1
|
Hughes GA, Inacio MC, Rowett D, Lang C, Jorissen RN, Corlis M, Sluggett JK. National Trends in Antidepressant Use in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities (2006-2019). J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:104957. [PMID: 38432647 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Antipsychotics have been the focus of reforms for improving the appropriateness of psychotropic medicine use in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Comprehensive evaluation of antidepressant use in RACFs is required to inform policy and practice initiatives targeting psychotropic medicines. This study examined national trends in antidepressant use among older people living in RACFs from 2006 to 2019. DESIGN National repeated cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged 65 to 105 years who were permanent, long-term (≥100 days) residents of Australian RACFs between January 2006 and December 2019 were included. METHODS Annual age- and sex-adjusted antidepressant prevalence rates and defined daily doses (DDDs) supplied per 1000 resident-days from 2006 to 2019 were determined. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Poisson and negative binomial regression models. RESULTS A total of 779,659 residents of 3371 RACFs were included (786,227,380 resident-days). Overall, antidepressant use increased from 46.1% (95% CI, 45.9-46.4) in 2006 to 58.5% (95% CI, 58.3-58.8) of residents in 2019 (aRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.02). Mirtazapine use increased from 8.4% (95% CI, 8.2-8.5) to 20.9% (95% CI, 20.7-21.1) from 2006 to 2019 (aRR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.07-1.07). Antidepressant use increased from 350.3 (95% CI, 347.6-353.1) to 506.0 (95% CI, 502.8-509.3) DDDs/1000 resident-days (aRR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.03), with mirtazapine utilization increasing by 6% annually (aRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.06-1.06). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This nationwide study identified a substantial increase in antidepressant use among residents of Australian RACFs, largely driven by mirtazapine. With nearly 3 in every 5 residents treated with an antidepressant in 2019, findings highlight potential off-label use and suggest that interventions to optimize care are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina A Hughes
- University of South Australia, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Debra Rowett
- University of South Australia, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Drug and Therapeutics Information Service, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Catherine Lang
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert N Jorissen
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Flinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Megan Corlis
- Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation SA Branch, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Janet K Sluggett
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; University of South Australia, UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eshetie TC, Caughey GE, Whitehead C, Crotty M, Corlis M, Visvanathan R, Wesselingh S, Inacio MC. The risk of fractures after entering long-term care facilities. Bone 2024; 180:116995. [PMID: 38145862 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stratifying residents at increased risk for fractures in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can potentially improve awareness and facilitate the delivery of targeted interventions to reduce risk. Although several fracture risk assessment tools exist, most are not suitable for individuals entering LTCF. Moreover, existing tools do not examine risk profiles of individuals at key periods in their aged care journey, specifically at entry into LTCFs. PURPOSE Our objectives were to identify fracture predictors, develop a fracture risk prognostic model for new LTCF residents and compare its performance to the Fracture Risk Assessment in Long term care (FRAiL) model using the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) Historical National Cohort, which contains integrated health and aged care information for individuals receiving long term care services. METHODS Individuals aged ≥65 years old who entered 2079 facilities in three Australian states between 01/01/2009 and 31/12/2016 were examined. Fractures (any) within 365 days of LTCF entry were the outcome of interest. Individual, medication, health care, facility and system-related factors were examined as predictors. A fracture prognostic model was developed using elastic nets penalised regression and Fine-Gray models. Model discrimination was examined using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) from the 20 % testing dataset. Model performance was compared to an existing risk model (i.e., FRAiL model). RESULTS Of the 238,782 individuals studied, 62.3 % (N = 148,838) were women, 49.7 % (N = 118,598) had dementia and the median age was 84 (interquartile range 79-89). Within 365 days of LTCF entry, 7.2 % (N = 17,110) of individuals experienced a fracture. The strongest fracture predictors included: complex health care rating (no vs high care needs, sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 1.52, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.67), nutrition rating (moderate vs worst, sHR = 1.48, 95%CI 1.38-1.59), prior fractures (sHR ranging from 1.24 to 1.41 depending on fracture site/type), one year history of general practitioner attendances (≥16 attendances vs none, sHR = 1.35, 95%CI 1.18-1.54), use of dopa and dopa derivative antiparkinsonian medications (sHR = 1.28, 95%CI 1.19-1.38), history of osteoporosis (sHR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.16-1.27), dementia (sHR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.17-1.28) and falls (sHR = 1.21, 95%CI 1.17-1.25). The model AUC in the testing cohort was 0.62 (95%CI 0.61-0.63) and performed similar to the FRAiL model (AUC = 0.61, 95%CI 0.60-0.62). CONCLUSIONS Critical information captured during transition into LTCF can be effectively leveraged to inform fracture risk profiling. New fracture predictors including complex health care needs, recent emergency department encounters, general practitioner and consultant physician attendances, were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesfahun C Eshetie
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Gillian E Caughey
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Megan Corlis
- Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (SA Branch), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Renuka Visvanathan
- Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Aged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Research, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, South Australia, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrison SL, Lang C, Eshetie TC, Crotty M, Whitehead C, Evans K, Corlis M, Wesselingh S, Caughey GE, Inacio MC. Hospitalisations and emergency department presentations by older individuals accessing long-term aged care in Australia. AUST HEALTH REV 2024; 48:182-190. [PMID: 38537302 DOI: 10.1071/ah24019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Objective The study examined emergency department (ED) presentations, unplanned hospitalisations and potentially preventable hospitalisations in older people receiving long-term care by type of care received (i.e. permanent residential aged care or home care packages in the community), in Australia in 2019. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Registry of Senior Australians National Historical Cohort. Individuals were included if they resided in South Australia, Queensland, Victoria or New South Wales, received a home care package or permanent residential aged care in 2019 and were aged ≥65 years. The cumulative incidence of ED presentations, unplanned hospitalisations and potentially preventable hospitalisations in each of the long-term care service types were estimated during the year. Days in hospital per 1000 individuals were also calculated. Results The study included 203,278 individuals accessing permanent residential aged care (209,639 episodes) and 118,999 accessing home care packages in the community (127,893 episodes). A higher proportion of people accessing home care packages had an ED presentation (43.1% [95% confidence interval, 42.8-43.3], vs 37.8% [37.6-38.0]), unplanned hospitalisation (39.8% [39.6-40.1] vs 33.4% [33.2-33.6]) and potentially preventable hospitalisation (11.8% [11.6-12.0] vs 8.2% [8.1-8.4]) than people accessing permanent residential aged care. Individuals with home care packages had more days in hospital due to unplanned hospitalisations than those in residential care (7745 vs 3049 days/1000 individuals). Conclusions While a high proportion of older people in long-term care have ED presentations, unplanned hospitalisations and potentially preventable hospitalisations, people in the community with home care packages experience these events at a higher frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Harrison
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Catherine Lang
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tesfahun C Eshetie
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Keith Evans
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Megan Corlis
- Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation SA Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia; and National Health and Medical Research Council, ACT, Australia
| | - Gillian E Caughey
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aged and Health Care Service Utilization by Older Australians Receiving Home Care Packages. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2023; 24:395-399.e2. [PMID: 36581309 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the (1) cohort of individuals living at home with Home Care Packages (HCPs) in 2016, (2) their access to other aged care services after HCP commencement, and (3) their hospital and ambulance service utilization. DESIGN A cross-sectional study was conducted using integrated aged care and health care data contained within the National Historical Cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This study included people who accessed HCP between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. METHODS The access to permanent residential aged care, transition care, respite care, hospital and ambulance services among Australian HCP recipients ≥65 years old in 2016 was evaluated. Descriptive statistics were employed. RESULTS In 2016, 84,681 individuals received HCPs, of which 68.4% (n = 57,942) accessed HCP levels 1‒2, 26.0% (n = 22,057) accessed HCP levels 3‒4, and 5.5% (n = 4682) accessed both care levels within the year. Of the individuals receiving HCP, 34.0% (n = 27,787) started services that year and 16.7% (n = 14,117) moved to permanent residential aged care, 18.4% (n = 15,592) used respite care and 5.8% (n = 4937) used transition care that year. Emergency department (ED) presentations [43.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 43.3‒44.0] were the most common hospital encounters, followed by inpatient hospitalizations for any reason (43.3%, 95% CI 42.9‒43.7), and unplanned hospitalizations (38%, 95% CI 37.6‒38.3). Forty-four percent (44.5%, 95% CI 43.9‒45.0) of individuals utilized ambulance services. ED presentations, hospitalization for any reason, and unplanned hospitalizations were more common in individuals receiving HCP levels 3‒4 compared with those accessing HCP levels 1‒2. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS HCP recipients in Australia have frequent hospitalizations, including ED presentations. In addition, almost 1 in 5 access respite care and 16.7% transition to permanent residential care each year. As the population accessing HCP is increasing, adequate support for these individuals to live well at home and avoid health events that lead to hospitalizations are necessary.
Collapse
|
5
|
Eshetie TC, Moldovan M, Caughey GE, Lang C, Sluggett JK, Khadka J, Whitehead C, Crotty M, Corlis M, Visvanathan R, Wesselingh S, Inacio MC. Development of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Risk of Hospitalization With Pressure Injury After Entering Residential Aged Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2023; 24:299-306.e9. [PMID: 36603825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although largely preventable, pressure injury is a major concern in individuals in permanent residential aged care (PRAC). Our study aimed to identify predictors and develop a prognostic model for risk of hospitalization with pressure injury (PI) using integrated Australian aged and health care data. DESIGN National retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Individuals ≥65 years old (N = 206,540) who entered 1797 PRAC facilities between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2016. METHODS PI, ascertained from hospitalization records, within 365 days of PRAC entry was the outcome of interest. Individual, medication, facility, system, and health care-related factors were examined as predictors. Prognostic models were developed using elastic nets penalized regression and Fine and Gray models. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) assessed model discrimination out-of-sample. RESULTS Within 365 days of PRAC entry, 4.3% (n = 8802) of individuals had a hospitalization with PI. The strongest predictors for PI risk include history of PIs [sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) 2.41; 95% CI 1.77-3.29]; numbers of prior hospitalizations (having ≥5 hospitalizations, sHR 1.95; 95% CI 1.74-2.19); history of traumatic amputation of toe, ankle, foot and leg (sHR 1.72; 95% CI 1.44-2.05); and history of skin disease (sHR 1.54; 95% CI 1.45-1.65). Lower care needs at PRAC entry with respect to mobility, complex health care, and medication assistance were associated with lower risk of PI. The risk prediction model had an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.72-0.75). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Our prognostic model for risk of hospitalization with PI performed moderately well and can be used by health and aged care providers to implement risk-based prevention plans at PRAC entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesfahun C Eshetie
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Max Moldovan
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gillian E Caughey
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Catherine Lang
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Janet K Sluggett
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jyoti Khadka
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Megan Corlis
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Renuka Visvanathan
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Centre of Research Excellence Frailty Trans-Disciplinary Research to Achieve Healthy Ageing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Aged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Research, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia; UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Inacio MC, Caughey GE, Wesselingh S. Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA): integrating cross-sectoral information to evaluate quality and safety of care provided to older people. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066390. [PMID: 36396322 PMCID: PMC9676420 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) was established to evaluate aged care experiences in Australia. In this manuscript, we describe the ROSA framework, the two ROSA cohorts, highlights from research findings, and future plans. PARTICIPANTS The South Australian ROSA Prospective Cohort (August 2018-June 2020) enrolled 26 605 participants, of which 59.2% (N=15 745) are women, with a median age of 83 (interquartile range (IQR) 77-88). The National ROSA Historical Cohort (January 2002-June 2020) includes 1 694 206 participants with an aged care eligibility assessment, of which 59.1% (N=1 001 705) are women and the median age is 78 (IQR 72-83). FINDINGS TO DATE Most research using the ROSA has focused on dementia, service accessibility, quality and safety of care, falls and injuries and quality use of medicines. The ROSA has also examined the experience of individuals with highly prevalent and understudied conditions in aged care settings (eg, eye and mental health) and aspects of services (eg, built environment) and innovation (eg, mobile radiological services) that can affect older people's health. Important learnings from the ROSA's development include the significant resources and multidisciplinary expertise required for establishing this platform. Between 2018 and 2022, 43 academic publications, eight reports of the Australian Government Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, and several reports to state health authorities and professional societies have used the ROSA. FUTURE PLANS Our plans include to: (1) continue delivering high-quality evidence to support the improvement of ageing and aged care services; (2) influence and improve the quality of research in and for the aged care sector; (3) expand scope to facilitate examining aims in more depth; (4) include future aged care sector data collections within the ROSA; (5) inform best practices and innovate how consumer engagement occurs in research; (6) monitor and evaluate the impact of the 2021 Australian Aged Care Reforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Older South Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gillian Elizabeth Caughey
- Registry of Older South Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu Q, Ou X, Li J. The risk of falls among the aging population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2022; 10:902599. [PMID: 36324472 PMCID: PMC9618649 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aims to clarify the risk factors for falls to prevent severe consequences in older adults. Methods We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases using the terms "risk factors" OR "predicting factors" OR "predictor" AND "fall" OR "drop" to identify all relevant studies and compare their results. The study participants were divided into two groups, the "fall group" and the "control group", and differences in demographic characteristics, lifestyles, and comorbidities were compared. Results We included 34 articles in the analysis and analyzed 22 factors. Older age, lower education level, polypharmacy, malnutrition, living alone, living in an urban area, smoking, and alcohol consumption increased the risk of falls in the aging population. Additionally, comorbidities such as cardiac disease, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, frailty, previous history of falls, depression, Parkinson's disease, and pain increased the risk of falls. Conclusion Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors can influence the risk of falls and should be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jinfeng Li
- Department of Geriatrics, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dyer SM, Suen J, Williams H, Inacio MC, Harvey G, Roder D, Wesselingh S, Kellie A, Crotty M, Caughey GE. Impact of relational continuity of primary care in aged care: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:579. [PMID: 35836118 PMCID: PMC9281225 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03131-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Greater continuity of care has been associated with lower hospital admissions and patient mortality. This systematic review aims to examine the impact of relational continuity between primary care professionals and older people receiving aged care services, in residential or home care settings, on health care resource use and person-centred outcomes. Methods Systematic review of five databases, four trial registries and three grey literature sources to October 2020. Included studies (a) aimed to increase relational continuity with a primary care professional, (b) focused on older people receiving aged care services (c) included a comparator and (d) reported outcomes of health care resource use, quality of life, activities of daily living, mortality, falls or satisfaction. Cochrane Collaboration or Joanna Briggs Institute criteria were used to assess risk of bias and GRADE criteria to rate confidence in evidence and conclusions. Results Heterogeneity in study cohorts, settings and outcome measurement in the five included studies (one randomised) precluded meta-analysis. None examined relational continuity exclusively with non-physician providers. Higher relational continuity with a primary care physician probably reduces hospital admissions (moderate certainty evidence; high versus low continuity hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92–0.96, n = 178,686; incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.99, 95%CI 0.76–1.27, n = 246) and emergency department (ED) presentations (moderate certainty evidence; high versus low continuity HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.89–0.92, n = 178,686; IRR 0.91, 95%CI 0.72–1.15, n = 246) for older community-dwelling aged care recipients. The benefit of providing on-site primary care for relational continuity in residential settings is uncertain (low certainty evidence, 2 studies, n = 2,468 plus 15 care homes); whilst there are probably lower hospitalisations and may be fewer ED presentations, there may also be an increase in reported mortality and falls. The benefit of general practitioners’ visits during hospital admission is uncertain (very low certainty evidence, 1 study, n = 335). Conclusion Greater relational continuity with a primary care physician probably reduces hospitalisations and ED presentations for community-dwelling aged care recipients, thus policy initiatives that increase continuity may have cost offsets. Further studies of approaches to increase relational continuity of primary care within aged care, particularly in residential settings, are needed. Review registration CRD42021215698. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03131-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Dyer
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Jenni Suen
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Maria C Inacio
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.,Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Steve Wesselingh
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Maria Crotty
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gillian E Caughey
- Registry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.,Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Utilization and National Variation of Plain X-Ray Services by Australian Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:1564-1572.e9. [PMID: 35667412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To (1) estimate incidence, trends, and determinants of government-subsidized diagnostic radiography (ie, plain x-ray) services utilization by Australian long-term care facility (LTCF) residents between 2009 and 2016; (2) examine national variation in services use. DESIGN A repeated cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Australian LTCF residents who were ≥65 years old. METHODS Medicare Benefits Schedule subsidized plain x-rays employed for diagnosing fall-related injuries, pneumonia, heart failure, and acute abdomen or bowel obstruction were identified. Yearly sex- and age-standardized utilization rates were calculated. Poisson and negative binomial regression models were employed. Facility-level variation was examined graphically. Overall and examination site-specific analyses were conducted. RESULTS A total of 521,497 LTCF episodes for 453,996 individuals living in 3018 LTCFs were examined. The median age was 84 years (interquartile range 79-88), 65% (n = 339,116) were women, and 53.9% (n = 281,297) had dementia. In addition, 34.5% (n = 341,6863) of episodes had at least 1 x-ray service. Overall, there was a 12% increase in utilization between 2009 and 2016 (from 535/1000 in 2009 to 602/1000 person-years in 2016, incidence rate ratio=1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02). Factors associated with x-ray use included being 80-89 years old, being a man, not having dementia, having multiple health conditions (4-6 or ≥7 compared to 0-3), being at a smaller facility (0-24 bed compared to 50-74), facility located in the Australian state of New South Wales, or in major cities (compared to regional areas). National variation in x-ray service use, with largest differences observed by state, was detected. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Plain x-ray service utilization by LTCF residents increased 12% between 2009 and 2016. Sex, age, dementia status, having multiple health conditions as well as facility size, and location were associated with plain x-ray use in LTCFs and use varied geographically. Differences in x-ray service utilization by residents highlight lack of consistent access and potential over- or underutilization.
Collapse
|