1
|
Murea M, Raimann JG, Divers J, Maute H, Kovach C, Abdel-Rahman EM, Awad AS, Flythe JE, Gautam SC, Niyyar VD, Roberts GV, Jefferson NM, Shahidul I, Nwaozuru U, Foley KL, Trembath EJ, Rosales ML, Fletcher AJ, Hiba SI, Huml A, Knicely DH, Hasan I, Makadia B, Gaurav R, Lea J, Conway PT, Daugirdas JT, Kotanko P. Comparative effectiveness of an individualized model of hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the TwoPlus trial). Trials 2024; 25:424. [PMID: 38943204 PMCID: PMC11212207 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08281-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients starting chronic in-center hemodialysis (HD) receive conventional hemodialysis (CHD) with three sessions per week targeting specific biochemical clearance. Observational studies suggest that patients with residual kidney function can safely be treated with incremental prescriptions of HD, starting with less frequent sessions and later adjusting to thrice-weekly HD. This trial aims to show objectively that clinically matched incremental HD (CMIHD) is non-inferior to CHD in eligible patients. METHODS An unblinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across diverse healthcare systems and dialysis organizations in the USA. Adult patients initiating chronic hemodialysis (HD) at participating centers will be screened. Eligibility criteria include receipt of fewer than 18 treatments of HD and residual kidney function defined as kidney urea clearance ≥3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urine output ≥500 mL/24 h. The 1:1 randomization, stratified by site and dialysis vascular access type, assigns patients to either CMIHD (intervention group) or CHD (control group). The CMIHD group will be treated with twice-weekly HD and adjuvant pharmacologic therapy (i.e., oral loop diuretics, sodium bicarbonate, and potassium binders). The CHD group will receive thrice-weekly HD according to usual care. Throughout the study, patients undergo timed urine collection and fill out questionnaires. CMIHD will progress to thrice-weekly HD based on clinical manifestations or changes in residual kidney function. Caregivers of enrolled patients are invited to complete semi-annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is a composite of patients' all-cause death, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes. We aim to enroll 350 patients, which provides ≥85% power to detect an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.9 between CMIHD and CHD with an IRR non-inferiority of 1.20 (α = 0.025, one-tailed test, 20% dropout rate, average of 2.06 years of HD per patient participant), and 150 caregiver participants (of enrolled patients). DISCUSSION Our proposal challenges the status quo of HD care delivery. Our overarching hypothesis posits that CMIHD is non-inferior to CHD. If successful, the results will positively impact one of the highest-burdened patient populations and their caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05828823. Registered on 25 April 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Murea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| | | | - Jasmin Divers
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Harvey Maute
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cassandra Kovach
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Emaad M Abdel-Rahman
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Alaa S Awad
- Division of Nephrology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer E Flythe
- University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samir C Gautam
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vandana D Niyyar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Glenda V Roberts
- External Relations and Patient Engagement, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Institute and Center for Dialysis Innovation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Islam Shahidul
- Department of Foundations of Medicine, Center for Population and Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ucheoma Nwaozuru
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kristie L Foley
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Alison J Fletcher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Sheikh I Hiba
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Anne Huml
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daphne H Knicely
- Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Irtiza Hasan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Raman Gaurav
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Janice Lea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paul T Conway
- American Association of Kidney Patients, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John T Daugirdas
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Kotanko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, LLC Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Takkavatakarn K, Jintanapramote K, Phannajit J, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-Ong S, Susantitaphong P. Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfad280. [PMID: 38186889 PMCID: PMC10768771 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality. Results A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kullaya Takkavatakarn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kavita Jintanapramote
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Royal Thai Air Force, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jeerath Phannajit
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Research Unit for Metabolic Bone Disease in CKD patients, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Somchai Eiam-Ong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paweena Susantitaphong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Research Unit for Metabolic Bone Disease in CKD patients, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|