Early outcomes of kidney transplantation from elderly donors after circulatory death (GEODAS study)

Results of Kidney Transplantation with Controlled Cardiac Death Donors Older Than 70 Years

BACKGROUND

The persistent shortage of optimal kidney donors and the progressive increase in patients on the waiting list has led to an expansion of organ acceptance criteria, such as controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors, as well as an expansion of criteria for accepting these organs (age, comorbidities, etc). However, there are some concerns and doubts about the survival outcomes achieved with these allografts.

METHODS

A retrospective observational single-center study including all kidney transplants (KTs) from donors ≥70 years old using cDCD and donation after brain death (DBD) performed from January 2017 to December 2022. A comparative analysis was conducted between the 2 groups regarding clinical characteristics, medium and short-term clinical outcomes, and patient and graft survival rates.

RESULTS

We studied 123 KTs performed with donors ≥70 years old, 81 from DBD, and 42 from cDCD. The median follow-up was 41 months (18-60). The age of the recipients from cDCD was higher (68 vs 65 years; P = .03), without significant differences in associated comorbidities. The age of DBD was significantly higher (73 vs 71; P = .001), and cDCD donors had a higher prevalence of diabetes (16% vs 5%; P = .04); however, there were no significant differences in Kidney Donor Profile Index between the groups. There was a trend toward a higher percentage of Delayed Graft Function in the cDCD group, although renal function was similar between the groups during follow-up. There were also no differences between the percentages of acute rejection. The mean graft survival rate censored for death with a functioning graft at one year (81% for DBD vs 79% for cDCD) and at 3 years (83% for DBD vs 75% for cDCD) was satisfactory (P = .141).

CONCLUSIONS

The medium-term results of KT with cDCD donors are promising and comparable to those of DBD, allowing for an expansion of the donor pool for selected transplant recipients.

Induction immunosuppression and outcome in kidney transplant recipients with early COVID-19 after transplantation

COVID-19 in kidney transplants has a high risk of complications and mortality, especially in older recipients diagnosed during the early period after transplantation. Management of immunosuppression has been challenging during the pandemic. We investigated the impact of induction immunosuppression, either basiliximab or thymoglobulin, on the clinical evolution of kidney transplants developing COVID-19 during the early period after transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients with less than 6 months with a functioning graft diagnosed of COVID-19 from the initial pandemic outbreak (March 2020) until July 31st, 2021 from different Spanish centers participating in a nationwide registry. A total of 127 patients from 17 Spanish centers developed COVID-19 during the first 6 months after transplantation, 73 (57.5%) received basiliximab and 54 (42.5%) thymoglobulin. Demographics were not different between groups but patients receiving thymoglobulin were more sensitized (cPRA of 32.7±40.8% vs. 5.6±18.5%) and were more frequently re-transplants (30% vs. 4%). Recipients older than 65 years treated with thymoglobulin showed the highest rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome (64.7% vs. 37.1% for older recipients receiving thymoglobulin and basiliximab [p<0.05], and 23.7% and 18.9% for young recipients receiving basiliximab and thymoglobulin [p>0.05]) and the poorest survival (mortality rate of 64.7% and 42.9% for older recipients treated with thymoglobulin and basiliximab, respectively [p<0.05], and 8.1% and 10.5% for young recipients treated with thymoglobulin and basiliximab [p>0.05]). Older recipients treated with thymoglobulin showed the poorest survival in the Cox's regression model adjusted for comorbidities. Thus, thymoglobulin should be used with caution in older recipients during the present pandemic era.

Kidney transplant outcome of expanded criteria donors after circulatory death

The increase in the number of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list has led to an attempt to increase the number of potential donors by incorporating candidates that previously would not have been considered optimal, including donors after cardiac death (DCD) and those with "expanded" criteria (ECD). Recipients of controlled DCD (cDCD) grafts suffer more delayed graft function (DGF), but have a long-term evolution comparable to those of brain-dead donors, which has allowed an increase in the number of cDCD transplants in different countries in recent years. In parallel, the use of cDCD with expanded criteria (cDCD/ECD) has increased in recent years in different countries, allowing the waiting list for kidney transplantation to be shortened. The use of these grafts, although associated with a higher frequency of DGF, offers similar or only slightly lower long-term graft survival than those of brain death donors with expanded criteria. Different studies have observed that cDCD/ECD graft recipients have worse kidney function than cDCD/standard and DBD/ECD. Mortality associated with cDCD/ECD graft transplantation mostly relates to the recipient age. Patients who receive a cDCD/≥60 graft have better survival than those who continue on the waiting list, although this fact has not been demonstrated in recipients of cDCD/>65 years. The use of this type of organ should be accompanied by the optimization of surgical times and the shortest possible cold ischemia.

Kidney transplant outcomes in elderly recipients with controlled donation after circulatory death or donation after brain death donors: a registry cohort study

The number of kidney transplant (KT) procedures with controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has exponentially increased in Spain in recent years, with a parallel increase in donor and recipient acceptance criteria. The outcomes of cDCD-KT have been reported to be comparable to those of KT with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, studies in elderly recipients have yielded contradictory results. We performed a registry analysis of 852 KT recipients aged ≥65 years (575 in the DBD-KT group, 277 in the cDCD-KT group) in Catalonia, Spain. Clinical outcomes and survival were compared between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients. The donor and recipient ages were similar between the two groups (71.5 ± 8.7 years for donors, 70.8 ± 4.1 years for recipients). Delayed graft function (DGF) was more frequent among cDCD-KT recipients, without a difference in the rate of primary nonfunction. The 3-year patient and death-censored graft survival rates were similar between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients (78.8% vs. 76.4% and 90.3% vs. 86.6%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, previous cardiovascular disease and DGF were independent risk factors for patient death. The type of donation (cDCD vs. DBD) was not an independent risk factor for patient survival or graft loss. cDCD-KT and DBD-KT provide comparable patient and graft survival in elderly recipients.

Effect of Long Cold Ischemia Time of Kidneys from Aged Donors on Prognosis of Kidney Transplantation

With the increasing incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), patients' life span and life quality are significantly reduced. Kidney transplantation has gradually become the ideal method for treating ESRD, and the shortage of organ sources has become the main problem. In recent years, China has successfully realized the transformation of organ sources. Voluntary donation after the death of citizens has increased year by year, and the number of kidney transplantations has increased, which alleviates the organ shortage to a certain extent, but compared with the past, the increasing proportion of aged donors has also become an inevitable global problem. At the same time, due to the sudden and widespread distribution of voluntary donation, most donor kidneys have the problem of longer cold ischemic time (CIT). The probability of adverse events, such as delayed renal function recovery after transplantation, was also significantly increased. At present, there is little research on the effect of donor's aging and long CIT on the prognosis of renal transplantation. This paper reviews the literature in recent years and explore this problem from 2 aspects: the elderly donor and the long CIT.

Deciphering transplant outcomes of expanded kidney allografts donated after controlled circulatory death in the current transplant era. A call for caution

Outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) with highly expanded criteria donors (ECD) and recipients have not been thoroughly evaluated. We analyzed in a multicenter cohort of 1161 consecutive KT, granular baseline donor and recipient factors predicting transplant outcomes, selected by bootstrapping and Cox proportional hazards, and were validated in a contemporaneous European KT cohort (n = 1585). 74.3% were DBD and 25.7% cDCD-KT. ECD-KT showed the poorest graft survival rates, irrespective of cDCD or DBD (log-rank < 0.001). Besides standard ECD classification, dialysis vintage, older age, and previous cardiovascular recipient events together with low class-II-HLA match, long cold ischemia time and combining a diabetic donor with a cDCD predicted graft loss (C-Index 0.715, 95% CI 0.675-0.755). External validation showed good prediction accuracy (C-Index 0.697, 95%CI 0.643-0.741). Recipient older age, male gender, dialysis vintage, previous cardiovascular events, and receiving a cDCD independently predicted patient death. Benefit/risk assessment of undergoing KT was compared with concurrent waitlisted candidates, and despite the fact that undergoing KT outperformed remaining waitlisted, remarkably high mortality rates were predicted if KT was undertaken under the worst risk-prediction model. Strategies to increase the donor pool, including cDCD transplants with highly expanded donor and recipient candidates, should be performed with caution.

Kidney transplant outcome of expanded criteria donors after circulatory death

The increase in the number of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list has led to an attempt to increase the number of potential donors by incorporating candidates that previously would not have been considered optimal, including donors after cardiac death (DCD) and those with "expanded" criteria (ECD). Recipients of controlled DCD (cDCD) grafts suffer more delayed graft function (DGF), but have a long-term evolution comparable to those of brain-dead donors, which has allowed an increase in the number of cDCD transplants in different countries in recent years. In parallel, the use of cDCD with expanded criteria (cDCD/ECD) has increased in recent years in different countries, allowing the waiting list for kidney transplantation to be shortened. The use of these grafts, although associated with a higher frequency of DGF, offers similar or only slightly lower long-term graft survival than those of brain death donors with expanded criteria. Different studies have observed that cDCD/ECD graft recipients have worse kidney function than cDCD/standard and brain death/ECD. Mortality associated with cDCD/ECD graft transplantation mostly relates to the recipient age. Patients who receive a cDCD/≥60 graft have better survival than those who continue on the waiting list, although this fact has not been demonstrated in recipients of cDCD/>65 years. The use of this type of organ should be accompanied by the optimization of surgical times and the shortest possible cold ischemia.

Kidney transplantation outcomes from elderly donors after circulatory death: a comparison with elderly brain-dead donors

Background

The use of kidneys from elderly controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has increased significantly in recent years. Concerns about outcomes achieved with these elderly cDCD kidneys have arisen. We aimed to compare outcomes from elderly cDCD kidney transplant recipients (KTrs) and elderly donation after brain death donors (DBDs) in KTrs.

Methods

We conducted a single-centre retrospective study including 87 cDCD-KTrs (46 from donors ≥65 years of age and 41 from <65 years) and 126 DBD-KTrs from donors ≥65 years of age from 2013 through 2017). Young cDCD-KTrs were used as controls. The median follow-up was 27.1 months for all cDCD-KTrs and 29.7 months for DBD-KTrs ≥65 years of age.

Results

Donors >65 years of age represented more than half of our global cDCD cohort (52.9%). KTs from elderly cDCDs had similar rates of delayed graft function, primary non-function and vascular complications compared with young cDCD-KTrs and elderly DBD-KTrs. Short and medium-term graft survival from elderly cDCD kidneys are excellent and are comparable to those from young cDCD and elderly DBD kidneys (90% young cDCD versus 88% elderly cDCD versus 80% elderly DBD at 36 months, P = 0.962 and 0.180, respectively). Although recipients from cDCDs ≥65 years of age showed lower 3-year patient survival (78% versus 87% in elderly DBD-KTrs; P = 0.01), recipient age was the only determinant of patient survival [hazard ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 1.02–1.17); P < 0.01], without any influence of donor characteristics.

Conclusions

The use of kidneys from elderly cDCDs is increasing in Spain. Short- and medium-term graft outcomes are similar when comparing kidneys from elderly cDCDs and DBDs. Recipient age is the only determinant of patient survival. Additional studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes.

[Postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of transplantation with expended criteria donors transplants]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze early, late complications and outcomes following expended criteria donors (ECD) kidney transplantation compared to standard donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including 470 patients who received a kidney transplant between 2005 and 2016. Expended criteria donors were defined following the United Network of Organ Sharing criteria. In each group, length of stay, delayed graft function, surgical site infection, acute rejection, surgical complications by type and according to Clavien and Dindo classification were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis. The impact of ECD transplant on transplant and patient survival was assessed using a Cox proportional regression model.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety seven (41.9%) patients received ECD kidney. The mean follow-up was 61,4 months (22.4-93.89). Patients with ECD transplant presented more delayed graft function (HR=2.1 (1.1-3.68), P=0.008) but the rate of complications including surgical complications was not different. Patients and transplant survival were decreased in ECD transplant group (P=0.005 et 0.001 respectively). In multivariate analysis ECD kidney was an independent factor only associated with decreased transplant survival (HR=1.81 (1.1-2.98), P=0.029) but not with patient survival.

CONCLUSION

ECD kidney transplantation was not associated with increased postoperative complications but a higher rate of delayed graft function. Nevertheless, it was associated with a decreased transplant survival. The use of pulsatile perfusion machine for explanted criteria transplant should be evaluated to improve these results.

Relevance of KDPI value and acute rejection on kidney transplant outcomes in recipients with delayed graft function - a retrospective study

Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with poorer graft survival and higher rate of acute rejection (AR). It is unknown whether this negative influence relies on the increased risk of AR or the DGF itself. The different Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) values may also play a role in this interaction. Retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of DGF on graft function and graft survival in a subset of KT recipients (2004-2017). We also analyzed the relationship between KDPI and DGF. The study includes 601 KT, 226 of them (37%) developed DGF. Graft survival was lower in patients with DGF compared with non-DGF patients. Multivariable analysis revealed DGF as risk factor for graft loss, independently of the presence or not of acute rejection. Between DGF patients, we observed poorer graft survival in patients with higher KDPI value (>85%). We observed a trend of a greater impact of KDPI in patients with DGF, although this interaction was not statistically significant. Additionally, we observed poorer 12-month graft function in DGF patients. DGF is related to poorer graft survival independently of the developed acute rejection. This negative impact might be influenced by high KDPI values.