Towards greater transparency in neurodevelopmental disorders research: use of a proposed workflow and propensity scores to facilitate selection of matched groups

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and propensity score matching analysis of postoperative radiotherapy for non-malignant meningioma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in non-malignant meningioma (NMM) has not been well explored.

METHODS

A total of 8629 patients with NMM (surgery alone group: n = 7716, postoperative radiotherapy group: n = 913) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patient profiles were matched by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PORT versus surgery alone (SA). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses determined prognostic variables with overall survival (OS) in NMM. Subgroup analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

All the SA (n = 7716) and PORT (n = 913) groups were included. Women with PORT (66.3%) and SA (70.9%) were almost twice as likely as men, and tumors with benign behaviors in the SA group were almost seven times more frequent than those with malignant characteristics. We explored the demographic, clinical characteristics, and prognostic factors in NMM. Laterality, surgery, tumor size, diagnosis year, age, and tumor behavior were associated with PORT versus SA. Patients treated with PORT had better OS than those treated with SA (p = 0.03). After PSM, PORT remained comparable to SA (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.88, p = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis of PORT treatment, borderline malignant behavior increased the death risk by 23%, while other variables did not have a significant clinical benefit (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline malignant behavior should be considered seriously, and the PORT regimen should be actively implemented for patients with benign meningiomas.

Solitary symbolic play, object substitution and peer role play skills at age 3 predict different aspects of age 7 structural language abilities in a matched sample of autistic and non-autistic children

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

Early symbolic play abilities are closely related to long-term language development for both autistic and non-autistic children, but few studies have explored these relations for different dimensions of pretence and of language. The current study explores carer-reported measures of solitary symbolic play, object substitution and peer role play abilities at age 3, and their respective relations with parent-reported semantics, syntax and narrative abilities at age 7 for both autistic and non-autistic children.

METHODS

We conducted secondary data analyses exploring links between different aspects of pretence and of language on the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children population cohort. We identified 92 autistic children and used propensity score matching to match them with 92 non-autistic children based on demographic and developmental information such as non-verbal IQ and socioeconomic status. We explored concurrent and longitudinal relations using correlation and regression models. Results: Both correlational and hierarchical regression analyses confirmed the significant effects of age 3 symbolic play abilities in facilitating age 7 semantics, syntax and narrative abilities for autistic children. We found that object substitution held most prominent influence, followed by peer role play and solitary symbolic play. In contrast, for non-autistic children, none of the age 3 symbolic play abilities were significant predictors, whereas socioeconomic status at birth and age 3 language abilities held significant influences on their age 7 semantics, syntax and narrative abilities. Conclusion: We discuss the implications of our findings for play interventions targeting language outcomes.