Comparing clinical outcomes of NOACs with warfarin on atrial fibrillation with Valvular heart diseases: a meta-analysis

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease Without Mechanical Valves

BACKGROUND

Despite proven efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), data on patients with AF and valvular heart disease remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate the DOACs compared with warfarin among patients with AF and valvular heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥18 years of age, who had AF and valvular heart disease, and were new users of DOACs or warfarin. The primary effectiveness outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding for safety. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression after propensity score matching to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. In the matched cohort, DOAC use (versus warfarin) was associated with a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.81]) and bleeding (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.80]). We found a lower rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62-0.89]) and apixaban (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.52-0.74]) but not dabigatran (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.63-1.26]). We found a lower rate of bleeding with rivaroxaban (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68]), dabigatran (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.97]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05-0.83]). We were unable to obtain estimates for the effectiveness outcome with edoxaban due to the small number of events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients with AF and valvular heart disease, DOAC treatment was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding compared with warfarin.

Residual risk of thromboembolic events despite anticoagulation in Middle Eastern patients with atrial fibrillation. The JoFib study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate residual risk of thromboembolic events despite anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation form the Middle East.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the JoFib registry, we described the characteristics of patients treated with anticoagulants (n = 1654) and calculated the incidence rate for thromboembolic events. We constructed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and calculated the population-attributable fraction to determine clinical factors predictive of residual thromboembolic events.

RESULTS

During the one-year follow-up, 57 thromboembolic events occurred (incidence rate 4.1 per 100 person-years). In multivariable time-to-event analysis, prior thromboembolic events (aHR 3.8, 95 %CI 2.2-6.4, p < 0.001) and diabetes (aHR 2.3, 95 %CI 1.3-4.1, p = 0.004) were independently predictive of residual thromboembolism. Percentage of thromboembolic risk attributable to prior thromboembolic events was 30.9 % (95 %CI 13.9-44.6, p = 0.001) and was 37.1 % (95 %CI 8.8-56.6, p = 0.015) for diabetes. Furthermore, the effect of diabetes on thromboembolic events depends on the type of anticoagulant, with diabetes being significantly predictive of thromboembolic events in patients anticoagulated with warfarin (aHR 4.11, 95 %CI 1.81-9.37, p = 0.001), but not non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (aHR 1.23, 95 %CI 0.51-2.97, p = 0.643) with a p = 0.045 for interaction. Prior thromboembolism was independently predictive of thromboembolic events in both anticoagulants (aHR 2.67, 95 %CI 1.28-5.58, p = 0.009; aHR 7.33, 95 %CI 3.05-17.65, p < 0.001; respectively; p = 0.084 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

Middle Eastern patients with atrial fibrillation remain at significant risk of thromboembolism and its recurrence despite anticoagulation, and especially in diabetic patients. Therefore, management should focus on controlling diabetes as well as other modifiable risk factors in addition to antithrombotic therapy.

Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and EHRA Type 2 Valvular Heart Disease: The Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib) Study

Aim

The risks of thromboembolism and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were assessed according to the "Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial" (EHRA) classification. Additionally, the safety and efficacy of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were compared in AF patients with EHRA type 2 valvular heart disease (VHD) versus those with no VHD.

Methods

AF patients enrolled in the "Jordan Atrial Fibrillation (JoFib)" study were followed up for thromboembolic events and major bleeding at 30, 180, and 365 days. Patients in the EHRA type 2 VHD and non-VHD groups were sub-grouped to compare different OACs.

Results

2020 AF patients were recruited. The thromboembolic risk was higher in EHRA type 2 VHD patients compared to non-VHD controls. Major bleeding also occurred at higher rates in EHRA type 2 patients. In addition, NOACs were more effective in preventing thromboembolic events than VKAs and non-anticoagulation in EHRA type 2 VHD patients. Furthermore, EHRA type 2 VHD patients taking rivaroxaban had significantly less thromboembolic risk than their non-anticoagulated counterparts. At the same time, apixaban and warfarin did not significantly lower the risk of thromboembolism compared to non-anticoagulation.

Conclusion

AF patients with EHRA type 2 VHD are at significant risk of thromboembolism and major bleeding. Furthermore, NOACs were more effective than VKAs in preventing thromboembolic events in this group of patients without conferring an added risk of major bleeding. Moreover, rivaroxaban appears to be particularly efficacious.

Rise in Percutaneous Vascular Procedures and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Is Associated With Increase in Emergent Vascular Operations

Background: The workload of vascular surgeons is widely affected by the procedural activity of other departments within the same medical center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trend in emergent vascular surgery procedures over a 5 year period in a tertiary referral hospital and categorize these procedures based on the nature of the operative procedure required. Methods: A single center, retrospective review of all emergent surgical operations performed at our tertiary referral hospital between the years 2017-2021. Data collected included types of emergent vascular surgery performed, in addition to procedures performed by the departments of interventional cardiology (IC), interventional radiology (IR), neurointerventional radiology (NIR) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at our institution. Results: During the study period were performed a total of 1783 operative procedures (mean 356 ± 26/year). Of those, 485 (27%) were emergent cases. We observed a gradual increase in emergent operative procedures performed from 2017 to 2021 (22% to 34% of all cases, increase of 56%, P<.01). A striking increase was seen with vascular repairs performed for iatrogenic vascular injuries secondary to arterial access complications (47% to 65% of all iatrogenic vascular injuries, increase of 38%). The increase correlated with an increase in activity seen in the departments of IC, IR/NIR and ECMO (15%, 31% and 300%, respectively). Conclusions: An increasing number of emergent surgical procedures performed by our vascular surgery department correlates with the increasing number of endovascular procedures performed by non- vascular services. As these procedures are expected to increase, together with the number of stroke units and ECMO units being created, medical centers must be aware that these may result in a significant increase in the workload of the vascular surgery department in order to deal with complications associated with these procedures.

Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Warfarin is the standard of care, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a group of newer drugs to prevent stroke in patients with valvular heart disease. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs and warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). The current meta-analysis was conducted using the standards developed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendation. The databases from the Cochrane library, PubMed, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) were used to search for relevant articles without placing restrictions on the year of publication. Outcomes assessed in the current meta-analysis included a number of patients with stroke or systemic embolism, patients having myocardial infarction during the study period, patients with major bleeding events, and patients who died due to any reason. Overall, five studies were included in the current meta-analysis. Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with VHD (relative risk (RR): 0.75, 95% confidence interval (C)I: 0.60 to 0.94). The risk of major bleeding events is 31% lower in patients receiving DOAC compared to patients receiving warfarin (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.83). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction. The current meta-analysis shows that DOACs were associated with a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism as compared to warfarin in patients with VHD. Besides this, the risk of major bleeding events was also lower in patients receiving DOACs compared to patients receiving warfarin. No significant differences were reported in terms of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality between the two groups.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Residual Adverse Events Despite Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation: Results From Phase II/III of the GLORIA-AF Registry

Background Residual risk of ischemic stroke despite anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a significant clinical issue that remains unaddressed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for residual adverse events in AF. Methods and Results Using data from phase II/III of the prospective GLORIA-AF (Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Anti-thrombotic Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) registry, we studied anticoagulated patients with newly diagnosed AF and an increased risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1). The primary outcome of interest was ischemic stroke. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction. A total of 22 410 patients were included; median age 65 (interquartile range 71-78) and 10 044 (44.8%) were female. During a median follow-up period of 3.0 (interquartile range 2.2-3.1) years, the incidence of ischemic stroke was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.67) per 100-PYs, all-cause death 3.22 (95% CI, 3.08-3.37) per 100-PYs, cardiovascular death 1.08 (95% CI, 1.00-1.16) per 100-PYs and myocardial infarction 0.59 (95% CI, 0.53-0.66) per 100-PYs. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, independent predictors of residual ischemic stroke were age (HR 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]), diabetes (HR 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.87]), prior thromboembolism (HR 2.27 [95% CI, 1.73-2.98]) and use of antiarrhythmic drugs (HR 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47-0.92]). The incidence of ischemic stroke was comparable among patients treated with nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist; however, there were differences in the independent predictors between both groups. Conclusions Patients with AF remain at significant residual risk of developing complications including ischemic stroke despite anticoagulation therapy. Further efforts among these patients should be directed at the management of modifiable risk factors that contribute to this risk. Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01468701, NCT01671007 and NCT01937377.

Residual Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation

AF contributes to increased stroke risk via various mechanisms, including deranged blood constituents, vessel wall abnormalities and abnormal blood flow. This excess risk is frequently managed with anticoagulation therapy, aimed at preventing thromboembolic complications. Yet, a significant proportion of patients with AF remain at high residual stroke risk despite receiving appropriate dose-adjusted anticoagulation. This article explores the residual stroke risk in AF and potential therapeutic options for these patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Valvular Atrial Fibrillation : A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in place of warfarin, but evidence about their effectiveness and safety in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin in patients with valvular AF.

DESIGN

New-user retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

SETTING

U.S.-based commercial health care database from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with valvular AF who were newly prescribed DOACs or warfarin.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of intracranial or gastrointestinal bleeding.

RESULTS

Among a total of 56 336 patients with valvular AF matched on propensity score, use of DOACs (vs. warfarin) was associated with lower risk for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.70]) and major bleeding events (HR, 0.67 [CI, 0.63 to 0.72]). The results for the effectiveness and safety outcomes remained consistent for apixaban (HRs, 0.54 [CI, 0.47 to 0.61] and 0.52 [CI, 0.47 to 0.57], respectively) and rivaroxaban (HRs, 0.74 [CI, 0.64 to 0.86] and 0.87 [CI, 0.79 to 0.96], respectively); with dabigatran, results were consistent for the major bleeding outcome (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.68 to 0.97]) but not for effectiveness (HR, 1.03 [CI, 0.81 to 1.31]).

LIMITATION

Relatively short follow-up; inability to ascertain disease severity.

CONCLUSION

In this comparative effectiveness study using practice-based claims data, patients with valvular AF who were new users of DOACs had lower risks for ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding than new users of warfarin. These data may be used to guide risk-benefit discussions regarding anticoagulant choices for patients with valvular AF.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Safety and Efficacy of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulant Use Early After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) initiated early after cardiac surgery.

DATA SOURCES:

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE (database inception to January 20, 2021), www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/, NOAC trial registries, and bibliographies of relevant guidelines and other reviews were used.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that initiated NOACs within the index hospitalization and that reported bleeding for the primary outcome were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 6 cohort studies, 1 RCT, and 3 ongoing RCTs were included. Most studies were single-centered, limited to postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, and with 30-day follow-up; few studies included patients with isolated bioprosthetic valve replacement or valve repair. Bleeding risk varied (0%-28.6%), and all but one study showed no significantly higher risk with NOAC compared with warfarin.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Overall, NOACs were used in 26% to 37.5% of patients early after cardiac surgery. Starting a NOAC on postoperative day 4 appeared to have similar bleeding rates compared with warfarin, but clinical application is limited by heterogeneity of outcome definitions, confounding, and bias. Compared with warfarin, NOACs may have similar thromboembolism risk, reduced length of stay, and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence to guide NOAC use early after cardiac surgery. Three ongoing randomized trials will add to the literature and provide guidance for clinicians on whether, in whom, when, and how to use NOACs safely early after cardiac surgery.

A European Academy of Neurology guideline on medical management issues in dementia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dementia is one of the most common disorders and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and decreased quality of life. The present guideline addresses important medical management issues including systematic medical follow-up, vascular risk factors in dementia, pain in dementia, use of antipsychotics in dementia and epilepsy in dementia.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework, we developed a guideline. Where recommendations based on GRADE were not possible, a good practice statement was formulated.

RESULTS

Systematic management of vascular risk factors should be performed in patients with mild to moderate dementia as prevention of cerebrovascular pathology may impact on the progression of dementia (Good Practice statement). Individuals with dementia (without previous stroke) and atrial fibrillation should be treated with anticoagulants (weak recommendation). Discontinuation of opioids should be considered in certain individuals with dementia (e.g. for whom there are no signs or symptoms of pain or no clear indication, or suspicion of side effects; Good Practice statement). Behavioral symptoms in persons with dementia should not be treated with mild analgesics (weak recommendation). In all patients with dementia treated with opioids, assessment of the individual risk-benefit ratio should be performed at regular intervals. Regular, preplanned medical follow-up should be offered to all patients with dementia. The setting will depend on the organization of local health services and should, as a minimum, include general practitioners with easy access to dementia specialists (Good Practice statement). Individuals with dementia and agitation and/or aggression should be treated with atypical antipsychotics only after all non-pharmacological measures have been proven to be without benefit or in the case of severe self-harm or harm to others (weak recommendation). Antipsychotics should be discontinued after cessation of behavioral disturbances and in patients in whom there are side effects (Good Practice statement). For treatment of epilepsy in individuals with dementia, newer anticonvulsants should be considered as first-line therapy (Good Practice statement).

CONCLUSION

This GRADE-based guideline offers recommendations on several important medical issues in patients with dementia, and thus adds important guidance for clinicians. For some issues, very little or no evidence was identified, highlighting the importance of further studies within these areas.

Management of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Challenges and therapeutic considerations

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is very common among patients with severe aortic stenosis. Moreover, new onset AF (NOAF) is a frequent finding after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). There is a significant impact of AF on outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR including mortality, thrombo-embolic and bleeding events. There is lack of clear evidence about the optimal management of AF in TAVR patients. This review aims to summarize the epidemiology, predictors, prognosis, therapeutic considerations and challenges in the management of AF in patients undergoing TAVR.

Efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonist on post-TAVI patients: a meta-analysis

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been a favored option for the patient who suffered from symptomatic aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety outcomes in novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) for post-TAVI patients are still controversial. This meta-analysis aims at comparing the clinical outcome and safety of NOACs and VKA in the patients after receiving TAVI.

Method

We searched literature articles in all reachable databases, and observational study as well as randomized controlled trial would be included in order to perform a comprehensive analysis. All-cause mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, disabling or nondisabling stroke were main pooled outcome measures. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were adopted to explore heterogeneity. Assessment of bias was performed under the suggestion of Cochrane’s Collaboration Tool.

Results

We collected 3841 non-duplicate citations from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov, and eventually 7 studies were included for this meta-analysis. As a result, VKA showed priority against NOACs in the field of anti-thromboembolism (4435 participants, RR:1.44, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.99, I² = 0%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

With corroborative analysis of severe complications, VKA is shown to be more protective on post-TAVI patients in disabling or nondisabling stroke scenario but not in mortality or bleeding event.