Comparison of two different uses of underbody forced-air warming blankets for the prevention of hypothermia in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized study

Effects of different forced-air warming systems on the core temperature of patients: a manikin and multi-center clinical study

BACKGROUND

The use of forced-air warming (FAW) blankets is widely recognized for preventing shivering and hypothermia in patients under general anesthesia. Various types of products are currently available for hospitals, and we have conducted a preliminary evaluation of insulation equipment based on expert opinions and initial parameters. However, we lack real-world experiments and accurate clinical data to validate these parameters and the accuracy of our decision-making results. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of different FAW systems by assessing the thermal protection and operational characteristics of the equipment in both experimental and clinical settings, thereby enhancing our evaluation database.

METHODS

In the manikin test, we conducted six tests including heat distribution and heating rate, heater outlet temperature stability, etc. In the clinical study, patients were randomly assigned to four groups [Group A (Bair Hugger Therapy, 3 M, St. Paul, MN, USA; 63500); Group B (EQUATOR® level I, Smith Medical ASD, MN, USA; Snuggle Warm, SW-2013); Group C (Jiang Men Da Cheng Medical Devices Co., Ltd, China; IOB-006); and Group D (Shang Hai Nest Tech Medical Materials Co., Ltd, China; BH-017)], with each group comprising 30 individuals. At the start of anesthesia induction, the FAW blanket was activated and set to 43 °C until the completion of surgery. The primary endpoint was the average core body temperature during surgery. Secondary endpoints included hemodynamic and surgical variables, adverse events, and recovery metrics.

RESULTS

In the manikin test, the observed results of the experimental parameters (heat distribution, air pressure difference, and hole observation test) for Group A are superior to those of the other groups. In the clinical study, although the mean perioperative core body temperature remained above 36 °C across all groups [Group A: 36.31 ± 0.04; Group B: 36.26 ± 0.06; Group C: 36.17 ± 0.03; Group D: 36.25 ± 0.05], patients in Group A maintained higher temperatures compared to the other groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer with general anesthesia, all four FAW systems effectively prevented perioperative hypothermia. However, the system in Group A minimized heat loss more effectively than the others, providing superior thermal protection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200065394, 03/11/2022.

Effects of propofol versus sevoflurane on surgical field visibility during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

During arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), clear surgical field visibility (SFV) is the basis of successful surgery, but the choice of anesthesia maintenance drugs may have different effects on SFV. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of propofol- and sevoflurane-based general anesthesia on SFV in patients undergoing ARCR.

METHODS

Patients (n = 130) undergoing elective ARCR in the lateral decubitus position were randomized into either the propofol group or sevoflurane group (65 per group). The duration of surgery and increased pressure irrigation (IPI), Boezaart score, rocuronium consumption and usage of remifentanil were recorded. The time of both spontaneous respiration recovery and extubation and the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting and agitation were also recorded.

RESULTS

The Boezaart score, duration of IPI and ratio of the duration of IPI to the duration of surgery (IPI/S ratio) were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). Rocuronium consumption, number of patients requiring remifentanil infusion and total remifentanil consumption were significantly lower in the sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). The spontaneous respiration recovery time was significantly longer in the propofol group (P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the extubation time between the groups(P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with propofol, sevoflurane provides equally clear SFV while improving the convenience of anesthesia maintenance in ARCR patients with interscalene plexus (ISB) combined with general anesthesia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This single-center, prospective, RCT was retrospective registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2300072110 (02/06/2023).

Incidence of postoperative hypothermia and shivering and risk factors in patients undergoing malignant tumor surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative hypothermia and shivering are common and can cause adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative hypothermia and shivering and their risk factors in patients undergoing malignant tumor surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected data from patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I or II who underwent scheduled surgery from November 2020 to March 2021 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Each patient's core body temperature was measured at three time points: time point 1 (arrival at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU)), time point 2 (after 30-min care in the PACU), and time point 3 (at discharge from the PACU). At time point 1, if the patient's body temperature was below 36 ℃, we provided an active forced-air warmer. At time point 2, if it was still below 36 ℃, the forced-air warmer was still applied until the patient was discharged from the PACU. If it reached 36 ℃, the forced-air warmer would be switched off. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression combined with stepwise methods and linear regression were used to explore risk factors for postoperative hypothermia and shivering.

RESULTS

The numbers (percentage) of 202 patients who developed postoperative hypothermia at the different time points were 52 (25.7%), 37 (18.3%) and 28 (13.9%). Eight patients (4.0%) experienced shivering. Multivariate logistic regression showed that high weight (OR = 0.923, 95% CI: 0.884 to 0.964, P = 0.0003) and low estimated blood loss (OR = 0.252, 95% CI: 0.115 to 0.550, P = 0.0005) were protective factors against hypothermia, while long surgical duration (OR = 3.339, 95% CI: 1.675 to 6.655, P = 0.0006) was an independent risk factor for hypothermia at time point 1. There was no risk factor associated with the occurrence of shivering (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the hypothermia and normothermia groups in the median length of stay in the PACU (59.0 vs. 49.0 min, P = 0.0123).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative hypothermia occurred frequently. Weight, estimated blood loss and surgical duration were significantly associated with hypothermia on arrival at the PACU.