Abnormal cisatracurium pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics among patients with severe aortic regurgitation during anesthetic induction

Effect of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Muscle relaxants are used during surgery, but their impact on ECG may differ, potentially affecting cardiac safety. This study aimed to compare the effects of Atracurium versus Cisatracurium on QT interval changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

METHOD

This double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in 2023 in Hamadan, Iran. A total of 80 patients undergoing cataract surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either Atracurium (n = 40) or Cisatracurium (n = 40). QT interval changes were measured at four time points to assess and compare the corrected QT interval (QTc) between the two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29, and a p-value < 0.05 was deemed significant.

RESULTS

Cisatracurium demonstrated significant reductions in QTc from pre-anesthesia to post-anesthesia and through recovery, with values of -9.325 ms (P = 0.045), -9.925 ms (P = 0.038), and - 19.359 ms (P = 0.016), respectively. Atracurium also showed reductions but a notable increase in QTc after anesthesia to the end of surgery (32.322 ms, P = 0.0019). Throughout the procedure, Cisatracurium maintained shorter QTc intervals compared to Atracurium (e.g., T0: 420.07 ms vs. 434.75 ms, P = 0.03), but post-recovery, no significant differences were observed (Cisatracurium: 440.05 ms; Atracurium: 439.80 ms, P = 0.489).

CONCLUSIONS

Atracurium causes more QT prolongation than Cisatracurium. While both affect QTc intervals, Cisatracurium has a more stable impact on cardiac repolarization, making it safer for patients at risk of QT prolongation. Cisatracurium's minimal impact on cardiovascular function, especially in patients with low ejection fraction, makes it the preferred choice for maintaining cardiac stability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20120215009014N441.

Comparative Analysis of the Anesthesia Effect of Cisatracurium Besylate and Mivacurium Chloride Otolaryngology Surgery

Objective

The aim is to investigate and compare the anesthesia effect of cisatracurium besylate and mivacurium chloride otolaryngology surgery.

Materials and Methods

108 patients who underwent ENT surgery under general anesthesia in our hospital from November 2021 to March 2022 were recruited for retrospective analysis, in which patients in the experimental group A were anesthetized with cisatracurium besylate and patients in the experimental group B were anesthetized with mivacurium, and the anesthetic effects and recovery of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry levels between the two groups at the six time points of admission, anesthesia induction, intubation, end of operation, recovery of consciousness, and extubation (all P > 0.05). The train of four stimulation values at end of operation, recovery of consciousness, and extubation were significantly higher than those of the experimental group A (all P > 0.05). The recovery time of self-consciousness, extubation time, and eye-opening time of the experimental group B were significantly shorter than those of the experimental group A, and the occurrence of agitation was significantly less than that of the experimental group A (all P > 0.05). The total incidence of adverse conditions in the experimental group B was significantly lower than that in the experimental group A (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with cisatracurium besylate in otolaryngology surgery, mivacurium chloride anesthesia offers a promising route with respect to less impact on hemodynamics, faster postoperative recovery, absence of the accumulation of neuromuscular blockade, less adverse reactions, and higher safety.