Breast cancer and background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

Dual-region MRI radiomic analysis indicates increased risk in high-risk breast lesions: bridging intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics for precision decision-making

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-derived clinicoradiological characteristics and intratumoral/peritumoral radiomic features in predicting pathological upgrades (malignant transformation) in high-risk breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively collected the data of 174 patients with high-risk breast lesions who underwent preoperative breast MRI examinations and were confirmed by biopsy pathology in Shenzhen People's Hospital between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2024. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n = 121) and a test set (n = 53) at a ratio of 7:3. Initially, during the second stage of DCE-MRI, the region of interest (ROI) was delineated along the maximum cross-section of the lesion, and then automatically expanded outward by 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm as the peritumoral ROIs. The intratumoral, each peritumoral, and the combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic models were established respectively. Independent risk factors predictive of malignant upgrades in high-risk lesions were identified through univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, which were subsequently incorporated as clinical and imaging characteristics. Finally, a combined model was established by integrating the intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features with the clinical and imaging features. The performance of each model was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

The peritumoral 3 mm radiomics model achieved the highest diagnostic performance among all the peritumoral models, with the AUC values of 0.704 and 0.654 for the training and test sets, respectively. In the training set, the combined model showed the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.883), which was superior to that of the clinical and imaging features model (AUC = 0.745, P = 0.003), the intratumoral radiomics model (AUC = 0.791, P = 0.027), the peritumoral 3 mm radiomics model (AUC = 0.704, P = 0.001), and the combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic model (AUC = 0.830, P = 0.004). In the test set, the combined model also showed the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.851). The combined model constructed by integrating the intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features with the clinical and imaging features had the best diagnostic performance, with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 79.4%, 82.7%, and 81.8% in the training set, and 72.7%, 85.7%, and 83.0% in the test set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combined predictive model, which integrates intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features with clinical and imaging data, exhibited strong diagnostic performance and a clinically applicable nomogram was constructed to stratify individualized upgrade risk, assisting clinicians in making more precise decisions.

Misdiagnosis in breast imaging: a statement paper from European Society Breast Imaging (EUSOBI)-Part 2: Main causes of errors in breast imaging and recommendations from European Society of Breast Imaging to limit misdiagnosis

IMPORTANCE

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of negligence claims in radiology. The objective of this document is to describe the specific main causes of errors in breast imaging and provide European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) recommendations to try to minimize these.

OBSERVATIONS

Technical failures represent 17% of all mammographic diagnostic negligence claims. Mammography quality control protocol and dedicated training for technologists and radiologists are essential. Lack of consideration of the clinical context is a second critical issue, as a clinical abnormality is found in 80% of malpractice claims. EUSOBI emphasizes the importance of communication and clinical examination before the diagnostic investigation. Detection errors or misapplications of the lexicon or Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) score account for 5% of malpractice claims and should be reduced by limiting radiologists' distraction or fatigue, and being aware of satisfaction of search errors and the importance of a personal systematic review. Errors related to pathological concordance and MDT review can be limited by the use of markers after biopsy and the use of standardized reports, which can aid communication with other specialities. Finally, errors related to tumor or patient factors should be discussed, considering the use of contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSION

Several factors are responsible for misdiagnosis in breast cancer, including errors in the practice of the technician and/or radiologist (technical failures, lack of consideration of the clinical context, incorrect application of the BI-RADS score, false reassurances), lack of communication with other specialists or with the patient, and the type of tumor and breast parenchyma.

KEY POINTS

Question What factors most contribute to and what implications stem from misdiagnosis in breast imaging? Findings Ongoing training and education for radiologists and other healthcare providers, as well as interdisciplinary collaboration and communication is paramount. Clinical relevance Misdiagnosis in breast imaging can have significant implications for patients, healthcare providers, and the entire healthcare system.

Influence of Breast Density and Menopausal Status on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis

Background: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has recently gained recognition as an effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing breast lesions, offering both morphological and functional imaging capabilities. However, the phenomenon of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) remains a critical consideration, as it can affect the interpretation of images by obscuring or mimicking lesions. While the impact of BPE has been well-documented in MRI, limited data are available regarding the factors influencing BPE in CEM and its relationship with breast cancer (BC) characteristics. Materials: This retrospective study included 116 patients with confirmed invasive BC who underwent CEM prior to biopsy and surgery. Data collected included patient age, breast density, receptor status, tumor grading, and the Ki-67 proliferation index. BPE was evaluated by two radiologists using the 2022 ACR BI-RADS lexicon for CEM. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between BPE, patient demographics, and tumor characteristics. Results: The study found a significant association between higher levels of BPE and specific patient characteristics. In particular, increased BPE was more commonly observed in patients with higher breast density (p < 0.001) and those who were pre-menopausal (p = 0.029). Among patients categorized under density level B, the majority exhibited minimal BPE, while those in categories C and D showed progressively higher levels of BPE, indicating a clear trend correlating higher breast density with increased enhancement. Additionally, pre-menopausal patients demonstrated a higher likelihood of moderate to marked BPE compared to post-menopausal patients. Despite these significant associations, the analysis did not reveal a meaningful correlation between BPE intensity and tumor subtypes (p = 0.77) or tumor grade (p = 0.73). The inter-reader agreement for BPE assessment was substantial, as indicated by a weighted kappa of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.89), demonstrating consistent evaluation between radiologists. Conclusions: These findings suggest that BPE in CEM is influenced by factors like breast density and age, aligning with patterns observed in MRI studies. However, BPE intensity was not associated with tumor subtypes or grades, indicating a poorer prognosis. These insights highlight the potential of BPE as a risk biomarker in preventive follow-up, particularly for patients with high breast density and pre-menopausal status. Further multicentric and prospective studies are needed to validate these results and deepen the understanding of BPE's role in CEM diagnostics.

High-risk breast lesions: a combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics nomogram model to predict pathologic upgrade and reduce unnecessary surgical excision

Objective

This study aimed to develop a nomogram that combines intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on multi-parametric MRI for predicting the postoperative pathological upgrade of high-risk breast lesions and sparing unnecessary surgeries.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 138 patients with high-risk breast lesions (January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2023) were randomly divided into a training set (n=96) and a validation set (n=42) at a 7:3 ratio. The best-performing MRI sequence for intratumoral radiomics was selected to develop individual and combined radiomics scores (Rad-Scores). The best Rad-Score was integrated with independent clinical and radiological risk factors by a nomogram. The diagnostic performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, along with accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity analysis.

Results

The nomogram based on the combined intratumoral and peritumoral Rad-Score of the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and clinical-radiological features achieved superior diagnostic efficacy in the training (AUC=0.914) and validation set (AUC=0.867) compared to other models. It also achieved a specificity and accuracy of 85.1% and 82.3% during training and 66.7% and 76.2% during validation.

Conclusion

The nomogram encapsulating the combined intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics demonstrated superior diagnostic efficacy in postoperative pathological upgrades of high-risk breast lesions, enabling clinicians to make more informed decisions about interventions and follow-up strategies.

Increased background parenchymal enhancement on peri-menopausal breast magnetic resonance imaging

Objectives

To examine the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) levels in peri-menopausal breast MRI compared with pre- and post-menopausal breast MRI.

Methods

This study included 562 patients (55.8±12.3 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI between 2011 and 2015 for clinical indications. We evaluated the BPE level, amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT), and social and clinical variables. The inter-reader agreement for the amount of FGT and the BPE level was evaluated using interclass correlation coefficients. Associations between the BPE level and body mass index (BMI), ages of menarche and menopause, childbirth history, number of children, and the amount of FGT were determined using Spearman's correlation coefficients or Mann-Whitney U-test. Pearson's χ2 test was used to assess the difference in the frequency of BPE categories among the age-groups.

Results

The inter-reader agreement was 0.864 for the amount of FGT and 0.840 for the BPE level, both indicating almost perfect agreement. The BPE level showed a weak positive correlation with the amount of FGT (Spearman's ρ=0.271, P<0.001). BPE was not significantly correlated with BMI, childbirth history, number of births, or ages of menarche or menopause. BPE was greater in the peri-menopausal age-group compared with the corresponding pre- and post-menopausal age-groups, both with benign and malignant lesions.

Conclusions

BPE was greater in the peri-menopausal stage than in the pre- and post-menopausal stages. Our results suggest that BPE showed a non-linear decrease with age and that the hormonal disbalance in the peri-menopausal period has a greater effect on the BPE level than was previously assumed.

Improvement of Breast Cancer Detection Using Dual-Layer Spectral CT

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of breast mass detection on monoenergetic image data at 40 keV (MonoE40) and on iodine maps (IM) compared with conventional image data (CI). In this prospective single-center case-control study, 50 breast cancer patients were examined using contrast-enhanced dual-layer spectral CT. For qualitative and quantitative comparison of MonoE40 and IM with CI image data, four blinded, independent readers assessed 300 randomized single slices (two slices for each imaging type per case) with or without cancerous lesions for the presence of a breast mass. Detection sensitivity and specificity were calculated and readers rated their subjective diagnostic certainty. For statistical analysis of sensitivity and specificity, a paired t-test and ANOVA were used (significance level p = 0.05). A total of 50 female patients (median age 51 years, range 28-83 years) participated. IM had the highest overall scores in sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer detection, with 0.97 ± 0.06 and 0.95 ± 0.07, respectively, compared with 0.90 ± 0.04 and 0.92 ± 0.06 in CI. MonoE40 yielded a sensitivity of 0.96 ± 0.02 and specificity of 0.94 ± 0.08. All differences in sensitivity and specificity between MonoE or IM and CI were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The superiority of IM sensitivity and specificity was most pronounced in patients with dense breasts. Spectral CT improved the detection of breast cancer with higher sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional image data in our study.

How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?

Introduction: Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting suspicious MRI findings. Methods: From all high-risk screening breast MRIs conducted between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020, we reviewed all BI-RADS 4/5 observations with pathological tissue diagnoses. Overall and annual PPV3s were computed. Radiologists with fewer than ten observations were excluded from performance analyses. PPV3s were computed for each radiologist. We assessed how MRI experience, BPE, and FGT impacted diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analyses, defining positive cases as malignancies alone (definition A) or malignant or high-risk lesions (definition B). Findings: There were 536 BI-RADS 4/5 observations with tissue diagnoses, including 77 malignant and 51 high-risk lesions. A total of 516 observations were included in the radiologist performance analyses. The average radiologist's PPV3 was 16 ± 6% (definition A) and 25 ± 8% (definition B). MRI experience in years correlated significantly with positive cases (definition B, OR = 1.05, p = 0.03), independent of BPE or FGT. Diagnostic accuracy improved exponentially with increased MRI experience (definition B, OR of 1.27 and 1.61 for 5 and 10 years, respectively, p = 0.03 for both). Lower levels of BPE significantly correlated with increased odds of findings being malignant, independent of FGT and MRI experience. Summary: More extensive MRI reading experience improves radiologists' diagnostic accuracy for high-risk or malignant lesions, even in MRI studies with increased BPE.

BIRADS 4 - Is it possible to downgrade lesions that do not enhance on recombinant contrast-enhanced mammography images?

PURPOSE

Analysis of the morphology of lesions classified into the BI-RADS 4 category and assessment of the possibility of downgrade the BI-RADS category in those that did not show enhancement on recombinant contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images.

METHOD

The retrospective, single-center study included 528 patients who underwent a core needle biopsy performed from January 2017 to November 2022 due to a breast lesion classified as BI-RADS 4 on CEM. Patients' electronic records and imaging examinations were reviewed. Individual lesions were classified into the morphological categories of mass, non-mass, and microcalcifications. Sensitivity, specificity, positive as well as negative predictive values were calculated for the whole group and individual morphological categories. The influence of the lesions' diameter on the results was analyzed.

RESULTS

CEM NPV for the whole group was 93.9% (±95% CI: 90.0-96.4), for mass lesions 100% (±95% CI: 94.5-100), for non-mass lesions 97.8% (±95% CI: 87.0-99.9) and 87.9% (±95% CI: 80.3-93.0) for microcalcifications. Given that 230 out of 383 benign lesions were not contrast-enhancing, 60.1% of unnecessary CNBs would have been correctly avoided. CEM sensitivity for lesions < 20 mm was lower than for lesions ≥ 20 mm and was respectively 86.6% (±95% CI: 76.8-92.8) vs 94.6% (±95% CI: 86.0-98.2), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CEM is characterized by high sensitivity in the detection of malignant lesions in the case of lesions with mass and non-mass morphology. The high NPV for recombinant images suggests that in the case of these lesions, the lack of enhancement supports the benign nature of the lesion and may lead to a downgrade of the BI-RADS category.

Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement

Background

High-grade background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), including moderate and marked, poses a considerable challenge for the diagnosis of breast disease due to its tendency to increase the rate of false positives and false negatives. The purpose of our study was to explore whether the Kaiser score can be used for more accurate assessment of benign and malignant lesions in high-grade BPE compared with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scans from 2 medical centers. Included were patients who underwent DCE-MRI demonstrating high-grade BPE and who had a pathology-confirmed diagnosis. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who had undergone biopsy prior to MRI examination. Two physicians with more than 7 years of experience specializing in breast imaging diagnosis jointly reviewed breast magnetic resonance (MR) images. The Kaiser score was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the BI-RADS from different BPE groups and different enhancement types. The performance of the Kaiser score and BI-RADS were compared according to diagnostic accuracy.

Results

A total of 126 cases of high-grade BPE from 2 medical centers were included in this study. The Kaiser score had a higher specificity and PPV than did the BI-RADS (87.5% vs. 46.3%) as well as a higher PPV (94.3% vs. 79.8%). The value of diagnostic accuracy and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the Kaiser score (accuracy 0.928; 95% CI: 0.883-0.973) was larger than that for BI-RADS (accuracy 0.810; 95% CI: 0.741-0.879). Moreover, the Kaiser score had a significantly higher value of diagnostic accuracy for both mass and non-mass enhancement, especially mass lesions (Kaiser score: accuracy 0.947, 95% CI: 0.902-0.992; BI-RADS: accuracy 0.821, 95% CI: 0.782-0.860), with a P value of 0.006.

Conclusions

The Kaiser score is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of high-grade BPE lesions, with a higher specificity, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy as compared to the BI-RADS.

Correlation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI with breast cancer

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic value of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women referred to radiological department as a high risk for breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study included 327 consecutive patients (mean age: 60 years, age range: 30-90 years) who underwent breast MRI and tissue biopsy between 2007 and 2016. All MRI images (T1, T2, and subtraction images) were evaluated visually. The relationship of BPE with patient age, fibroglandular tissue (FGT), Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories, presence of breast cancer, and expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), progesterone receptor (PR), oestrogen receptor (ER), and Ki67 were analysed. Furthermore, all variables were correlated with pre- and postmenopausal status.

RESULTS

BPE of bilateral breast showed a weak correlation with FGT (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.004; left BPE: r=0.16, p=0.003), a weak negative correlation with patient age (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.007; left BPE: r=-0.15, p=0.006), and significant correlation with HER2 (right BPE, p=0.02), left BPE with HER2 was not significant. Among the correlations between BPE and BIRADS, only between right BPE and right BIRADS was significant (p=0.031). No clear evidence of an association between breast MRI BPE and breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal status was observed, and no difference was found between the right and left breasts.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study showed no significant correlations between BPE and breast cancer. In addition, there was no significant difference between the right and left breast. Hence, BPE of MRI may not be a reliable biomarker of breast cancer development.

Quantitative background parenchymal enhancement and fibro-glandular density at breast MRI: Association with BRCA status

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether MRI-based measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density (MRBD), and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) could be used to stratify two cohorts of healthy women: BRCA carriers and women at population risk of breast cancer.

METHODS

Pre-menopausal women aged 40-50 years old were scanned at 3 T, employing a standard breast protocol including a DCE-MRI (35 and 30 participants in high- and low-risk groups, respectively). The dynamic range of the DCE protocol was characterised and both breasts were masked and segmented with minimal user input to produce measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and voxelwise BPE. Statistical tests were performed to determine inter- and intra-user repeatability, evaluate the symmetry between metrics derived from left and right breasts, and investigate MRBD and BPE differences between the high- and low-risk cohorts.

RESULTS

Intra- and inter-user reproducibility in estimates of fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and median BPE estimations were good, with coefficients of variation < 15%. Coefficients of variation between left and right breasts were also low (< 25%). There were no significant correlations between fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, and BPE for either risk group. However, the high-risk group had higher BPE kurtosis, although linear regression analysis did not reveal significant associations between BPE kurtosis and breast cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant differences or correlations in fibro-glandular tissue volume, MRBD, or BPE metrics between the two groups of women with different levels of breast cancer risk. However, the results support further investigation into the heterogeneity of parenchymal enhancement.

KEY POINTS

• A semi-automated method enabled quantitative measurements of fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density, and background parenchymal enhancement with minimal user intervention. • Background parenchymal enhancement was quantified over the entire parenchyma, segmented in pre-contrast images, thus avoiding region selection. • No significant differences and correlations in fibro-glandular tissue volume, breast density, and breast background parenchymal enhancement were found between two cohorts of women at high and low levels of breast cancer risk.

Risk Factors for Lymphovascular Invasion in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Based on Clinical and Preoperative Breast MRI Features: a Retrospective Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) plays an important role in the prediction of metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer (BC) patients. The present study assessed correlations between preoperative breast MRI, clinical features, and LVI in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and identified risk factors based on these correlation factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients confirmed with IDC between 01/2012 and 12/2021 were retrospectively reviewed at our hospital. A total of 5 clinical and 14 MRI features to characterize tumours were extracted. LVI evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin sections. T-test and chi-square tests were used to compare the differences in clinical and MRI features between the LVI positive and negative groups. The associations between individual features and LVI were analysed by univariable logistic regression analysis, and risk factors for LVI were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis based on these correlation factors.

RESULTS

This study included 353 patients with IDC, including 130 with positive LVI. Age, CEA, CA-153, amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT), background parenchymal enhancement, tumour size, shape, skin thickening, nipple retraction, adjacent vessel sign, and axillary lymph node (ALN) size in the LVI positive group were significantly different from the LVI negative group (all p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (odds ratio OR = 1.030), CA-153 (OR = 1.018), heterogeneous FGT (OR = 2.484), shape (OR = 2.157), and ALN size (OR = 1.051) were risk factors for LVI (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative breast MRI and clinical features correlated with LVI, age, CA-153, heterogeneous FGT, shape, and ALN size are risk factors for LVI in patients with IDC.

Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in combination with mammography for screening early-stage breast cancer

Objective

To study the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in combination with mammography for screening early-stage breast cancer.

Methods

Ninety-three female patients visiting Zhejiang Zhuji Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2020 to March 2022 were enrolled to receive DCE-MRI and mammography. The diagnostic efficiencies of different methods were assessed with pathological diagnosis as the golden standard. The factors affecting diagnostic sensitivity were investigated based on clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

Forty-one patients were diagnosed as malignant pathological changes by DCE-MRI, and the signs were unclear boundary with surrounding tissues and irregular or unsmooth edges. The maximum linear slope and ratio of the maximum linear SlopeR of malignant pathological changes were significantly larger than those of benign pathological changes (P<0.05). Forty-five patients were diagnosed as malignant pathological changes by mammography combined with DCE-MRI. Compared to single diagnosis method, the combined diagnosis had significantly increased sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, and decreased rates of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis (P<0.05). Lesion diameter was an independent risk factor affecting the diagnostic sensitivity (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Mammography and DCE-MRI play key roles in the early diagnosis of breast cancer, and their combination can increase the diagnostic efficiency.

Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities

Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. In digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, breast density is assessed visually using the four-category scale developed by the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (5th edition as of November 2022). Epidemiologically based risk models, such as the Tyrer-Cuzick model (version 8), demonstrate superior modeling performance when mammographic density is incorporated. Beyond just density, a separate mammographic measure of breast cancer risk is parenchymal textural complexity. With advancements in radiomics and deep learning, mammographic textural patterns can be assessed quantitatively and incorporated into risk models. Other supplemental screening modalities, such as breast US and MRI, offer independent risk measures complementary to those derived from mammography. Breast US allows the two components of fibroglandular tissue (stromal and glandular) to be visualized separately in a manner that is not possible with mammography. A higher glandular component at screening breast US is associated with higher risk. With MRI, a higher background parenchymal enhancement of the fibroglandular tissue has also emerged as an imaging marker for risk assessment. Imaging markers observed at mammography, US, and MRI are powerful tools in refining breast cancer risk prediction, beyond mammographic density alone.

Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Categorization Using Deep Learning: Outperforming the Radiologist

BACKGROUND

Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is assessed on breast MRI reports as mandated by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) but is prone to inter and intrareader variation. Semiautomated and fully automated BPE assessment tools have been developed but none has surpassed radiologist BPE designations.

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning model for automated BPE classification and to compare its performance with current standard-of-care radiology report BPE designations.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Consecutive high-risk patients (i.e. >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer) who underwent contrast-enhanced screening breast MRI from October 2013 to January 2019. The study included 5224 breast MRIs, divided into 3998 training, 444 validation, and 782 testing exams. On radiology reports, 1286 exams were categorized as high BPE (i.e., marked or moderate) and 3938 as low BPE (i.e., mild or minimal).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 1.5 T or 3 T system; one precontrast and three postcontrast phases of fat-saturated T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.

ASSESSMENT

Breast MRIs were used to develop two deep learning models (Slab artificial intelligence (AI); maximum intensity projection [MIP] AI) for BPE categorization using radiology report BPE labels. Models were tested on a heldout test sets using radiology report BPE and three-reader averaged consensus as the reference standards.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Associations between high BPE and BI-RADS assessments were evaluated using McNemar's chi-square test (α* = 0.025).

RESULTS

The Slab AI model significantly outperformed the MIP AI model across the full test set (area under the curve of 0.84 vs. 0.79) using the radiology report reference standard. Using three-reader consensus BPE labels reference standard, our AI model significantly outperformed radiology report BPE labels. Finally, the AI model was significantly more likely than the radiologist to assign "high BPE" to suspicious breast MRIs and significantly less likely than the radiologist to assign "high BPE" to negative breast MRIs.

DATA CONCLUSION

Fully automated BPE assessments for breast MRIs could be more accurate than BPE assessments from radiology reports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Predictive Value of Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Imaging Features in Breast Cancer Patients with Postoperative Recurrence Time

Although the implementation of surgery has reduced the mortality of breast cancer, postoperative recurrence is still an important problem bothering patients. DCE-GMRI can not only clearly display the morphological characteristics of breast lesions but also dynamically observe the blood perfusion of the lesions. On account of this, we explored the predictive value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) imaging features in breast cancer patients on postoperative recurrence time of breast cancer. The results showed that DCE-MRI images can clearly show the hemodynamic characteristics and morphological characteristics of tumor lesions, and have important value in predicting the recurrence time of breast cancer after surgery. The prognosis of early recurrence of breast cancer is worse. DCE-MRI can predict the time of postoperative recurrence and provide important clinical references.

A simplified scoring protocol to improve diagnostic accuracy with the breast imaging reporting and data system in breast magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon provides a standardized terminology for describing leision characteristics but does not provide defined rules for converting specific imaging features into diagnostic categories. The inter-reader agreement of the BI-RADS is moderate. In this study, we explored the use of a simplified protocol and scoring system for BI-RADS categorization which integrates the morphologic features (MF), kinetic time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with equal weights, with a view to providing a convenient and practical method for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and improving the inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of BI-RADS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective, single-center study included 879 patients with 898 histopathologically verified lesions who underwent an MRI scan on a 3.0 Tesla GE Discovery 750 MRI scanner between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020. The BI-RADS categorization of the studied lesions was assessed according to the sum of the assigned scores (the presence of malignant MF, lower ADC, and suspicious TIC each warranted a score of +1). Total scores of +2 and +3 were classified as category 5, scores of +1 were classified as category 4, and scores of +0 but with other lesions of interest were classified as category 3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this categorization were investigated to assess its efficacy and its consistency with pathology.

RESULTS

There were 472 malignant, 104 risk, and 322 benign lesions. Our simplified scoring protocol had high diagnostic accuracy, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.896. In terms of the borderline effect of pathological risk and category 4 lesions, our results showed that when risk lesions were classified together with malignant ones, the AUC value improved (0.876 vs. 0.844 and 0.909 vs. 0.900). When category 4 and 5 lesions were classified as malignant, the specificity, accuracy, and AUC value decreased (82.3% vs. 93.2%, 89.3% vs. 90.2%, and 0.876 vs. 0.909, respectively). Therefore, to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the protocol for BI-RADS categorization, only category 5 lesions should be considered to be malignant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our simplified scoring protocol that integrates MF, TIC, and ADC values with equal weights for BI-RADS categorization could improve both the diagnostic performance of the protocol for BI-RADS categorization in clinical practice and the understanding of the benign-risk-malignant breast diseases.

MRI as a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed female invasive cancer in Western countries and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Nowadays, tumor heterogeneity is a well-known characteristic of BC, since it includes several nosological entities characterized by different morphologic features, clinical course and response to treatment. Thus, with the spread of molecular biology technologies and the growing knowledge of the biological processes underlying the development of BC, the importance of imaging biomarkers as non-invasive information about tissue hallmarks has progressively grown. To date, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered indispensable in breast imaging practice, with widely recognized indications such as BC screening in females at increased risk, locoregional staging and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) monitoring. Moreover, breast MRI is increasingly used to assess not only the morphologic features of the pathological process but also to characterize individual phenotypes for targeted therapies, building on developments in genomics and molecular biology features. The aim of this review is to explore the role of breast multiparametric MRI in providing imaging biomarkers, leading to an improved differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions and to a customized management of BC patients in monitoring and predicting response to treatment. Finally, we discuss how breast MRI biomarkers offer one of the most fertile ground for artificial intelligence (AI) applications. In the era of personalized medicine, with the development of omics-technologies, machine learning and big data, the role of imaging biomarkers is embracing new opportunities for BC diagnosis and treatment.

Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Serum CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, and TFF1 for Breast Cancer

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with serum CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, and TFF1 for breast cancer.

Methods

By means of a retrospective study, 60 breast cancer patients treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were selected as the breast cancer group, 60 patients with benign breast lesions were selected as the benign group, and 60 healthy individuals who received physical examination in our hospital in the same period were selected as the control group. All study subjects received dynamic enhanced MRI scan and serological tests, their serum CA15-3 and CYFRA21-1 levels were measured with the electrochemiluminescence instrument and original auxiliary reagent, and the TFF1 level was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The MRI performance variation in breast lesion patients was analyzed, the serum CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, and TFF1 levels of study subjects were compared among the three groups, and the efficacy of single diagnosis by dynamic enhanced MRI, CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, or TFF1 as well as combined diagnosis was explored by ROC curves.

Results

Dynamic enhanced MRI showed that malignant lesion had obscure boundary, irregular margin, and heterogeneity after enhancement, and the time-signal intensity curve presented fast-in fast-out; the benign lesion had a clear boundary and smooth margin, 25 cases showed homogeneity after enhancement, and the time-signal intensity curve presented slow-in slow-out; the CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, and TFF1 levels were significantly different among the breast cancer group, benign group, and control group (33.81 ± 12.46 vs 19.02 ± 6.47 vs 9.55 ± 2.64, 4.08 ± 1.41 vs 1.96 ± 1.19 vs 0.99 ± 0.21, 1.39 ± 0.54 vs 1.04 ± 0.26 vs 0.89 ± 0.12, P < 0.05); 57 breast cancer patients were diagnosed by a combined examination, with a sensitivity of 95.0%, specificity of 83.3%, positive predictive value of 74.0%, negative predictive value of 97.1%, accuracy rate of 87.2%, and AUC (95%CI) = 0.892 (0.840–0.943), indicating a significantly higher diagnostic value of the combined examination than the single examination by CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, TFF1, or MRI.

Conclusion

Combining dynamic enhanced MRI with serum CA15-3, CYFRA21-1, and TFF1 has good efficacy in diagnosing breast cancer, which can be applied in clinical diagnosis of breast cancer.

Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Assessment and Clinical Implications

Purpose of Review

To present recent literature regarding the assessment and clinical implications of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI.

Recent Findings

The qualitative assessment of BPE remains variable within the literature, as well as in clinical practice. Several different quantitative approaches have been investigated in recent years, most commonly region of interest-based and segmentation-based assessments. However, quantitative assessment has not become standard in clinical practice to date. Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear association between higher BPE and future breast cancer risk. While higher BPE does not appear to significantly impact cancer detection, it may result in a higher abnormal interpretation rate. BPE is also likely a marker of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with decreases in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with pCR. In contrast, pre-treatment BPE does not appear to be predictive of pCR. The association between BPE and prognosis is less clear, with heterogeneous results in the literature.

Summary

Assessment of BPE continues to evolve, with heterogeneity in approaches to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. The level of BPE has important clinical implications, with associations with future breast cancer risk and treatment response. BPE may also be an imaging marker of prognosis, but future research is needed on this topic.