Premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine decreases barbiturate requirement in pediatric patients sedated for magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study

Intranasal Administration of the Combination of Dextro-Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine for Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain in Rats

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has become a public health problem, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality, due to the chronic complications, such as diabetic neuropathy. Current recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain achieve a reduction of 30% in only 30% of cases. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new therapeutic approaches to improve the quality of life of diabetic patients.

Methods

This work evaluated the antinociceptive effect of intranasal administration of the combination of dextro-ketamine (keta), a non-competitive glutamatergic receptor antagonist, and dexmedetomidine (DEX), a selective alpha2-adrenergic agonist, in rats with neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin-DM.

Results

The thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia observed in DM model are reduced with the intranasal administration of the combination of keta and DEX (200 + 0.10 μg/kg) after 3 days of treatment. The antinociceptive action could be due to reduction of Ca2+ influx with lower glutamate release and reduced excitability through the activation of alpha2-adrenergic receptors by DEX and reduction of NMDA receptor activation by glutamate with lower excitability due to the antagonism produced by keta. DM induced increased expression of glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) detected by immunohistochemistry, indicating greater astrocyte activity and intense inflammatory response. Intranasal administration for 10 days of the combination of low doses of keta and DEX promoted an intense decrease in the expression of both GFAP and TNF-alpha, indicating lower activation of astrocytes in the spinal cord and reduced production and release of TNF-alpha, favoring the reduction of inflammation.

Conclusion

Intranasal administration of low doses of keta with DEX could be a new therapeutic approach to reduce neuropathic pain and consequently improve the quality of life of diabetic patients.

Two-center randomized controlled trial comparing oral chloral hydrate and intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine for procedural sedation in children: study protocol

BACKGROUND

Oral chloral hydrate is widely used in pediatric sedation. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been increasingly used for pediatric sedation; however, its improvement is warranted. The combination of dexmedetomidine with ketamine can improve onset and hemodynamic stability while maintaining sedative efficacy. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine compared to oral chloral hydrate.

METHODS

This is a prospective, parallel-arm, single-blinded, two-center, superiority randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation, designed to compare the effects of intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine with those of oral chloral hydrate. We shall enroll 136 patients aged < 7 years old in this study. Prior to the procedure, we shall randomize each patient into the control group (oral chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg) or study group (intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg and ketamine 3 mg/kg). The primary outcome will be the rate of achieving an adequate sedation level (6-point Pediatric Sedation State Scale 1, 2, or 3) within 15 min. In addition, we shall measure the sedation time, sedation failure rate, completion of procedure, adverse events, patient acceptance, and physician satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of the intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in comparison with oral chloral hydrate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04820205. Registered on 19th March 2021.

Factors affecting successful use of intranasal dexmedetomidine: a cohort study from a national paediatrics tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

Use of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine for procedural sedation has been reported in recent years. Good patient selection is important to ensure high success rates. We aimed to identify factors that influence the successful use of IN dexmedetomidine in non-invasive investigations.

METHODS

All paediatric patients who received IN dexmedetomidine for investigations between 01 July 2019 to 01 July 2020 were included. Baseline demographics, time to reach adequate sedation level, duration of sedation, dose, indications for sedation and need for rescue sedatives were recorded. Procedures were classified into "long" or "short" according to completion time. Successful sedation was defined by completion of investigations by IN dexmedetomidine alone.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients included, median age was 20.0 months, and median weight 11.0 kg. Magnetic resonance imaging (56, 53.3%) was the most common indication. Sixty (57.1%) were successfully sedated using IN dexmedetomidine alone. Automated auditory brainstem response, computerised tomography and mercaptoacetyltriglycine-3 renogram scans had the highest success rate (83.3%, 83.3%, and 100% respectively). On multivariate analysis, short procedures had an adjusted odds ratio of 5.30 (95% CI: 1.69-16.61; P=0.004) compared to long procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

IN dexmedetomidine is effective for procedural sedation for paediatric patients. The most important predictor for sedation success was indication of sedation and duration of procedures.