Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of Aliskiren Monotherapy (AM): an umbrella review of systematic reviews

Blood Pressure Management Strategies and Podocyte Health

Hypertension (HTN) is one of the key global cardiovascular risk factors, which is tightly linked to kidney health and disease development. Podocytes, glomerular epithelial cells that play a pivotal role in maintenance of the renal filtration barrier, are significantly affected by increased glomerular capillary pressure in HTN. Damage or loss of these cells causes proteinuria, which marks the initiation of the HTN-driven renal damage. It goes without saying that effective blood pressure (BP) management should not only mitigate cardiovascular risks but also preserve renal function by protecting podocyte integrity. This review offers a comprehensive examination of current BP management strategies and their implications for podocyte structure and function and emphasizes strategies for the reduction of proteinuria in HTN. We explore primary and secondary antihypertensive agents, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics, as well as newer therapies (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 blocking and endothelin receptor antagonism), emphasizing their mechanistic roles in safeguarding podocytes and curtailing proteinuria.

Effects of Aliskiren Monotherapy versus Amlodipine Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients with Obesity or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors have been reported to exert protective effects against organ damage and failure; however, the impact of the direct renin inhibitor as monotherapy has not been assessed. Here, we investigated the effects of 24-week monotherapy with aliskiren compared to amlodipine in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity.

METHODS

In this randomized intervention study, 62 adult hypertensive patients with visceral obesity (defined as a body mass index [BMI] greater than 25 kg/m2 and a visceral adipose tissue area [VFA] greater than 100 cm2) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (age 57 ± 13, 65% men, BMI 28.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2, VFA 134.8 ± 47.0 cm2, blood pressure 141 ± 16/86 ± 13 mm Hg) were randomized to receive 24-week treatment with aliskiren (max. 300 mg) or amlodipine (max. 10 mg). The primary outcome was the change in VFA at 24 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS

Change in VFA did not differ significantly from baseline in either group. Systolic blood pressure significantly decreased at 12 weeks (-10 mm Hg, p = 0.001) and 24 weeks (-10 mm Hg, p = 0.001) in the amlodipine group and at 24 weeks (-11 mm Hg, p = 0.001) in the aliskiren group. Diastolic blood pressure significantly decreased at 24 weeks (-6 mm Hg, p = 0.009) only in the amlodipine group. Although the estimated glomerular filtration rates did not significantly change in either group, the logarithm of urinary albumin excretion significantly decreased at 24 weeks only in the aliskiren group (-0.60, p < 0.001). The 24-week changes in the urinary albumin excretion significantly correlated with the changes in the plasma renin activity in the aliskiren group (r = 0.51, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Aliskiren monotherapy did not show any superiority to amlodipine monotherapy on VFA, estimated glomerular filtration rates, or urinary albumin excretion in obese or type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway modulators in chronic kidney disease: A comparative review

Chronic kidney disease presents a health challenge that has a complex underlying pathophysiology, both acquired and inherited. The pharmacotherapeutic treatment options available today lower the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life but cannot completely cure it. This poses a challenge to the healthcare provider to choose, from the available options, the best way to manage the disease as per the presentation of the patient. As of now, the recommended first line of treatment to control the blood pressure in chronic kidney disease is the administration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators. These are represented mainly by the direct renin inhibitor, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. These modulators are varied in their structure and mechanisms of action, hence showing varying treatment outcomes. The choice of administration of these modulators is determined by the presentation and the co-morbidities of the patient, the availability and affordability of the treatment option, and the expertise of the healthcare provider. A direct head-to-head comparison between these significant renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modulators is lacking, which can benefit healthcare providers and researchers. In this review, a comparison has been drawn between the direct renin inhibitor (aliskiren), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. This can be of significance for healthcare providers and researchers to find the particular loci of interest, either in structure or mechanism, and to intervene as per the case presentation to obtain the best possible treatment option.

Interaction of the renin inhibitor aliskiren with the SARS-CoV-2 main protease: a molecular docking study

The renin protein is an upstream enzymatic regulator of the renin-aldosterone-angiotensin system (RAAS) essential for the maintenance of blood pressure. The angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) is a major component of the RAAS and a cell surface receptor exploited by the SARS-CoV-2 virus to enter host cells. A recent molecular modeling study has revealed that the direct renin peptide inhibitor remikiren can bind to the catalytic site of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M^pro). By analogy, we postulated that the non-peptidic drug aliskiren, a more potent renin inhibitor than remikiren and a drug routinely used to treat hypertension, may also be able to interact with M^pro. An in silico comparison of the binding of the two compounds to M^pro indicates that aliskiren (ΔE = -75.9 kcal/mol) can form stable complexes with the main viral protease, binding to the active site, as remikiren (ΔE = -83.2 kcal/mol). The comparison with a panoply of 30 references compounds (mainly antiviral drugs) indicated that remikiren is a potent M^pro binder comparable to drugs like glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (ΔE = -96.5 kcal/mol). The energy of interaction (ΔE) of aliskiren with M^pro is about 10% lower than with remikiren, comparable to that calculated with drugs like velpatasvir and sofosbuvir. A model is proposed to define the drug binding site, with the best binders (including remikiren) penetrating deeply into the site, whereas the less potent binders (including aliskiren) interact more superficially with the protein.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Advances in pathogenesis and treatment of essential hypertension

Hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and the leading cause of premature death worldwide. However, the pathogenesis of the hypertension, especially essential hypertension, is complex and requires in-depth studies. Recently, new findings about essential hypertension have emerged, and these may provide important theoretical bases and therapeutic tools to break through the existing bottleneck of essential hypertension. In this review, we demonstrated important advances in the different pathogenesis areas of essential hypertension, and highlighted new treatments proposed in these areas, hoping to provide insight for the prevention and treatment of the essential hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of aliskiren combination therapy: a protocol for an umbrella review

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of aliskiren combination therapy with other antihypertensive has been evaluated in the treatment of patients with hypertension in recent systematic reviews. However, most previous reviews only focused on one single health outcome or one setting, none of them made a full summary that assessed the impact of aliskiren combination treatment comprehensively. As such, this umbrella review based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses is aimed to synthesise the evidences on efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren-based therapy for hypertension and related comorbid patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI published from inception to August 2020 will be conducted. The selected articles are systematic reviews which evaluated efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren combination therapy. Two reviewers will screen eligible articles, extract data and evaluate quality independently. Any disputes will be resolved by discussion or the arbitration of a third person. The quality of reporting evidence will be assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews V.2 tool tool. We will take a mixed-methods approach to synthesising the review literatures, reporting summary of findings tables and iteratively mapping the results.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for the study, as we would only collect data from available published materials. This umbrella review will be also submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication after completion.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020192131.