1
|
Umeonwuka CI, Roos R, Ntsiea V. Clinical and demographic predictors of unilateral spatial neglect recovery after prism therapy among stroke survivors in the sub-acute phase of recovery. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2023; 33:1624-1649. [PMID: 36242544 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2131582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Unilateral Spatial Neglect (USN) affects the rehabilitation process and leads to poor outcomes after stroke. Factors that influence USN recovery following prism adaptation therapy have not been investigated. This study investigated predictors of USN recovery after prism therapy at the sub-acute phase of recovery. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial. USN was assessed with the Behavioural Inattention Test and Catherine Bergego scale. Seventy-four patients with USN were divided into control and intervention group (prism). The prism group used 20 dioptre prism lenses for repeated aiming for 12 sessions while the control group used neutral lenses for aiming training. Regression analysis was conducted to establish clinical and sociodemographic factors that influence USN recovery. RESULTS: Gender, age, years of education, race, employment status, handedness, type of stroke, time since stroke and site of stroke (p > 0.005) showed no significant influence on USN recovery following PA treatment. Higher Cognitive function (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.08-2.14, p = 0.016) and group allocationng (being in the prism group) (OR = 63.10, CI = 9.70-410.59, P < 0.001) were found to significantly influence USN recovery following PA treatment session. CONCLUSIONS: A significant modulating effect on general cognitive ability was found in this study. This suggests that prism adaptation therapy's effect on neural activity and spatial neglect depends on the cognitive function of stroke survivors.Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry identifier: PACTR201903732473573.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuka Ifeanyi Umeonwuka
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ronel Roos
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Veronica Ntsiea
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vatanparasti S, Kazemnejad A, Oveisgharan S. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Prism Adaptation in Art Constructive Errors in Painting. Basic Clin Neurosci 2023; 14:143-154. [PMID: 37346871 PMCID: PMC10279982 DOI: 10.32598/bcn.2021.2207.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to investigate the influence of neglect and the effect of prism adaptation (PA) combined with continuous Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) on the art constructive errors in painting rehabilitation of stroke patients with neglect. Methods Fourteen patients with neglect and art constructive errors in painting secondary to stroke were randomly assigned to the rehabilitation group and received PA combined with the inhibitory protocol of cTBS over the intact parietal cortex; the control group received PA combined with sham cTBS for two weeks in ten daily sessions. Patients were assessed for art constructive errors in painting in figure copying test (FCT), and coloring test (CT) before and after the intervention. Art constructive errors in painting were classified into omission, deformation, size, neglect of warm colors, and perseveration of errors. Neglect was evaluated using the line bisection task (LBT), figure copying test (FCT), and coloring test (CT). Results All patients showed a significant improvement in art constructive errors in painting (measured using the pattern of painting' errors in FCT and CT), and neglect (measured using LBT, FCT, and CT) (P<0.05). Omission, neglect of warm colors, and deformation were the most frequent errors. Conclusion Neglect and rehabilitation influence the painting system in stroke patients. Both approaches improved art constructive errors in painting and neglect symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shole Vatanparasti
- Department of Rehabilitation, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Oveisgharan
- Department of Neurology, Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fortis P, Ronchi R, Velardo V, Calzolari E, Banco E, Algeri L, Spada MS, Vallar G. A home-based prism adaptation training for neglect patients. Cortex 2020; 122:61-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
4
|
Vatanparasti S, Kazemnejad A, Yoonessi A, Oveisgharan S. The Effect of Continuous Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Prism Adaptation on the Neglect Recovery in Stroke Patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 28:104296. [PMID: 31395425 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was designed to investigate the effect of prism adaptation (PA) combined with continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) on the neglect recovery of stroke patients with unilateral neglect. METHODS A total of 14 stroke patients with unilateral neglect were randomly assigned to 2 groups including an intervention group undergone PA combined with cTBS over the left intact parietal cortex and a control group. PA combined with sham cTBS was perfomed for 2 weeks in 10 daily sessions. Before and after the intervention, patients were evaluated for visuospatial neglect measured using the Star Cancellation Test (SCT), Line Bisection Task (LBT), Figure Copying Test, and Clock Drawing Task. Neurological function was evaluated using the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). RESULTS Both groups (PA alone and PA+ cTBS) showed improvement in their neglected symptoms (measured by SCT, LBT, Figure Copying Test, and Clock Drawing Task), and in their disability in the neurological function (measured by MRS) (P< .05). CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study showed that, transcranial magnetic stimulation did not increase the effect of PA on neglect symptoms in stroke patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shole Vatanparasti
- Department of Cognitive Science, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Yoonessi
- Neuroscience Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Oveisgharan
- Department of Neurology, Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Spreij LA, Ten Brink AF, Visser-Meily JMA, Nijboer TCW. Simulated driving: The added value of dynamic testing in the assessment of visuo-spatial neglect after stroke. J Neuropsychol 2018; 14:28-45. [PMID: 30325578 PMCID: PMC7154737 DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Visuo-spatial neglect (VSN) is generally assessed with neuropsychological paper-and-pencil tasks, which are often not sensitive enough to detect mild and/or well-compensated VSN. It is of utmost importance to develop dynamic tasks, resembling the dynamics of daily living. OBJECTIVE A simulated driving task was used to assess (1) differences in performance (i.e., position on the road and magnitude of sway) between patients with left- and right-sided VSN, recovered VSN, without VSN, and healthy participants; (2) the relation between average position and VSN severity; and (3) its diagnostic accuracy in relation to traditional tasks. METHODS Stroke inpatients were tested with a cancellation task, the Catherine Bergego Scale and the simulated driving task. RESULTS Patients with left-sided VSN and recovered VSN deviated more regarding position on the road compared to patients without VSN. The deviation was larger in patients with more severe VSN. Regarding diagnostic accuracy, 29% of recovered VSN patients and 6% of patients without VSN did show abnormal performance on the simulated driving task. The sensitivity was 52% for left-sided VSN. Right-sided VSN was not well detected, probably due to the asymmetric layout. CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, the simulated driving task should not be the only task to assess VSN, especially in its current form. Given the heterogenic nature of VSN, the assessment should always consist of several tasks varying in nature and complexity and include a dynamic task to detect mild and/or recovered VSN. A symmetric design should be used when designing novel tasks to assess right-sided VSN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauriane A Spreij
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, The Netherlands
| | - Antonia F Ten Brink
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja C W Nijboer
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, The Netherlands.,Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The fields of human motor control, motor learning, and neurorehabilitation have long been linked by the intuition that understanding how we move (and learn to move) leads to better rehabilitation. In reality, these fields have remained largely separate. Our knowledge of the neural control of movement has expanded, but principles that can directly impact rehabilitation efficacy remain somewhat sparse. This raises two important questions: What can basic studies of motor learning really tell us about rehabilitation, and are we asking the right questions to improve the lives of patients? This review aims to contextualize recent advances in computational and behavioral studies of human motor learning within the framework of neurorehabilitation. We also discuss our views of the current challenges facing rehabilitation and outline potential clinical applications from recent theoretical and basic studies of motor learning and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T Roemmich
- Center for Movement Studies, The Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| | - Amy J Bastian
- Center for Movement Studies, The Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.,Department of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ten Brink AF, Visser-Meily JMA, Schut MJ, Kouwenhoven M, Eijsackers ALH, Nijboer TCW. Prism Adaptation in Rehabilitation? No Additional Effects of Prism Adaptation on Neglect Recovery in the Subacute Phase Poststroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31:1017-1028. [DOI: 10.1177/1545968317744277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background. Patients with neglect ignore or respond slower to contralesional stimuli. Neglect negatively influences independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most frequently studied treatments, yet there is little evidence regarding positive effects on neglect behavior in ADL. Objective. To assess whether PA in the subacute phase ameliorates neglect in situations of varying complexity. Methods. A total of 70 neglect patients admitted for inpatient stroke rehabilitation received either PA or sham adaptation (SA) for 2 weeks, with full access to standard treatment. There were 7 time-dependent measurements (baseline and 1-4, 6, and 14 weeks after start of treatment). The primary outcome was change of neglect as observed during basic ADL with the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS). Secondary outcomes were changes in performance on a dynamic multitask (ie, the Mobility Assessment Course [MAC]) and a static paper-and-pencil task (ie, a shape cancellation task [SC]). Results. In all, 34 patients received PA and 35 SA. There were significant time-dependent improvements in performance as measured with the CBS, MAC, and SC (all F > 15.57; P < .001). There was no significant difference in magnitude of improvement between groups on the CBS, MAC, and SC (all F < 2.54; P > .113]. Conclusions. No beneficial effects of PA over SA in the subacute phase poststroke were observed, which was comparable for situations of varying complexity. Heterogeneity of the syndrome, time post–stroke onset, and the content of treatment as usual are discussed. Basic knowledge on subtypes and recovery patterns would aid the development of tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia F. Ten Brink
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
- De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Tanja C. W. Nijboer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
- Utrecht University, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ten Brink AF, Visser-Meily JMA, Nijboer TCW. Dynamic assessment of visual neglect: The Mobility Assessment Course as a diagnostic tool. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2017; 40:161-172. [DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1324562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia F. Ten Brink
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus,University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus,University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja C. W. Nijboer
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus,University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|