Implementation of highly challenging balance training for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice: a process evaluation

Effects of HiBalance training program on physical function of individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of the HiBalance training program for individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) remains debated, prompting a systematic investigation. This study aims to assess whether the HiBalance training program yields favorable outcomes on physical function and self-reported function measures in PD individuals.

METHODS

A systematic search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, and PEDro databases identified studies exploring HiBalance training's impact on physical function in idiopathic PD. Publication date restrictions were not applied. Two independent reviewers evaluated bias risk using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and study quality using the PEDro scale. Effect size (standardized mean difference, SMD) and heterogeneity (Higgins I2) were determined.

RESULTS

Six studies underwent qualitative analysis, with two randomized-controlled trials and one multi-center clinical trial being included in the meta-analysis. HiBalance training exhibited a significant impact on physical function (SMD = 0.49; P = 0.0003). The Mini-BESTest score and gait velocity displayed improvements with moderate-effect sizes. However, solely gait velocity showed clinical enhancement. Yet, these benefits did not remain at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups post-intervention. Self-reported function measures showed no alteration post-HiBalance training. Publication bias was absent.

CONCLUSION

HiBalance training led to clinically significant improvements solely in gait velocity, though these gains waned over time. The findings suggest the necessity of refining the HiBalance program to sustain positive outcomes and ensure lasting enhancements. This underscores the importance of post-HiBalance training exercise programs to maintain benefits in the long term.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

The protocol of this review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022325649). Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022325649 .

Knowledge translation theories in fall prevention and balance control: A scoping review

Falls are a major problem all over the world. Falls may result in bone fractures, fear of falling, and reduced participation in activities of daily living and in social activities, thus, an increased cost of health care to the individual and the society. Falls occur as a result of compounding factors that combine and overwhelm an individual's ability to maintain or regain his or her balance. However, fall rates are often reported as high, suggesting the presence of a gap between clinical practices related to fall prevention and the knowledge of the best available evidence related to fall prevention. The science of knowledge translation (KT) offers a variety of theories that can facilitate the implementation of up-to-date knowledge among clinicians. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify and review the use of knowledge translation theories, namely the Knowledge to Action Framework (KTA), Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (PARIHS), Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), in studies related to fall prevention and balance control. A scoping review was conducted to identify studies related to fall prevention and balance control that used one of these four KT theories. An extensive literature search was performed up to January 2021. Two independent reviewers conducted a study selection process followed by data extraction of the search results. Our results identified 16 studies that were related to the scope of our review, with three studies utilizing KTA, two studies using PARIHS, four studies using CFIR, and seven studies using the TDF. Overall, it appears that the use of KT theories is helpful to guide interventions for fall prevention and improve balance control. Future efforts are needed to facilitate the use of KT theories for guiding clinical practices related to fall prevention and balance control.

The Implementation Process of Two Evidence-Based Protocols: A Spatial Neglect Network Initiative

Introduction

Spatial neglect, a neurocognitive disorder of lateralized spatial attention, is prevalent among stroke survivors especially in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). The ultimate goal of the project was to improve spatial neglect care in inpatient rehabilitation and trained as many OTs as possible using both tools in their regular practices as the means to achieve our overall objective. Therefore, we conducted a project aimed at implementing two evidence-based protocols, one for assessment (KF-NAP®) and the other for treatment (KF-PAT®), and share the implementation process, which included barriers and facilitators identified during and after the process, and implementation outcomes.

Methods

Sixteen IRFs were involved. The Knowledge-To-Action Cycle was used to describe the process of knowledge inquiry (training), translating knowledge (implementation) and evaluating the use of knowledge in clinical practice (outcomes). Barriers and strategies were reported using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and identified through a survey, after the study concluded.

Results

Thirty-two therapists at the participating sites were trained to some level of the KF-NAP and KF-PAT. Throughout the project and also once after it finished, different barriers were identified by researchers and clinicians, who then determined together actions to eliminate or minimize the barriers. For example, multiple sites reported: "not having time to train other staff at their hospital due to high patient volume and other responsibilities."

Discussion

The project shared our implementation process which demonstrated the importance of using implementation methods and incorporating a researcher-clinician partnership, not only for knowledge generation but also knowledge translation. Frequent communications and exchanging information with stakeholders at different levels, may be determinant to the success of each implementation phase. Further research is needed.