1
|
Fasting A, Hetlevik I, Mjølstad BP. Put on the sidelines of palliative care: a qualitative study of important barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and guideline implementation in Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:254-265. [PMID: 38289262 PMCID: PMC11003325 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2306241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demographic changes, the evolvement of modern medicine and new treatments for severe diseases, increase the need for palliative care services. Palliative care includes all patients with life-limiting conditions, irrespective of diagnosis. In Norway, palliative care rests on a decentralised model where patient care can be delivered close to the patient's home, and the Norwegian guideline for palliative care describes a model of care resting on extensive collaboration. Previous research suggests that this guideline is not well implemented among general practitioners (GPs). In this study, we aim to investigate barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and implementation of the guideline. METHODS We interviewed 25 GPs in four focus groups guided by a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed qualitatively with reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS We identified four main themes as barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and to implementation of the guideline: (1) different established local cultures and practices of palliative care, (2) discontinuity of the GP-patient relationship, (3) unclear clinical handover and information gaps and (4) a mismatch between the guideline and everyday general practice. CONCLUSION Significant structural and individual barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care exist, which hamper the implementation of the guideline. GPs should be involved as stakeholders when guidelines involving them are created. Introduction of new professionals in primary care needs to be actively managed to avoid inappropriate collaborative practices. Continuity of the GP-patient relationship must be maintained throughout severe illness and at end-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Fasting
- General Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Unit for Palliative Care and Chemotherapy Treatment, Oncology Department, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Kristiansund Hospital, Norway
| | - Irene Hetlevik
- General Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bente Prytz Mjølstad
- General Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Saksvik legekontor, Saxe Viks veg 4, N-7562 Hundhammeren, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozdemir H, Sagris D, Abdul-Rahim AH, Lip GYH, Shantsila E. Management of ischaemic stroke survivors in primary care setting: the road to holistic care. Intern Emerg Med 2024; 19:609-618. [PMID: 37875703 PMCID: PMC11039521 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-023-03445-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
The management of ischaemic stroke survivors is multidisciplinary, necessitating the collaboration of numerous medical professionals and rehabilitation specialists. However, due to the lack of comprehensive and holistic follow-up, their post-discharge management may be suboptimal. Achieving this holistic, patient-centred follow-up requires coordination and interaction of subspecialties, which general practitioners can provide as the first point of contact in healthcare systems. This approach can improve the management of stroke survivors by preventing recurrent stroke through an integrated post-stroke care, including appropriate Antithrombotic therapy, assisting them to have a Better functional and physiological status, early recognition and intervention of Comorbidities, and lifestyles. For such work to succeed, close interdisciplinary collaboration between primary care physicians and other medical specialists is required in a holistic or integrated way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hizir Ozdemir
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dimitrios Sagris
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Azmil Husin Abdul-Rahim
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gregory Yoke Hong Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Eduard Shantsila
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kernan WN, Viera AJ, Billinger SA, Bravata DM, Stark SL, Kasner SE, Kuritzky L, Towfighi A. Primary Care of Adult Patients After Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021; 52:e558-e571. [PMID: 34261351 DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Primary care teams provide the majority of poststroke care. When optimally configured, these teams provide patient-centered care to prevent recurrent stroke, maximize function, prevent late complications, and optimize quality of life. Patient-centered primary care after stroke begins with establishing the foundation for poststroke management while engaging caregivers and family members in support of the patient. Screening for complications (eg, depression, cognitive impairment, and fall risk) and unmet needs is both a short-term and long-term component of poststroke care. Patients with ongoing functional impairments may benefit from referral to appropriate services. Ongoing care consists of managing risk factors such as high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, carotid stenosis, and dyslipidemia. Recommendations to reduce risk of recurrent stroke also include lifestyle modifications such as healthy diet and exercise. At the system level, primary care practices can use quality improvement strategies and available resources to enhance the delivery of evidence-based care and optimize outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pedersen RA, Petursson H, Hetlevik I, Thune H. Stroke follow-up in primary care: a discourse study on the discharge summary as a tool for knowledge transfer and collaboration. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:41. [PMID: 33413305 PMCID: PMC7792345 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-06021-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The acute treatment for stroke takes place in hospitals and in Norway follow-up of stroke survivors residing in the communities largely takes place in general practice. In order to provide continuous post stroke care, these two levels of care must collaborate, and information and knowledge must be transferred between them. The discharge summary, a written report from the hospital, is central to this communication. Norwegian national guidelines for treatment of stroke, issued in 2010, therefore give recommendations on the content of the discharge summaries. One ambition is to achieve collaboration and knowledge transfer, contributing to integration of the health care services. However, studies suggest that adherence to guidelines in general practice is weak, that collaboration within the health care services does not work the way the authorities intend, and that health care services are fragmented. This study aims to assess to what degree the discharge summaries adhere to the guideline recommendations on content and to what degree they are used as tools for knowledge transfer and collaboration between secondary and primary care. Methods The study was an analysis of 54 discharge summaries for home-dwelling stroke patients. The patients had been discharged from two Norwegian local hospitals in 2011 and 2012 and followed up in primary care. We examined whether content was according to guidelines’ recommendations and performed a descriptive and interpretative discourse analysis, using tools adapted from an established integrated approach to discourse analysis. Results We found a varying degree of adherence to the different advice for the contents of the discharge summaries. One tendency was clear: topics relevant here and now, i.e. at the hospital, were included, while topics most relevant for the later follow-up in primary care were to a larger degree omitted. In most discharge summaries, we did not find anything indicating that the doctors at the hospital made themselves available for collaboration with primary care after dischargeof the patient. Conclusions The discharge summaries did not fulfill their potential to serve as tools for collaboration, knowledge transfer, and guideline implementation. Instead, they may contribute to sustain the gap between hospital medicine and general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rune Aakvik Pedersen
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Halfdan Petursson
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Irene Hetlevik
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, General Practice Research Unit, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Henriette Thune
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laborde C, Barben J, Mihai AM, Nuss V, Vovelle J, d’Athis P, Jouanny P, Putot A, Manckoundia P. Impact of Age, Multimorbidity and Frailty on the Prescription of Preventive Antiplatelet Therapy in Older Population. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17124541. [PMID: 32599756 PMCID: PMC7344555 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAI) have widely proven their efficiency for the prevention of ischemic cardiovascular events. We aimed to describe PAI prescription in an elderly multimorbid population and to determine the factors that influence their prescription, including the impact of age, comorbidities and frailty, evaluated through a comprehensive geriatric assessment. This cross-sectional study included all patients admitted to the acute geriatric department of a university hospital from November 2016 to January 2017. We included 304 consecutive hospitalized patients aged 88.7 ± 5.5 years. One third of the population was treated with PAI. A total of 133 (43.8%) patients had a history of cardiovascular disease, 77 of whom were on PAI. For 16 patients, no indication was identified. The prescription or the absence of PAI were consistent with medical history in 61.8% of patients. In the multivariate analysis, among the 187 patients with an indication for PAI, neither age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.91-1.08], per year of age), nor comorbidities (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: [0.75-1.26], per point of Charlson comorbidity index), nor cognitive disorders (OR = 0.98; 95% CI [0.91-1.06] per point of Mini Mental State Examination), nor malnutrition (OR = 1.07; 95% CI [0.96-1.18], per g/L of albumin) were significantly associated with the therapeutic decision. PAI were less prescribed in primary prevention situations, in patients taking anticoagulants and in patients with a history of bleeding. In conclusion, a third of our older comorbid population of inpatients was taking PAI. PAI prescription was consistent with medical history for 61.8% of patients. Age, multimorbidity and frailty do not appear to have a significant influence on therapeutic decision-making. Further research is needed to confirm such a persistence of cardiovascular preventive strategies in frail older patients from other settings and to assess whether these strategies are associated with a clinical benefit in this specific population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Laborde
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Jérémy Barben
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Anca-Maria Mihai
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Valentine Nuss
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Jérémie Vovelle
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Philippe d’Athis
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, François Mitterrand Hospital, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Pierre Jouanny
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
| | - Alain Putot
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Patrick Manckoundia
- Department of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France; (C.L.); (J.B.); (A.-M.M.); (V.N.); (J.V.); (P.J.); (P.M.)
- UMR Inserm/U1093 Cognition, Action, Sensorimotor Plasticity, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|