1
|
Marges OM, Nieboer JP, de Keijzer IN, Rettab R, van Amsterdam K, Scheeren TWL, Absalom ARA, Vereecke HEM, Struys MMRF, Vos JJ, van den Berg JP. Comparing the haemodynamic effects of high- and low-dose opioid anaesthesia: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput 2024; 38:1347-1355. [PMID: 39031233 PMCID: PMC11604680 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01195-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024]
Abstract
Post-induction hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) occurs frequently and is usually caused by the cardiovascular adverse effects of the anaesthetic induction drugs used. We hypothesize that a clinically significant difference in the incidence and severity of hypotension will be found when different doses of propofol and remifentanil are used for induction of anaesthesia. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial wherein four groups (A-D) of patients received one out of four different combinations of propofol and remifentanil, titrated to a predicted equipotency in probability of tolerance to laryngoscopy (PTOL) according to the Bouillon interaction model. In group A, a high dose of propofol and a low dose of remifentanil was administered, and across the groups this ratio was gradually changed until it was reversed in group D. Mean and systolic arterial blood pressure (MAP, SAP) were compared at four time points (Tbaseline, Tpost-bolus, T3min, Tnadir) within and between groups Heart rate, bispectral index (BIS) and the incidence of hypotension were compared. RESULTS Data from 76 patients was used. At Tpost-bolus a statistically significant lower MAP and SAP was found in group A versus D (p = 0.011 and p = 0.002). A significant higher heart rate was found at T3min and Tnadir between groups A and B when compared to groups C and D (p = < 0.001 and p = 0.002). A significant difference in BIS value was found over all groups at T3min and Tnadir (both p < 0.001). All other outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION Induction of anaesthesia with different predicted equipotent combinations of propofol and remifentanil did result in statistically different but clinically irrelevant differences in haemodynamic endpoints during induction of anaesthesia. Our study could not identify preferable drug combinations that decrease the risk for hypotension after induction, although they all yield a similar predicted PTOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O M Marges
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - J P Nieboer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - I N de Keijzer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - R Rettab
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - K van Amsterdam
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - T W L Scheeren
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - A R A Absalom
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - H E M Vereecke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV, Bruges, Belgium
| | - M M R F Struys
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-Operative Medicine, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - J J Vos
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - J P van den Berg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saugel B, Annecke T, Bein B, Flick M, Goepfert M, Gruenewald M, Habicher M, Jungwirth B, Koch T, Kouz K, Meidert AS, Pestel G, Renner J, Sakka SG, Sander M, Treskatsch S, Zitzmann A, Reuter DA. Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery: Guidelines of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine in collaboration with the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies. J Clin Monit Comput 2024; 38:945-959. [PMID: 38381359 PMCID: PMC11427556 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01132-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
Haemodynamic monitoring and management are cornerstones of perioperative care. The goal of haemodynamic management is to maintain organ function by ensuring adequate perfusion pressure, blood flow, and oxygen delivery. We here present guidelines on "Intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring and management of adults having non-cardiac surgery" that were prepared by 18 experts on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und lntensivmedizin; DGAI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Thorsten Annecke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Hospital of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - Berthold Bein
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Asklepios Hospital Hamburg St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Flick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Goepfert
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Alexianer St. Hedwigkliniken Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Gruenewald
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Evangelisches Amalie Sieveking Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marit Habicher
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bettina Jungwirth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tilo Koch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karim Kouz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Agnes S Meidert
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gunther Pestel
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Renner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Municipal Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Samir G Sakka
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Michael Sander
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Giessen, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Sascha Treskatsch
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amelie Zitzmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Daniel A Reuter
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Medical Centre of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Washio T, Krainski F, Fu Q, Levine BD. Blood pressure during ambulation: are noninvasive beat-by-beat finger measures and intermittent brachial measures comparable? Clin Auton Res 2023; 33:197-199. [PMID: 36800050 DOI: 10.1007/s10286-023-00930-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Takuro Washio
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave., Ste. 435, Dallas, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Felix Krainski
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave., Ste. 435, Dallas, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Qi Fu
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave., Ste. 435, Dallas, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin D Levine
- Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Ave., Ste. 435, Dallas, TX, USA. .,The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|