Comparative genomics reveals a novel genetic organization of the sad cluster in the sulfonamide-degrader 'Candidatus Leucobacter sulfamidivorax' strain GP

Isolation, identification and whole-genome analysis of an Achromobacter strain with a novel sulfamethazine resistance gene and sulfamethazine degradation gene cluster

A sulfamethazine (SM2) degrading strain, Achromobacter mucicolens JD417, was isolated from sulfonamide-contaminated sludge using gradient acclimation. Optimal SM2 degradation conditions were pH 7, 36 °C, and 5 % inoculum, achieving a theoretical maximum degradation rate of 48 % at 50 ppm SM2. Cell growth followed the Haldane equation across different SM2 concentrations. Whole-genome sequencing of the strain revealed novel functional annotations, including a sulfonamide resistance gene (sul4) encoding dihydropteroate synthase, two flavin-dependent monooxygenase genes (sadA and sadB) crucial for SM2 degradation, and unique genomic islands related to metabolism, pathogenicity, and resistance. Comparative genomics analysis showed good collinearity and homology with other Achromobacter species exhibiting organics resistance or degradation capabilities. This study reveals the novel molecular resistance and degradation mechanisms and genetic evolution of an SM2-degrading strain, providing insights into the bioremediation of sulfonamide-contaminated environments.

From micro to macro: The role of seawater in maintaining structural integrity and bioactivity of granules in treating antibiotic-laden mariculture wastewater

Granular sludge (GS) has superior antibiotic removal ability to flocs, due to GS's layered structure and rich extracellular polymeric substances. However, prolonged exposure to antibiotics degrades the performance and stability of GS. This study investigated how a seawater matrix might help maintain the structural integrity and bioactivity of granules. The results demonstrated that GS had better sulfadiazine (SDZ) removal efficiency in a seawater matrix (85.6 %) than in a freshwater matrix (57.6 %); the multiple ions in seawater enhanced boundary layer diffusion (kiR1 = 0.0805 mg·g-1·min-1/2 and kiR2 = 0.1112 mg·g-1·min-1/2) and improved adsorption performance by 15 % (0.123 mg/g-SS freshwater vs. 0.141 mg/g-SS seawater). Moreover, multiple hydrogen bonds (1-3) formed between each SDZ and lipid bilayer fortified the adsorption. Beyond S-N and S-C bond hydrolyses that took place in freshwater systems, there was an additional biodegradation pathway for GS to be cultivated in a saltwater system that involved sulfur dioxide extrusion. This additional pathway was attributable to the greater microbial diversity and larger presence of sulfadiazine-degrading bacteria containing SadAC genes, such as Leucobacter and Arthrobacter, in saltwater wastewater. The findings of this study elucidate how seawater influences GS properties and antibiotic removal ability.

Deciphering of sulfonamide biodegradation mechanism in wetland sediments: from microbial community and individual populations to pathway and functional genes

Figuring out the comprehensive metabolic mechanism of sulfonamide antibiotics (SA) is critical to improve and optimize SA removal in the bioremediation process, but relevant studies are still lacking. Here, an approach integrating metagenomic analysis, degraders' isolation, reverse transcriptional quantification and targeted metabolite determination was used to decipher microbial interactions and functional genes' characteristics in SA-degrading microbial consortia enriched from wetland sediments. The SA-degrading consortia could rapidly catalyze ipso-hydroxylation and subsequent reactions of SA to achieve the complete mineralization of sulfadiazine and partial mineralization of the other two typical SA (sulfamethoxazole and sulfamethazine). Paenarthrobacter, Achromobacter, Pseudomonas and Methylobacterium were identified as the primary participants for the initial transformation of SA. Among them, Methylobacterium could metabolize the heterocyclic intermediate of sulfadiazine (2-aminopyrimidine), and the owning of sadABC genes (SA degradation genes) made Paenarthrobacter have relatively higher SA-degrading activity. Besides, the coexistence of sadABC genes and sul1 gene (SA resistance gene) gave Paenarthrobacter a dual resistance mechanism to SA. The results of reverse transcription quantification further demonstrated that the activity of sadA gene was related to the biodegradation of SA. Additionally, sadABC genes were relatively conserved in a few Microbacteriaceae and Micrococcaceae SA-degraders, but the multiple recombination events caused by densely nested transposase encoding genes resulted in the differential sequence of sadAB genes in Paenarthrobacter genome. These new findings provide valuable information for the selection and construction of engineered microbiomes.

Microbiome assembly for sulfonamide subsistence and the transfer of genetic determinants

Antibiotic subsistence in bacteria represents an alternative resistance machinery, while paradoxically, it is also a cure for environmental resistance. Antibiotic-subsisting bacteria can detoxify antibiotic-polluted environments and prevent the development of antibiotic resistance in environments. However, progress toward efficient in situ engineering of antibiotic-subsisting bacteria is hindered by the lack of mechanistic and predictive understanding of the assembly of the functioning microbiome. By top-down manipulation of wastewater microbiomes using sulfadiazine as the single limiting source, we monitored the ecological selection process that forces the wastewater microbiome to perform efficient sulfadiazine subsistence. We found that the community-level assembly selects for the same three families rising to prominence across different initial pools of microbiomes. We further analyzed the assembly patterns using a linear model. Detailed inspections of the sulfonamide metabolic gene clusters in individual genomes of isolates and assembled metagenomes reveal limited transfer potential beyond the boundaries of the Micrococcaceae lineage. Our results open up new possibilities for engineering specialist bacteria for environmental applications.

Antibiotrophy: Key Function for Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Colonize Soils-Case of Sulfamethazine-Degrading Microbacterium sp. C448

Chronic and repeated exposure of environmental bacterial communities to anthropogenic antibiotics have recently driven some antibiotic-resistant bacteria to acquire catabolic functions, enabling them to use antibiotics as nutritive sources (antibiotrophy). Antibiotrophy might confer a selective advantage facilitating the implantation and dispersion of antibiotrophs in contaminated environments. A microcosm experiment was conducted to test this hypothesis in an agroecosystem context. The sulfonamide-degrading and resistant bacterium Microbacterium sp. C448 was inoculated in four different soil types with and without added sulfamethazine and/or swine manure. After 1 month of incubation, Microbacterium sp. (and its antibiotrophic gene sadA) was detected only in the sulfamethazine-treated soils, suggesting a low competitiveness of the strain without antibiotic selection pressure. In the absence of manure and despite the presence of Microbacterium sp. C448, only one of the four sulfamethazine-treated soils exhibited mineralization capacities, which were low (inferior to 5.5 ± 0.3%). By contrast, manure addition significantly enhanced sulfamethazine mineralization in all the soil types (at least double, comprised between 5.6 ± 0.7% and 19.5 ± 1.2%). These results, which confirm that the presence of functional genes does not necessarily ensure functionality, suggest that sulfamethazine does not necessarily confer a selective advantage on the degrading strain as a nutritional source. 16S rDNA sequencing analyses strongly suggest that sulfamethazine released trophic niches by biocidal action. Accordingly, manure-originating bacteria and/or Microbacterium sp. C448 could gain access to low-competition or competition-free ecological niches. However, simultaneous inputs of manure and of the strain could induce competition detrimental for Microbacterium sp. C448, forcing it to use sulfamethazine as a nutritional source. Altogether, these results suggest that the antibiotrophic strain studied can modulate its sulfamethazine-degrading function depending on microbial competition and resource accessibility, to become established in an agricultural soil. Most importantly, this work highlights an increased dispersal potential of antibiotrophs in antibiotic-polluted environments, as antibiotics can not only release existing trophic niches but also form new ones.

Living with sulfonamides: a diverse range of mechanisms observed in bacteria

Sulfonamides are the oldest class of synthetic antibiotics still in use in clinical and veterinary settings. The intensive utilization of sulfonamides has been leading to the widespread contamination of the environment with these xenobiotic compounds. Consequently, in addition to pathogens and commensals, also bacteria inhabiting a wide diversity of environmental compartments have been in contact with sulfonamides for almost 90 years. This review aims at giving an overview of the effect of sulfonamides on bacterial cells, including the strategies used by bacteria to cope with these bacteriostatic agents. These include mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, co-metabolic transformation, and partial or total mineralization of sulfonamides. Possible implications of these mechanisms on the ecosystems and dissemination of antibiotic resistance are also discussed. KEY POINTS: • Sulfonamides are widespread xenobiotic pollutants; • Target alteration is the main sulfonamide resistance mechanism observed in bacteria; • Sulfonamides can be modified, degraded, or used as nutrients by some bacteria.

Subsistence and complexity of antimicrobial resistance on a community-wide level

There are a multitude of resistance strategies that microbes can apply to avoid inhibition by antimicrobials. One of these strategies is the enzymatic modification of the antibiotic, in a process generally termed inactivation. Furthermore, some microorganisms may not be limited to the mere inactivation of the antimicrobial compounds. They can continue by further enzymatic degradation of the compounds' carbon backbone, taking nutritional and energetic advantage of the former antibiotic. This driving force to harness an additional food source in a complex environment adds another level of complexity to the reasonably well-understood process of antibiotic resistance proliferation on a single cell level: It brings bioprotection into play at the level of microbial community. Despite the possible implications of a resistant community in a host and a lurking antibiotic failure, knowledge of degradation pathways of antibiotics and their connections is scarce. Currently, it is limited to only a few families of antibiotics (e.g. β-lactams and sulfonamides). In this article, we discuss the fluctuating nature of the relationship between antibiotic resistance and the biodegradation of antibiotics. This distinction mainly depends on the genetic background of the microbe, as general resistance genes can be recruited to function in a biodegradation pathway.