investigate the potential association of cerebrovascular function with hormonal migraine and (2) determine whether abnormalities of cerebrovascular function in hormonal migraineurs are associated with migraine-related disability and/or quality of life.

Method: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in 50 hormonal migraineurs (mean age: 38.7 ± 1.2 years) and 29 controls (mean age: 35.6 ± 1.8 years). Data were collected at a single point in time from all participants during the inter-ictal period when they were free from migraine and not menstruating. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to measure resting blood flow velocity and cerebrovascular responsiveness (CVR) to hypercapnia and cognitive stimulation (neurovascular coupling) in the left and right middle cerebral artery (MCA). Additionally, hormonal migraineurs completed three questionnaires to assess migraine-related disability and quality of life as well as migraine frequency and intensity: Headache Impact Test-6™, Migraine-Specific Quality of Life and Migraine Disability Assessment.

Results: Hormonal migraineurs had lower resting mean blood flow velocity (MBFV) (P = 0.009) and neurovascular coupling during cognitive stimulation (P = 0.010) in the left MCA than controls. No such differences were found in the right MCA. Additionally, heart rate (P = 0.004) was higher in hormonal migraineurs than controls. However, no differences in CVR to hypercapnia were found between hormonal migraineurs and controls. Multi-variate analysis revealed age to be a significant (P = 0.012) predictor of MBFV in the left MCA. Negative correlations between headache frequency and CVR to hypercapnia in the left (P = 0.026) and right MCA (P = 0.044) were found. Additionally, negative correlations between neurovascular coupling during the 2-Back 1.5 s task in the right MCA and the MSQoL emotional (P = 0.013) and role-function restrictive (P = 0.039) domains were found.

Conclusions: This is the first study to show that hormonal migraineurs have poorer cerebrovascular function, as represented by lower resting MBFV and impaired neurovascular coupling in the left MCA. Future studies should investigate whether improving cerebrovascular function can prevent hormonal migraine and improve quality of life.

Clinical Trial Registration: ACTRN12618001230246.

Daily Headache in Chronic Migraine Is a Predictive Factor of Response in Patients Who Had Completed Three Sessions of OnabotulinumtoxinA

OnabotulinumtoxinA is one of the main preventive treatments for chronic migraine. Despite that up to one third of patients with chronic migraine suffer from daily headache, these individuals have hardly been studied. We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients with chronic migraine and treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA according to the PREEMPT paradigm. The primary endpoint was to assess whether patients with chronic migraine and daily headache had a different response after three sessions of OnabotulinutoxinA than patients without daily headache. The secondary endpoint was to analyse the presence of predictive factors that could be associated with a higher response to OnabotulinumtoxinA. Patients with daily headache had a reduction of 14.9 (SD: 9.7) headache days per month, patients with 22–29 headache days a reduction of 10.6 (SD: 9.9) days, and patients with 15–21 headache days a reduction of 8.6 (SD: 7.1) days (p < 0.001). In the univariate regression analysis, a higher number of headache days per month at baseline was associated with higher odds of reduction in the number of headache days per month after OnabotulinumtoxinaA treatment (OR: 0.474, 95% CI: 0.278–0.670, p < 0.001). This association was maintained in the multivariate regression analysis (OR: 0.540, 95% CI: 0.333–0.746, p < 0.001). In our sample, daily headache was not associated with a worse response to OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment. A higher frequency of headache at baseline was a predictor of better response to OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment.

Approach to Pediatric Intractable Migraine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intractable migraine in children and adolescents is a significant cause of disability and decreased quality of life (QoL) in this population. Challenges include lack of unifying definition for intractable migraine, and limited data on best-practice management in this age group, with most current treatment pathways extrapolated from adult studies or expert consensus.

RECENT FINDINGS

A comprehensive approach in the evaluation and management of intractable migraine in this age group encompasses excluding secondary causes of headache; making an accurate diagnosis; identifying and appropriately managing modifiable risk factors; and initiating appropriate pharmacologic therapy to reduce disability, improve health-related quality of life, reduce risk of progression, and develop adaptive pain coping strategies. Several strategies for management of pediatric intractable migraine including use of acute medications, bridge therapy in outpatient setting, emerging therapies for preventive therapy, and a stepwise combination therapy for management of pediatric intractable migraine in emergency and inpatient setting are presented based on available clinical data, safety/tolerability, availability, cost-effectiveness, and expert consensus. This descriptive review of the available literature focuses on approach to therapy for acute intractable migraine in a pediatric population including outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient management.

Progressive Response to Repeat Application of Capsaicin 179 mg (8% w/w) Cutaneous Patch in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Comprehensive New Analysis and Clinical Implications

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of repeated application of capsaicin 179 mg cutaneous patch in nonresponders to the first application.

Design

Post hoc, as-treated analysis of two prospective trials (STRIDE and PACE) with 52-week follow-up.

Blinding

Open-label.

Setting

Multicenter clinical trial.

Subjects

STRIDE: nondiabetic neuropathic pain; PACE: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Methods

Patients were divided according to number of applications needed before attainment of a ≥30% reduction in average pain intensity (question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI-Q5]). We assessed the change from baseline in average pain intensity (BPI-Q5), mean “interference with sleep” score, Patient Global Impression of Change, quality of life (QOL) via the EuroQol 5-dimension, and Self-Assessment of Treatment.

Results

In STRIDE and PACE, respectively, n = 306 and n = 313 received the capsaicin patch; n = 60 and n = 96 had a response after the first application, n = 33 and n = 68 after the second, and n = 11 and n = 43 after the third. Among patients without a ≥30% reduction in pain intensity at 3 months, in STRIDE and PACE, respectively, 23.3% and 28.1% achieved a ≥30% reduction at 6 months, increasing to 33.9% and 45.7% at 12 months. Similar results were obtained when a decrease of ≥50% was used as the responder definition. Progressive improvements in pain intensity in slower responders reached levels similar to those in early responders at month 12 and were accompanied by improvements in sleep, QOL, and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

Although some patients with peripheral neuropathic pain experience rapid improvements with a single treatment of capsaicin 179 mg patch, some may require two or three treatments before an initial response is observed. Similar benefits for pain, sleep, and QOL can be achieved in early and late responders.

Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Headache

Botulinum toxin type A has been used in the treatment of chronic migraine for over a decade and has become established as a well-tolerated option for the preventive therapy of chronic migraine. Ongoing research is gradually shedding light on its mechanism of action in migraine prevention. Given that its mechanism of action is quite different from that of the new monoclonal antibodies directed against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor, it is unlikely to be displaced to any major extent by them. Both will likely remain as important tools for patients with chronic migraine and the clinicians assisting them. New types of botulinum toxin selective for sensory pain neurons may well be discovered or produced by recombinant DNA techniques in the coming decade, and this may greatly enhance its therapeutic usefulness. This review summarizes the evolution of botulinum toxin use in headache management over the past several decades and its role in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and other headache disorders.

Impulse control disorders in chronic migraine with medication overuse after onabotulinumtoxinA: A single-center prospective cohort study

Chronic migraine (CM) with medication overuse headache (MOH) is one of the most common and disabling chronic headache disorders associated with both frequencies of use of medication and behavioral alterations, including psychopathology and psychological drug dependence. Several previous studies on large patient samples have demonstrated the efficacy of Onabotulinum toxin A (OnabotA) on physical symptomatology treatment of headache, but effects on behavioral alterations remain still debate. Our study investigated the effects of OnabotA on psychiatric comorbidities and on quality of life of patients with CM and MOH that failed on traditional therapies. OnabotA was injected, according to the PREEMPT paradigm, 40 patients with CM and MOH and data on headache-related impairment, before and after the OnabotA injections were collected from the patient's headache diaries. Data on depressive, anxiety symptomatology and impulse control disorders also were collected by means of self-report scales and a semi-structured interview. After six months, patients with CM and MOH showed a significant decrease in monthly headache attacks (from 19.3 ± 5.9 to 11.8 ± 8.5, p = 0.003), monthly headache days (from 23 ± 8.9 to 11.1 ± 6.2, p = 0.001), numbers of analgesics used per month (from 18.2 ± 6.3 to 8.5 ± 4.7, p < 0.0001). The anxiety symptomatology (p ≤ 0.003) and impulse control disorders (from 30% to 10%), but not depressive symptomatology (p = 0.81), were significantly reduced from throughout the study. The treatment with OnabotA proved beneficial effects on anxiety symptomatology and on impulse control disorders in our clinical practice with CM and MOH and further studies should shed light in larger patient samples on long-term behavioural effects.

What is changing in chronic migraine treatment? An algorithm for onabotulinumtoxinA treatment by the Italian chronic migraine group

INTRODUCTION

OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are two of the few treatments that ameliorate chronic migraine (CM) in randomized controlled trials and real-life studies. Separate clinical practice guidelines have been developed for the management of CM with OBT-A or CGRP-targeting mAbs.

AREAS COVERED

Considering the concomitant availability of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs as therapeutic treatment options, Italian migraine experts reviewed the evidence supporting the efficacy of OBT-A and CGRP-targeting mAbs in CM in order to rationalize the management of CM patients treated with OBT-A. Experts addressed everyday practice needs to shape the optimal pharmacological management by balancing adherence to regulatory indications, ethical considerations, and clinical expertise. Considering the remarkable challenge of improving the health and quality of life of patients with CM, even partial improvements may be clinically meaningful, particularly for those who are resistant or intolerant to oral migraine treatments.

EXPERT OPINION

In this collaborative effort, we propose a treatment algorithm that integrates the relevant aspects of managing patients with CM to provide ready-to-use practical guidance regarding the appropriate use of OBT-A.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Health-Related Quality of Life of Chronic Migraine Patients Treated with Onabotulinum Toxin A

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to describe the efficacy and safety of onabotulinum toxin A (BonT-A) with evaluation of treatment satisfaction and impact on quality of life in chronic migraine (CM) patients in real life.

METHODS

This study was conducted in CM patients who were treated with BoNT-A with 12 months of follow-up. Data about outcome, adverse events, and patients' pre- and post-treatment status including health-related quality of life data were analyzed. Health-related quality of life scores were measured at baseline and months 6 and 12 after the beginning of BoNT-A administration.

RESULTS

Of 42 enrolled patients, 30 were included in the analysis. At 12 months, all patients showed a reduction in number of headaches and analgesic use per month and none reported adverse events. After BoNT-A supplementation, health-related quality-of-life scores improved significantly. There was a direct association between health-related quality of life with reduction of headache days at the end of study.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that BoNT-A treatment is effective on CM and improves the functional well-being and quality of life of patients.

OnabotulinumtoxinA injection in the treatment of chronic migraine

The earliest descriptions of botulism were in the early 19th century, and was reported by the German physician Justinus Kerner. The term "botulism" was derived from the Latin word botulus, indicating its original association with sausages. It took another 150 years or so to come into clinical use. The first clinical application was strabismus, and was developed by the American ophthalmologist Alan B. Scott, whose effort led to the pharmaceutical product known as onabotulinumtoxinA today. The therapeutic benefit in migraine was an incidental finding in a report by the American plastic surgeon William J. Binder, which inspired a series of clinical studies in headache disorders. The doses and injection techniques in the earlier reports were variable, so were the results. It was until the Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) 1 and 2 studies when its efficacy and safety, as well as the indication, i.e., chronic migraine (CM), were ascertained. Even though there were criticisms regarding the heterogeneities in the results between the PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies, the data on efficacy endpoints and safety were generally consistent, which were subsequently confirmed by the open-label extension of the PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies, and three open-label studies, namely the Chronic Migraine OnabotulinuMtoxinA Prolonged Efficacy open Label (COMPEL), the REal-life use of botulinum toxin for the symptomatic treatment of adults with chronic migraine, measuring healthcare resource utilization, and Patient-reported OutcomeS observed in practice (REPOSE) studies, and the CM Post-Authorization Safety Study (CM PASS) studies. On the other hand, the results were challenged by the Chronification and Reversibility of Migraine (CHARM) study, which involved CM patients with medication overuse. It was concluded that the clinical improvement was attributed to early withdrawal of the overused acute medications, rather than onabotulinumtoxinA injections. However, fundamental differences in the patient profile and methodology between the CHARM and PREEMPT studies existed, and cautious should be exercised when interpreting and comparing the results. According to the practical guidelines and reimbursement regulations in many countries, its use is limited to CM patients, and is reserved for those who fail at least 2-3 preventive medications, due to either lack of efficacy or intolerability. Cessation of treatment is recommended in patients who do not respond to 2-3 injection cycles, or in patients whose headache frequency has dropped to <10-15 days a month. Even in the era of calcitonin-gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, onabotulinumtoxinA injection remains a treatment option of reasonable cost-effectiveness in carefully selected patients.

OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine: A Profile of Its Use

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox^®; a formulation of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A)] is indicated for the prevention of headaches in adults with chronic migraine (CM) in numerous countries, including those of Europe. In clinical trials, intramuscular administration of BoNT/A (155-195 units at 12-week intervals) to patients with CM was generally well tolerated and associated with sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in multiple assessments of headache symptoms, headache-related impact and/or disability and migraine-specific health-related quality of life over a period of 1 year (in the pivotal PREEMPT 1 and 2 studies) and 2 years (in the phase IV COMPEL study). The efficacy and safety of BoNT/A therapy have been confirmed in a number of large, prospective, real-world studies conducted in Europe, including the 2-year REPOSE study. Intramuscular BoNT/A has also demonstrated greater clinical utility than the oral prophylactic medication topiramate in a clinical practice setting (FORWARD study).