1
|
Zolotareva AA. Medically Unexplained Symptoms among Adults from Russia: An Assessment using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15. PSYCHOLOGY IN RUSSIA: STATE OF ART 2023; 16:33-47. [PMID: 37818345 PMCID: PMC10561782 DOI: 10.11621/pir.2023.0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) is one of the most frequently used instruments to measure medically unexplained symptoms in the general population, as well as in groups of patients with mental and physical health problems. Objective This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the PHQ-15 in assessing a Russian community sample. Design A total of 1153 Russian adults age 18 or older participated in this cross-sectional study. They completed the Russian versions of the PHQ-15 and Symptom Check List-90-Revised, SCL-90-R (SCL-90-R). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the Russian PHQ-15, and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses were used to test measurement invariance across sex and age. Cronbach's alpha coefficients and Pearsons Correlation Coefficients were used to evaluate the internal reliability and convergent validity of the Russian PHQ-15. Results Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution highlighting pain-fatigue, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary symptoms. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a bifactor structure for the Russian PHQ-15 merging general and specific somatic symptoms. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed partial invariance across sex and age. The Russian PHQ-15 demonstrated acceptable Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 for specific factors and a good Cronbach's alpha for the total score (a = 0.85), proving the questionnaire's internal reliability. Finally, positive correlations between the PHQ-15 and SCL-90-R dimensions, and positive intercorrelations between PHQ-15 specific factors, suggested convergent validity. Conclusion The Russian PHQ-15 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing medically unexplained symptoms in the general population. This instrument can be used in diagnostic and counseling settings.
Collapse
|
2
|
Toonders SAJ, van Westrienen PE, de Wit NJ, van Dongen JM, Gerrits M, Pisters MF, Veenhof C. The cost-effectiveness of an indicated blended care intervention in primary care compared to usual care in patients with moderate persistent somatic symptoms. J Psychosom Res 2023; 171:111387. [PMID: 37270910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Appropriate treatment for people with an increased risk for developing chronic Persistent Somatic Symptoms (PSS) is of great importance at an early stage to improve quality of life and prevent high costs for society. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an integrated blended care intervention compared to usual care for QALYs, subjective symptom impact and physical and mental health status in patients with moderate PSS. METHODS This economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 12-month prospective, multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in Dutch primary care. 80 participants received the intervention and 80 participants received usual care. Seemingly unrelated regression analyzes were performed to estimate cost and effect differences. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Bootstrapping techniques were used to estimate uncertainty. RESULTS We found no significant difference in total societal costs. Intervention, primary and secondary healthcare and absenteeism costs were higher for the intervention group. The ICER for QALYs demonstrated the intervention was on average less costly and less effective compared to usual care. For the subjective symptom impact and physical health, the ICER indicated that the intervention group was on average less costly and more effective. For mental health, the intervention was on average more costly and less effective. CONCLUSION We didn't find an integrated blended primary care intervention to be cost-effective compared to usual care. However, when looking on relevant, but specific outcome measures (subjective symptom impact and physical health) for this population, average costs are found to be lower and the effectiveness found to be higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A J Toonders
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - P E van Westrienen
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N J de Wit
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Gerrits
- Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M F Pisters
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C Veenhof
- Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hennemann S, Böhme K, Kleinstäuber M, Ruckes C, Baumeister H, Daniel Ebert D, Küchler AM, Witthöft M. Is Therapist Support Needed? Comparing Therapist- and Self-Guided Internet-Based CBT for Somatic Symptom Distress (iSOMA) in Emerging Adults. Behav Ther 2022; 53:1205-1218. [PMID: 36229117 DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Persistent somatic symptoms of varying etiology are very common in emerging adults and can lead to distress and impairment. Internet-delivered interventions could help to prevent the burden and chronicity of persistent somatic symptoms. This study investigated the impact of therapist guidance on the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral Internet intervention for somatic symptom distress (iSOMA) in emerging adults, as a secondary analysis of a two-armed randomized controlled trial. We included 149 university students (83.2% female, 24.60 yrs) with varying degrees of somatic symptom distress who were either allocated to the 8-week intervention with regular, written therapeutic guidance (iSOMA guided) or to the control group (waitlist), which was afterwards crossed over to receive iSOMA with guidance-on-demand (iSOMA-GoD). Primary outcomes were somatic symptom distress (assessed by the PHQ-15) and psychobehavioral symptoms of the somatic symptom disorder (assessed by the SSD-12) at pre- and post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included depression, anxiety, and disability. Both treatments showed statistically significant pre-post improvements in primary (iSOMA-guided: d = 0.86-0.92, iSOMA-GoD: d = 0.55-0.63) and secondary outcomes. However, intention-to-treat analysis revealed non-significant between-group effects for all outcomes (ps ≥ .335), after controlling for confounding variables, and effect sizes were marginal (d = -0.06 to 0.12). Overall, our findings indicate that Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy with regular guidance is not unequivocally superior to guidance-on-demand in alleviating somatic symptom distress and associated psychopathology in emerging adults. As a next step, non-inferiority studies are needed to test the robustness of these findings and their impact on clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria Kleinstäuber
- Utah State University, Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Most patients with Lyme disease will fully recover with recommended antibiotic therapy. However, some patients report persisting nonspecific symptoms after treatment, referred to as posttreatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDs) or syndrome (PTLDS), depending on the degree to which the individual's symptoms impact their quality of life. PTLDs occur in a portion of patients diagnosed with chronic Lyme disease (CLD), a controversial term describing different patient populations, diagnosed based on unvalidated tests and criteria. Practitioners should review the evidence for the Lyme disease diagnosis and not overlook unrelated conditions. Current evidence shows that prolonged antibiotic therapy provides little benefit and carries significant risk. Further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying persistent symptoms after Lyme disease and to understand CLD is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Marques
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, BG 10 RM 12C118 MSC 1888 10 Center, Bethesda, MD 20892-1888, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The careful assessment tool for managing patients with medically unexplained symptoms – The experience of Slovenian family medicine trainees: A qualitative study. Zdr Varst 2021; 61:48-54. [PMID: 35111266 PMCID: PMC8776293 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Primary care physicians use various tools and methods to identify medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). The main purpose of our study is to determine the views of Slovenian family medicine trainees (FMT) about using the “Careful Assessment” tool for managing patients with MUS. Methods A qualitative study using open survey questions focused on the experience of family medicine trainees in managing patients with MUS. The sample consisted of surveys from 184 family medicine trainees. These trainees analysed a total of 702 patients with MUS. Manual coding was used for quantitative content analysis. Results In the coding process, 49 codes were developed that included broader research fields about using the “Careful Assessment” tool for managing patients with MUS. The codes were grouped into four theoretically grounded, logical categories in accordance with the elaborated theoretical concept: multi-purpose utility; improved patient management; in-depth knowledge and new skills; and patient response. Conclusion The study demonstrated that, in the view of Slovenian FMT, the “Careful Assessment” tool has multi-purpose utility. The study showed that FMT felt that this tool helps them in systematic patient management. Their opinion is that it helps them establish a trusting relationship with patients, which is a precondition for providing further treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Toonders SAJ, van Westrienen PE, Konings S, Nieboer ME, Veenhof C, Pisters MF. Patients' Perspectives on the Usability of a Blended Approach to an Integrated Intervention for Patients With Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e19794. [PMID: 34581674 PMCID: PMC8512187 DOI: 10.2196/19794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Medically unexplained physical symptoms are physical symptoms, such as pain, fatigue, and dizziness, that persist for more than a few weeks and cannot be explained after adequate medical examination. Treatment for preventing the chronicity of symptoms is recommended. A promising approach is identifying patients who are at risk and subsequently offering a blended care intervention that focuses on promoting self-management while using eHealth as a supportive tool. When these interventions match with a patient’s expectations, their effectiveness grows. Objective This study aimed to obtain more insights into usability from the patient perspective to improve future interventions. Methods A mixed methods design (ie, the use of qualitative and quantitative data) was used. Through semistructured interviews, in-depth insights were gained into patients’ perspectives on usability. The analysis process was continuous and iterative. Data were synthesized and categorized into different themes. The System Usability Scale, which measures the usability of a system, was used to compare participants that found usability to be low, medium, or high. This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee Utrecht (approval number: 17-391/C). Results Saturation was reached after interviewing 13 participants. The following four themes emerged from the interviews: motivations and expectations prior to participating in the program, the applicability of e-coaching, the role of health care professionals, and the integrated design of the blended approach. Conclusions The successful implementation of integrated blended care interventions based on patients’ perspectives requires matching treatments to patients’ individual situations and motivations. Furthermore, personalizing the relative frequency of face-to-face appointments and e-coaching can improve usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suze Adriana Johanna Toonders
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paula Elisabeth van Westrienen
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sophie Konings
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Sciences Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marianne E Nieboer
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Cindy Veenhof
- Physical Therapy Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Sciences Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Martijn F Pisters
- Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Physical Therapy Sciences Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daly M, Zarate-Lopez N. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: History taking skills in practice. Clin Med (Lond) 2021; 21:e480-e486. [PMID: 38594850 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This article offers a framework in history taking for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Clinicians rely on history taking and knowledge of the latest 'Rome IV criteria' rather than biomarkers to make a positive diagnosis of FGIDs. Improving one's history-taking skills is imperative, as early diagnosis can improve patient outcomes by avoiding over investigation and/or chronicity. Our suggested structure for history taking adopts the bio-psycho-social model of disease. We describe the assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms with open and closed questions, the importance of ruling out 'alarm' signs or symptoms, the use of a multi-system approach to identify coexisting functional disorders and eliciting patients' nutritional history. We explore the increased psychological comorbidity present in FGIDs and the significance of the social history in identify predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors, which will ultimately guide treatment recommendations. We believe history taking should be used to build rapport with patients while, at the same time, validating their problems and reducing stigma. Reattribution of symptoms is then achieved through education of the gut-brain axis and can be used to provide reassurance to patients at the first encounter. Success of treatment depends on engagement and acceptance of such explanations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Daly
- University College Hospital, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on a blended care program in primary care; A qualitative study. Internet Interv 2021; 26:100440. [PMID: 34401397 PMCID: PMC8358151 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasingly, healthcare policies have changed focus from cure and care to behaviour and health. Prevention is becoming more important, which requires a change in the role of healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals' role is changing from being a therapist to taking on the role of a coach. To prevent chronicity in Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms (MUPS), an integrated blended care program was developed. To apply this new program in daily practice, it is important to gain insight into the usability. From the healthcare professionals' point of view the concept of usability consists of performance, satisfaction and acceptability. In this qualitative study participants were recruited after participating in the PARASOL program. Demographics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Ten healthcare professionals (six physical therapists and four mental health nurses) were interviewed. Four themes on usability were identified: (1) Who fits in the program, (2) preparation, (3) experience with the program and (4) interprofessional collaboration. This study gathered healthcare professionals' experiences with and attitudes towards integrating healthcare and offering blended care programs. An integrated blended care program offers the possibility to personalize treatment. Findings show attention should be given to the new responsibilities of healthcare professionals, and their role in integrated and blended care. This new approach of delivering healthcare can facilitate interprofessional collaboration. Achieving sustainable change in patients however still requires instruction and support for healthcare professionals implementing behavioural change techniques.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zargar F, Rahafrouz L, Tarrahi MJ. Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Psychological Symptoms, Quality of Life, and Symptom Severity in Patients with Somatic Symptom Disorder. Adv Biomed Res 2021; 10:9. [PMID: 33959566 PMCID: PMC8095256 DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_111_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with somatic symptom disorder (SSD) had a poor quality of life and suffered from depression, anxiety, and stress. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a psychological treatment with remarkable effects on several psychological disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the MBSR program on psychological symptoms, quality of life, and symptom severity in patients with SSD. Materials and Methods: The patients with SSD were randomly divided into two groups of receiving venlafaxine alone and venlafaxine with an 8-week MBSR program. Depression, anxiety, and stress with their severities were assessed along with the quality of life, the number of physical symptoms and their severities, as well as SSD severity before and after the intervention. Subsequently, the results were compared between the two groups. Results: This study included 37 patients with SSD who referred to Shariati Psychosomatic Clinic, Isfahan, Iran, with a mean age of 37.08 ± 8.26 years. It should be noted that 37.8% of the participants were male. The intervention group obtained significantly lower scores in depression, anxiety, stress, and their severities, compared to the control group. Moreover, the number of physical symptoms, their severity, and the severity of SSD were significantly decreased more in the intervention group rather than the controls. Conclusion: The MBSR accompanied by prescribing venlafaxine can significantly reduce the severity of SSD, as well as the number and severity of physical symptoms. Moreover, it can reduce depression, anxiety, stress, and their severity. The MBSR can be used as complementary medicine for the treatment of patients with SSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Zargar
- Department of Health Psychology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Leila Rahafrouz
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Javad Tarrahi
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Tilburg ML, van Westrienen PE, Pisters MF. Demographic and health-related factors associated with reduced work functioning in people with moderate medically unexplained physical symptoms: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1316. [PMID: 32867731 PMCID: PMC7457349 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09415-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are a leading cause of reduced work functioning. It is not known which factors are associated with reduced work functioning in people with moderate MUPS. Insight in these factors can contribute to prevention of reduced work functioning, associated work-related costs and in MUPS becoming chronic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify which demographic and health-related factors are associated with reduced work functioning, operationalized as impaired work performance and absenteeism, in people with moderate MUPS. METHODS Data of 104 participants from an ongoing study on people with moderate MUPS were used in this cross-sectional study. Ten independent variables were measured at baseline to determine their association with reduced work functioning: severity of psychosocial symptoms (four domains, measured with the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire), physical health (RAND 36-Item Health Survey), moderate or vigorous physical activity (Activ8 activity monitor), age, sex, education level and duration of complaints. Two separate multivariable linear regression analyses were performed with backward stepwise selection, for both impaired work performance and absenteeism. RESULTS Absenteeism rate rose with 2.5 and 0.6% for every increased point on the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire for domain 'depression' (B = 0.025, SE = 0.009, p = .006) and domain 'somatization' (B = 0.006, SE = 0.003, p = .086), respectively. An R2 value of 0.118 was found. Impaired work performance rate rose with 0.2 and 0.5% for every increased point on the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire for domain 'distress' (B = 0.002, SE = 0.001, p = .084) and domain 'somatization' (B = 0.005, SE = 0.001, p < .001), respectively. An R2 value of 0.252 was found. CONCLUSIONS Severity of distress, probability of a depressive disorder and probability of somatization are positively associated with higher rates of reduced work functioning in people with moderate MUPS. To prevent long-term absenteeism and highly impaired work performance severity of psychosocial symptoms seem to play a significant role. However, because of the low percentage of explained variance, additional research is necessary to gain insight in other factors that might explain the variance in reduced work functioning even better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L van Tilburg
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Expertise Center Healthy Urban Living, Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 7, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Paula Elisabeth van Westrienen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn F Pisters
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beems MEC, Toonders SAJ, van Westrienen PE, Veenhof C, Pisters MF. Identifying subgroups based on self-management skills in primary care patients with moderate medically unexplained physical symptoms. J Psychosom Res 2019; 125:109785. [PMID: 31421323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms (MUPS) are a major burden on both patients and society and frequently develop into chronic MUPS. Self-management interventions may prevent moderate MUPS from becoming chronic. Tailoring interventions to the patient population is strongly recommended. This can be facilitated by identifying subgroups based on self-management skills. This study aimed to identify these subgroups and their clinical profiles in primary care patients with moderate MUPS. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed on baseline measurements from a randomized clinical trial (PARASOL-study). To identify subgroups based on self-management skills, a hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted for adults with moderate MUPS from primary health care centers. Self-management skills were measured with the Health education impact Questionnaire. Cluster variables were seven constructs of this questionnaire. Additionally, specific patient profiles were determined by comparing the identified clusters on the clinical variables pain, fatigue and physical functioning. RESULTS Four subgroups were identified: High-Self-Management Skills (SMS) (n = 29), Medium-SMS (n = 55), Low-SMS (n = 49) and Active & Low Distress-SMS (n = 20). The latter showed a distinctly different pattern on cluster variables, while the other subgroups differed significantly on means of the cluster variables (p < .001). On clinical variables, significant differences between subgroups were mainly found on fatigue and physical functioning. CONCLUSION This study found four specific subgroups based on self-management skills in moderate MUPS-patients. One subgroup demonstrated a distinctly different pattern on self-management skills. In other subgroups, more similar patterns on self-management skills were found that negatively correlated with pain and fatigue and positively correlated with physical functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E C Beems
- Physical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Fysio Center Den Haag, The Hague, the Netherlands.
| | - S A J Toonders
- Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - P E van Westrienen
- Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - C Veenhof
- Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Expertise Center Innovation of Care, Research Group Innovation of Mobility Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - M F Pisters
- Physical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Leidsche Rijn Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Innovation and Technology, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|