1
|
Tagiling N, Ibrahim IL, Lee YY, Udin MY, Mohamad Kamarulzaman MD, Phoa PKA, Damulira E, Mohd Rohani MF, Wan Zainon WMN, Mat Nawi N. Randomized, crossover trial: comparing the effects of standardized egg-white meal and Vital ® on global gastric emptying parameters and intragastric meal distribution in healthy Asian participants. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024. [PMID: 38705971 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Measurements of gastric emptying and accommodation for alternative test-meal protocol during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), such as high-calorie nutrient drinks, are not fully established. We aimed to compare the effects of standardized egg-white meal (EWM) versus high-calorie nutrient drink (Vital®; Abbott Laboratories) on global GES parameters and intragastric meal distribution at immediate scan (IMD0h). METHODS Of 84 screened participants, 60 asymptomatic healthy Asian population (38 females; 24.0 ± 1.5 years; 23.8 ± 2.6 kg/m2) were recruited in this 2 × 2 (AB/BA) crossover trial. Participants were randomized to a 4-h GES with 99mTc-radiolabeled EWM (~255.8 kcal), followed by a 200 mL Vital® (300 kcal), or vice versa, separated by a 2-week washout period. Global meal retention (GMR), power-exponential model emptying parameters (half-emptying [T1/2], lag phases [Tlag2%, Tlag5%, Tlag10%]), and IMD0h were determined and compared. RESULTS GMRs for both test meals were within the international standard references for solid GES. Compared to EWM, Vital® exhibited significantly lower GMRs (faster emptying) from 0.5 to 3 h (all P < 0.001) but comparable at 4 h (P = 0.153). Similar observations were found for the model-based T1/2 and the different Tlag thresholds (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, IMD0h was found to be lower with Vital®, indicating lower gastric accommodation (faster antral filling) immediately post-ingestion (P < 0.001). Both test meals showed significant moderate-to-strong positive associations at the late-phase GE (GMR 2-4 h, T1/2) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Overall, Vital® is an acceptable alternative test meal to the EWM for GES; however, exercise caution when interpreting early-phase GE. The normative values for global GES parameters and IMD0h are also established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nashrulhaq Tagiling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Gastrointestinal Function and Motility (GIFM) Unit, Clinical Examination Lab, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Izleen Laili Ibrahim
- Medical Physics Program, School of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia Main Campus, 11800 Bertam, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- Gastrointestinal Function and Motility (GIFM) Unit, Clinical Examination Lab, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Muhamad Yusri Udin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohamad Dzulhilmi Mohamad Kamarulzaman
- Aseptic Dispensary and Radiopharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Picholas Kian Ann Phoa
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Edrine Damulira
- Département de physique, Complexe des sciences, Université de Montréal, 1375, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mohd Fazrin Mohd Rohani
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 50300 Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Wan Mohd Nazlee Wan Zainon
- Department of Family Medicine, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Norazlina Mat Nawi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Health Campus, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah H, Sundar R, Prado DEA, Dong JW, Chow DZ, Kuo B, Voss SD, Jacene HA, Robertson MS, Ng TSC. Standard Adult Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy Criteria Is Applicable for Partial Meal Ingestion. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:541-553. [PMID: 35995883 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07667-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Gastric emptying scintigraphy is commonly performed to assess for dysmotility. A standardized meal with associated threshold criteria was established in 2000 to enable robust interpretation. However, no guidance is available to interpret results when patients do not ingest the entire meal. The purpose of this study is to determine the continued appropriateness of the threshold criteria in contemporary clinical practice and its relevance for partially ingested meals. METHODS This retrospective study analyzed patients (n = 1365 total) who underwent solid-phase gastric emptying scintigraphy at an academic medical center. Patients were stratified based on their completion of the standard meal. Patients were further stratified into normal and delayed gastric emptying cohorts based on the current criteria. Percent gastric retention values at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h were compared. RESULTS Median (95% upper reference) normal gastric retention values for the complete standard meal were 64% (87%) at 1 h, 25% (60%) at 2 h, 13% (54%) at 3 h and 4% (9%) at 4 h. Consumption of at least 50% of the standard meal yielded similar retention; 53% (86%) at 1 h, 19% (58%) at 2 h, 6% (29%) at 3 h and 3% (10%) at 4 h. There was no significant age- or gender-specific differences using the current criteria, and no differences were observed based on diabetic status. Retention values matched well with the current criteria and validated with data-driven clustering. CONCLUSION Adult normative standards for gastric emptying scintigraphy are appropriate for differentiating normal and delayed populations and can be applied to partial meals with at least 50% completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hina Shah
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 405 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Reethy Sundar
- Brandeis University, 415 South St, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - David E Arboleda Prado
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jian W Dong
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - David Z Chow
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Braden Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stephan D Voss
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Heather A Jacene
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 405 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Matthew S Robertson
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Thomas S C Ng
- Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 405 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|