Application of advanced diffusion models from diffusion weighted imaging in a large cohort study of breast lesions

Enhanced preoperative prediction of breast lesion pathology, prognostic biomarkers, and molecular subtypes using multiple models diffusion-weighted MR imaging

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the clinical utility of five diffusion models, including conventional mono-exponential (Mono), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), stretched exponential (SEM), and continuous-time random-walk (CTRW), for preoperatively predicting of breast lesion pathology, prognostic biomarkers, and molecular subtypes. We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients with pathologically verified breast lesions (41 benign and 91 malignant) who underwent a full protocol preoperative breast MRI protocol, including a diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with nine b values (0 to 2000 s/mm2) on a 3.0T MR scanner. The diffusion parameters from each model-Mono (ADC), IVIM (D, D*, f), DKI (MD, MK), SEM (DDC, α) and CTRW (Dm, α, β)-were quantitatively calculated and compared between benign and malignant breast lesions, as well as across different prognostic biomarker statuses in breast cancer, using Mann-Whitney U-tests. For molecular subtypes comparisons, we employed the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni. All parameters, except IVIM-D*, significantly differentiated benign from malignant lesions. Notably, IVIM-D and DKI-MK values were significantly different between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative tumors. Progesterone receptor (PR)-positive cancers exhibited lower Mono-ADC, IVIM-D, DKI-MD, SEM-DDC, CTRW-Dm, and CTRW-α values, alongside higher DKI-MK value compared to PR-negative cancers (p < 0.05). Significant differences in IVIM-D, IVIM-D*, and DKI-MK values were observed between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and HER2-positive tumors. Furthermore, higher SEM-α and CTRW-β values, along with lower DKI-MD and SEM-DDC values, were noted in the high Ki-67 expression group compared to the low Ki-67 group (p < 0.05). All five diffusion models proved valuable for breast cancer diagnosis, with the CTRW model exhibiting the highest diagnostic performance, although the difference was not statistically significant. The diffusion parameters derived from these models can effectively assist in distinguishing prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monoexponential, biexponential and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models in the grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Materials and Methods

Fifty-one patients with pathologically proven ccRCC underwent DWI with fifteen b factors (0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000 sec/mm²) on a 3.0T MR scanner. The isotropic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (ADCslow), pseudodiffusion coefficient (ADCfast), and fraction of perfusion (f) were derived from DWI using a biexponential model. The water diffusion heterogeneity index (α) and distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) were derived from DWI using a stretched-exponential model. All values were calculated for the solid area of tumors and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC. The Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis. The DeLong test was performed to compare the ROC curves.

Results

The mean ADC, DDC, ADCslow and α values were significantly lower in high-grade ccRCC than in low-grade ccRCC (P< 0.01). However, the ADCfast and f were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). According to the ROC analyses, the AUC for α was 0.941, which was significantly greater than those of the other parameters, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 84.2%. The DeLong test showed that there were significant differences in the ROCs among ADCfast/ADC, ADCfast/α, f/ADCslow, ADCfast/ADCslow, f/α, DDC/α, and f/ADC.

Conclusions

Diffusion-related parameters (ADC, DDC, ADCslow and α) could be used to distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. The α derived from the stretched-exponential model may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC.

Histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging: Correlation with molecular prognostic factors and combined subtypes of breast cancer

PURPOSE

To look for links between diffusion and IVIM parameters and different molecular subtypes and prognostic factors through histogram analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 139 patients with breast cancer who had pre-operative MRI examinations were enrolled in this retrospective study. Histograms of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were analyzed for the whole tumor, and an association was investigated between the parameters and the different molecular prognostic factors and subtypes using the nonparametric test, Spearman's rank correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The histogram metrics of the diffusion and IVIM parameters were significantly different for molecular prognostic factors such as human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2), progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and ki-67. All histogram metrics displayed a poor correlation with all groups (r = -0.28-0.29). There were significant differences in the histogram metrics for the Luminal B-HER2 (-) vs. HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the mean and 10th percentile D, with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.742 and 0.700, respectively, and for the Luminal A and HER2-positive (non-luminal) subtypes in the 90th percentile and entropy of D*, with AUCs of 0.769 and 0.727, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The histogram metrics of IVIM parameters exhibited links with breast cancer prognosis factors and combined subtypes.

Quantitative characterization of breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue using compartmentalized diffusion-weighted model: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and restriction spectrum imaging

BACKGROUND

To compare the compartmentalized diffusion-weighted models, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), in characterizing breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 152 patients with 157 histopathologically verified breast lesions (41 benign and 116 malignant). All patients underwent a full-protocol preoperative breast MRI, including a multi-b-value DWI sequence. The diffusion parameters derived from the mono-exponential model (ADC), IVIM model (Dt, Dp, f), and RSI model (C1, C2, C3, C1C2, F1, F2, F3, F1F2) were quantitatively measured and then compared among malignant lesions, benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the pairwise comparisons. Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. The ROC analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean AUC values were calculated and compared to evaluate the discriminative ability of each parameter or model.

RESULTS

Almost all quantitative diffusion parameters showed significant differences in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from both benign lesions (other than C2) and normal fibroglandular tissue (all parameters) (all P < 0.0167). In terms of the comparisons of benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues, the parameters derived from IVIM (Dp, f) and RSI (C1, C2, C1C2, F1, F2, F3) showed significant differences (all P < 0.005). When using individual parameters, RSI-derived parameters-F1, C1C2, and C2 values yielded the highest AUCs for the comparisons of malignant vs. benign, malignant vs. normal tissue and benign vs. normal tissue (AUCs = 0.871, 0.982, and 0.863, respectively). Furthermore, the combined diagnostic model (IVIM + RSI) exhibited the highest diagnostic efficacy for the pairwise discriminations (AUCs = 0.893, 0.991, and 0.928, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative parameters derived from the three-compartment RSI model have great promise as imaging indicators for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions compared with the bi-exponential IVIM model. Additionally, the combined model of IVIM and RSI achieves superior diagnostic performance in characterizing breast lesions.