The bidirectional temporal relationship between headache and affective disorders: longitudinal data from the HUNT studies

Signatures of migraine aura in high-density-EEG

OBJECTIVE

Cortical spreading depolarization is highly conserved among the species. It is easily detectable in direct cortical surface recordings and has been recorded in the cortex of humans with severe neurological disease. It is considered the pathophysiological correlate of human migraine aura, but direct electrophysiological evidence is still missing. As signatures of cortical spreading depolarization have been recognized in scalp EEG, we investigated typical spontaneous migraine aura, using full band high-density EEG (HD-EEG).

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with migraine with aura were investigated during spontaneous migraine aura and interictally. Time compressed HD-EEG were analyzed for the presence of cortical spreading depolarization characterized by (a) slow potential changes below 0.05 Hz, (b) suppression of faster activity from 0.5 Hz - 45 Hz (c) spreading of these changes to neighboring regions during the aura phase. Further, topographical changes in alpha-power spectral density (8-14 Hz) during aura were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 26 HD-EEGs were recorded in patients with migraine with aura, thereof 10 HD-EEGs during aura. Eight HD-EEGs were recorded in the same subject. During aura, no slow potentials were recorded, but alpha-power was significantly decreased in parieto-occipito-temporal location on the hemisphere contralateral to visual aura, lasting into the headache phase. Interictal alpha-power in patients with migraine with aura did not differ significantly from age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Unequivocal signatures of spreading depolarization were not recorded with EEG on the intact scalp in migraine. The decrease in alpha-power contralateral to predominant visual symptoms is consistent with focal depression of spontaneous brain activity as a consequence of cortical spreading depolarization but is not specific thereof.

SIGNIFICANCE

Cortical spreading depolarization is relevant in migraine, other paroxysmal neurological disorders and neurointensive care.

Migraine Aura-Catch Me If You Can with EEG and MRI-A Narrative Review

Roughly one-third of migraine patients suffer from migraine with aura, characterized by transient focal neurological symptoms or signs such as visual disturbance, sensory abnormalities, speech problems, or paresis in association with the headache attack. Migraine with aura is associated with an increased risk for stroke, epilepsy, and with anxiety disorder. Diagnosis of migraine with aura sometimes requires exclusion of secondary causes if neurological deficits present for the first time or are atypical. It was the aim of this review to summarize EEG an MRI findings during migraine aura in the context of pathophysiological concepts. This is a narrative review based on a systematic literature search. During visual auras, EEG showed no consistent abnormalities related to aura, although transient focal slowing in occipital regions has been observed in quantitative studies. In contrast, in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) and migraine with brain stem aura, significant EEG abnormalities have been described consistently, including slowing over the affected hemisphere or bilaterally or suppression of EEG activity. Epileptiform potentials in FHM are most likely attributable to associated epilepsy. The initial perfusion change during migraine aura is probably a short lasting hyperperfusion. Subsequently, perfusion MRI has consistently demonstrated cerebral hypoperfusion usually not restricted to one vascular territory, sometimes associated with vasoconstriction of peripheral arteries, particularly in pediatric patients, and rebound hyperperfusion in later phases. An emerging potential MRI signature of migraine aura is the appearance of dilated veins in susceptibility-weighted imaging, which may point towards the cortical regions related to aura symptoms ("index vein"). Conclusions: Cortical spreading depression (CSD) cannot be directly visualized but there are probable consequences thereof that can be captured Non-invasive detection of CSD is probably very challenging in migraine. Future perspectives will be elaborated based on the studies summarized.

Migraine and Tension-type Headache in Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy/Corticobasal Syndrome

Objective

To compare the prevalence and characteristics of migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) among patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy/corticobasal syndrome (PSP/CBS), and healthy controls (HCs).

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved the collection of data from consecutive PD (n = 81) and PSP/CBS (n = 21) patients along with 104 HCs. Migraine and TTH were diagnosed using the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition criteria. Demographic data, PD or PSP/CBS details, and the presence and characteristics of migraine and TTH were collected. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Pittsburgh Sleep-Quality Index were used to assess cognition, depression, and sleep quality, respectively.

Results

A comparable proportion of PD and PSP/CBS patients reported lifetime headache (46.9% vs 23.8%; P = 0.06). TTH was more common, observed in 84.3%, 100%, and 93.5% of PD, PSP/CBS, and HCs with lifetime headache, respectively. A comparable proportion of participants in all three groups had bilateral (P = 0.10), dull-aching headache (P = 0.09), and occurring <5/month (P > 0.99). The mean severity score of headache among three groups was comparable (P = 0.39). Although the demographic and clinical characteristics of PSP/CBS patients with and without headache were comparable, PD patients with headache had a higher MDS-UPDRS-III score than those without. More than two-third PD and all PSP/CBS patients with lifetime headache reported headache improvement following parkinsonism onset.

Conclusion

The prevalence and characteristics of migraine and TTH were comparable in PD, PSP/CBS, and HCs. Headache was associated with greater motor severity in PD. Following parkinsonism onset, headache improved in the majority of PD and PSP/CBS patients with lifetime headache.

Migraine and treatment-resistant depression

Migraine and major depressive disorders (MDD) or treatment resistant depression (TRD) represent a significant global burden and are often comorbid, further complicating diagnosis and treatment. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a bidirectional relationship between migraine and MDD/TRD, with patients suffering from one disorder exhibiting a heightened risk of developing the other. This association is believed to result from shared genetic factors, neurotransmitter dysregulation, inflammation, hormonal alteration, and other conditions comorbid with both disorders. Emerging evidence suggests that therapeutics targeting common pathways in both disorders may be beneficial for comorbid patients. Novel therapeutics for migraine or MDD/TRD, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeting therapy, onabotulinumtoxinA, ketamine/esketamine, vagus nerve stimulation or transcranial magnetic stimulation, may be helpful in selected patients with comorbid migraine-MDD/TRD. Nevertheless, continued efforts are needed to improve early detection and intervention, to better understand the complex interplay between genetic, environmental, and psychosocial factors contributing to this comorbidity, to identify novel therapeutic targets, and ultimately, to alleviate the disease burden caused by this comorbidity.

The use of clinical scales and PROMs in headache disorders and migraine, summarizing their dissemination and operationalization

Measurements are an essential aspect of scientific research. This review will present clinical scales and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for headache disorders and migraine that have been endorsed by the International Headache Society (IHS) and are intended for use by both physicians and researchers. A clinical scale is a tool to assess a patient's condition or symptoms in a standardized and quantifiable way. Clinical scales are often used in research settings and can be used to track a patient's progress over time, monitor the effectiveness of treatment, and make decisions. They can be self-administered or completed by a healthcare professional. PROMs are tools used to evaluate a patient's health status, symptoms, and quality of life. These measures are completed by the patient and provide valuable information about the patient's perspective and experience of their condition. PROMs are increasingly used in clinical practice and research to improve patient-centered care, patient engagement, and shared decision-making. This review also briefly covers the creation process, testing for reliability and validity, and interpreting the results of the use of clinical scales and PROMs in clinical and research settings in headache disorders. The first step in creating a clinical scale or PROM is to define the purpose of the scale and the population it is intended to assess. The next step is to identify the domains or areas that the scale will assess. Then, the items or questions that will be included in the scale need to be developed. These items should be relevant to the defined purpose and population of the scale and should be worded clearly and concisely. After the items have been developed, the scale or PROM can be administered to a sample of individuals in the target population. This allows researchers to assess the reliability and validity of the scale or PROM, as well as to make any necessary revisions.

Associations between anxiety, depression with migraine, and migraine-related burdens

Background

Anxiety and depression are the most common psychiatric comorbidities in migraine, but their impact on the risk of developing migraine and their gender and age differences are unclear, and research on their associations with migraine-related burdens are limited.

Objective

To systematically explore the association between anxiety and depression with migraine and migraine-related burdens, including the risk of developing migraine, as well as migraine frequency, severity, disability, headache impact, quality of life and sleep quality.

Methods

A total of 170 migraineurs and 85 sex-and age-matched healthy control subjects were recruited consecutively for this study. Anxiety and depression were assessed using Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), respectively. Logistic regression and linear regression analyses were used to explore the associations between anxiety and depression with migraine and its burdens. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of SAS score and SDS score on migraine and its severe burdens.

Results

After adjusting for confounders, anxiety and depression remained significantly associated with an increased risk of developing migraine, with odds ratios of 5.186 (95% CI:1.755-15.322) and 3.147 (95% CI:1.387-7.141), respectively. Meanwhile, there were significant additive interactions between the association of anxiety and depression with the risk of developing migraine in gender and age (P for interaction <0.05), and the stronger correlations were found in participants with an age ≤ 36 years old and females. In addition, anxiety and depression were significantly independently associated with the migraine frequency, severity, disability, headache impact, quality of life, and sleep quality in migraine patients (P trend <0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of SAS score in predicting developing migraine was significantly higher than that of SDS score [0.749 (95% CI: 0.691-0.801) vs. 0.633 (95% CI: 0.571-0.692), p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Anxiety and depression were significantly independently associated with the increased risk of migraine and migraine-related burdens. Enhanced assessment of SAS score and SDS score is of great clinical value for the early prevention and treatment of migraine and its burdens.

Hypoechogenicity of the raphe nuclei as a biomarker of migraine: A case-control study, review, and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hypoechogenicity of the raphe nuclei (hR) has been related to major depression. Comorbidity between migraine and depression is bidirectional postulating a common mechanism of serotonergic dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the association between migraine and hR and its role as biomarker of migraine-associated depression and disease severity.

METHODS

This is a single-center cross-sectional descriptive study. We included consecutive patients with episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). We collected their comorbidities, analgesic consumption, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), disability, and impact on quality of life associated with migraine. We also included a group of control subjects, matched for age and sex with the patients. In both groups, hR was assessed by means of transcranial sonography. We performed a meta-analysis of the studies investigating the association between migraine and hR.

RESULTS

A total of 107 subjects were included (57 cases and 50 controls). hR rate was lower in controls than in migraine patients (22.2% vs. 42.9%, p = .02) with a progressive increase in EM and CM groups respect to the control group (33.3% and 50% vs. 22.2%, respectively; p = .03). Among patients, hR was not associated with depression, higher HADS score, greater migraine-related disability, or higher consumption of analgesic medication. The meta-analysis showed a significant association between migraine and hR (odds ratio = 2.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.42-3.29).

CONCLUSION

hR is more prevalent in migraine patients than in controls and, in our population, its prevalence increases in a stepwise manner in patients with EM and CM. These findings support the role of raphe nuclei in migraine pathophysiology.

Depression and anxiety in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension compared to migraine: A matched controlled cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate mental health burden in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) compared to matched women with migraine and population controls.

BACKGROUND

Depression and anxiety are recognized comorbid conditions in those with IIH and lead to worse predicted medical outcomes. The mental health burden in IIH has not been previously evaluated in a large, matched cohort study.

METHODS

We performed a population-based matched, retrospective cohort study to explore mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety). We used data from IQVIA Medical Research Data, an anonymized, nationally representative primary care electronic medical records database in the United Kingdom, from January 1, 1995, to September 25, 2019. Women aged ≥16 years were eligible for inclusion. Women with IIH (exposure) were matched by age and body mass index with up to 10 control women without IIH but with migraine (migraine controls), and without IIH or migraine (population controls).

RESULTS

A total of 3411 women with IIH, 30,879 migraine controls and 33,495 population controls were included. Of these, 237, 2372 and 1695 women with IIH, migraine controls and population controls, respectively, developed depression during follow-up, and 179, 1826 and 1197, respectively, developed anxiety. There was a greater hazard of depression and anxiety in IIH compared to population controls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.58; and aHR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19-1.64, respectively), while hazards were similar to migraine controls (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.13; and aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.14, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Depression and anxiety burden in women with IIH is higher than in the general population, and comparable to that in matched women with migraine. This may indicate that presence of headache is a potential driver for comorbid depression and anxiety in IIH.

Off-Label Cyproheptadine in Children and Adolescents: Psychiatric Comorbidities, Interacting Variables, Safety, and Risks of Hepatotoxicity

Cyproheptadine is a widely prescribed first-generation antihistamine, and due to its unique chemical structure, it has a popular off-label choice for a range of clinical conditions. Its efficacy is widely debated in the literature, but there are reports of hepatotoxicity as a rare adverse effect. Its benefits in migraine prophylaxis and appetite stimulation also underscore a highly overlapping clinical pathway that requires additional assessment and evaluation. The evidence suggests a baseline metabolic profile before initiation and assessment for co-occurring mental health conditions may improve overall response with evidence-based mental health interventions.

Applying a biopsychosocial model to migraine: rationale and clinical implications

Migraine is a complex condition in which genetic predisposition interacts with other biological and environmental factors determining its course. A hyperresponsive brain cortex, peripheral and central alterations in pain processing, and comorbidities play a role from an individual biological standpoint. Besides, dysfunctional psychological mechanisms, social and lifestyle factors may intervene and impact on the clinical phenotype of the disease, promote its transformation from episodic into chronic migraine and may increase migraine-related disability.Thus, given the multifactorial origin of the condition, the application of a biopsychosocial approach in the management of migraine could favor therapeutic success. While in chronic pain conditions the biopsychosocial approach is already a mainstay of treatment, in migraine the biomedical approach is still dominant. It is instead advisable to carefully consider the individual with migraine as a whole, in order to plan a tailored treatment. In this review, we first reported an analytical and critical discussion of the biological, psychological, and social factors involved in migraine. Then, we addressed the management implications of the application of a biopsychosocial model discussing how the integration between non-pharmacological management and conventional biomedical treatment may provide advantages to migraine care.

The bidirectional relation of migraine and affective disorders

No abstract