Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with peritoneal dialysis: the prevalence, influence factors and association with quality of life

Anxiety as a mediator between symptom distress and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: insights from mediation analysis and nonlinear models

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates anxiety's role as a mediator between symptom burden and quality of life in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, emphasizing the potential for targeted interventions to enhance patient outcomes.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional design, 320 peritoneal dialysis patients were recruited, with 305 providing valid responses (response rate: 95.31%). Symptom burden (occurrence and distress), anxiety levels, and quality of life were measured using validated tools. Multiple linear regression and restricted cubic spline models assessed associations, using β with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI), while mediation analysis with 1000 bootstrap samples quantified anxiety's mediating effects.

RESULTS

Participants reported an average of 8.2 ± 2.3 concurrent symptoms, with 'worry,', 'tiredness', and 'dry skin' being the most severe. Both symptom number (β = -0.90; 95%CI: -1.26 to -0.55) and distress (β = -1.20; 95%CI: -1.41 to -0.98) negatively correlated with quality of life. Anxiety mediated these relationships significantly, explaining 38.9% (95%CI: 18%-62%) and 33.3% (95%CI: 19%-49%) of the total effects for symptom number and distress, respectively. Restricted cubic spline models revealed an 'L-shaped' relationship between symptom burden and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety significantly mediates the relationship between symptom burden and quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients. These findings underline the importance of integrating psychological interventions and routine symptom screening into patient care to enhance quality of life. Future research should explore longitudinal designs and standardized intervention strategies.

Probiotic treatment induces changes in intestinal microbiota but does not alter SCFA levels in peritoneal dialysis patients-a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The gut microbiota alterations interact with the pathogenesis and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Probiotics have received wide attention as a potential management in CKD. We investigated the effects of Lactobacillus paracasei N1115 (LP N1115) on intestinal microbiota and related short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in end stage kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. The intervention group (n = 38, PR group) was given the probiotics (two bags) containing fructooligosaccharide (FOS) (additive amount > 80%), maltosaccharin, and LP N1115 (additive amount > 3 × 1010 CFU/bag) every day whereas the control group (n = 19, PL group) received placebo (two bags) containing only pregelatinized starch and lactose, both for 12 weeks. In addition to collecting fecal samples for 16S rRNA gene high-throughput sequencing and SCFAs analysis, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were also assessed at baseline and after the intervention. Probiotics administration caused significant changes in the composition of gut microbiota, as indicated by increased abundance of beneficial bacteria (Firmicutes), decreased Bacteroidetes, and opportunistic pathogens (Fusobacterium, Bilophila) (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in intestinal microbial diversity. SCFAs levels increased in PR group although the change was not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, probiotics administration could effectively reduce GI symptoms, particularly in dyspepsia and constipation (p < 0.05). Together, the results suggest that probiotics administration caused significant changes in the composition of gut microbiota and also could effectively reduce GI symptoms, particularly in dyspepsia and constipation in PD patients. Trial registration: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Trial registration number: ChiCTR-INR-17011718; Date of the first registration: 21/06/2017).

Exploring symptom clusters in Chinese patients with peritoneal dialysis: a network analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the research on symptom management in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has shifted from a single symptom to symptom clusters and network analysis. This study collected and evaluated unpleasant symptoms in PD patients and explored groups of symptoms that may affect PD patients with a view to higher symptom management.

METHODS

The symptoms of PD patients were measured using the modified Dialysis Symptom Index. The symptom network and node characteristics were assessed by network analysis, and symptom clusters were explored by factor analysis.

RESULTS

In this study of 602 PD patients (mean age 47.8 ± 16.8 years, 47.34% male), most had less than 2 years of dialysis experience. Five symptom clusters were obtained from factor analysis, which were body symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, mood symptom cluster, sexual disorder symptom cluster, and skin-sleep symptom cluster. Itching and decreased interest in sex may be sentinel symptoms, and being tired or lack of energy and feeling anxious are core symptoms in PD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the importance of recognizing symptom clusters in PD patients for better symptom management. Five clusters were identified, with key symptoms including itching, decreased interest in sex, fatigue, and anxiety. Early intervention focused on these symptom clusters in PD patients holds promise for alleviating the burden of symptoms.

Study on the occurrence and influencing factors of gastrointestinal symptoms in hemodialysis patients with uremia

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal symptoms are common in patients with uremia undergoing hemodialysis, and these symptoms seriously affect patients' prognosis.

AIM

To assess the occurrence and factors influencing gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with uremia undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 98 patients with uremia who underwent regular hemodialysis treatment in the blood purification center of our hospital from December 2022 to December 2023. The gastrointestinal symptoms and scores of each dimension were evaluated using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Grading Scale (GSRS). Patients were divided into gastrointestinal symptoms and no gastrointestinal symptom groups according to whether they had gastrointestinal symptoms. The factors that may affect gastrointestinal symptoms were identified by single-factor analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal symptoms included indigestion, constipation, reflux, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and eating disorders, and the total average GSRS score was 1.35 ± 0.47. This study showed that age, number of tablets, dialysis time, glucocorticoid, parathyroid hormone (PTH), combined diabetes mellitus and C-reactive protein (CRP) were independent risk factors for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with uremia undergoing hemodialysis, whereas body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), and urea clearance index were independent protective factors (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal symptoms are mostly mild in patients with uremia undergoing hemodialysis, most commonly including dyspepsia, eating disorders, and gastroesophageal reflux. The independent influencing factors mainly include the BMI, age, number of pills taken, dialysis time, urea clearance index, Hb, use of glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormone level. PTH, CRP, and diabetes are clinically related factors influencing the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms, and targeted prevention can be performed.

Using the concept of food as medicine to mitigate inflammation in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

The most common kidney replacement therapy (KRT) worldwide is hemodialysis (HD), and only 5%-10% of patients are prescribed peritoneal dialysis (PD) as KRT. Despite PD being a different method, these patients also present particular complications, such as oxidative stress, gut dysbiosis, premature aging, and mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to an inflammation process and high cardiovascular mortality risk. Although recent studies have reported nutritional strategies in patients undergoing HD with attempts to mitigate these complications, more information must be needed for PD patients. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent studies of nutritional intervention to mitigate inflammation in PD patients.

Cut-off values of haemoglobin and clinical outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis: the PDTAP study

BACKGROUND

To explore the cut-off values of haemoglobin (Hb) on adverse clinical outcomes in incident peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients based on a national-level database.

METHODS

The observational cohort study was from the Peritoneal Dialysis Telemedicine-assisted Platform (PDTAP) dataset. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and modified MACE (MACE+). The secondary outcomes were the occurrences of hospitalization, first-episode peritonitis and permanent transfer to haemodialysis (HD).

RESULTS

A total of 2591 PD patients were enrolled between June 2016 and April 2019 and followed up until December 2020. Baseline and time-averaged Hb <100 g/l were associated with all-cause mortality, MACE, MACE+ and hospitalizations. After multivariable adjustments, only time-averaged Hb <100 g/l significantly predicted a higher risk for all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] 1.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-281], P = .006}, MACE [HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.16-3.40), P = .012] and MACE+ [HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.15-2.73), P = .010] in the total cohort. No associations between Hb and hospitalizations, transfer to HD and first-episode peritonitis were observed. Among patients with Hb ≥100 g/l at baseline, younger age, female, use of iron supplementation, lower values of serum albumin and renal Kt/V independently predicted the incidence of Hb <100 g/l during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world evidence on the cut-off value of Hb for predicting poorer outcomes through a nation-level prospective PD cohort.

Longitudinal association between dietary protein intake and survival in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Decreased dietary protein intake (DPI) may lead to protein-energy malnutrition and may be associated with increased mortality risk. We hypothesized that longitudinal changes in dietary protein intake have independent associations with survival in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

668 stable PD patients were selected in the study from January 2006 to January 2018 and were followed up until December 2019. Their three-day dietary records were collected at the baseline (the sixth month after PD) and thereafter every 3 months for two and a half years. The latent class mixed models (LCMM) were used to identify subgroups of PD patients with similar longitudinal trajectories of DPI. The relation between DPI (baseline and longitudinal data) and survival was examined using Cox model to estimate death hazard ratios. Meanwhile, different formulae were used to assess nitrogen balance.

RESULTS

The results showed that baseline DPI ≤ 0.60g/kg/day was associated with the worst outcome in PD patients. Patients with DPI 0.80-0.99g/kg/day and DPI ≥ 1.0g/kg/day both presented positive nitrogen balance; patients with DPI 0.61-0.79g/kg/day presented obviously negative nitrogen balance. Longitudinal association between time-dependent DPI and survival was found in PD patients. The consistently low DPI' (0.61-0.79g/kg/d) group was correlated with increased death risk as compared with the 'consistently median DPI' group (0.80-0.99g/kg/d, HR = 1.59, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in survival between 'consistently median DPI' group and 'high-level DPI' group (≥1.0 g/kg/d, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that DPI ≥ 0.8 g/kg/day was beneficial to the long-term outcome for the PD population.

Patient perspectives on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the PD catheter: Strategies and Solutions

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter complications reduce quality of life and increase risks for hospitalizations, for unplanned transitions to haemodialysis and for death. Patient PD catheter management is crucial for safe, sustained PD. Patient perspectives on strategies for living with PD and using a PD catheter may inform efforts to reduce PD catheter complications, increase individual patient PD modality persistence, and thus increase overall home dialysis prevalence.

METHODS

We interviewed 32 adult PD patients in Nashville, Tennessee. Qualitative analyses included (1) isolation of themes, (2) development of a coding system and (3) creation of a conceptual framework using an inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Challenges identified by patients as important included drain pain, difficulty eating and sleeping, and fear of peritonitis. Coping strategies included repositioning while draining, adjusting eating patterns, and development of PD patient and helper knowledge and confidence, especially at home after initial training. Patients described a trial-and-error iterative process of trying multiple strategies with input from multiple sources, which led to individualised solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial-and-error process may be crucial for maintaining PD. Individual patient success with PD may be promoted by creating expectations during training that a solution may require multiple attempts, and by a reimbursement policy that supports robust nursing support for safe progression through the trial-and-error process, particularly in the first few months for incident patients. Interventions to support patient motivation and optimal coping behaviour may also support an increase in PD modality duration for individual patients, and thus increase overall PD prevalence.

CLINICAL SIGNS AND QUALITY OF LIFE ANALYSIS IN THE PATIENTS WITH HYPOTHYREOSIS AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To analyze the clinical condition and evaluate the quality of life of patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP and patients with isolated CP based on the results of testing according to the GSRS and SF-36 questionnaires.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Were examined 62 patients with comorbid course of Ht and CP. The comparison group consisted of 48 people with isolated CP, the control group consisted of 30 healthy people, comparable in age and sex. The average age of all patients was (51.4±26.7) years. Two questionnaires were used in the study: the GSRS (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale) questionnaire was used to assess the severity of gastroenterological symptoms and QoL, and the general SF-36 questionnaire was used to assess the clinic and health status.

RESULTS

Results: Analyzing the data of the GSRS questionnaire, it was found that in patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP, reflux, pain and dyspepsia syndromes took the leading place in the clinic of the disease (p>0.05). They should be considered as the main factor in reducing the quality of life in patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP. According to the GSRS questionnaire, the comorbidity of Ht and CP caused a complication of the clinical condition compared to patients with isolated CP of a gastroenterological patient: according to the scale of gastric reflux - by 48.57%, according to the scale of dyspepsia - by 35.84%, diarrhea - by 26.94%, constipation - by 19.93%, abdominal pain - by 40.81% (p<0.05). As a result of the study, a significantly lower level of quality of life was established in patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: It has been proven that the quality of life of patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP was significantly lower compared to that of isolated CP (the total difference between groups on all scales of the GSRS questionnaire was 33.59% (p<0.05)). According to the SF-36 questionnaire, the overall quality of life of patients with a comorbid course of Ht and CP, compared to the group of patients with isolated CP, was reduced by 34.9% and 20.9% on the scales of physical and psychological health (р<0, 05).

Presence of gastrointestinal symptoms in IgA nephropathy: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in end-stage kidney disease. Mounting evidence indicates that the intestine plays an important role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). However, no studies have addressed the obvious question; do IgAN patients suffer from GI symptoms?

METHODS

Presence of GI symptoms and health-related quality of life were evaluated using the validated Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) questionnaires in 104 patients with kidney biopsy-verified IgAN and in 147 healthy controls. A person was regarded to experience 'increased GI symptoms' if the GSRS score exceeded plus 1 standard deviation of the mean of the corresponding score in the healthy controls.

RESULTS

According to the GSRS total score, the IgAN patients had more GI symptoms than the healthy controls (2.0 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001). Female IgAN patients had higher GSRS total score than male patients (2.2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.001). More IgAN patients with preserved kidney function (eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73m²) suffered from increased symptoms of diarrhoea (76 vs. 25%, p = 0.028), constipation (81 vs. 19%, p = 0.046) and reflux (85 vs. 15%, p = 0.004) than did IgAN patients with reduced kidney function (eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m²).

CONCLUSIONS

IgAN patients and especially female IgAN patients experienced more GI symptoms than healthy controls. More prevalent GI symptoms were already observed before kidney function was clearly reduced. Systematic enquiry of GI symptoms might increase the standard of care among IgAN patients. Moreover, GI symptoms may provide clues for future studies that examine the pathophysiology of IgAN.

Impact of Gastrointestinal Symptoms on Health-Related Quality of Life in an Australian Parkinson’s Disease Cohort

Background. Gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) in people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP) are often underreported and may remain untreated. Constipation is a common nonmotor symptom that can adversely affect health-related quality of life (QoL); however, the impact of other GIS has not been adequately investigated. Objectives. To investigate the relationship between QoL and constipation using the Bristol Stool Chart, bowel movement frequency, and a perceived constipation measure; and to explore the relationship between QoL and other GIS in an Australian PD cohort. Methods. The impact of constipation and other GIS on QoL, as measured using the PDQ-39 scale, was assessed in a cohort of 144 (89 males, 55 females) clinic-attending PwP. Constipation was assessed using the Bristol Stool Chart as well as a composite constipation measure, and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was used to rate other GIS. Covariate corrected linear regression models were utilised to determine significant associations between GIS and QoL scores. Results. Individual and combined constipation measures were significantly associated with poorer QoL ( $p=0.032$ and $p=0.002$ , respectively). Analysis of GSRS symptom domains showed that in addition to symptoms of gastrointestinal hypomotility, a number of other symptoms such as increased eructation and increased flatus were also associated with poorer QoL. Conclusions. The findings point to the importance of GIS as contributor to health-related QoL in PwP. A better understanding of the relationship between GIS and QoL will help facilitate the development of more effective screening and treatment programs to improve symptom management and QoL for PwP.

Range and consistency of gastrointestinal outcomes reported in peritoneal dialysis trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) health is considered vital to the success of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is critically important to patients, caregivers and clinicians. However, the multiplicity of GI outcome measures in trials undermines the ability to evaluate the frequency, impact and treatment of GI symptoms in patients receiving PD. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the range and consistency of GI outcomes reported in contemporary PD trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING AND POPULATION

Individuals with kidney failure requiring PD.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving patients on PD, identified from the PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE Central Registry of controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database, from January 2010 to July 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Any PD-related intervention.

OUTCOMES

The frequency and characteristics of GI outcome measures were analysed and classified.

RESULTS

Of the 324 eligible PD trials, GI outcomes were only reported in 61 (19%) trials, mostly as patient-reported outcomes (45 trials; 74%). The most frequently reported outcomes were nausea in 27 (43%), diarrhoea in 26 (43%), vomiting in 22 (36%), constipation in 21 (34%) and abdominal pain in 19 (31%) of trials. PD peritonitis was the primary non-GI outcome reported in 24 (40%) trials, followed by death in 13 (21%) trials) and exit-site infection in 9 (15%) trials). Across all trials, 172 GI outcome measures were extracted and grouped into 29 different outcomes. Nausea and diarrhoea contributed to 16% and 15% of GI outcomes, respectively, while vomiting, constipation and abdominal pain contributed to 13%, 12% and 12%, respectively. Most (90%) GI outcomes were patient-reported adverse effects with no defined metrics. Faecal microbiome was reported as the primary study outcome in 3 (100%) trials using the subjective global assessment score, GI symptom rating scale and faecal microbiological and biochemical analysis. Two trials reported nausea as a primary study outcome using symptom assessment score (SAS) and kidney disease quality of life-short-form-36. One trial each reported anorexia and abdominal pain as the primary study outcome using SAS. Bowel habits, constipation and stool type were also reported as the primary study outcome in one trial each using the Bristol stool form scale. GI bleeding was reported as the secondary outcome in three (37%) out of eight trials reporting it.

LIMITATIONS

Restricted sampling frame to focus on contemporary trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the clinical importance of GI outcomes among patients on PD, they are reported in only 19% of PD trials, using inconsistent metrics, often as patient-reported adverse events. Efforts to standardise GI outcome reporting are critical to optimising comparability, reliability and value of trial evidence to improve outcomes for patients receiving PD.

Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important home-based treatment for kidney failure and accounts for 11% of all dialysis and 9% of all kidney replacement therapy globally. Although PD is available in 81% of countries, this provision ranges from 96% in high-income countries to 32% in low-income countries. Compared with haemodialysis, PD has numerous potential advantages, including a simpler technique, greater feasibility of use in remote communities, generally lower cost, lesser need for trained staff, fewer management challenges during natural disasters, possibly better survival in the first few years, greater ability to travel, fewer dietary restrictions, better preservation of residual kidney function, greater treatment satisfaction, better quality of life, better outcomes following subsequent kidney transplantation, delayed need for vascular access (especially in small children), reduced need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and lower risk of blood-borne virus infections and of SARS-CoV-2 infection. PD outcomes have been improving over time but with great variability, driven by individual and system-level inequities and by centre effects; this variation is exacerbated by a lack of standardized outcome definitions. Potential strategies for outcome improvement include enhanced standardization, monitoring and reporting of PD outcomes, and the implementation of continuous quality improvement programmes and of PD-specific interventions, such as incremental PD, the use of biocompatible PD solutions and remote PD monitoring.

The use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be advantageous compared with haemodialysis treatment, although several barriers limit its broad implementation. This review examines the epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes, including clinical, patient-reported and surrogate PD outcomes.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has distinct advantages compared with haemodialysis, including the convenience of home treatment, improved quality of life, technical simplicity, lesser need for trained staff, greater cost-effectiveness in most countries, improved equity of access to dialysis in resource-limited settings, and improved survival, particularly in the first few years of initiating therapy.

Important barriers can hamper PD utilization in low-income settings, including the high costs of PD fluids (owing to the inability to manufacture them locally and the exorbitant costs of their import), limited workforce availability and a practice culture that limits optimal PD use, often leading to suboptimal outcomes.

PD outcomes are highly variable around the world owing in part to the use of variable outcome definitions, a heterogeneous practice culture, the lack of standardized monitoring and reporting of quality indicators, and kidney failure care gaps (including health care workforce shortages, inadequate health care financing, suboptimal governance and a lack of good health care information systems).

Key outcomes include not only clinical outcomes (typically defined as medical outcomes based on clinician assessment or diagnosis) — for example, PD-related infections, technique survival, mechanical complications, hospitalizations and PD-related mortality — but also patient-reported outcomes. These outcomes are directly reported by patients and focus on how they function or feel, typically in relation to quality of life or symptoms; patient-reported outcomes are used less frequently than clinical outcomes in day-to-day routine care.