Leg length discrepancy, overgrowth, and associated risk factors after a pediatric tibial shaft fracture

Prediction of leg-length discrepancy in pediatric femoral shaft fracture using bone SPECT/CT: A case report

RATIONALE

Children's bones are in the process of growing in both length and width. Therefore, evaluating whether fractures affect the growth plate or not is very crucial. However, even in cases of lower limb fractures where the growth plate remains unaffected, overgrowth or shortening of the affected limb are encountered.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 11-year-old boy was admitted to the emergency department after a passenger car accident.

DIAGNOSES

A comminuted fracture of the right femoral shaft was diagnosed by X-ray image.

INTERVENTIONS

Closed reduction and internal fixation were performed using intramedullary titanium elastic nails. Six months after the operation, bone union was achieved and the nails were removed.

OUTCOMES

Nine months after nail removal, the right leg was unexpectedly noticed 5 mm shorter than the left one. On the initial and follow-up bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images with a 9-month interval, radioactivity of growth plate in the right proximal femur was much lower than that of the left femur, suggesting a further increasing of leg-length discrepancy (LLD) in the future. As we expected, LLD had progressively increased up to 20 mm. Epiphysiodesis was finally decided for the left distal femur. Twenty-two months after the length equalization operation, LLD decreased to 5 mm.

LESSONS

This case emphasizes that quantitative analysis of growth plate activity using bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography could predict LLD and help us decide when and which limb should be operated on for pediatric patients with lower limb fractures.

Patient-reported outcomes of adolescents with tibia shaft fractures: comparison of closed reduction and casting vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing

Tibial shaft fractures are the third most common pediatric long bone fractures. Closed reduction and casting (CRC) is considered initial treatment in this population, however, surgical management using elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is also used in adolescents. This study compared patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of adolescents with tibia fractures treated with ESIN or CRC. This single-center retrospective study gathered adolescent patients 10-18 years of age with closed tibia shaft fractures between the years 2015 and 2021 treated by either CRC or ESIN. Measured outcomes include patient demographics, overall casting time, time to full weight bearing, time to full healing, radiographic healing, complications (loss of reduction, malunion >5° and >10°) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. A total of 141 patients (68% male) were included, with 31 receiving ESIN and 110 having CRC. Patient demographics were similar across groups. At follow-up, CRC had a significant shorter time to healing (11 vs. 15 weeks), but an increased casting duration (7 vs. 4 weeks). Finally, the ESIN group had significantly greater pre-intervention angulation, displacement, and shortening. In both interventions, mobility and pain interference scores showed significant improvements from baseline (2 weeks post-op) at 12, 16, and 24 weeks. No statistically significant differences were noted between CRC and ESIN groups across PROMIS domains of pain interference and mobility. CRC and ESIN are effective in improving pain and mobility in adolescent diaphyseal tibia fractures, but neither intervention is superior based on PROMIS scores at 12, 16 and 24+ weeks. From a patient standpoint, we demonstrate that neither treatment is superior in achieving better-perceived mobility or decreasing pain sooner. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Risk factors for femoral overgrowth after femoral shortening osteotomy in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Objective

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) refers to a series of deformity of acetabulum and proximal femur and abnormal relationship between them, it represents the most common hip disease in children. Overgrowth and limb length discrepancy (LLD) was common complication in children undergoing femoral shortening osteotomy. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors of overgrowth after femoral shortening osteotomy in children with DDH.

Methods

We included 52 children with unilateral DDH who underwent pelvic osteotomy combined with femoral shortening osteotomy between January 2016 and April 2018, including seven males (six left and one right hip) and 45 females (33 left and 12 right hips) with an average age of 5.00 ± 2.48 years, and an average follow-up time of 45.85 ± 6.22 months. The amount of overgrowth and limb length discrepancies (LLDs) were calculated. The risk factors of femoral overgrowth ≥1 cm and LLD ≥ 1 cm were analyzed.

Results

There were statistical differences in age (p < 0.001) and operation duration (p = 0.010) between the two groups with femoral overgrowth <1 cm and ≥1 cm. There was a statistical difference in operation duration (p < 0.001) between the two groups. Age (p < 0.001) was an independent influencing factor of femoral overgrowth in children with unilateral DDH after pelvic osteotomy and femoral shortening osteotomy, and a risk factor (p = 0.008) of LLD in these children.

Conclusion

The overgrowth and LLD of children with developmental dislocation of hip after pelvic osteotomy and femoral shortening osteotomy are significantly related to age. There was no significant difference between different pelvic osteotomies for femoral overgrowth in children. Therefore, surgeons should consider the possibility of LLD after femoral shortening osteotomy in children of a young age.

Nonoperative Management of Closed Displaced Tibia Shaft Fractures in Patients Under 18 Years of Age: Low Failure Rate

BACKGROUND

Tibial shaft fractures are the third most common pediatric long bone fracture pattern. Historically, these fractures have been initially treated with closed reduction and casting (CRC). Recently, there has been an increasing trend toward surgical intervention as an initial treatment for these injuries. In an effort to better understand whether this trend is warranted, this study seeks to characterize the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a large number of children who underwent nonoperative treatment with CRC as their initial treatment for pediatric tibial shaft fractures at a single tertiary care center.

METHODS

Outcomes measured included final alignment, other procedures performed, length of time to full radiographic healing, and length of time in each method of immobilization before progressing to full weight-bearing status. Patients were separated by ages into the following cohorts during statistical analysis: 4 to 8 years, 9 to 12 years, and 13+ years. Differences between continuous variables were analyzed with independent-samples t tests. χ 2 tests were used to analyze differences in categorical variables. An α<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 10.19 years (4.03 to 17.43). The average initial displacement among all age groups was 27.42% (±15.05%). After the initial intervention with CRC, all age groups demonstrated an average of <5 degrees of residual angulation and <20% of residual displacement. Complete radiographic healing was seen in 127 (92.7%) patients by 3 months. Loss of reduction requiring additional clinical intervention was seen in 30 (21.9%) patients with only 5% requiring surgical intervention, whereas malunion was seen in a total of 16 (11.7%) patients at the final visit. There were no cases of compartment syndrome or deep wound infection. Male and initial angulation were the only factors predictive of loss of reduction.

CONCLUSION

Initial intervention with CRC is a safe and effective treatment for the majority of children in all age groups presenting with tibial shaft fractures demonstrating minimal angulation and displacement with surgical intervention being required in only 5% of patients. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the characteristics of patients who may benefit most from initial surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective study.

External fixation versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing in the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in children

Introduction

External fixator (EF) is a popular choice for open tibial fractures, but pin tract infection (PTI) and refracture are common complications. Elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) has been reported in the treatment for open tibial fractures. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of EF vs. ESIN in the treatment for open tibial shaft fracture in children retrospectively.

Methods

Patients aged 5–11 years with Gustilo-Anderson II and IIIA tibial shaft fracture treated at our institute from January 2008 to January 2018 were reviewed retrospectively and categorized into EF and ESIN groups. Patients with pathological fracture, neuromuscular disorder, metabolic disease, previous tibial fracture or instrumentation, and polytrauma were excluded. Patients with follow-up < 24 months or incomplete medical records were also excluded.

Results

In all, 55 patients (33 males, 22 females) were included in the EF group, whereas 37 patients (21 males, 16 females) were included in the ESIN group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups concerning sex, age, body weight, duration from injury to surgery, Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, and concomitant injuries. There was no case of nonunion and malunion in either group. The angulation at the latest follow-up was higher in the EF group than the ESIN group (P < 0.01). The radiological union was faster in the ESIN group (7.0 ± 0.9 weeks) than those in the EF group (9.0 ± 2.2 weeks) (P < 0.01). Limb length discrepancy (LLD) was more in the EF group (12.1 ± 4.4, mm) than in the ESIN group (7.3 ± 4.3, mm) (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

ESIN is a viable option in selected patients of GA grade II and IIIA open tibial fractures with comparable clinical outcomes as external fixator. Pin tract infection is the most troublesome complication in the EF group while implant prominence is a nuisance in the ESIN group.