1
|
Munté E, Feliubadaló L, Del Valle J, González S, Ramos-Muntada M, Balmaña J, Ramon Y Cajal T, Tuset N, Llort G, Cadiñanos J, Brunet J, Capellá G, Lázaro C, Pineda M. Open-Source Bioinformatic Pipeline to Improve PMS2 Genetic Testing Using Short-Read NGS Data. J Mol Diagn 2024:S1525-1578(24)00118-1. [PMID: 38851388 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The molecular diagnosis of mismatch repair-deficient cancer syndromes is hampered by difficulties in sequencing the PMS2 gene, mainly owing to the PMS2CL pseudogene. Next-generation sequencing short reads cannot be mapped unambiguously by standard pipelines, compromising variant calling accuracy. This study aimed to provide a refined bioinformatic pipeline for PMS2 mutational analysis and explore PMS2 germline pathogenic variant prevalence in an unselected hereditary cancer (HC) cohort. PMS2 mutational analysis was optimized using two cohorts: 192 unselected HC patients for assessing the allelic ratio of paralogous sequence variants, and 13 samples enriched with PMS2 (likely) pathogenic variants screened previously by long-range genomic DNA PCR amplification. Reads were forced to align with the PMS2 reference sequence, except those corresponding to exon 11, where only those intersecting gene-specific invariant positions were considered. Afterward, the refined pipeline's accuracy was validated in a cohort of 40 patients and used to screen 5619 HC patients. Compared with our routine diagnostic pipeline, the PMS2_vaR pipeline showed increased technical sensitivity (0.853 to 0.956) in the validation cohort, identifying all previously PMS2 pathogenic variants found by long-range genomic DNA PCR amplification. Fifteen HC cohort samples carried a pathogenic PMS2 variant (15 of 5619; 0.285%), doubling the estimated prevalence in the general population. The refined open-source approach improved PMS2 mutational analysis accuracy, allowing its inclusion in the routine next-generation sequencing pipeline streamlining PMS2 screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Munté
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lídia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Del Valle
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara González
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mireia Ramos-Muntada
- Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Judith Balmaña
- High Risk and Cancer Prevention Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Teresa Ramon Y Cajal
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noemí Tuset
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Gemma Llort
- Department of Medical Oncology Parc Taulí, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Cadiñanos
- R&D Laboratory, Fundación Centro Médico de Asturias-IMOMA, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Precision Oncology Group (OncoGir_Pro), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Gabriel Capellá
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Hereditary Cancer Group, Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy in Oncology Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain; Ciber Oncología, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rothenmund H, Lambert P, Khan D, Kim C, Sharma B, Serfas K, Chodirker B, Singh H. Province-Wide Ascertainment of Lynch Syndrome in Manitoba. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:642-652.e2. [PMID: 37879520 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We describe the experience of Lynch syndrome (LS) diagnosis in the province of Manitoba, Canada, over the past 20 years. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of charts from the provincial Genetics Clinic from January 1, 2000, to May 31, 2023. We extracted data on individuals identified to carry a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic LS gene variant, the mode of ascertainment, family history, and cascade genetic testing (CGT). Data were stratified and compared before and after the year of implementation (October 2013) of the provincial LS screening program (LSSP) and ascertainment by the LSSP vs clinic referrals (CRs). RESULTS Between 2014 and 2021, 50 of 101 (49.5%) index cases were identified by the LSSP compared with 51 of 101 (50.5%) from CRs. The proportion of PMS2 variants was 34% (17 of 50) for LSSP index cases compared with 21.6% (11 of 51) for CRs from 2014 to 2021 (P < .001). Among CRs from 2014 to 2021, 24 of 51 (47.1%) families met the Amsterdam criteria, compared with 11 of 50 (22.0%) for the LSSP (P = .01). CGT occurred among 46.8% (95 of 203; average, 1.9 relatives/index) of first-degree relatives of CR index cases vs 36.5% (84 of 230; average, 1.7 relatives/index) of first-degree relatives of LSSP index cases (P = .03). Daughters were most likely to undergo CGT. CONCLUSIONS A tumor screening program is more effective at detecting individuals with lower penetrant gene variants and families who do not meet traditional family history-based criteria. Cascade genetic testing is higher among clinic referrals compared with the screening program. These findings suggest a complementary role of these 2 ascertainment methods for Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Rothenmund
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Pascal Lambert
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Deirdre Khan
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Christina Kim
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Bhavya Sharma
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kim Serfas
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Bernard Chodirker
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davidson AL, Dressel U, Norris S, Canson DM, Glubb DM, Fortuno C, Hollway GE, Parsons MT, Vidgen ME, Holmes O, Koufariotis LT, Lakis V, Leonard C, Wood S, Xu Q, McCart Reed AE, Pickett HA, Al-Shinnag MK, Austin RL, Burke J, Cops EJ, Nichols CB, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Higgins MJ, Ip EL, Kiraly-Borri C, Lau C, Mansour JL, Millward MW, Monnik MJ, Pachter NS, Ragunathan A, Susman RD, Townshend SL, Trainer AH, Troth SL, Tucker KM, Wallis MJ, Walsh M, Williams RA, Winship IM, Newell F, Tudini E, Pearson JV, Poplawski NK, Mar Fan HG, James PA, Spurdle AB, Waddell N, Ward RL. The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants-a multi-site prospective cohort study. Genome Med 2023; 15:74. [PMID: 37723522 PMCID: PMC10507925 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01223-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many families and individuals do not meet criteria for a known hereditary cancer syndrome but display unusual clusters of cancers. These families may carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and be at higher risk for developing cancer. METHODS This multi-centre prospective study recruited 195 cancer-affected participants suspected to have a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken. RESULTS Pathogenic variants consistent with the presenting cancer(s) were identified in 5.1% (10/195) of participants and pathogenic variants considered secondary findings with potential risk management implications were identified in another 9.7% (19/195) of participants. Health economic analysis estimated the marginal cost per case with an actionable variant was significantly lower for upfront WGS with virtual panel ($8744AUD) compared to standard testing followed by WGS ($24,894AUD). Financial analysis suggests that national adoption of diagnostic WGS testing would require a ninefold increase in government annual expenditure compared to conventional testing. CONCLUSIONS These findings make a case for replacing conventional testing with WGS to deliver clinically important benefits for cancer patients and families. The uptake of such an approach will depend on the perspectives of different payers on affordability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee L Davidson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Uwe Dressel
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah Norris
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, L2.22 The Quadrangle (A14), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Daffodil M Canson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dylan M Glubb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Cristina Fortuno
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Georgina E Hollway
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael T Parsons
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Miranda E Vidgen
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Oliver Holmes
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lambros T Koufariotis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Vanessa Lakis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Conrad Leonard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Scott Wood
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Qinying Xu
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amy E McCart Reed
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Hilda A Pickett
- Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Mohammad K Al-Shinnag
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Rachel L Austin
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Jo Burke
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Elisa J Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cassandra B Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marion T Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Megan J Higgins
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Emilia L Ip
- Cancer Genetics, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Chiyan Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genomics, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julia L Mansour
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Michael W Millward
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Melissa J Monnik
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nicholas S Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Familial Cancer Services, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel D Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Sharron L Townshend
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Simon L Troth
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mathew J Wallis
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- School of Medicine and Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Maie Walsh
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel A Williams
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Felicity Newell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emma Tudini
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John V Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicola K Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Helen G Mar Fan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Nicola Waddell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, L2.22 The Quadrangle (A14), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prodanov T, Bansal V. A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing. Bioinformatics 2023; 39:i279-i287. [PMID: 37387146 PMCID: PMC10311303 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION Low-copy repeats (LCRs) or segmental duplications are long segments of duplicated DNA that cover > 5% of the human genome. Existing tools for variant calling using short reads exhibit low accuracy in LCRs due to ambiguity in read mapping and extensive copy number variation. Variants in more than 150 genes overlapping LCRs are associated with risk for human diseases. METHODS We describe a short-read variant calling method, ParascopyVC, that performs variant calling jointly across all repeat copies and utilizes reads independent of mapping quality in LCRs. To identify candidate variants, ParascopyVC aggregates reads mapped to different repeat copies and performs polyploid variant calling. Subsequently, paralogous sequence variants that can differentiate repeat copies are identified using population data and used for estimating the genotype of variants for each repeat copy. RESULTS On simulated whole-genome sequence data, ParascopyVC achieved higher precision (0.997) and recall (0.807) than three state-of-the-art variant callers (best precision = 0.956 for DeepVariant and best recall = 0.738 for GATK) in 167 LCR regions. Benchmarking of ParascopyVC using the genome-in-a-bottle high-confidence variant calls for HG002 genome showed that it achieved a very high precision of 0.991 and a high recall of 0.909 across LCR regions, significantly better than FreeBayes (precision = 0.954 and recall = 0.822), GATK (precision = 0.888 and recall = 0.873) and DeepVariant (precision = 0.983 and recall = 0.861). ParascopyVC demonstrated a consistently higher accuracy (mean F1 = 0.947) than other callers (best F1 = 0.908) across seven human genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION ParascopyVC is implemented in Python and is freely available at https://github.com/tprodanov/ParascopyVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timofey Prodanov
- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
- Center for Digital Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Vikas Bansal
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbes S, Baldi S, Sellami H, Amedei A, Keskes L. Molecular methods for colorectal cancer screening: Progress with next-generation sequencing evolution. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:425-442. [PMID: 37009313 PMCID: PMC10052664 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i3.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the third most common malignancy and the second most deadly cancer worldwide, with a higher incidence in developed countries. Like other solid tumors, CRC is a heterogeneous genomic disease in which various alterations, such as point mutations, genomic rearrangements, gene fusions or chromosomal copy number alterations, can contribute to the disease development. However, because of its orderly natural history, easily accessible onset location and high lifetime incidence, CRC is ideally suited for preventive intervention, but the many screening efforts of the last decades have been compromised by performance limitations and low penetrance of the standard screening tools. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has both facilitated the identification of previously unrecognized CRC features such as its relationship with gut microbial pathogens and revolutionized the speed and throughput of cataloguing CRC-related genomic alterations. Hence, in this review, we summarized the several diagnostic tools used for CRC screening in the past and the present, focusing on recent NGS approaches and their revolutionary role in the identification of novel genomic CRC characteristics, the advancement of understanding the CRC carcinogenesis and the screening of clinically actionable targets for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Abbes
- Laboratory of Parasitic and Fungal Molecular Biology, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| | - Simone Baldi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Hayet Sellami
- Drosophila Research Unit-Parasitology and Mycologie Laboratory, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| | - Amedeo Amedei
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
- SOD of Interdisciplinary Internal Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Leila Keskes
- Laboratory of Human Molecular Genetic, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Using comprehensive genomic and functional analyses for resolving genotype-phenotype mismatches in children with suspected CMMRD in Lebanon: an IRRDC study. Hum Genet 2023; 142:563-576. [PMID: 36790526 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-023-02530-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is an aggressive and highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome. Because of its variable clinical presentation and phenotypical overlap with neurofibromatosis, timely diagnosis remains challenging, especially in countries with limited resources. Since current tests are either difficult to implement or interpret or both we used a novel and relatively inexpensive functional genomic assay (LOGIC) which has been recently reported to have high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CMMRD. Here we report the clinical and molecular characteristics of nine patients diagnosed with cancer and suspected to have CMMRD and highlight the challenges with variant interpretation and immunohistochemical analysis that led to an uncertain interpretation of genetic findings in 6 of the 9 patients. Using LOGIC, we were able to confirm the diagnosis of CMMRD in 7 and likely exclude it in 2 patients, resolving ambiguous result interpretation. LOGIC also enabled predictive testing of asymptomatic siblings for early diagnosis and implementation of surveillance. This study highlights the varied manifestations and practical limitations of current diagnostic criteria for CMMRD, and the importance of international collaboration for implementing robust and low-cost functional assays for resolving diagnostic challenges.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rojahn S, Hambuch T, Adrian J, Gafni E, Gileta A, Hatchell H, Johnson B, Kallman B, Karfilis K, Kautzer C, Kennemer M, Kirk L, Kvitek D, Lettes J, Macrae F, Mendez F, Paul J, Pellegrino M, Preciado R, Risinger J, Schultz M, Spurka L, Swamy S, Truty R, Usem N, Velenich A, Aradhya S. Scalable detection of technically challenging variants through modified next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022; 10:e2072. [PMID: 36251442 PMCID: PMC9747563 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some clinically important genetic variants are not easily evaluated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods due to technical challenges arising from high- similarity copies (e.g., PMS2, SMN1/SMN2, GBA1, HBA1/HBA2, CYP21A2), repetitive short sequences (e.g., ARX polyalanine repeats, FMR1 AGG interruptions in CGG repeats, CFTR poly-T/TG repeats), and other complexities (e.g., MSH2 Boland inversions). METHODS We customized our NGS processes to detect the technically challenging variants mentioned above with adaptations including target enrichment and bioinformatic masking of similar sequences. Adaptations were validated with samples of known genotypes. RESULTS Our adaptations provided high-sensitivity and high-specificity detection for most of the variants and provided a high-sensitivity primary assay to be followed with orthogonal disambiguation for the others. The sensitivity of the NGS adaptations was 100% for all of the technically challenging variants. Specificity was 100% for those in PMS2, GBA1, SMN1/SMN2, and HBA1/HBA2, and for the MSH2 Boland inversion; 97.8%-100% for CYP21A2 variants; and 85.7% for ARX polyalanine repeats. CONCLUSIONS NGS assays can detect technically challenging variants when chemistries and bioinformatics are jointly refined. The adaptations described support a scalable, cost-effective path to identifying all clinically relevant variants within a single sample.
Collapse
|
8
|
Prodanov T, Bansal V. Robust and accurate estimation of paralog-specific copy number for duplicated genes using whole-genome sequencing. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3221. [PMID: 35680869 PMCID: PMC9184528 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30930-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The human genome contains hundreds of low-copy repeats (LCRs) that are challenging to analyze using short-read sequencing technologies due to extensive copy number variation and ambiguity in read mapping. Copy number and sequence variants in more than 150 duplicated genes that overlap LCRs have been implicated in monogenic and complex human diseases. We describe a computational tool, Parascopy, for estimating the aggregate and paralog-specific copy number of duplicated genes using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Parascopy is an efficient method that jointly analyzes reads mapped to different repeat copies without the need for global realignment. It leverages multiple samples to mitigate sequencing bias and to identify reliable paralogous sequence variants (PSVs) that differentiate repeat copies. Analysis of WGS data for 2504 individuals from diverse populations showed that Parascopy is robust to sequencing bias, has higher accuracy compared to existing methods and enables prioritization of pathogenic copy number changes in duplicated genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timofey Prodanov
- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Vikas Bansal
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tan S, Wu X, Wang A, Ying L. Diagnostic challenges in a CMMRD patient with a novel mutation in the PMS2 gene: a case report. BMC Med Genomics 2021; 14:184. [PMID: 34247610 PMCID: PMC8274000 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-01031-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) is a rare autosomal recessive condition, which is caused by biallelic mutations in mismatch repair genes: MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2. Case presentation We reported a unique case of an 11-year-old Chinese girl with colorectal polyposis and café-au-lait macules who had no obvious family history of Lynch syndrome-associated tumors, followed by brain gliomas and colorectal carcinoma five years later. The diagnosis of CMMRD was based on gene sequencing analysis showing a homozygous deletion NM_00535.5:c.1577delA (p.Asp526fs) in exon 11 of the PMS2 gene. Although the patient underwent surgery and radiation therapy, and close surveillances including radiological, endoscopic and hematological screening have been recommended, she died of the exacerbation of neurological symptoms at the age of 18. Conclusions We identified a novel homozygous deletion in the PMS2 gene in a CMMRD patient with complex clinical features. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-021-01031-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiqing Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xiaoting Wu
- Department of Dermatology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Aoxue Wang
- Department of Dermatology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Li Ying
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Claes KBM, Rosseel T, De Leeneer K. Dealing with Pseudogenes in Molecular Diagnostics in the Next Generation Sequencing Era. Methods Mol Biol 2021; 2324:363-381. [PMID: 34165726 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1503-4_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Presence of pseudogenes is a dreadful issue in next generation sequencing (NGS), because their contamination can interfere with the detection of variants in the genuine gene and generate false positive and false negative variants.In this chapter we focus on issues related to the application of NGS strategies for analysis of genes with pseudogenes in a clinical setting. The degree to which a pseudogene impacts the ability to accurately detect and map variants in its parent gene depends on the degree of similarity (homology) with the parent gene itself. Hereby, target enrichment and mapping strategies are crucial factors to avoid "contaminating" pseudogene sequences. For target enrichment, we describe advantages and disadvantages of PCR- and capture-based strategies. For mapping strategies, we discuss crucial parameters that need to be considered to accurately distinguish sequences of functional genes from pseudogenic sequences. Finally, we discuss some examples of genes associated with Mendelian disorders, for which interesting NGS approaches are described to avoid interference with pseudogene sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Toon Rosseel
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kim De Leeneer
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rehder C, Bean LJH, Bick D, Chao E, Chung W, Das S, O'Daniel J, Rehm H, Shashi V, Vincent LM. Next-generation sequencing for constitutional variants in the clinical laboratory, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021; 23:1399-1415. [PMID: 33927380 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01139-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are now established in clinical laboratories as a primary testing modality in genomic medicine. These technologies have reduced the cost of large-scale sequencing by several orders of magnitude. It is now cost-effective to analyze an individual with disease-targeted gene panels, exome sequencing, or genome sequencing to assist in the diagnosis of a wide array of clinical scenarios. While clinical validation and use of NGS in many settings is established, there are continuing challenges as technologies and the associated informatics evolve. To assist clinical laboratories with the validation of NGS methods and platforms, the ongoing monitoring of NGS testing to ensure quality results, and the interpretation and reporting of variants found using these technologies, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) has developed the following technical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lora J H Bean
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Bick
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Chao
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Wendy Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Soma Das
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Julianne O'Daniel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Heidi Rehm
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Vandana Shashi
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa M Vincent
- Division of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.,Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030467. [PMID: 33530449 PMCID: PMC7865821 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific, as most of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Therefore, the identification of MSI/dMMR requires additional diagnostic tools to identify LS. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS and present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with current strategies, which should be taken into account in order to improve the diagnosis of LS. Abstract Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific to it, as approximately 80% of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Methods leading to the diagnosis of LS have considerably evolved in recent years and so have tumoral tests for LS screening and for the discrimination of LS-related to MSI-sporadic tumors. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS, including the clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. We present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with the current strategies, which should be taken into account to improve the diagnosis of LS and avoid inappropriate clinical management.
Collapse
|
13
|
Resolving misalignment interference for NGS-based clinical diagnostics. Hum Genet 2020; 140:477-492. [PMID: 32915251 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-020-02216-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an incredibly useful tool for genetic disease diagnosis. However, the most commonly used bioinformatics methods for analyzing sequence reads insufficiently discriminate genomic regions with extensive sequence identity, such as gene families and pseudogenes, complicating diagnostics. This problem has been recognized for specific genes, including many involved in human disease, and diagnostic labs must perform additional costly steps to guarantee accurate diagnosis in these cases. Here we report a new data analysis method based on the comparison of read depth between highly homologous regions to identify misalignment. Analyzing six clinically important genes-CYP21A2, GBA, HBA1/2, PMS2, and SMN1-each exhibiting misalignment issues related to homology, we show that our technique can correctly identify potential misalignment events and be used to make appropriate calls. Combined with long-range PCR and/or MLPA orthogonal testing, our clinical laboratory can improve variant calling with minimal additional cost. We propose an accurate and cost-efficient NGS testing procedure that will benefit disease diagnostics, carrier screening, and research-based population studies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Yanus GA, Akhapkina TA, Iyevleva AG, Kornilov AV, Suspitsin EN, Kuligina ES, Ivantsov AO, Aleksakhina SN, Sokolova TN, Sokolenko AP, Togo AV, Imyanitov EN. The spectrum of Lynch syndrome-associated germ-line mutations in Russia. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 63:103753. [PMID: 31491536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome (LS), is a common cancer-predisposing syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the spectrum of germ-line mutations in Russian LS patients. LS-related mismatch repair (MMR) genes were analyzed in 16 patients, who were forwarded to genetic testing due to strong clinical features of LS and had high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in the tumor (n = 14) or unknown MSI status (n = 2). In addition, 672 consecutive colorectal cancer (CRC) cases were screened for family history; 15 patients were younger than 50 years and reported 2 or more instances of LS-related cancers in 1st- or 2nd-degree relatives. Seven of these cases demonstrated MSI-H and therefore were subjected to DNA germ-line testing. Overall, 17/23 (74%) subjects carried LS-associated gene variants (MLH1: 10; MSH2: 4; MSH6: 2; PMS2: 1), with 2 alleles (MLH1 c.677G > T and MSH2 с.1906G > C) detected twice. Testing for recurrent mutations of 30 consecutive MSI-H CRCs led to the identification of 2 additional subjects with LS. The analysis of all relevant publications identified 28 unrelated LS patients presented in Russian medical literature and 3 unrelated Russian LS subjects described in international journals. Overall, 15/49 (31%) genetic defects revealed in Russian LS patients were represented by six recurrent alleles (MLH1: c.350C > T, c.677G > T, c.1852_1854del; MSH2: c.942+3A > T, c.1861C > T, с.1906G > C). We conclude that the founder effect for LS in Russia is seemingly less pronounced than the one for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, however testing for recurrent LS mutations may be considered feasible in some circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigoriy A Yanus
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia.
| | | | - Aglaya G Iyevleva
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia
| | | | - Evgeny N Suspitsin
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia
| | | | - Alexandr O Ivantsov
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia
| | | | | | - Anna P Sokolenko
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia
| | - Alexandr V Togo
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia
| | - Evgeny N Imyanitov
- St.-Petersburg Pediatric Medical University, 194100, Russia; N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, 197758, Russia; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western Medical University, 191015, Russia; St.-Petersburg State University, 199034, St.-Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|