1
|
Chen L, Lin X, Yu X, Yang C, Li R, Guo Q, Shi J, Liao X, Chen X, Ma Z, Lin J. Decoy receptor 3 as a prognostic biomarker for sepsis and septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2025; 15:1529917. [PMID: 40125518 PMCID: PMC11925903 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1529917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025] Open
Abstract
Objectives The present study was conducted to reappraise the prognostic value of decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) for patients with sepsis and septic shock according to the latest Sepsis-3 definitions. Methods Subjects suffering from sepsis or septic shock were enrolled within 6 h of admission. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the plasma levels of DcR3, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukin-6 were measured. Group comparisons were made based on the survival status on day 28 after onset. Predictors of mortality were assessed using the Cox proportional hazard models, and survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Discriminative performances of single and combined indicators were evaluated via the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves. Results Among 143 eligible sepsis cases, 77 developed septic shock, and the 28-day mortality rates were 32.2% and 45.5%, respectively. Regardless of the population (all sepsis or septic shock), non-survivors exhibited significantly higher DcR3 levels compared to survivors (median 4.19 vs. 2.64 ng/mL and 4.37 vs. 3.18 ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). DcR3 levels were most correlated with organ dysfunction presented by SOFA scores (correlation coefficient = 0.347 and 0.308, respectively; p = 0.001 and 0.016, respectively) but did not differ among the various pathogenic microbes of infection. Multivariate Cox regression identified DcR3 as an independent predictor of mortality [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.570 (1.048-2.352) and 1.828 (1.047-3.194), respectively; p = 0.029 and 0.034, respectively]. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that elevated DcR3 concentrations were associated with significantly lower survival rates (p = 0.001 and 0.013, respectively). The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of DcR3 alone for predicting outcome were superior to that of the other three biomarkers (0.731 and 0.711, respectively) and could be further improved when coupled with SOFA scores (0.803 and 0.784, respectively). Conclusions DcR3 is a valuable prognostic biomarker for sepsis and septic shock, offering the potential to predict 28-day mortality in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery & Neurocritical Care, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao Lin
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xing Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chunxia Yang
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Neurosurgery & Neurocritical Care, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingqing Guo
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jingshi Shi
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiuyu Liao
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaoli Chen
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zengyi Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery & Neurocritical Care, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiandong Lin
- Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Su J, Tong Z, Wu S, Zhou F, Chen Q. Research Progress of DcR3 in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sepsis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12916. [PMID: 37629097 PMCID: PMC10454171 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3), a soluble glycosylated protein in the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, plays a role in tumor and inflammatory diseases. Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by the dysregulation of the response to infection. Currently, no specific drug that can alleviate or even cure sepsis in a comprehensive and multi-level manner has been found. DcR3 is closely related to sepsis and considerably upregulated in the serum of those patients, and its upregulation is positively correlated with the severity of sepsis and can be a potential biomarker for diagnosis. DcR3 alone or in combination with other markers has shown promising results in the early diagnosis of sepsis. Furthermore, DcR3 is a multipotent immunomodulator that can bind FasL, LIGHT, and TL1A through decoy action, and block downstream apoptosis and inflammatory signaling. It also regulates T-cell and macrophage differentiation and modulates immune status through non-decoy action; therefore, DcR3 could be a potential drug for the treatment of sepsis. The application of DcR3 in the treatment of a mouse model of sepsis also achieved good efficacy. Here, we introduce and discuss the progress in, and suggest novel ideas for, research regarding DcR3 in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Qi Chen
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Biomedical Research Center of South China, College of Life Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China; (Z.T.); (S.W.); (F.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Jin T, Dou Z, Wei B, Zhang B, Sun C. The dual role of the CD95 and CD95L signaling pathway in glioblastoma. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1029737. [PMID: 36505426 PMCID: PMC9730406 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1029737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Binding of CD95, a cell surface death receptor, to its homologous ligand CD95L, transduces a cascade of downstream signals leading to apoptosis crucial for immune homeostasis and immune surveillance. Although CD95 and CD95L binding classically induces programmed cell death, most tumor cells show resistance to CD95L-induced apoptosis. In some cancers, such as glioblastoma, CD95-CD95L binding can exhibit paradoxical functions that promote tumor growth by inducing inflammation, regulating immune cell homeostasis, and/or promoting cell survival, proliferation, migration, and maintenance of the stemness of cancer cells. In this review, potential mechanisms such as the expression of apoptotic inhibitor proteins, decreased activity of downstream elements, production of nonapoptotic soluble CD95L, and non-apoptotic signals that replace apoptotic signals in cancer cells are summarized. CD95L is also expressed by other types of cells, such as endothelial cells, polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor-associated microglia, and macrophages, which are educated by the tumor microenvironment and can induce apoptosis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which recognize and kill cancer cells. The dual role of the CD95-CD95L system makes targeted therapy strategies against CD95 or CD95L in glioblastoma difficult and controversial. In this review, we also discuss the current status and perspective of clinical trials on glioblastoma based on the CD95-CD95L signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanrui Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Taian Jin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhangqi Dou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Boxing Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Buyi Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China,*Correspondence: Buyi Zhang, ; Chongran Sun,
| | - Chongran Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China,Key Laboratory of Precise Treatment and Clinical Translational Research of Neurological Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China,Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China,*Correspondence: Buyi Zhang, ; Chongran Sun,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tu Q, Zhu Y, Yuan Y, Guo L, Liu L, Yao L, Zou Y, Li J, Chen F. Gypenosides Inhibit Inflammatory Response and Apoptosis of Endothelial and Epithelial Cells in LPS-Induced ALI: A Study Based on Bioinformatic Analysis and in vivo/vitro Experiments. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2021; 15:289-303. [PMID: 33531796 PMCID: PMC7846875 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s286297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Severe inflammatory response leads to poor prognosis of acute lung injury (ALI), the role of gypenosides (GPs) on ALI is not fully clear. The study aimed at investigating the effects of GPs on ALI. Methods We firstly established LPS-induced ALI mice model. Then, we tested whether GPs contributed to alleviate inflammatory response and lung injury of ALI in vivo. In order to identify specific mechanisms of the phenomenon, we conducted a bioinformatic analysis of LPS-induced ALI mice based on GEO database to identify hub differentially expressed genes (DEGs). PPI network of the DEGs was used to find hub-genes. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were conducted based on the DAVID database to identify which pathways the genes enriched. Then, we tested whether GPs inhibited lung injury and inflammatory response via the enriched pathways. We also tested whether GPs inhibited the apoptosis of endothelial and epithelial cells secondary to severe inflammation. Results We found GPs significantly alleviated lung injury and improved the survival rate of LPS-induced ALI mice in vivo. Bioinformatic analysis identified 20 hub-genes from DEGs, they were mainly enriched in NF-κB and TNF-α pathways. GPs could reduce the lung injury and inflammatory response via inhibiting NF-κB and TNF-α pathways in vivo. Our results indicated that GPs also inhibited inflammatory response of epithelial and endothelial cells via NF-κB and TNF-α pathways in vitro. Severe inflammatory response could also lead to apoptosis of endothelial and epithelial cells. Our results indicated that GPs effectively inhibited the apoptosis of endothelial and epithelial cells. Conclusion Our study suggested GPs contributed to alleviated lung injury in vivo and inhibited inflammation and apoptosis of endothelial and epithelial cells in vitro, providing novel strategies for the prevention and therapy for ALI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Tu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Yabing Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Long Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Liu
- School of Anesthesiology, Weifang Medical University, Weifang 261053, People's Republic of China
| | - Liangfang Yao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun Zou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinbao Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|