Effect of Empagliflozin and Pioglitazone on left ventricular function in patients with type two diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease without established cardiovascular disease: a randomized single-blind clinical trial

Efficacy of Hypoglycemic Agents in Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a universal hepatic disease, and many recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have explored whether hypoglycemic agents may be beneficial for its treatment. This study aimed to assess the relative effectiveness of each hypoglycemic agent for MASLD.

METHODS

China National Knowledge Infrastructure（CNKI）, WanFang, Weipu, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for RCTs on the efficacy of hypoglycemic agents in MASLD published up to December 31, 2024. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistical methods.

RESULTS

A total of 26 hypoglycemic agents for treating MASLD in 37 studies with 2406 participants were included. Empagliflozin was most effective in improving liver stiffness measurement (LSM), whereas liraglutide showed significant benefits in body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. Both sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors (e.g., empagliflozin) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide) improved liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyltransferase [GGT]), glucose metabolism (fasting plasma glucose [FPG], and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR]), and lipid profiles. Pioglitazone had limited benefits in these outcomes. Secondary outcomes such as inflammatory markers and fibrosis showed minimal changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Several hypoglycemic agents can improve laboratory and imaging indicators in adult patients with MASLD. Liraglutide is more effective than other agents, whereas empagliflozin emerged as the most effective for reducing LSM. However, different agents have different effects on the indicators; therefore, the relevant agents must be selected according to the specific patient condition.

Update in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease management: role of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by excessive lipid accumulation in hepatocytes without significant alcohol consumption. It is closely associated with sedentarism, hypercaloric diets, obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and genetic predisposition. NAFLD comprises a spectrum of liver disorders, from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic (NASH) and liver cirrhosis. The complex etiological mechanisms include oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and fibrosis; therefore, its management is challenging. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a class of antidiabetic drugs, have emerged as promising therapeutic agents due to their ability to improve key metabolic parameters, including obesity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia. This review explores the cellular mechanisms by which SGLT2i, either as monotherapy or combined with other treatments, modulate signaling pathways involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Additionally, we examine their effects on oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, and apoptosis, which are critical drivers of NAFLD progression. This review is intended to summarize the multiple benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors and to educate healthcare providers on the therapeutic potential of these drugs in order to foster their incorporation into effective NAFLD management plans.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitors in treating Asian patients in MASLD associated with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with MASLD and Type 2 Diabetes(T2DM).

METHODS

Electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wan-Fang Digital Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched from inception to December 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility, performed continuous data extraction， and independently evaluated bias risks. Liver ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and biochemical indices were utilized to determine the impact of treatment in both groups. Improvement in liver biomarkers and fibrosis as primary outcome indicators; Improvement in body composition, metabolic parameters, glucose parameters, and incidence of adverse effects as a secondary outcome indicator. For continuous variables, mean and standard deviation (SD) were extracted. RevMan 5.4 software was used to systematically analyze the literature, including heterogeneity testing, odds ratios (OR) calculation, and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for each influencing factor.

RESULTS

Nine randomly controlled trials with 755 Asian participants were included. Our research showed that SGLT2i was more effective than pioglitazone in improving fibrosis-4 score (SMD 0.41 [95%CI 0.18,0.64] p = 0.005), visceral fat area (SMD 0.34 [95%CI 0.14,0.54] p = 0.0007), BMI (SMD 0.29 [95%CI 0.03,0.56] p = 0.03), and low-density lipoprotein levels (SMD 0.21 [95%CI 0.04,0.38] p = 0.01). In contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that in patients with MASLD and T2DM, SGLT2i was more effective overall in improving liver fibrosis, blood lipids, liver fat, and body composition in the short term. These findings establish a theoretical basis for safe and rational drug use in clinical practice. Additionally, they may contribute to new insights into the pathogenesis of MASLD and type 2 diabetes and drug discovery and development efforts.

Comparison of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Protein-2 Inhibitors on Treating Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease or Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 receptor agonists) and sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (previously known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD] and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH]), we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

The study searched Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to November 26, 2023. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included in the analysis. GLP-1 receptor agonists were found to be more effective than placebo in resolving NASH (relative risk: 2.48, 95% CI:1.86 to 3.30). Both drugs were superior to placebo in reducing liver fat content, as well as decreasing levels of liver enzyme. Network meta-analysis indicated that SGLT-2 inhibitors were more effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels. According to the surface under the cumulative probability ranking curve values, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors consistently ranked among the top 2 in terms of reducing anthropometric data compared to other included drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors have significant effects on reducing liver fat content and liver enzymes in NAFLD or NASH patients compared to placebo. GLP-1 receptor agonists were found to be superior to placebo in resolving NASH. SGLT-2 inhibitors were more effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists in reducing alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels.

The cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the protective effects of sodium-glucose linked transporter 2 inhibitors against metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a common, highly heterogeneous condition that affects about a quarter of the world's population, with no approved drug therapy. Current evidence from preclinical research and a number of small clinical trials indicates that SGLT2 inhibitors could also be effective for MAFLD. MAFLD is associated with a higher risk of chronic liver disease and multiple extrahepatic events, especially cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). MAFLD is considered a more appropriate terminology than NAFLD because it captures the complex bidirectional interplay between fatty liver and metabolic dysfunctions associated with disease progression, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SGLT2 inhibitors are antidiabetic drugs that block glucose reabsorption in the kidney proximal tubule. In this article, we reviewed current clinical evidence supporting the potential use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a drug therapy for MAFLD and discussed the possible cellular and molecular mechanisms involved. We also reviewed the clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors against MAFLD-related comorbidities, especially CVD, CKD and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (CKM). The broad beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors support their use, likely in combination with other drugs, as a therapy for MAFLD.

Effect of combination pioglitazone with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and real-world study from an international federated database

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and cardiovascular outcomes of combination pioglitazone with either a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of a large international real-world database.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science to identify relevant articles for inclusion (PROSPERO [CRD: 42023483126]). Nineteen studies assessing pioglitazone + SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs versus controls were identified, 16 of which were randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools and quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. We additionally performed a retrospective cohort study of all individuals aged 18 years or over with T2D, using the TriNetX platform. We included propensity-score-matched individuals who were treated for at least 1 year with pioglitazone and a GLP-1RA or pioglitazone and an SGLT2 inhibitor, compared against GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor monotherapy. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure, chronic kidney disease and composite stroke and transient ischaemic attack.

RESULTS

The average follow-up in the included studies ranged from 24 to 52 weeks. Combination of pioglitazone with a GLP-1RA reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight greater than in controls: mean differences -1% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.27, -0.74) and -1.19 kg (95% CI -1.80, -0.58), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or mortality between groups: mean difference - 1.56 mmHg (95% CI -4.48, 1.35; p = 0.30) and relative risk (RR) 0.29 (95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08), respectively. Combination of pioglitazone with SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HbA1c, weight and SBP to a greater extent than control treatment: mean differences -0.48% (95% CI -0.67, -0.28), -2.3 kg (95% CI -2.72, -1.88) and -2.4 mmHg (95% CI -4.1, -0.7; p = 0.01), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.81, 95% CI 0.30-10.97; p = 0.52). The included trials demonstrated a reduction in risk of heart failure with combination treatment. Similarly, from the real-world database (n = 25 230 identified), pioglitazone and SGLT2 inhibitor combination therapy was associated with reduced risk of heart failure compared to monotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both our systematic review/meta-analysis and the real-world dataset show that combination of pioglitazone with either GLP-1RAs or SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with increased weight loss and reduced risk of heart failure compared with monotherapy.

Hypoglycemic Drugs in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Narrative Review

Over the last few years, given the increase in the incidence and prevalence of both type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF), it became crucial to develop guidelines for the optimal preventive and treatment strategies for individuals facing these coexisting conditions. In patients aged over 65, HF hospitalization stands out as the predominant reason for hospital admissions, with their prognosis being associated with the presence or absence of T2DM. Historically, certain classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone), raised concerns due to an observed increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular (CV)-related mortality. In response to these concerns, regulatory agencies started requiring CV outcome trials for all novel antidiabetic agents [i.e., dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitors), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)] with the aim to assess the CV safety of these drugs beyond glycemic control. This narrative review aims to address the current knowledge about the impact of glucose-lowering agents used in T2DM on HF prevention, prognosis, and outcome.