1
|
Rodrigues IB, Ioannidis G, Kane LL, Hillier LM, Adachi J, Heckman G, Hirdes J, Holroyd-Leduc J, Jaglal S, Kaasalainen S, Marr S, McArthur C, Straus S, Tarride JE, Abbas M, Costa AP, Lau AN, Thabane L, Papaioannou A. Assessing the feasibility of an integrated collection of education modules for fall and fracture prevention (iCARE) for healthcare providers in long term care: A longitudinal study. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003096. [PMID: 39585819 PMCID: PMC11588276 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/27/2024]
Abstract
Falls and hip fractures are a major health concern among older adults in long term care (LTC) with almost 50% of residents experiencing a fall annually. Hip fractures are one of the most important and frequent fall-related injuries in LTC. There is moderate to strong certainty evidence that multifactorial interventions may reduce the risk of falls and fractures; however, there is little evidence to support its implementation. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility (recruitment rate and adaptations) with a subobjective to understand facilitators to and barriers of implementing the PREVENT (Person-centred Routine Fracture PreEVENTion) model in practice. The model includes a multifactorial intervention on diet, exercise, environmental adaptations, hip protectors, medications (including calcium and vitamin D), and medication reviews to treat residents at high risk of fracture. Our secondary outcomes were to determine if there was a change in knowledge uptake of the guidelines among healthcare providers and in the proportion of fracture prevention prescriptions post-intervention. We conducted a mixed-methods longitudinal cohort study in three LTC homes across southern Ontario. A local champion was selected to help guide the implementation of the model and promote best practices. We reported recruitment rates using descriptive statistics and challenges to implementation using content analysis. We reported changes in knowledge uptake and in the proportion of fracture prevention medications using the McNemar's test. We recruited three LTC homes and identified one local champion for each home. We required two months to identify and train the local champion over three, 1.5-hour train-the-trainer sessions, and the local champion required three months to deliver the intervention to a team of healthcare professionals. We identified several facilitators, barriers, and adaptations to PREVENT. Benefits of the model include easy access to the Fracture Risk Scale (FRS), clear and succinct educational material catered to each healthcare professional, and an accredited Continuing Medical Educational module for physicians and nurses. Challenges included misperceptions between the differences in fall and fracture prevention strategies, fear of perceived side effects associated with fracture prevention medications, and time barriers with completing the audit report. Our study found an increase knowledge uptake of the guidelines and an increase in the proportion of fracture prevention prescriptions post-intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel B. Rodrigues
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Community Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - George Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren L. Kane
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loretta M. Hillier
- Department of Community Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jonathan Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Heckman
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Hirdes
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Susan Jaglal
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sharon Marr
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin McArthur
- School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Sharon Straus
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Momina Abbas
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew P. Costa
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arthur N. Lau
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wimalawansa SJ, Weiss ST, Hollis BW. Integrating Endocrine, Genomic, and Extra-Skeletal Benefits of Vitamin D into National and Regional Clinical Guidelines. Nutrients 2024; 16:3969. [PMID: 39599755 PMCID: PMC11597479 DOI: 10.3390/nu16223969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Vitamin D is essential for bone health, immune function, and overall well-being. Numerous ecological, observational, and prospective studies, including randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), report an inverse association between higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D; calcifediol] levels in various conditions, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders such as diabetes and obesity, susceptibility to infection-related complications, autoimmune diseases, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Vitamin D operates through two distinct systems. The endocrine system comprises the renal tubular cell-derived circulatory calcitriol, which primarily regulates calcium homeostasis and muscular functions. In contrast, intracellularly generated calcitriol in peripheral target cells is responsible for intracrine/paracrine system signaling and calcitriol-vitamin D receptor-mediated genomic effects. Government-appointed committees and health organizations have developed various clinical practice guidelines for vitamin D supplementation and management. However, these guidelines heavily relied on the 2011 Institute of Medicine (IoM) report, which focused solely on the skeletal effects of vitamin D, ignoring other body systems. Thus, they do not represent maintaining good overall health and aspects of disease prevention. Additionally, the IoM report was intended as a public health recommendation for the government and is not a clinical guideline. DISCUSSION New country- and regional-specific guidelines must focus on healthy nations through disease prevention and reducing healthcare costs. They should not be restricted to bone effect and must encompass all extra-skeletal benefits. Nevertheless, due to misunderstandings, medical societies and other governments have used faulty IoM report as a foundation for creating vitamin D guidelines. Consequently, they placed disproportionate emphasis on bone health while largely overlooking its benefits for other bodily systems, making current guidelines, including 2024, the Endocrine Society less applicable to the public. As a result, the utility of published guidelines has been significantly reduced for clinical practice and RCTs that designed on bone-centric are generate misleading information and remain suboptimal for public health and disease prevention. CONCLUSIONS This review and its recommendations address the gaps in current vitamin D clinical practice guidelines and propose a framework for developing more effective, country and region-specific recommendations that capture the extra-skeletal benefits of vitamin D to prevent multiple diseases and enhance public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Scott T. Weiss
- Harvard Medical School, Channing Division of Network Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Bruce W. Hollis
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laird C, Williams KA, Benson H. Osteoporosis management in Australian aged care facilities: a mixed method study. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:37. [PMID: 38744716 PMCID: PMC11093840 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01401-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common but sub-optimally managed disease amongst aged care residents. Pharmacists undertaking comprehensive medication reviews is one strategy to improve osteoporosis management. Analysis of pharmacist medication review recommendations has identified common clinical practice issues that can be addressed to optimise osteoporosis management for aged care residents. PURPOSE This study investigates the prevalence of osteoporosis medicine use amongst Australian aged care residents and explores drug-related problems (DRPs) identified during medication reviews and pharmacist recommendations to resolve them. METHODS Resident demographics, medications, diagnoses, osteoporosis related DRPs, and recommendations to resolve them were extracted from medication review reports. A mixed methods approach was taken to analysis, involving descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. RESULTS Medication review reports relating to 980 residents were collected. Antiresorptive therapies were used by 21.7% of residents, of which 87.2% were prescribed denosumab. Osteoporosis related DRPs represented 14.0% of all DRPs identified by pharmacists. Vitamin D was involved in 55.4% of these DRPs, the remainder concerned antiresorptive therapies (23.4%), medications contributing to osteoporosis (16.3%), and calcium (4.9%). Frequent deviations in practice from aged care clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium were found. DRPs and accompanying recommendations relating to denosumab revealed inadequate monitoring and inadvertent therapy disruptions. CONCLUSION Pharmacist identified DRPs and recommendations revealed common aspects of clinical practice that can be addressed to improve osteoporosis management for aged care residents. A need to raise awareness of aged care-specific consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium is evident. Facility protocols and procedures must be developed and implemented to ensure safe and effective use of denosumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Laird
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Kylie A Williams
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Helen Benson
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Windle A, Marshall A, de la Perrelle L, Champion S, Ross PD, Harvey G, Davy C. Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review. JBI Evid Implement 2023; 22:02205615-990000000-00072. [PMID: 38153118 PMCID: PMC11163893 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review is to identify factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care. INTRODUCTION Aged care is a dynamic sector experiencing rapid change. Implementation of innovations in aged care has received relatively little research attention compared to health care. INCLUSION CRITERIA This review included studies of any design, that examined the implementation of innovations in aged care settings. METHODS Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, and ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection for studies published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2022. The titles and abstracts of retrieved citations were screened by two independent reviewers. Full-text articles were screened by one reviewer to determine inclusion. Data were extracted in NVivo using a tool developed by the research team. Factors that influenced implementation were inductively coded, interpreted, and grouped into categories in a series of workshops. RESULTS Of the 2530 studies that were screened, 193 were included. Of the included papers, the majority (74%) related to residential aged care, 28% used an implementation theory or framework, and 15% involved consumers. Five key categories of factors influencing implementation were identified: organizational context including resourcing and culture; people's attitudes and capabilities; relationships between people; the intervention and its appropriateness; and implementation actions such as stakeholder engagement and implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS Our findings can be used to develop practical resources to support implementation efforts, and highlight the importance of resourcing for successful implementation. Attention to community-based aged care, and greater engagement with theory and community is needed to promote research rigor, relevance and applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Windle
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Amy Marshall
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lenore de la Perrelle
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Stephanie Champion
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Paul D.S. Ross
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Carol Davy
- Aged Care Research and Industry Innovation Australia (ARIIA), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mangano GRA, Avola M, Blatti C, Caldaci A, Sapienza M, Chiaramonte R, Vecchio M, Pavone V, Testa G. Non-Adherence to Anti-Osteoporosis Medication: Factors Influencing and Strategies to Overcome It. A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2022; 12:14. [PMID: 36614816 PMCID: PMC9821321 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the reasons for inadequate adherence to osteoporosis therapy and to describe the strategies for improving adherence to and persistence with regular medications, we conducted a review of the literature. The primary outcome of the study was the determination of the factors adverse to the onset and maintenance of anti-osteoporosis therapies. Secondly, we focused on studies whose efforts led to finding different strategies to improve adherence and persistence. We identified a total of 26 articles. The most recurrent and significant factors identified were aging, polypharmacy, and smoking habits. Different strategies to guide patients in their osteoporosis care have been identified, such as monitoring and follow-up via telephone calls, email, and promotional meetings, and proactive care interventions such as medication monitoring, post-fracture care programs, and decision aids. Changes in the drugs regimen and dispensation are strategies tried to lead to better adherence and persistence, but also improved satisfaction of patients undergoing anti-osteoporosis treatment. Patient involvement is an important factor to increase medication persistence while using a flexible drugs regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Rita Agata Mangano
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Marianna Avola
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Chiara Blatti
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Alessia Caldaci
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Sapienza
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Rita Chiaramonte
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Michele Vecchio
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Vito Pavone
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| | - Gianluca Testa
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Policlinico-San Marco, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Launois R, Cabout E, Benamouzig D, Velpry L, Briot K, Alliot F, Perrin L, Grange L, Sellami R, Touboul C, Joubert JM, Roux C. Barriers and Expectations for Patients in Post-Osteoporotic Fracture Care in France: The EFFEL Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:571-581. [PMID: 35365301 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to quantify the relative importance of barriers to better secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures and of care expectations expressed by patients with osteoporotic fractures in France. METHODS A qualitative exploration of potential barriers to care and expectations was undertaken through a systematic literature review and in-depth patients interviews. A list of 21 barriers and 21 expectations was identified. These were presented to 324 subjects with osteoporotic fractures, identified in a representative sample of the French population, in the form of best-worst scaling questionnaires. Patients rated the relative importance of the attributes, and arithmetic mean importance scores were calculated and ranked. A Bayesian hierarchical model was also performed to generate a relative importance score. Latent class analysis was performed to identify potential subgroups of patients with different response profiles. RESULTS A total of 7 barriers were rated as the most important, relating to awareness of osteoporosis and coordination of care. The highest-ranked barrier, "my fracture is not related to osteoporosis," was significantly more important than all the others (mean importance score 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.56). A similar ranking of attributes was obtained with both the arithmetic and the Bayesian approach. For expectations, no clear hierarchy of attributes was identified. Latent class analysis discriminated 3 classes of respondents with significant differences in response profiles (the educated environmentalists, the unaware, and the victims of the system). CONCLUSIONS Better quality of care of osteoporosis and effective secondary fracture prevention will require improvements in patient education, training of healthcare professionals, and coordination of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elise Cabout
- Health Economic Assessment Network, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamouzig
- French National Center for Scientific Research, Paris, France; Sciences Po, Center of the Sociology of Organizations, Paris, France
| | - Livia Velpry
- Sociology and Anthropology Department, Paris 8 University, Paris, France
| | - Karine Briot
- Rhumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Laurent Grange
- Rhumatology Department, Grenobles Alpes University Hospital, Echirolles, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McArthur C, Bai Y, Hewston P, Giangregorio L, Straus S, Papaioannou A. Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Implement Sci 2021; 16:70. [PMID: 34243789 PMCID: PMC8267230 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term care setting poses unique challenges and opportunities for effective knowledge translation. The objectives of this review are to (1) synthesize barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care, as defined as a home where residents require 24-h nursing care, and 50% of the population is over the age of 65 years; and (2) map barriers and facilitators to the Behaviour Change Wheel framework to inform theory-guided knowledge translation strategies. METHODS Following the guidance of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Series and the ENTREQ reporting guidelines, we systematically reviewed the reported experiences of long-term care staff on implementing evidence-based guidelines into practice. MEDLINE Pubmed, EMBASE Ovid, and CINAHL were searched from the earliest date available until May 2021. Two independent reviewers selected primary studies for inclusion if they were conducted in long-term care and reported the perspective or experiences of long-term care staff with implementing an evidence-based practice guideline about health conditions. Appraisal of the included studies was conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist and confidence in the findings with the GRADE-CERQual approach. FINDINGS After screening 2680 abstracts, we retrieved 115 full-text articles; 33 of these articles met the inclusion criteria. Barriers included time constraints and inadequate staffing, cost and lack of resources, and lack of teamwork and organizational support. Facilitators included leadership and champions, well-designed strategies, protocols, and resources, and adequate services, resources, and time. The most frequent Behaviour Change Wheel components were physical and social opportunity and psychological capability. We concluded moderate or high confidence in all but one of our review findings. CONCLUSIONS Future knowledge translation strategies to implement guidelines in long-term care should target physical and social opportunity and psychological capability, and include interventions such as environmental restructuring, training, and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin McArthur
- Dalhousie University, 5869 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada. .,GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.
| | - Yuxin Bai
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Patricia Hewston
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.,Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, 150 Laurelwood Drive, Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 0E2, Canada
| | - Sharon Straus
- University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A4, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- GERAS Centre for Aging Research, 88 Maplewood Avenue, Hamilton, Ontario, L8M 1W9, Canada.,Master University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walker P, Kifley A, Kurrle S, Cameron ID. Increasing the uptake of vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities: results from the vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:383. [PMID: 33023492 PMCID: PMC7542101 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01784-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is variable and non-optimal. The vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study aimed to employ a range of strategies to support the uptake of this best practice in participating facilities. The aim of this paper is to report on facility level prevalence outcomes and factors associated with vitamin D supplement use. METHODS This trial followed a stepped wedge cluster, non-randomised design with 41 individual facilities serving as clusters pragmatically allocated into two wedges that commenced the intervention six months apart. This multifaceted, interdisciplinary knowledge translation intervention was led by a project officer, who worked with nominated champions at participating facilities to provide education and undertake quality improvement (QI) planning. Local barriers and responsive strategies were identified to engage stakeholders and promote widespread uptake of vitamin D supplement use. RESULTS This study found no significant difference in the change of vitamin D supplement use between the intervention (17 facilities with approx. 1500 residents) and control group (24 facilities with approx. 1900 residents) at six months (difference in prevalence change between groups was 1.10, 95% CI - 3.8 to 6.0, p = 0.6). The average overall facility change in adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use over 12 months was 3.86% (95% CI 0.6 to 7.2, p = 0.02), which achieved a facility level average prevalence of 59.6%. The variation in uptake at 12 months ranged from 25 to 88% of residents at each facility. In terms of the types of strategies employed for implementation, there were no statistical differences between facilities that achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥10%) or a desired prevalence of vitamin D supplement use (80% of residents) compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS This work confirms the complex nature of implementation of best practice in the RACF setting and indicates that more needs to be done to ensure best practice is translated into action. Whilst some strategies appeared to be associated with better outcomes, the statistical insignificance of these findings and the overall limited impact of the intervention suggests that the role of broader organisational and governmental support for implementation should be investigated further. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered (ANZCTR ID: ACTRN12616000782437 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippy Walker
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. .,John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Annette Kifley
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Health Service, Hornsby, NSW, 2077, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, McArthur C, Hillier LM, Feldman S, Giangregorio L, Jaglal S, Jain R, Van der Horst ML, Adachi J. Preventing Fractures in Long-Term Care: Translating Recommendations to Clinical Practice. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 22:36-42. [PMID: 32800745 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy for long-term care (LTC) aims to support fracture risk-reduction. LTC specific recommendations for fracture prevention were developed in 2015. This article describes the use of the Knowledge-to Action framework to guide the development and application of research evidence on fracture prevention in older adults. Knowledge translation activities highlighted fractures as a significant source of morbidity in LTC, significant gaps in fracture risk assessment and treatment, and barriers and facilitators to guideline implementation. Multifaceted knowledge translation strategies, targeting staff in LTC homes in Ontario, Canada to support fracture guideline implementation have included education, audit and feedback, team-based action planning, and engagement of LTC residents, their families, and health professionals. Provincial administrative databases were accessed to monitor fracture rates between 2005 and 2015. Our research has identified enablers and barriers to knowledge use such as limited knowledge of osteoporosis, fracture risk, and prevention. Province-wide over a 10-year period, hip fracture rates in LTC decreased from 2.3% to 1.9%, and any fracture rates decreased from 4% to 3.6%. This body of work suggests that multifaceted knowledge translation initiatives are feasible to implement in LTC and can improve the uptake of clinical recommendations for fracture prevention. A key aspect of our fracture prevention knowledge translation activities has been the full engagement of key stakeholders to assist in the co-development and design of knowledge translation products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Papaioannou
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - George Ioannidis
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin McArthur
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sid Feldman
- GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Jaglal
- GERAS Center for Aging Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ravi Jain
- Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Walker P, Kifley A, Kurrle S, Cameron ID. Process outcomes of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary knowledge translation intervention in aged care: results from the vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:177. [PMID: 31238882 PMCID: PMC6593532 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitamin D supplement use is recommended best practice in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) for the prevention of falls, however has experienced delays in uptake. Following successful international efforts at implementing this evidence into practice, the ViDAus study sought to replicate this success for the Australian context. The aim of this paper is to report on the process outcomes of implementing this intervention. METHODS Forty-one RACFs were engaged in a multifaceted, interdisciplinary knowledge translation intervention. This focused on raising awareness to improve knowledge on vitamin D, and supporting facilities to identify barriers and implement locally devised strategies to improve the uptake of evidence based practice (EBP). RESULTS Staff members of participating facilities (n = 509 including nursing, care and allied health staff) were well engaged and accepting of the intervention, though engagement of servicing general practitioners (GPs) (n = 497) and pharmacists (n = 9) was poor. Facilities each identified between three and eight strategies focused on raising awareness, identifying residents to target for vitamin D and creating referral pathways depending upon their own locally identified barriers and capacity. There was variable success at implementing these over the 12-month intervention period. Whilst this study successfully raised awareness among staff, residents and their family members, barriers were identified that hindered engagement of GPs. CONCLUSIONS The intervention was overall feasible to implement and perceived as appropriate by GPs, pharmacists, facility staff, residents and family members. More facilitation, higher-level organisational support and strategies to improve RACF access to GPs however were identified as important improvements for the implementation of vitamin D supplement use. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered (ANZCTR ID: ACTRN12616000782437 ) on 15 June 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippy Walker
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre D17, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.,John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Annette Kifley
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Susan Kurrle
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Health Service, Hornsby, NSW, 2077, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Negm AM, Ioannidis G, Jantzi M, Bucek J, Giangregorio L, Pickard L, Hirdes JP, Adachi JD, Richardson J, Thabane L, Papaioannou A. Validation of a one year fracture prediction tool for absolute hip fracture risk in long term care residents. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:320. [PMID: 30587140 PMCID: PMC6307179 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-1010-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frail older adults living in long term care (LTC) homes have a high fracture risk, which can result in reduced quality of life, pain and death. The Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) was designed for fracture risk assessment in LTC, to optimize targeting of services in those at highest risk. This study aims to examine the construct validity and discriminative properties of the FRS in three Canadian provinces at 1-year follow up. METHODS LTC residents were included if they were: 1) Adults admitted to LTC homes in Ontario (ON), British Columbia (BC) and Manitoba (MB) Canada; and 2) Received a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0. After admission to LTC, one-year hip fracture risk was evaluated for all the included residents using the FRS (an eight-level risk scale, level 8 represents the highest fracture risk). Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the differences in incident hip or all clinical fractures across the provinces and FRS risk levels. We examined the differences in incident hip or all clinical fracture for each FRS level across the three provinces (adjusted for age, BMI, gender, fallers and previous fractures). We used the C-statistic to assess the discriminative properties of the FRS for each province. RESULTS Descriptive statistics on the LTC populations in ON (n = 29,848), BC (n = 3129), and MB (n = 2293) are: mean (SD) age 82 (10), 83 (10), and 84 (9), gender (female %) 66, 64, and 70% respectively. The incident hip fractures and all clinical fractures for FRS risk level were similar among the three provinces and ranged from 0.5 to 19.2% and 1 to 19.2% respectively. The overall discriminative properties of the FRS were similar between ON (C-statistic = 0.673), BC (C-statistic = 0.644) and MB (C-statistic = 0.649) samples. CONCLUSION FRS is a valid tool for identifying LTC residents at different risk levels for hip or all clinical fractures in three provinces. Having a fracture risk assessment tool that is tailored to the LTC context and embedded within the routine clinical assessment may have significant implications for policy, service delivery and care planning, and may improve care for LTC residents across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M Negm
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,School of Rehabilitation Sciences, IAHS 403, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1C7, Canada.
| | - George Ioannidis
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Micaela Jantzi
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenn Bucek
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lora Giangregorio
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Kinesiology and Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Pickard
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - John P Hirdes
- School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan D Adachi
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, IAHS 403, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 1C7, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandra Papaioannou
- Geriatric Education and Research in Aging Sciences (GERAS), St Peter's Hospital, 88 Maplewood Ave, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyanov MA, Czerwinski E, Shinkov A, Palička V, Lakatos P, Poiana C, Payer J, Killinger Z, Kocjan T, Lesnyak O, Holzer G, Resch H. Patterns in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men: A Questionnaire-based Survey in Central and Eastern European Countries. ACTA MEDICA BULGARICA 2017. [DOI: 10.1515/amb-2017-0017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
SummaryTo assess the current practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of male osteoporosis based on questionnaires. Questionnaires were presented and filled out by osteoporosis experts from Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Russia. The questions included focused on the proportion of male referrals to DXA, the main reasons for referral, the preferred measurement sites and reference database, the definition of male osteoporosis, needed laboratory investigations, data on calcium and vitamin D supplementation as well as on treatment modalities and their reimbursement rate. Men comprised 5 to 10% of all DXA referrals. The main reasons for referral were low back pain and fractures. Most of the respondents used the International male reference database. The diagnosis of osteoporosis was based mainly on a T-score below −2.5 after the age of 50, but a few respondents added fractures as a necessary condition. Only 1/3 of men visiting DXA sites are expected to have normal BMD. A consensus for the use of laboratory investigations in male osteoporosis is practically lacking. Treatment modalities include alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, rhPTH and strontium (with some restrictions for the latter three). Data on treatment adherence and persistence are generally lacking except for Austria, Romania and Slovakia. The levels of reimbursement vary a lot across countries. Osteoporosis in men is an under-recognized problem in CEE countries, leading to a tremendous gap in the diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. A. Boyanov
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic of Endocrinology and Metabolism , University Hospital “Alexandrovska”, Medical University – Sofia , Bulgaria
| | - E. Czerwinski
- Jagiellonian University Medical College , Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Bone and Joint Diseases – Cracow , Poland
| | - A. Shinkov
- Clinic of Thyroid and Bone Metabolic Diseases , University Hospital of Endocrinology “Acad. Ivan Penchev”, Medical University – Sofia , Bulgaria
| | - V. Palička
- Osteocentra , University Hospital and Charles University , School of Medicine , Hradec Kralove , Czech Republic
| | - P. Lakatos
- 1st Department of Medicine , Semmelweis University – Budapеst , Hungary
| | - C. Poiana
- Department of Endocrinology, National Institute of Endocrinology , University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Bucharest , Romania
| | - J. Payer
- 5th Department of Internal Medicine , University Hospital, Medical Faculty of Comenius University , Bratislava , Slovakia
| | - Z. Killinger
- 5th Department of Internal Medicine , University Hospital, Medical Faculty of Comenius University , Bratislava , Slovakia
| | - T. Kocjan
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases , University Medical Centre Ljubljana – Ljubljana , Slovenia
| | - O. Lesnyak
- Urals State Medical University , Yekaterinburg – Russian Federation
- North-Western State Medical University , Saint Petersburg – Russian Federation
| | - G. Holzer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Medical University of Vienna – Vienna , Austria
| | - H. Resch
- Metabolic Bone Diseases, Medical Faculty , “Sigmund Freud” University , Department of Internal Medicine II, St. Vincent Hospital Vienna , Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical University – Vienna , Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Role of Side Effects, Physician Involvement, and Patient Perception in Non-Adherence with Oral Bisphosphonates. Adv Ther 2016; 33:1374-84. [PMID: 27329383 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0360-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The benefits of osteoporosis therapy are compromised by low adherence, thus requiring a better understanding of its barriers and unmet needs. The objective of this study was to assess reasons for non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates among osteoporotic women. METHODS A cross-sectional patient survey of women who initiated therapy with risedronate or alendronate between the years 2010 and 2012 were non-adherent [Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) <70%] or switched therapy within the first year. Survey participants were identified using Maccabi Health Services computerized database. Patients who gave informed consent completed a 20-min telephonic survey, assessing reasons for discontinuation or switching, including physician involvement, side effects, administration regimen, perceptions of bone health, and medications' efficacy. RESULTS The study population included 493 females (mean age = 66 ± 7) of whom 40% discontinued all anti-osteoporotic therapy (mean MPR = 19%), 9% remained on initial therapy (mean MPR = 47%), and 51% switched therapy (mean MPR = 62%). Family history, fracture history, socioeconomic status, and index drug class and frequency were similar in all groups. The most common reasons for switching or discontinuation of the first-line therapy were gastrointestinal side effects, such as heartburn, acid reflux or other (40.0%), and physician recommendation (26.7%). The major reasons for complete discontinuation of therapy were side effects (26.9%) and physician recommendation (20.0%). Perceived low importance was more commonly mentioned than high cost of medication (14% vs. 3%). CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the importance of low tolerability to non-adherence with osteoporosis therapy and underlines poor patients' awareness and sub-optimal physicians' involvement in conveying the importance of this therapy. FUNDING Merck & Co Inc.
Collapse
|
15
|
Vitamin D status and its predictors in New Zealand aged-care residents eligible for a government-funded universal vitamin D supplementation programme. Public Health Nutr 2016; 19:3349-3360. [PMID: 27453540 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016001683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The provision of prescribed vitamin D to all aged-care residents has been implemented in New Zealand as part of a government-led falls prevention programme. To our knowledge, there has been no evaluation of this universal programme on vitamin D status and functional and health outcomes. Thus, we aimed to determine 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations and their predictors in aged-care residents across the country and to investigate whether the government-funded programme was associated with adequate vitamin D status. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey of sociodemographic, biochemical, anthropometric, dietary and health characteristics. Blood samples were analysed for serum 25(OH)D and other biochemical measures. Multiple regression was used to examine predictors of vitamin D status. SETTING Sixteen residential aged-care facilities throughout New Zealand. SUBJECTS Residents aged ≥60 years with residency duration >12 weeks (n 309). RESULTS Mean serum 25(OH)D was 89·9 (95 % CI 85·2, 94·5) nmol/l and monthly supplements (1250 µg (50 000 IU)) were taken by 75 % of all residents. Of those not taking a funded supplement, 65·3 % had serum 25(OH)D 125 nmol/l. CONCLUSIONS Residents taking supplemental vitamin D had adequate vitamin D status; however monitoring of long-term supplementation should be considered, due to the high proportion of participants with high serum 25(OH)D levels.
Collapse
|