Renal function deterioration in adult patients with type-2 diabetes

Association of age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with the risks of the morbidity of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality: Evidence from a real-world study with a large population-based cohort study

AIMS

To investigate the impact of diagnosis age of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on subsequent adverse outcomes within the Chinese population.

METHODS

549,959 eligible T2DM patients were included from Ningbo and Jinhua city in Zhejiang province, China. Standardized ratio was used to evaluate the risks of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cancer and all-cause death in different T2DM diagnosis age groups.

RESULTS

For all adverse outcomes, higher excess risks were observed in the youngest age group (30-39) than in the oldest age group (≥80) with T2DM. The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were 5.93 (95% CI: 3.46, 10.14) for CHD, 5.45 (95% CI: 3.72, 7.99) for stroke and 1.85 (95% CI: 1.38, 2.49) for cancer in the youngest age group, and were 1.32 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.60) for CHD, 1.25 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.44) for stroke, and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.56, 1.09) for cancer, respectively, in the oldest age group. The standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for all-cause death were 3.15 (1.69, 5.84) vs. 1.12 (0.88, 1.43). These excess risks decreased with increasing diagnosis age (all P value < 0.001). Consistent results were observed when individuals were stratified by sex or further excluded with the time from T2DM diagnosis to endpoints less than 1 or 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Th earlier the diagnosis of T2DM, the higher the risk for subsequent adverse outcomes. It is imperative to enhance the management and monitoring of early-onset patients during follow-up.

Spillover effects from a type 2 diabetes integrated model of care in 22,706 Australians: an open cohort stepped wedge trial

BACKGROUND

Many Australian adults are not receiving timely or effective diabetes management to prevent or delay the onset of diabetes related complications. Integrated care, a worldwide trend in healthcare reform, aims to reduce the fragmented delivery of health services and improve outcomes. This study aimed to test whether a specialist-led integrated model of care provided to a small subset of patients in general practices leads to spillover clinical improvements in all patients of the practice with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Seventy-two general practice sites (clusters) in New South Wales, Australia received the Diabetes Alliance intervention, creating a non-randomised open cohort stepped wedge trial. The intervention comprised of case conferencing, delivered directly to a small proportion of adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,072) of the general practice sites; as well as practice feedback, education and training. Spillover clinical improvements were assessed on all adults with type 2 diabetes within the general practice sites (n = 22,706), using practice level data recorded in the MedicineInsight electronic database, compared before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included frequency of diabetes screening tests in line with the Annual Cycle of Care, and clinical results for weight, blood pressure, HbA1c, lipids, and kidney function.

RESULTS

Compared to before Diabetes Alliance, the odds of all practice patients receiving screening tests at or above the recommended intervals were significantly higher for all recommended tests after Diabetes Alliance (odds ratio range 1.41-4.45, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed for weight (absolute mean difference: -1.38 kg), blood pressure (systolic - 1.12 mmHg, diastolic - 1.18 mmHg), HbA1c (-0.03% at the mean), total cholesterol (-0.11 mmol/L), and triglycerides (-0.02 mmol/L) (p < 0.05). There were small but significant declines in kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated care delivered to a small subset of patients with type 2 diabetes across a large geographic region has spillover benefits that improve the process measures and clinical outcomes for all practice patients with type 2 diabetes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12622001438741; 10th November 2022, retrospectively registered: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622001438741.aspx .

A 3-year follow-up analysis of renal function in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and an estimated glomerular filtration rate <90 mL/min/1.73m2: A retrospective cohort study

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a risk factor for patients with impaired renal function. The onset of T2DM-induced diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is frequently sub-clinical, potentially culminating in end-stage renal disease. In the current study the factors influencing DKD in elderly patients diagnosed with T2DM were determined. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients ≥60 years of age with T2DM from June 2019 to December 2022. The Cockcroft-Gault formula was used to estimate the glomerular filtration rate. The clinical information and biochemical indicators of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 90 mL/min/1.73m2 were collected. Patients were grouped based on a 3-year eGFR decline < 15% and ≥ 15%. The differences between the two groups were compared and the factors influencing the 3-year eGFR decline ≥ 15% were analyzed. A total of 242 patients were included, including 154 in the group with a 3-year eGFR decline < 15% and 88 in the group with a three-year eGFR decline ≥ 15%. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking cigarettes, and triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein levels were related to a 3-year eGFR decline ≥ 15% (P = .039, P < .001, and P = .011, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the TG level was independently related to a 3-year eGFR decline ≥ 15% (P = .004; OR = 2.316). There was a significant linear relationship between the eGFR decline and TG level (P = .002). Patients with a TG concentration > 1.7 mmol/L had a more apparent decrease in the eGFR (P < .05). For elderly patients with T2DM and an eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73m2, the TG level may be an important risk factor for deteriorating renal function that warrants actively intervention.

Influence of the duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus on colorectal cancer outcomes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease, which affects colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. However, data on the relationship between CRC survival and T2DM duration is scarce and controversial. A retrospective observational study was conducted. Sub-cohorts were created based on the duration of T2DM as follows, ≤ or > 5/10/15/20 years. 204 of the 817 (24.95%) included study participants had T2DM at any point of CRC. 160 of the 204 CRC + T2DM patients had detailed T2DM duration data. At the time of CRC diagnosis, 85, 50, 31, and 11 patients had T2DM for > 5/10/15/20 years, respectively, which increased to 110, 71, 45, and 17 during the course of the study. Despite constant glycated hemoglobin values throughout the study, shorter overall and disease-specific survival times were observed for the > 5/10/15 years cohorts and longitudinal survival modeling techniques confirmed the significant effect of T2DM duration in all cohorts. While in the first 3 years after CRC diagnosis, the best survival was found for the ≤ 5 years cohort, all diabetes cohorts had the same survival thereafter. T2DM duration affected CRC survival significantly, therefore, a closer follow-up of this sub-populations is suggested.

Validation of a risk prediction model for early chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Data from the German/Austrian Diabetes Prospective Follow-up registry

AIM

To validate a recently proposed risk prediction model for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects from the German/Austrian Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) registry with T2D, normoalbuminuria, an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60 ml/min/1.73m² or higher and aged 39-75 years were included. Prognostic factors included age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and HbA1c. Subjects were categorized into low, moderate, high and very high-risk groups. Outcome was CKD occurrence.

RESULTS

Subjects (n = 10 922) had a mean age of 61 years, diabetes duration of 6 years, BMI of 31.7 kg/m² , HbA1c of 6.9% (52 mmol/mol); 9.1% had diabetic retinopathy and 16.3% were smokers. After the follow-up (~59 months), 37.4% subjects developed CKD. The area under the curve (AUC; unadjusted base model) was 0.58 (95% CI 0.57-0.59). After adjustment for diabetes and follow-up duration, the AUC was 0.69 (95% CI 0.68-0.70), indicating improved discrimination. After follow-up, 15.0%, 20.1%, 27.7% and 40.2% patients in the low, moderate, high and very high-risk groups, respectively, had developed CKD. Increasing risk score correlated with increasing cumulative risk of incident CKD over a median of 4.5 years of follow-up (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model achieved moderate discrimination but good calibration in a German/Austrian T2D population, suggesting that the model may be relevant for determining CKD risk.

A prediction model for the decline in renal function in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-established complication in people with diabetes mellitus. Roughly one quarter of prevalent patients with diabetes exhibit a CKD stage of 3 or higher and the individual course of progression is highly variable. Therefore, there is a clear need to identify patients at high risk for fast progression and the implementation of preventative strategies. Existing prediction models of renal function decline, however, aim to assess the risk by artificially grouped patients prior to model building into risk strata defined by the categorization of the least-squares slope through the longitudinally fluctuating eGFR values, resulting in a loss of predictive precision and accuracy.

METHODS

This study protocol describes the development and validation of a prediction model for the longitudinal progression of renal function decline in Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). For development and internal-external validation, two prospective multicenter observational studies will be used (PROVALID and GCKD). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) obtained at baseline and at all planned follow-up visits will be the longitudinal outcome. Demographics, clinical information and laboratory measurements available at a baseline visit will be used as predictors in addition to random country-specific intercepts to account for the clustered data. A multivariable mixed-effects model including the main effects of the clinical variables and their interactions with time will be fitted. In application, this model can be used to obtain personalized predictions of an eGFR trajectory conditional on baseline eGFR values. The final model will then undergo external validation using a third prospective cohort (DIACORE). The final prediction model will be made publicly available through the implementation of an R shiny web application.

DISCUSSION

Our proposed state-of-the-art methodology will be developed using multiple multicentre study cohorts of people with DM2 in various CKD stages at baseline, who have received modern therapeutic treatment strategies of diabetic kidney disease in contrast to previous models. Hence, we anticipate that the multivariable prediction model will aid as an additional informative tool to determine the patient-specific progression of renal function and provide a useful guide to early on identify individuals with DM2 at high risk for rapid progression.

Impact of comorbidities on acute kidney injury and renal function impairment after partial and radical tumor nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

To test for the impact of patient comorbidities and medical risk factors on kidney function after partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with normal preoperative renal function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2014, 195 consecutive RCC patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 ml/min/1.73 m² underwent PN or RN. Stratification was performed according to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) vs. no AKI. Moreover, logistic regression models tested for risk factors predicting postoperative AKI and subsequent new-onset chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 60 or < 45 ml/min/1.73 m²).

RESULTS

Of all eligible patients, 127 (65.1%) exhibited AKI. AKI patients underwent more frequently RN (44.9 vs. 13.2% PN) and harbored more often preoperative diabetes (17.3 vs. 5.9% no diabetes), hypertension (46.5 vs. 23.5% no hypertension) and larger median tumor size (4.5 vs. 2.5 cm, all p < 0.05) than non-AKI patients. Moreover, after median follow-up of 14 months, 18.9% of AKI patients exhibited an eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² vs. 7.4% non-AKI patients (p = 0.01). In multivariable models, hypertension and RN were risk factors for postoperative AKI (both p < 0.01). Age > 60 years and RN as well as preoperative diabetes were risk factors for postoperative eGFR < 60 or < 45 ml/min/1.73 m² (all p < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AKI is a non-negligible event especially after RN that can be further triggered by comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Comorbidities should be considered in clinical decision-making for RCC surgery and patients need to be counseled about the increased risk of consecutive renal function impairment.

Management of Kidney Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: What Are the Best Options?

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most frequent cause of kidney failure (KF). There are large variations in the incidence rates of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Late referral to nephrology services has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In many countries, when patients reach severely reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), they are managed by multidisciplinary teams led by nephrologists. In these clinics, efforts will continue to halt chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and to prevent cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In patients with diabetes and severely reduced GFR and KF, treating hyperglycemia is a challenge, since some drugs are contraindicated and most of them require dose adjustments. Even more, a decision-making process will help in deciding whether the patient would prefer comprehensive conservative care or KRT. On many occasions, this decision will be conditioned by diabetes mellitus itself. Effective education should cover the necessary information for the patient and family to answer these questions: 1. Should I go for KRT or not? 2. If the answer is KRT, dialysis and/or transplantation? 3. Dialysis at home or in center? 4. If dialysis at home, peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis? 5. If transplantation is desired, discuss the options of whether the donation would be from a living or deceased donor. This review addresses the determinant factors with an impact on DKD, aiming to shed light on the specific needs that arise in the management and recommendations on how to achieve a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with chronic kidney disease.

Guidelines adherence in the prevention and management of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus on the background of recent European recommendations - a registry-based analysis

Background

Recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) guidelines provide recommendations for detecting and treating chronic kidney disease (CKD) in diabetic patients. We compared clinical practice with guidelines to determine areas for improvement.

Methods

German database analysis of 675,628 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, with 134,395 included in this analysis. Data were compared with ESC/EASD recommendations.

Results

This analysis included 17,649 and 116,747 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The analysis showed that 44.1 and 49.1 % patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, were annually screened for CKD. Despite anti-diabetic treatment, only 27.2 % patients with type 1 and 43.5 % patients with type 2 achieved a target HbA1c of < 7.0 %. Use of sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (1.5 % type 1/8.7 % type 2 diabetes) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (0.6 % type 1/5.2 % type 2 diabetes) was limited. Hypertension was controlled according to guidelines in 41.1 and 67.7 % patients aged 18–65 years with type 1 and 2 diabetes, respectively, (62.4 vs. 68.4 % in patients > 65 years). Renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors were used in 24.0 and 40.9 % patients with type 1 diabetes (micro- vs. macroalbuminuria) and 39.9 and 47.7 %, respectively, in type 2 diabetes.

Conclusions

Data indicate there is room for improvement in caring for diabetic patients with respect to renal disease diagnosis and treatment. While specific and potentially clinically justified reasons for non-compliance exist, the data may serve well for a critical appraisal of clinical practice decisions.