1
|
Ozdemir S, Chaudhry I, Malhotra C, Teo I, Finkelstein EA. Goals of Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in the Last Years of Life. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e245866. [PMID: 38602677 PMCID: PMC11009823 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Understanding goals of care for terminally ill patients at the end of life is crucial to ensure that patients receive care consistent with their preferences. Objectives To investigate the patterns of goals of care among patient-caregiver dyads over the last years of the patient's life and the associations of the goals of care with patient-caregiver characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study of 210 patient-caregiver dyads involved surveys every 3 months from July 8, 2016, until the patient's death or February 28, 2022. Data from the last 2 years of the patients' lives were analyzed. Dyads, which comprised patients with stage IV solid cancer and their caregivers, were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 major cancer centers in Singapore. Main Outcomes and Measures Goals of care were examined via the tradeoffs between life extension and symptom management and between life extension and cost containment. The actor-partner interdependence framework was implemented using mixed-effects linear regressions. Results This study included 210 dyads (patients: mean [SD] age, 62.6 [10.5] years; 108 men [51.4%]; caregivers: mean [SD] age, 49.4 [14.6] years; 132 women [62.9%]). On average, 34% of patients (264 of 780 observations; range, 23%-42%) and 29% of caregivers (225 of 780 observations; range, 20%-43%) prioritized symptom management over life extension, whereas 24% of patients (190 of 780 observations; range, 18%-32%) and 19% of caregivers (148 of 780 observations; range, 8%-26%) prioritized life extension. Between cost containment and life extension, on average, 28% of patients (220 of 777 observations; range, 22%-38%) and 17% of caregivers (137 of 780 observations; range, 10%-25%) prioritized cost containment, whereas 26% of patients (199 of 777 observations; range, 18%-34%) and 35% of caregivers (271 of 780 observations; range, 25%-45%) prioritized life extension. Goals of care did not change as patients approached death. Patients prioritized symptom management if they experienced higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), worse spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], -0.04 [0.01]), and accurate (vs inaccurate) prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.40 [0.18]) and if their caregivers reported accurate prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.53 [0.18]), lower impact of caregiving on finances (average marginal effect [SE], -0.28 [0.08]), and poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.48 [0.16]). Compared with patients, caregivers expressed lower preferences for cost containment (average marginal effect [SE], -0.63 [0.09]). Patients prioritized cost containment if they were older (average marginal effect [SE], 0.03 [0.01]), had higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), had poorer spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], -0.04 [0.01]), and their caregivers reported poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.51 [0.16]) and more family support (average marginal effect [SE], -0.30 [0.14]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patient-caregiver dyads, findings suggested the importance of interventions aimed at reducing discordance in goals of care between patients and caregivers and helping them develop realistic expectations to avoid costly, futile treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lebovitz AL, Schwab SA, Richardson MM, Meyer KB, Sweigart B, Vesel T. Dialysis decision-making process by Chinese American patients at an urban, academic medical center: a retrospective chart review. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:25. [PMID: 38273297 PMCID: PMC10809624 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01357-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines emphasize shared decision-making for kidney replacement treatment, yet little is known about the influence of cultural differences on that process. We undertook a retrospective chart review to explore the process and timing of dialysis decision making and initiation in Chinese American patients to provide quality kidney care for this population. DESIGN Participants received outpatient care at Tufts Medical Center and dialysis at Dialysis Clinic, Inc. Boston or Somerville, MA from 2001-2021. Clinic chart review sourced demographic, clinical, and end-of-life care information from 180 participants (82 Chinese American, 98 other) from stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis initiation. RESULTS Chinese American participants were older (mean 70 vs. 59, p < 0.0001), less likely to speak English (12% vs. 87%, p < 0.0001), and used interpreter services more (80% vs. 11%, p < 0.0001). Chinese American participants had more visits (median 14 vs. 10, p = 0.005); were more often accompanied by family members (75% vs. 40%, p < 0.001); and had significantly lower rates of healthcare proxy documentation (35% vs. 55%, p = 0.006). There was no statistical difference in months between first CKD 4 visit and first dialysis. Both groups started dialysis at the same average eGFR and with similar rates of permanent dialysis access. Chinese American participants had significantly lower serum albumin at dialysis initiation (mean 3.3 g/dL vs 3.7 g/dL, p = 0.0003). Documentation reflected a low number of conversations about non-dialytic care, end-of-life planning, or palliative care in both groups across all visits. CONCLUSION The time between CKD 4 and dialysis initiation was the same in both groups, suggesting a similar overall outcome of care. Chart documentation suggests that Chinese American participants had a significantly higher number of visits with nephrologists where discussion about dialysis was noted and were more likely to have a family member present at the visit. Fewer Chinese American participants completed healthcare proxies. Among all study participants, healthcare proxy, code status, and palliative care discussions were reported less frequently than expected. These findings highlight opportunities for collaboration between palliative care clinicians and nephrologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michelle M Richardson
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Dialysis Clinic, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | - Klemens B Meyer
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Dialysis Clinic, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Tamara Vesel
- Tufts Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramakrishnan C, Widjaja N, Malhotra C, Finkelstein E, Khan BA, Ozdemir S. Unravelling complex choices: multi-stakeholder perceptions on dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care in kidney disease. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25:6. [PMID: 38172719 PMCID: PMC10765633 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03434-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients on dialysis with poor quality of life and prognosis, dialysis withdrawal and subsequent transition to palliative care is recommended. This study aims to understand multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding dialysis withdrawal and identify their information needs and support for decision-making regarding withdrawing from dialysis and end-of-life care. METHODS Participants were recruited through purposive sampling from eight dialysis centers and two public hospitals in Singapore. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patients on dialysis, 8 family caregivers, and 16 renal healthcare providers. They were held in-person at dialysis clinics with patients and caregivers, and virtually via video-conferencing with healthcare providers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework's decisional-needs manual was used as a guide for data collection and analysis, with two independent team members coding the data. RESULTS Four themes reflecting perceptions and support for decision-making were identified: a) poor knowledge and fatalistic perceptions; b) inadequate resources and support for decision-making; c) complexity of decision-making, unclear timing, and unpreparedness; and d) internal emotions of decisional conflict and regret. Participants displayed limited awareness of dialysis withdrawal and palliative care, often perceiving dialysis withdrawal as medical abandonment. Patient preferences regarding decision-making ranged from autonomous control to physician or family-delegated choices. Cultural factors contributed to hesitancy and reluctance to discuss end-of-life matters, resulting in a lack of conversations between patients and providers, as well as between patients and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making for dialysis withdrawal is complicated, exacerbated by a lack of awareness and conversations on end-of-life care among patients, caregivers, and providers. These findings emphasize the need for a culturally-sensitive tool that informs and prepares patients and their caregivers to navigate decisions about dialysis withdrawal and the transition to palliative care. Such a tool could bridge information gaps and stimulate meaningful conversations, fostering informed and culturally aligned decisions during this critical juncture of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrika Ramakrishnan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nathan Widjaja
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Behram Ali Khan
- Division of Nephrology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- National Kidney Foundation, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Til JA, Pearce A, Ozdemir S, Hollin IL, Peay HL, Wu AW, Ostermann J, Deal K, Craig BM. Role Preferences in Medical Decision Making: Relevance and Implications for Health Preference Research. THE PATIENT 2024; 17:3-12. [PMID: 37874464 PMCID: PMC10769916 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00649-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Health preference research (HPR) is being increasingly conducted to better understand patient preferences for medical decisions. However, patients vary in their desire to play an active role in medical decisions. Until now, few studies have considered patients' preferred roles in decision making. In this opinion paper, we advocate for HPR researchers to assess and account for role preferences in their studies, to increase the relevance of their work for medical and shared decision making. We provide recommendations on how role preferences can be elicited and integrated with health preferences: (1) in formative research prior to a health preference study that aims to inform medical decisions or decision makers, (2a) in the development of health preference instruments, for instance by incorporating a role preference instrument and (2b) by clarifying the respondent's role in the decision prior to the preference elicitation task or by including role preferences as an attribute in the task itself, and (3) in statistical analysis by including random parameters or latent classes to raise awareness of heterogeneity in role preferences and how it relates to health preferences. Finally, we suggest redefining the decision process as a model that integrates the role and health preferences of the different parties that are involved. We believe that the field of HPR would benefit from learning more about the extent to which role preferences relate to health preferences, within the context of medical and shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine A van Til
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), University of Twente, Technohal, Room 3304, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Alison Pearce
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ilene L Hollin
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Holly L Peay
- Genomics and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Albert W Wu
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jan Ostermann
- Department of Health Services, Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Ken Deal
- DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Benjamin M Craig
- Department of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mulcahy Symmons S, Ryan K, Aoun SM, Selman LE, Davies AN, Cornally N, Lombard J, McQuilllan R, Guerin S, O'Leary N, Connolly M, Rabbitte M, Mockler D, Foley G. Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance-systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:374-385. [PMID: 35318213 PMCID: PMC10804031 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-making in palliative care usually involves both patients and family caregivers. However, how concordance and discordance in decision-making manifest and function between patients and family caregivers in palliative care is not well understood. OBJECTIVES To identify key factors and/or processes which underpin concordance and/or discordance between patients and family caregivers with respect to their preferences for and decisions about palliative care; and ascertain how patients and family caregivers manage discordance in decision-making in palliative care. METHODS A systematic review and narrative synthesis of original studies published in full between January 2000 and June 2021 was conducted using the following databases: Embase; Medline; CINAHL; AMED; Web of Science; PsycINFO; PsycARTICLES; and Social Sciences Full Text. RESULTS After full-text review, 39 studies were included in the synthesis. Studies focused primarily on end-of-life care and on patient and family caregiver preferences for patient care. We found that discordance between patients and family caregivers in palliative care can manifest in relational conflict and can result from a lack of awareness of and communication about each other's preferences for care. Patients' advancing illness and impending death together with open dialogue about future care including advance care planning can foster consensus between patients and family caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Patients and family caregivers in palliative care can accommodate each other's preferences for care. Further research is needed to fully understand how patients and family caregivers move towards consensus in the context of advancing illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Mulcahy Symmons
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karen Ryan
- St Francis Hospice Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Samar M Aoun
- Palliative Care Unit, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Lucy E Selman
- Palliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Neil Davies
- Academic Department of Palliative Medicine, Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicola Cornally
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - John Lombard
- School of Law, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Regina McQuilllan
- St Francis Hospice Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Palliative Care, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Suzanne Guerin
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Norma O'Leary
- Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Palliative Care, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Connolly
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mary Rabbitte
- All Ireland Institute of Hospice and Palliative Care, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- John Stearne Medical Library, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Geraldine Foley
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ozdemir S, Choong LHL, Gan SWS, Lim LW, Malhotra C, Jafar TH, Yee ACP, Vishwanath P, Tan SNG, Finkelstein EA. Patient Decision Aid Development for Older Adults With End-Stage Kidney Disease in Singapore. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:2885-2896. [PMID: 34805639 PMCID: PMC8589693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction In managing end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), older adults face a decision regarding whether to undergo dialysis or manage symptoms through kidney supportive care (KSC). This article describes the development of a patient decision aid (PDA) that is designed specifically for older adults with ESKD. Methods The decision context of the PDA was to choose a treatment between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and KSC. The development process used insights obtained from qualitative interviews with patients, informal caregivers, and health care providers. The PDA was then developed in English and Mandarin and was pilot-tested with patients, caregivers, and health care providers. We finalized the PDA based on feedback from pilot testing and performed a preliminary evaluation based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDASi v4.0) criteria. Results The final PDA consists of 2 booklets and a video. During pilot testing, patients and caregivers reported high levels of ease of understanding and usefulness with ≥92.5% providing agree/strongly agree responses for the "Content"-related criteria, and ≥75% providing agree/strongly agree responses for the "Development Process and Effectiveness"-related criteria. The final PDA met 10 of 12 IPDASi v4.0 criteria. Conclusions This PDA was found useful during pilot-testing. It will be used during renal counseling in Singapore to help older adults with ESKD and their caregivers make informed decisions on which treatment option is best for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Lydia Wei Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Tazeen H Jafar
- Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention on stress and anxiety of family caregivers managing peritoneal dialysis. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/20101058211054913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) has not been evaluated for its feasibility and effectiveness in reducing stress and anxiety among family caregivers of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Objectives (1) To evaluate the feasibility to include MBI during PD training for family caregivers. (2) To determine the effect of MBI on the caregivers’ levels of stress (perceived stress scale, PSS), anxiety state-trait anxiety inventory, STAI), QOL (short-form 36) and reactions to caregiving (caregiver reaction assessment, CRA). (3) To determine differences in the health-related QOL (Kidney Disease Quality of Life Instrument-Short Form, KDQOL PCS and SF-36 MCS) of care recipients with caregivers receiving MBI at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months when compared to those with caregivers receiving routine training. (4) To gather the caregiver’s feedback on the MBI. Methods This feasibility study recruited family caregivers to receive either mindfulness training (MT) or treatment-as-usual (TAU) group. Both groups received 4.5-days of structured PD training, but only caregivers in the MT group received 4 days of MT sessions, audio-guided mindfulness practice at home and weekly telephone follow-up. Results Forty-four family caregivers participated in this study. Including MBI as part of the PD training was feasible. There was a trend towards lower scores for PSS and T-STAI in the MT group compared to the TAU group. The baseline score of both PSS and T-STAI were positively correlated with post-intervention outcome scores. Conclusions Mindfulness-based intervention has the potential to improve psychological symptoms among caregivers of patients with PD.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shi Y, Li W, Duan F, Pu S, Peng H, Ha M, Luo Y. Factors promoting shared decision-making in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 54:553-574. [PMID: 34159522 PMCID: PMC8831292 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02913-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Shared decision-making (SDM) about the type of renal replacement therapy to use is a matter of great importance involving patients, their families, and health treatment teams. This review aims to synthesize the volume of qualitative work explaining the factors influencing SDM regarding renal replacement therapy. METHODS A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis approach recommended by JBI was used, six databases were searched. Studies were qualitative or mixed research published since 2000, with a primary focus on patient experiences, perceptions and practices regarding which method to choose for renal replacement therapy in End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) patients. All themes were analyzed and compared to the established connectedness. RESULTS A total of 1313 patients were enrolled in 32 studies focusing on factors associated with SDM regarding renal replacement therapy were included. All quality evaluations of the literature were medium to high. Four common themes were identified in our synthesis: (1) patient personal reasons, (2) family-related factors, (3) health care professional-related factors, and (4) social factors influence. CONCLUSION The model proposes pathways that could be explored further in future qualitative and quantitative studies and suggests that patients' beliefs, emotions, and awareness should be targeted alongside patients' decision-making practices to increase the efficacy of interventions. The majority of studies included in this review focus on older patients, and all report patients' perspectives. Further research is required to understand the family member perspectives on SMD of renal replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shi
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.,Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Wang Li
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Fangjian Duan
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi Pu
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Peng
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China
| | - Mei Ha
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu Luo
- School of Nursing, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), No. 30 Gaotanyan Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ozdemir S, Ng S, Malhotra C, Teo I, Finkelstein EA. Patient-Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem. Innov Aging 2021; 5:igab020. [PMID: 34316519 PMCID: PMC8306724 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Many patient–caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increased caregiver burden. However, the relationships between treatment discordance among dyads and caregiver psychological outcomes are not well studied among advanced cancer patients—a gap this study aims to fill. Research Design and Methods Outcome variables included caregiver burden and caregiving esteem, measured via a modified 4-domain Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale. The main independent variable was patient–caregiver treatment preference discordance, examined using questions adapted from an existing protocol. Analyses were conducted using multivariable regressions. Results A convenience sample of 285 patient–caregiver dyads were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. The majority (60%) of patient–caregiver dyads reported discordant treatment preferences. Discordance in this study arose because caregivers wanted a balance between life extension and symptom management while patients preferred life-extending treatment. In multivariable analyses, discordance predicted caregiver burden arising from impact on caregiver schedule and health (β = 0.16, p = .07) and lack of family support (β = 0.13, p = .04). Discussion and Implications Theoretically, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of how dyad discordance may worsen the burdens felt by caregivers, and which aspects of their lives (i.e., burden due to impact of caregiver schedule and health and lack of family support) are most affected. Our findings can aid in establishing therapeutic interventions targeted toward improving communication skills and encouraging end-of-life discussions among patients, caregivers, and their health care providers. The importance of establishing and improving therapy programs specifically targeted toward caregivers was also underlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sean Ng
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric A Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gieseler F, Heidenreich A, Schubert J, Frielitz F, Rehmann‐Sutter C, Wörler F, Schües C, Hübner J, Elsner S, Block K, Rody A, von Bubnoff N, Keck T, Steimann M, Endsin G, Katalinic A. The role of family confidants and caregivers in the care of older cancer patients: Extending the concept of "shared decision-making". Health Sci Rep 2021; 4:e281. [PMID: 33977163 PMCID: PMC8100949 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Family caregivers play an important role in assisting their family members with cancer, but their influence on the treatment decision-making process has not yet been adequately investigated. This exploratory study approached this topic via reconstructive methodology, focusing on assessing patient-caregiver relationships. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 mostly elderly cancer patients (median age: 74 years) about the context of their diagnosis, treatment decision, and family support. Additionally, we interviewed 34 caregivers of cancer patients. Of these, 25 were related to patients interviewed. We analyzed the interviews via a multi-step coding method informed by Grounded Theory methodology toward characterizing patient-caregiver relationships, the treatment decision-making process, and the caregivers' role therein. RESULTS In the majority of cases (86%), patients were being supported by caregivers. We categorized patient-caregiver relationships in regards to the caregivers' involvement in the therapy decision-making process. We found patient-caregiver interaction patterns that indicate the potential of caregivers to decidedly influence the therapy decision-making process. Yet, only in 38% of cases, a caregiver attended relevant patient-physician-consultations. CONCLUSION Depending on the nature of the patient-caregiver relationship, the traditional concept of shared decision-making, which assumes a dyadic relationship, needs to be extended toward a more dynamic concept in which caregivers should be involved more frequently. This could enable physicians to better understand a patient's reasons for or against a therapy proposal and ensure that the patient's wishes are communicated and considered. On the other hand, strong caregiver-involvement bears risks of over-stepping elderly patients' wishes, thus violating patient autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Gieseler
- Clinic for Hematology and OncologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH)LuebeckGermany
| | - Andreas Heidenreich
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Jacqueline Schubert
- Clinic for Hematology and OncologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH)LuebeckGermany
| | - Fabian Frielitz
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | | | - Frank Wörler
- Institute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Christina Schües
- Institute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Joachim Hübner
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Susanne Elsner
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Katarina Block
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| | - Achim Rody
- Clinic for GynecologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH)LuebeckGermany
| | - Nikolas von Bubnoff
- Clinic for Hematology and OncologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH)LuebeckGermany
| | - Tobias Keck
- Clinic for SurgeryUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein (UKSH)LuebeckGermany
| | - Monika Steimann
- Strandklinik Ostseebad BoltenhagenOstseebad BoltenhagenGermany
| | | | - Alexander Katalinic
- Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin YP, Chen J, Lee WC, Chiang YJ, Huang CW. Understanding family dynamics in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation decision-making in Taiwan: Motivation, communication, and ambivalence. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1068-1079. [PMID: 32860293 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated how multiple family members co-construct the ethical significance of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and how the family structure and dynamics of donor-recipient-caregiver relationships shape the communication and decision-making process within the sociocultural context of Taiwan. We conducted in-depth interviews with 36 participants from 13 families at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from February to December 2019. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated from Mandarin to English and analyzed utilizing grounded theory and thematic analysis. Our findings revealed that LDLT in Taiwan is not merely a personal choice of either donor or recipient but essentially a collaborative process of family-centered medical decision-making, intertwined with socioeconomic conditions, cultural and social norms, gender roles, and the division of labor in the household. The notion of reciprocity and indebtedness for family members is a central theme underlying the entire process of motivation, deliberation, and decision-making, thereby reinforcing the naturalness of LDLT. However, our study highlighted that donors from families with traditional gender hierarchy and power imbalance may experience psychological and social vulnerabilities. Conclusively, we suggest that healthcare professionals should be sensitive to the contextual and relational factors involved in family dynamics and provide appropriate support to the ambivalent donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Ping Lin
- Institute of Public Health; Department of Public Health and Medical Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University.,Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Chang Gung Medical Education Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jung Chen
- Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Liver and Transplantation Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Jen Chiang
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wan Huang
- Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Rehabilitation & Community Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Woo K, Pieters H. The patient experience of hemodialysis vascular access decision-making. J Vasc Access 2020; 22:911-919. [PMID: 33118395 DOI: 10.1177/1129729820968400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe vascular access (VA)-related decision-making from the patient perspective, in patients who have already chosen hemodialysis as their renal replacement modality, and identify areas where physicians can improve this experience. METHODS In-person, semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with end-stage kidney disease were systematically analyzed by two independent researchers using thematic analysis. Interviews were conducted until systematic analysis revealed no new themes. RESULTS Patients had mean age 57 (range 22-85), with seven males and diverse racial/ethnic/marital status. All (15/15) patients viewed VA as "intertwined and interrelated" with dialysis, prioritized the dialysis, described the VA merely as the "hookup" to life-preserving dialysis and gave it minimal consideration. Three themes were identified: consolidation of dialysis and VA, reliance on supportive advisors and communication with physicians. Although 14/15 patients described processes common to medical decision-making, including information seeking, learning from the experiences of others, and weighing risks and benefits, they did not apply these processes specifically to VA. While all participants took ownership of the VA decision, they lacked clear understanding about the different types of VA and their consequences. Most patients (14/15) depended on family and friends for reinforcement, motivation and advice. Patients all described physician characteristics they associated with trustworthiness, the most common being listening and explaining, demonstrating empathy and making an effort to meet the patient's individual needs. Perceived arrogance, unavailability and lack of expertise represented untrustworthiness. The majority (14/15) accepted VA recommendations from physicians they found trustworthy and authoritative. CONCLUSIONS The study participants were minimally engaged in VA decision-making. Educational aids and shared decision-making tools are needed to empower patients to make better-informed, self-efficacious VA decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Woo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Huibrie Pieters
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Instability in End-of-Life Care Preference Among Heart Failure Patients: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial in Singapore. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:2010-2016. [PMID: 32103441 PMCID: PMC7351942 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05740-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to improve quality of end-of-life (EOL) care are increasingly focused on eliciting patients' EOL preference through advance care planning (ACP). However, if patients' EOL preference changes over time and their ACP documents are not updated, these documents may no longer be valid at the time EOL decisions are made. OBJECTIVES To assess extent and correlates of changes in stated preference for aggressive EOL care over time. DESIGN Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of a formal ACP program versus usual care in Singapore. PATIENTS Two hundred eighty-two patients with heart failure (HF) and New York Heart Association Classification III and IV symptoms were recruited and interviewed every 4 months for up to 2 years to assess their preference for EOL care. Analytic sample included 200 patients interviewed at least twice. RESULTS Nearly two thirds (64%) of patients changed their preferred type of EOL care at least once. Proportion of patients changing their stated preference for type of EOL care increased with time and the change was not unidirectional. Patients who understood their prognosis correctly were less likely to change their preference from non-aggressive to aggressive EOL care (OR 0.66, p value 0.07) or to prefer aggressive EOL care (OR 0.53; p value 0.001). On the other hand, patient-surrogate discussion of care preference was associated with a higher likelihood of change in patient preference from aggressive to non-aggressive EOL care (OR 1.83; p value 0.03). CONCLUSION The study provides evidence of instability in HF patients' stated EOL care preference. This undermines the value of an ACP document recorded months before EOL decisions are made unless a strategy exists for easily updating this preference. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02299180.
Collapse
|
14
|
Physicians' Recognition and Management of Kidney Disease: A Randomized Vignette Study Evaluating the Impact of the KDIGO 2012 CKD Classification System. Kidney Med 2020; 2:258-266. [PMID: 32734245 PMCID: PMC7380357 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (KDOQI) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification systems published in 2002 and 2012, respectively, are recommended worldwide and based on strong epidemiologic data. However, their impact on CKD recognition and management is not well evaluated in clinical practice, and we therefore investigated whether they help physicians recognize and appropriately care for patients with CKD. Study Design Randomized vignette experiment with fractional factorial design based on 6 kidney-related scenarios and 3 laboratory presentation methods reflecting the CKD guidelines. Participants evaluated 1 of 3 subsets of the 18 vignettes (ie, 6 vignettes each with 4 answer alternatives). Setting & Participants 249 interns, general practitioners, and residents/fellows attending postgraduate meetings and courses in Norway and the United States. Intervention Kidney-related results (serum creatinine level and urinary albumin excretion) were presented as the “minimal data” (high/low levels), KDOQI-2002 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] reported automatically), or KDIGO-2012 (eGFR + albuminuria categorization + risk for complications) laboratory report. Outcome CKD management choice by physicians. Results When kidney laboratory data were presented as the KDOQI-2002 report (automatic eGFR calculation), there was a significantly higher odds for correct patient management decisions compared with the minimal data report (OR, 1.57; P < 0.001). Additional significant improvement was obtained with the KDIGO-2012 report (OR, 2.28 for correct answer vs minimal data report [P < 0.001]; OR, 1.45 compared to KDOQI-2002 report [P = 0.005]). The KDIGO classification system improved physician management in 4 of the 6 clinical scenarios covering a wide range of kidney-related topics. Interaction analysis showed that general practitioners and those with 1 to 3 years of internal medicine experience had the greatest improvements with the new presentation techniques. Limitations Physicians’ management was evaluated by theoretical scenarios rather than direct patient care. Conclusions Automatic GFR estimation, albuminuria categorization, and notification of the associated risk for complications improve most physicians` recognition and management of a wide range of CKD clinical scenarios.
Collapse
|