1
|
Cornelis FH, Sarkar D, Solomon SB. Building a Culture of Resilience in Interventional Radiology Through Strategic Equipment Management. Can Assoc Radiol J 2025; 76:201-202. [PMID: 39614723 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241305023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francois H Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debkumar Sarkar
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geevarghese R, Bodard S, Razakamanantsoa L, Marcelin C, Petre EN, Dohan A, Kastler A, Frandon J, Barral M, Soyer P, Cornelis FH. Interventional Oncology: 2024 Update. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024; 75:658-670. [PMID: 38444144 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241236152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Interventional Oncology (IO) stands at the forefront of transformative cancer care, leveraging advanced imaging technologies and innovative interventions. This narrative review explores recent developments within IO, highlighting its potential impact facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI), personalized medicine and imaging innovations. The integration of AI in IO holds promise for accelerating tumour detection and characterization, guiding treatment strategies and refining predictive models. Imaging modalities, including functional MRI, PET and cone beam CT are reshaping imaging and precision. Navigation, fusion imaging, augmented reality and robotics have the potential to revolutionize procedural guidance and offer unparalleled accuracy. New developments are observed in embolization and ablative therapies. The pivotal role of genomics in treatment planning, targeted therapies and biomarkers for treatment response prediction underscore the personalization of IO. Quality of life assessment, minimizing side effects and long-term survivorship care emphasize patient-centred outcomes after IO treatment. The evolving landscape of IO training programs, simulation technologies and workforce competence ensures the field's adaptability. Despite barriers to adoption, synergy between interventional radiologists' proficiency and technological advancements hold promise in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Geevarghese
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sylvain Bodard
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Clement Marcelin
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux University, Hopital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Adrian Kastler
- Department of Radiology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Julien Frandon
- Department of Radiology, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France
| | - Matthias Barral
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Soyer
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - François H Cornelis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Sorbonne University, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gómez FM, Van der Reijd DJ, Panfilov IA, Baetens T, Wiese K, Haverkamp-Begemann N, Lam SW, Runge JH, Rice SL, Klompenhouwer EG, Maas M, Helmberger T, Beets-Tan RG. Imaging in interventional oncology, the better you see, the better you treat. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:895-902. [PMID: 38062853 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Imaging and image processing is the fundamental pillar of interventional oncology in which diagnostic, procedure planning, treatment and follow-up are sustained. Knowing all the possibilities that the different image modalities can offer is capital to select the most appropriate and accurate guidance for interventional procedures. Despite there is a wide variability in physicians preferences and availability of the different image modalities to guide interventional procedures, it is important to recognize the advantages and limitations for each of them. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most frequently used image guidance modalities for interventional procedures and its typical and future applications including angiography, computed tomography (CT) and spectral CT, magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound and the use of hybrid systems. Finally, we resume the possible role of artificial intelligence related to image in patient selection, treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando M Gómez
- Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Área Clínica de Imagen Médica, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ilia A Panfilov
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tarik Baetens
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Wiese
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Siu W Lam
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen H Runge
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Samuel L Rice
- Radiology, Interventional Radiology Section, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Helmberger
- Institut für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Minimal-Invasive Therapie, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | - Regina Gh Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kobe A, Tselikas L, Deschamps F, Roux C, Delpla A, Varin E, Hakime A, de Baère T. Thermal ablation of ultrasound and non-contrast computed tomography invisible primary and secondary liver tumors: targeting by selective intra-arterial lipiodol injection. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:609-613. [PMID: 36992626 PMCID: PMC10679642 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.221317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the technical feasibility and outcomes of thermal ablation following selective intra-arterial lipiodol injection (SIALI) for targeting primary and secondary liver tumors invisible on ultrasound (US) and non-contrast computed tomography (CT). METHODS This retrospective study included 18 patients with 20 tumors (67% male, mean age 60.8 ± 12.1 years). The 20 tumors included 15 liver metastases and 5 hepatocellular carcinomas. All patients underwent single-session SIALI and subsequent CT-guided thermal ablation. The primary outcome was a technical success, defined as visualization of the tumor after SIALI and successful thermal ablation. Secondary outcomes were local recurrence rate and procedure-related complications. RESULTS The median tumor size was 1.5 (1-2.5) cm. In addition, SIALI was performed with a median volume of 3 (1-10) mL of lipiodol resulting in intra-tumoral iodized oil accumulation in 19 tumors and negative imprint with iodized oil accumulation of the surrounding liver parenchyma in 1 tumor. The technical success rate was 100%. No local occurrence was observed at a mean follow-up time of 3 ± 2.5 years. CONCLUSION SIALI to tag liver tumors not visible with US and non-contrast CT before percutaneous ablation is highly feasible and has a high success rate for the treatment of both primary and secondary liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Kobe
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Frédéric Deschamps
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Roux
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandre Delpla
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Eloi Varin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Hakime
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Thierry de Baère
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Floridi C, Cellina M, Irmici G, Bruno A, Rossini N, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Arrichiello A, Candelari R, Barile A, Carrafiello G, Giovagnoni A. Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures. J Clin Med 2022; 11:4028. [PMID: 35887791 PMCID: PMC9322069 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology (IO) procedures have become extremely popular in interventional radiology (IR) and play an essential role in the diagnosis, treatment, and supportive care of oncologic patients through new and safe procedures. IR procedures can be divided into two main groups: vascular and non-vascular. Vascular approaches are mainly based on embolization and concomitant injection of chemotherapeutics directly into the tumor-feeding vessels. Percutaneous approaches are a type of non-vascular procedures and include percutaneous image-guided biopsies and different ablation techniques with radiofrequency, microwaves, cryoablation, and focused ultrasound. The use of these techniques requires precise imaging pretreatment planning and guidance that can be provided through different imaging techniques: ultrasound, computed tomography, cone-beam computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities can be used alone or in combination, thanks to fusion imaging, to further improve the confidence of the operators and the efficacy and safety of the procedures. This article aims is to provide an overview of the available IO procedures based on clinical imaging guidance to develop a targeted and optimal approach to cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Floridi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Michaela Cellina
- Radiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Irmici
- Post-Graduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.I.); (A.A.)
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Nicolo’ Rossini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (F.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Francesco Arrigoni
- Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Antonio Arrichiello
- Post-Graduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.I.); (A.A.)
| | - Roberto Candelari
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (F.B.); (A.B.)
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Operative Unit of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (N.R.); (A.A.); (A.G.)
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Umberto I—Lancisi—Salesi”, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|