Randomized double-blind safety comparison of intravenous iron dextran versus iron sucrose in an adult non-hemodialysis outpatient population: A feasibility study

Acute aortic intraluminal thrombus with embolisation and lower-limb ischaemia following intravenous iron sucrose infusion reaction

A woman in her 50s developed iron deficiency anaemia. Her medical history included hypertension, asthma and remote postpartum pulmonary embolism. There was a strong family history of atherosclerosis. After receiving intravenous iron sucrose (500 mg), she developed vomiting and large-volume diarrhoea, followed by diaphoresis, back pain, haemoconcentration (haematocrit increase, 0.242 to 0.326), leucocytosis and platelet count decline. Myocardial infarction was ruled out and the truncal pain subsided. However, 2 days postdischarge, she was diagnosed with aortic intraluminal thrombus (ILT) with embolisation into the lower extremities. The limbs were salvaged by emergency embolectomies and fasciotomies. Acute aortic ILT is a rare disorder that has not been previously reported as a complication of parenteral iron therapy. We postulate that acute intravascular volume losses (vomiting and diarrhoea) with resulting haemoconcentration and catecholamine-associated platelet activation and consumption, in a patient with subclinical aortic atherosclerosis, triggered acute aortic ILT presenting as lower-limb ischaemia.

Decreased Clinical Toxicity and Two-Phase Elimination Kinetics Observed After Intravenous Iron Sucrose Overdose

BACKGROUND

Management of oral iron overdoses is well-established, but there is limited literature regarding intravenous iron sucrose overdoses. Indications for administering deferoxamine after oral iron overdoses include clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity, along with a serum iron concentration ≥ 500 μg/dL. Reported signs and symptoms of iron sucrose overdose do not appear to correlate with those of oral iron overdoses.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of intravenous iron sucrose overdose in a clinically well-appearing patient with a presenting serum iron concentration that was several times higher than the usual threshold concentration for initiating deferoxamine treatment. A 21-year-old woman presented to the emergency department after an accidental intravenous iron sucrose overdose. The patient received a home infusion of 1000 mg iron sucrose, which was five times the prescribed dose. Her presenting serum iron concentration was 1799 μg/dL, with bicarbonate and anion gap both within normal limits and an unremarkable physical examination. Because she did not have evidence of severe iron toxicity, she was treated supportively and deferoxamine was not administered. Her serum iron concentration decreased below the toxic range over the next 14 h, and she was discharged home the next day. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This patient was managed successfully with expectant care alone, suggesting that iron sucrose overdose has much lower toxicity than oral iron salt overdose. This discrepancy between measured iron concentrations and clinical presentation may be explained by the elimination kinetics of iron sucrose having separate redistribution and elimination phases.

Intravenous iron: do we adequately understand the short- and long-term risks in clinical practice?

Intravenous (IV) iron as a therapeutic agent is often administered but not always fully understood. The benefits of IV iron are well proven in many fields, particularly in nephrology. IV iron is beneficial not only for true iron deficiency but also for iron-restricted anaemia (functional iron deficiency). Yet, the literature on intravenous iron has many inconsistencies regarding its adverse effects. Over the last several years, newer forms of iron have been developed, leading to the more regular use of iron and in larger doses. This review will summarize some of the older and newer literature regarding the differences among iron products, including the mechanisms and frequency of their adverse events (AEs). The pathway and frequency of an underrecognized adverse event (hypophosphataemia) will be discussed. Recent insights on infection risk and iron handling by macrophages are examined. Potential but presently unproven risks of iron overload due to IV iron are discussed. The impact of these on the risk:benefit ratio and dosing of intravenous iron are considered in different clinical settings, including pregnancy and cancer. IV iron is an essential component of the therapy of anaemia and understanding these issues will enable more informed treatment decisions and knowledgeable use of these drugs.

Intravenous iron therapy for non-anaemic, iron-deficient adults

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is one of the most common nutritional deficiencies, and has a number of physiological manifestations. Early, or non-anaemic iron deficiency can result in fatigue and diminished exercise capacity. Oral iron preparations have a high incidence of intolerable side effects, and are ineffective in certain forms of iron deficiency. Consequently, intravenous iron preparations are increasingly used in the treatment of non-anaemic iron deficiency. The newer, more stable iron preparations in particular purport to have a lower incidence of side effects, and are now used across a range of different patient populations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of intravenous iron therapy in the treatment of adults with non-anaemic iron deficiency.

SEARCH METHODS

On 18 October 2019 we electronically searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two further databases and two trials registries 2019. We handsearched the references of full-text extracted studies, and contacted relevant study authors for additional data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that compared any intravenous iron preparation to placebo in adults. We excluded other forms of comparison such as oral iron versus placebo, intramuscular iron versus placebo, or intravenous iron studies where other iron preparations were used as the comparator. We also excluded studies involving erythropoietin therapy or obstetric populations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened references for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved differences in opinion through discussion and consensus, and where necessary, involved a third review author to adjudicate disputes. We contacted study authors to request additional data where appropriate. The primary outcome measures were haemoglobin concentration at the end of follow-up, and quality-of-life scores at end of follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were serum ferritin, peak oxygen consumption (as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing), adverse effects (graded as mild to moderate and severe) and bacterial infection. We pooled data for continuous outcomes, which we then reported as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We reported quality-of-life metrics as standardised mean difference (SMD), and then converted them back into a more familiar measure, the Piper Fatigue Scale. We analysed dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RRs). Given an expected degree of heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model for all outcomes. We performed the analysis with the software package Review Manager 5.

MAIN RESULTS

This review includes 11 studies with 1074 participants. Outcome metrics for which data were available (haemoglobin concentration, quality-of-life scores, serum ferritin, peak oxygen consumption and mild to moderate adverse effects) were similar across the included studies. The incidence of severe adverse events across all studies was zero. None of the studies measured bacterial infection as a specific outcome metric. Substantial heterogeneity influenced the results of the meta-analysis, arising from differing patient populations, definitions of iron deficiency, iron preparations and dosing regimens, and time to end of follow-up. Consequently, many outcomes are reported with small group sizes and wide confidence intervals, with a subsequent downgrading in the quality of evidence. The level of bias in many included studies was high, further reducing confidence in the robustness of the results. We found that intravenous iron therapy may lead to a small increase in haemoglobin concentration of limited clinical significance compared to placebo (MD 3.04 g/L, 95% CI 0.65 to 5.42; I2 = 42%; 8 studies, 548 participants; low-quality evidence). Quality-of-life scores (Piper Fatigue Scale MD 0.73, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.18; I2 = 0%; studies = 3) and peak oxygen consumption (MD 2.77 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.89 to 6.43; I2 = 36%; 2 studies, 32 participants) were associated with very low-quality evidence, and we remain uncertain about the role of intravenous iron for these metrics. We were unable to present pooled estimates for the outcomes of serum ferritin at the end of follow-up or mild to moderate adverse effects due to extreme statistical heterogeneity. Ultimately, despite the results of the meta-analysis, the low- or very low-quality evidence for all outcomes precludes any meaningful interpretation of results beyond suggesting that further research is needed. We performed a Trial Sequential Analysis for all major outcomes, none of which could be said to have reached a necessary effect size.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is insufficient to show benefit of intravenous iron preparations for the treatment of non-anaemic iron deficiency across a variety of patient populations, beyond stating that it may result in a small, clinically insignificant increase in haemoglobin concentration. However, the certainty for even this outcome remains limited. Robust data for the effectiveness of intravenous iron for non-anaemic iron deficiency is still lacking, and larger studies are required to assess the effect of this therapy on laboratory, patient-centric, and adverse-effect outcomes.

LDL dinitrosyl iron complex: A new transferrin-independent route for iron delivery in hepatocytes

In view of the interrelations between NO, Fe, and LDL in the cardiovascular system it appears interesting to find out, if the lipoprotein particles undergo the process of iron-nitrosylation, commonly observed for other proteins and what is the biological fate of iron-nitrosylated LDL particles. Iron-nitrosylated LDL preparation containing Fe(NO)₂ motif (DNICLDL) was obtained and characterized for the first time. In order to test its interactions with potential target cells, DNICLDL was administered to the hepatoma HepG2 cells. The effects were referred to those induced by native LDL (nLDL) and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) particles. DNICLDL administration considerably increased total iron content in the studied cell line, but did not influence the level of calcein-chelatable ions. DNICLDL was found to be low toxic to cells. The study suggests that DNICLDL might be a potential transducer of iron. © 2017 BioFactors, 44(2):192-201, 2018.

Hospital-Based HTA and Know4Go at MEDICI in London, Ontario, Canada

The majority of healthcare in Canada is universally provided and publicly funded through the provincial government.