Validation of coding algorithms for identifying people with viral hepatitis using claims data according to different standard references

Validated administrative data based ICD-10 algorithms for chronic conditions: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to identify ICD-10 based validated algorithms for chronic conditions using health administrative data.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL was performed to identify studies, published between 1983 and May 2023, on validated algorithms for chronic conditions using administrative health data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and reviewed full text of selected studies to complete data extraction. A third reviewer resolved conflicts arising at the screening or study selection stages. The primary outcome was validated studies of ICD-10 based algorithms with both sensitivity and PPV of ≥70 %. Studies with either sensitivity or PPV <70 % were included as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, the search identified 1686 studies of which 54 met the inclusion criteria. Combining a previously published literature search, a total of 61 studies were included for data extraction. The study identified 40 chronic conditions with high validity and 22 conditions with moderate validity. The validated algorithms were based on administrative data from different countries including Canada, USA, Australia, Japan, France, South Korea, and Taiwan. The algorithms identified included several types of cancers, cardiovascular conditions, kidney diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, and peripheral vascular diseases, amongst others.

CONCLUSION

With ICD-10 prominently used across the world, this up-to-date systematic review can prove to be a helpful resource for research and surveillance initiatives using administrative health data for identifying chronic conditions.

Prevalence and characteristics of hepatitis delta virus infection in patients with hepatitis B in the United States: An analysis of the All-Payer Claims Database

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

HDV leads to the most severe form of viral hepatitis; however, the prevalence of HDV is not well understood. Using real-world data from the All-Payer Claims Database, this study estimates the prevalence of HBV/HDV infection among the chronic HBV population and describes patient/clinical characteristics for adults with HBV/HDV infection in the United States.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adults (≥18 years) with ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims for HDV infection or HBV in the All-Payer Claims Database from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, were identified. HDV prevalence was calculated as the proportion of patients with HBV/HDV infection among total patients with HBV infection. Patient characteristics, socioeconomic status, advanced liver complications (eg, cirrhosis, HCC), and comorbidities were assessed. A total of 6719 patients were diagnosed with HBV/HDV among 144,975 with HBV and 12 months of continuous data, for a prevalence of 4.6%. At diagnosis, 31.7% of patients with HBV/HDV had advanced liver complications, including compensated cirrhosis (16.3%) and decompensated cirrhosis (10.4%). Diabetes (50.5%), hypertension (49.8%), and HIV infection (30.9%) were the top 3 comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large database capturing approximately 80% of the US-insured population, HBV/HDV infection prevalence was 4.6% among adults infected with HBV. Patients infected with HDV had high rates of baseline liver complications and other comorbidities at the time of diagnosis, suggesting potentially delayed diagnosis and/or treatment. Earlier identification of HBV/HDV infection among the population with HBV may provide opportunities to improve linkage to care and treatment, thereby reducing the risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality.

Association between adverse outcomes of hepatitis A and acetaminophen use: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen (APAP) may cause acute liver injury with therapeutic doses in high-risk conditions such as chronic alcohol consumption or malnutrition. In acute hepatitis A (AHA), however, the safety of APAP has not been fully established. This study examined the potential association between APAP use and clinical outcomes of AHA in a nationwide and hospital-based cohort.

METHODS

Adult patients with AHA were identified from claims data of South Korean national healthcare insurance between 2008 and 2016 (n = 43,500). Logistic regression models were used to compare the risk of adverse outcomes (renal replacement therapy, hepatic encephalopathy and/or brain edema, mechanical ventilation, and liver transplantation) in patients exposed to APAP against control and patients exposed to NSAIDs. A propensity score (PS)-matched hospital-based AHA cohort (n = 146) was assessed for biochemical profiles after exposure to APAP or NSAIDs.

RESULTS

AHA patients were exposed to APAP or NSAIDs in 26.4% and 11.5% of cases, respectively. Compared to NSAID treatment, APAP exposure was associated with a higher incidence of hospitalization (98.8% vs. 92.4%; p < 0.0001). APAP exposure was independently associated with increased adverse outcomes (odds ratio [OR] = 5.66, p < 0.0001 against control; OR =1.67, p = 0.0015 against NSAIDs). PS-matched hospital cohort showed higher peak serum bilirubin levels (7.0 vs. 5.3 mg/dL; p = 0.03) and a longer time to recovery of jaundice after APAP use than with NSAID use.

CONCLUSION

APAP exposure was associated with increased adverse outcomes in a nationwide AHA cohort.