Durability of switch regimens based on rilpivirine or on integrase inhibitors, both in association with tenofovir and emtricitabine, in HIV-infected, virologically suppressed patients

Association between integrase strand transfer inhibitor use with insulin resistance and incident diabetes mellitus in persons living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are associated with a higher risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) than other antiretroviral therapies (ART) needs to be established.MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov registries were searched for studies published between 1 January 2000 and 15 June 2022. Eligible studies reported incident DM or mean changes in insulin resistance measured by Homeostatic Model for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) in patients on INSTIs compared with other ARTs. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to obtain pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.A total of 16 studies were pooled: 13 studies meta-analyzed for incident diabetes with a patient population of 72 404 and 3 for changes in HOMA-IR. INSTI therapy was associated with a lower risk of incident diabetes in 13 studies (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.96, I²=29%), of which 8 randomized controlled trials demonstrated a 22% reduced risk (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.96, I²=0%). INSTIs had a lower risk compared with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.89, I²=0%) but similar to protease inhibitor-based therapy (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.01, I²=27%). The risk was lower in studies with longer follow-up (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, I²=24%) and among ART-naïve patients (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94, I²=3%) but increased in African populations (RR 2.99, 95% CI 2.53 to 3.54, I²=0%).In conclusion, exposure to INSTIs was not associated with increased risk of DM, except in the African population. Stratified analyses suggested reduced risk among ART-naïve patients and studies with longer follow-up.International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42021273040.

Safety and efficacy of switching to elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-experienced people with HIV: a multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the virologic efficacy of switching to co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) in patients with controlled HIV infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study including adult patients with controlled HIV-1 infection on any stable antiretroviral (ART) regimen, who switched to E/C/F/TDF. Success was measured by the proportion of patients with plasma viral load < 50 copies/ml at W48 using the FDA snapshot algorithm. We also assessed risk factors associated with virological failure (VF).

RESULTS

382 patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL who switched to E/C/F/TDF were included in the study. Most patients (69.9%) were male, with median age 44 years (IQR 38-51), who had been on ART for a median of 7 years (IQR 4-13). Median CD4 count was 614/mm³ and 24.6% of the patients had a history of previous virological failure. The reasons for switching were simplification (67.0%) and tolerance issues (22.0%). At week 48, 314 (82.0% [95% CI 78.4-86.0]) patients had HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL, 13 (3.5% [95% CI 3.64-8.41]) experienced virological failure. Genotype at failure was available in 6/13 patients with detection of resistance-associated mutations to integrase inhibitors and NRTIs in 5/6 (83.3%) patients. We found no predictive factor associated with virological failure except for a borderline significance with the duration of viral suppression before the switch. Tolerability of E/C/F/TDF was good with 23/382 (6.0%) patients experiencing mild adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, switching well-suppressed patients to E/C/F/TDF resulted in few virologic failures and was well tolerated. However, resistance to integrase inhibitors emerged in patients with virological failure.

Efficacy and durability of two- vs. three-drug integrase inhibitor-based regimens in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients: Data from real-life ODOACRE cohort

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and durability of treatment switch to two-drug (2DR) vs. three-drug (3DR) integrase inhibitor (InSTI)-based regimens in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Within the ODOACRE cohort, we selected adult patients with HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL switching to an InSTI-based 2DR or 3DR. Survival analyses were performed to estimate the probability of virological failure (VF, defined as one HIV RNA > 1000 copies/mL or two consecutive HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL) and treatment discontinuation (TD, defined as any modification, intensification or interruption of the regimen), and to evaluate their predictors.

RESULTS

Overall, 1666 patients were included, of whom 1334 (80%) were treated with a 3DR (19.9%, 25.0% and 55.1% elvitegravir-, raltegravir- and dolutegravir-based, respectively) and 332 (20%) with a 2DR (79.2% dolutegravir + lamivudine and 20.8% dolutegravir + rilpivirine). Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 100 (52-150) weeks, 52 (3.1%) patients experienced VF with an incidence of 1.5/100 person-year of follow-up (PYFU). The estimated 96-week probability of VF was similar for the 2DR and 3DR groups (2.3% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.53), but it was higher for elvitegravir (4.9%) and raltegravir (5.0%) than for dolutegravir (1.5%) (P = 0.04). Four hundred (24%) patients discontinued their InSTI-based regimen, with an incidence of 11.3/100 PYFU. At 96 weeks, 3DRs showed a higher probability of TD for any reason (20.6% vs. 11.2%, P < 0.001) and TD for toxicity (9.0% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.02) when compared with 2DRs. A higher risk of TD for central nervous system toxicity was observed for dolutegravir than for elvitegravir and raltegravir (4.0% vs. 2.5% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients, 2DRs showed an efficacy similar to 3DRs but with better tolerability.

Virologic Failure Among People Living With HIV Initiating Dolutegravir-Based Versus Other Recommended Regimens in Real-World Clinical Care Settings

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for initial antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens have evolved, with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) increasingly prominent. Research on virologic failure (VF) with INSTI therapy is predominantly from clinical trials not care settings, especially for recently approved medications including dolutegravir. We compared outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH) who initiated recommended regimens in clinical care across the United States.

SETTING

We examined 2 groups of PLWH at 8 clinics who initiated ART regimens (August 1, 2013-March 31, 2017): those ART treatment-naive at initiation, and those treatment-experienced.

METHODS

The outcome in this longitudinal cohort study was VF, defined as a viral load of ≥400 copies/mL ≥6 months after ART initiation. We examined the proportion of individuals who remained on, switched, or discontinued the regimen. Associations between regimens and outcomes were examined with adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 5177 PLWH, a lower proportion experienced VF on dolutegravir- versus other INSTI- or darunavir-based regimens for previously treatment-naive (7% vs. 12% vs. 28%) and treatment-experienced PLWH (6% vs. 10% vs. 21%). In adjusted analyses, hazard ratios were similar across regimens for the combined outcome of regimen discontinuation or treatment switch. The hazard ratios for VF comparing dolutegravir- to darunavir-based regimens was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6) among previously treatment-naive PLWH and was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.4 to 0.8) among treatment-experienced PLWH.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of previously treatment-naive PLWH remaining on recommended ART regimens did not differ by regimen. The likelihood of VF was lower with dolutegravir- than darunavir-based regimens for previously treatment-naive and treatment-experienced PLWH.

Effectiveness of integrase strand transfer inhibitors among treatment-experienced patients in a clinical setting

OBJECTIVE

Characterize virologic and immunologic outcomes of INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in experienced patients with and without virologic failure.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical cohort.

METHODS

ART-experienced, INSTI-naive participants in the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research HIV Clinical Cohort (UCHCC) initiating an INSTI-containing regimen 2007-2016 were followed from INSTI initiation (baseline) to the earliest of: outcome of interest, loss to follow-up (LTFU, 1 year without clinical visit), or death. Outcomes of interest were virologic failure (first of two consecutive viral loads at least 200 copies/ml more than 2 weeks apart, or one viral load ≥200 before LTFU) and immune recovery (first CD4 ≥500 cells/μl). Patients with baseline viral load at least 50 copies/ml were given 24 weeks before meeting virologic failure criteria. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models compared INSTI regimens and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 773 patients, 32% were women, 59% African-American, and 42% had a viral load at least 50 copies/ml at INSTI initiation. After 2 years, 5% of patients with baseline viral load less than 50 copies/ml experienced virologic failure, compared with 35% of patients with baseline viral load at least 50 copies/ml (P < 0.01). Among patients with baseline viral load less than 50 copies/ml, dolutegravir/NRTIs was associated with longer time to virologic failure [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.80], whereas among patients with baseline viral load at least 50 copies/ml, raltegravir/NRTIs was associated with longer time to virologic failure (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.68), both compared with elvitegravir/NRTIs. After 5 years suppressed, irrespective of baseline viral load, 61% of patients experienced immune recovery.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, INSTI-containing regimens led to low virologic failure rates in patients switching ART while suppressed. Viremic patients initiating INSTIs were at high risk of virologic failure during follow-up.