Global assessment of migraine severity measure: preliminary evidence of construct validity

The Assessment of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Burden of Illness in Patients With Episodic and Chronic Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a prevalent and disabling primary headache disorder worldwide, causing significant years lost due to disability (YLD) and impacting various aspects of everyday life. Despite its high prevalence and substantial burden, there is a lack of comprehensive data on clinical patterns and management trends, in places like Tamil Nadu, India. This study aims and also fill gaps by investigating and analyzing the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and illness burden among patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) in the state of Tamil Nadu.

STUDY

This cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, over a three-month period starting from January 2024 to March 2024. The study included migraine patients aged 18 years and above who met the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 criteria and took treatment at the department. Data were collected using patient interviews, medical records, and counseling sessions and using a pre-designed questionnaire. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, symptom prevalence, prescription patterns, and illness burden were analyzed accordingly. The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire was used to measure the burden of illness.

RESULTS

The analysis involved 400 migraine patients, 92.5% of them having EM and 7.5% of them having CM. The mean age of patients was 37.5 years, with a predominance of females (73.5%). Patients with CM had having significantly higher average number of headache days per month when compared to those with EM. Tension-type headache (TTH) and medication-overuse headache (MOH) were more prevalent in those CM patients. Trigger factors include lack of sleep, bright light exposure, and stress. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, and depression were significantly higher in CM patients. Acute treatment included NSAIDs and Triptans, while preventive therapy was more commonly used in CM patients. The mean MIDAS score was significantly higher in CM patients, which indicates greater disability.

CONCLUSION

The study provides valuable insights into the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and burden of illness among migraine patients in Tamil Nadu, India. Significant differences were observed between EM and CM patients, which highlights the need for comprehensive management strategies. Preventive therapy, lifestyle modifications, and comprehensive assessment of disability are all important in addressing the variable needs of migraine patients and also reducing the burden of illness. Further research is necessary to explore additional factors influencing migraine outcomes in this population.

Quality of Life in Patients With Confirmed and Suspected Spinal CSF Leaks

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a debilitating condition typically producing orthostatic headache limiting upright time. SIH is often difficult to diagnose and treat, negatively affecting quality of life (QoL) in patients with the disorder. We studied QoL in patients with confirmed and suspected SIH using standardized instruments, including suicidality.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey of adult patients with confirmed and clinically suspected SIH evaluated in our Headache and Facial Pain Program from 2016 to 2022. Using an online data collection tool (REDCap V 11.2.2), participants completed validated questionnaires assessing general well-being (SF-36), depression (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), spiritual well-being during chronic illness therapy (FACIT-Sp-12), and headache impact (HIT-6). Subsequently, we interviewed willing participants to administer the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) assessing suicidal behavior and ideation.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria and were invited to participate in the study, and 95 patients (59 confirmed and 36 clinically suspected) completed the questionnaires. The average age of the cohort was 51.1 years (SD: 15.5), predominantly female (69.5%), White (91.6%), and married (69.5%). Three-quarters (74.5%) scored within the most severe headache category (HIT-6). SF-36 scores were significantly inferior (p < 0.0001) to the general population and lower than reported values for patients with multiple sclerosis and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Almost half (49.1%) of respondents scored in the moderate depression range or worse (>10), and 25.4% scored with moderate anxiety or worse (>10). FACIT-Sp-12 scores were significantly worse (p < 0.0001) in symptomatic participants than in the validation cohorts of patients with AIDS and cancer. Of the 67 respondents who completed the C-SSRS, more than half (64.2%) endorsed a wish to be dead, and 22.4% had demonstrated suicidal behavior. Patients with symptom-free SIH (n = 22) scored significantly better than symptomatic patients, comparable with the general population.

DISCUSSION

Based on our single-center cohort, SIH is associated with severe headache pain and high rates of depression, anxiety, and disability, affecting basic activities of daily living. Individuals with confirmed and suspected spinal CSF leaks scored similarly on these measures including suicidality. Outcomes were comparable with the general population after successful treatment or spontaneous remission. Improved identification and treatment of SIH are imperative to improve patients' QoL.

Effects of Fremanezumab on Psychiatric Comorbidities in Difficult-to-Treat Patients with Chronic Migraine: Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Greek Registry

OBJECTIVE

this post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fremanezumab in difficult-to-treat chronic migraine (CM) patients with and without psychiatric comorbidities (PCs), mainly anxiety and/or depression.

METHODS

We assessed data from CM patients with and without PCs who failed at least 3 preventives and eventually received at least 3 consecutive monthly doses of fremanezumab 225 mg. Outcomes included the crude response (≥50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs)) rates to fremanezumab from the baseline to the last clinical follow-up. The changes in MHDs; MHDs of moderate/greater severity; monthly days with intake of abortive medication; and the proportion of patients' changing status from with PCs to decreased/without PCs were also compared. Disability and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients enrolled, 65 (60.7%) had baseline PCs. The percentage of patients with (n = 38/65; 58.5%) and without (n = 28/42; 66.6%) PCs that achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs with fremanezumab was comparable (p = 0.41), whereas MHDs were significantly reduced (difference vs. baseline) in both patients with PCs (mean -8.9 (standard error: 6.8); p < 0.001) and without PCs (-9.8 (7.5); p < 0.001). Both groups experienced significant improvements in all other efficacy, disability, and QOL outcomes at comparable rates, including in MHD reduction. A significant proportion of fremanezumab-treated patients with baseline PCs de-escalated in corresponding severities or even reverted to no PCs (28/65; 43.1%) post-fremanezumab.

CONCLUSIONS

fremanezumab appears to be effective as a preventive treatment in difficult-to-treat CM patients with and without PCs while also being beneficial in reducing the severity of comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

CGRP, Migraine, and Brain MRI in CADASIL: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Migraine is associated with neuroimaging differences in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). However, it is unknown if migraine-related disability (MRD) or if calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a vasoactive peptide important in migraine pathology, have radiographic implications. The aims of this study were to identify whether MRD or interictal serum CGRP levels impacted neuroimaging findings for those with CADASIL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was performed. The primary outcomes were neuroimaging differences associated with MRD among those with migraine or interictal serum CGRP levels of those with and without migraine. MRD was defined by 2 migraine disability scales (Migraine Disability Assessment, Headache Impact Test-6). Retrospective brain magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed (average 1.7 ± 2.0 y before enrollment). Rank-sum and χ 2 tests were used.

RESULTS

Those with migraine (n=25, vs. n=14 without) were younger [median 49 (25 to 82) y vs. 60 (31 to 82) y, P <0.007], had fewer cerebral microbleeds (0 to 31 vs. 0 to 50, P =0.02) and less frequently had anterior temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [68% (17/25) vs 100% (14/14), P =0.02]. MRD scale outcomes had no significant radiographic associations. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ (migraine: n=18, 27.0±9.6 pg/mL vs. no migraine: n=10, 26.8±15.7 pg/mL, P =0.965).

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine may forestall microangiopathy in CADASIL, though possibly independent of severity as measured by MRD. Interictal serum CGRP did not differ in our cohort suggesting CGRP may not be vital to migraine pathophysiology in CADASIL. Larger studies are needed to account for age differences.

Recurrent Epistaxis: An Unusual Manifestation of Clinical Spectrum of Migraine -Case Series with Scoping Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE

We report four cases of migraine induced epistaxis and reviewed the published literature of migraine with epistaxis to establish demographic profiles, types of migraine, severity, family history of headache and other associated disorders in adults.

METHODS

A panoramic search of the Medline database through Pubmed was done in May 2022 using search terms: {Migraine with Epistaxis}, case reports. All articles/case reports in English from January 2001 to April 2022 where age of patients was > 18 years were included in our review.

RESULTS

Our search recognized total of three cases and with inclusion of the four cases who reported to us, we reviewed these seven cases and studied demographic profile, clinical features, association of epistaxis with types and severity of migraine and relationship with other medical disorders. Mean age of presentation was 28.7 years (range 18-49), with five female and two male patients. The intensity of headache was severe in three of seven cases and there was one case each of moderate and mild category. Five of seven (71%) patients had reduction in intensity of headache with onset of bleeding and various types of migraine (Migraine with and without Aura, vestibular migraine, sporadic familial hemiplegic migraine) according to ICHD classification were associated with epistaxis. Four of seven had positive family history of migraine. There was no diagnostic finding in any patient and all patients responded to migraine preventive medication.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent epistaxis is not so uncommon manifestation of various types of migraine and specialist should keep this clinical diagnosis in mind to avoid misdiagnosis.

Epidemiology and treatment utilization for Canadian patients with migraine: a literature review

The objective of this narrative review was to identify real-world evidence regarding the burden of migraine in Canada. We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published between August 2010 and August 2020. Of the 3269 publications identified, 29 studies were included. Prevalence estimates varied widely across Canada, and mental health comorbidities were common. Individuals with migraine have a lower quality of life, detrimental impact on workforce productivity, and higher rates of health care resource utilization (HCRU), with HCRU and costs highest among those with chronic migraine. We found inconsistencies in care, including underutilization of medications such as triptans, and varied utilization of over-the-counter and prescription medications. Increased medication use was identified among those with chronic migraine, and only a small number of patients used migraine preventive medications. The burden of migraine in Canada is substantial. Reduced quality of life and workforce productivity, increased HCRU and costs, and underutilization of triptans and migraine preventive medications highlight an important need for more effective management of individuals with migraine.

Characteristics of migraine in patients with headache disorders: A clinic‐based study from Central American and Caribbean countries

Objective

The objective of the study was to measure the proportion of patients who consulted for headache and of those who had a final diagnosis of migraine. We also assessed the proportion and characteristics of patients with migraine and the impact of migraine on the daily activities and the professional and social lives of patients visiting private/public medical centers in Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, and the Dominican Republic.

Background

Underdiagnosis of migraine is high in Central America and Caribbean urban communities. However, there is limited knowledge on characteristics of headache disorders for the appropriate classification of migraine, which is a prerequisite for targeted treatment. Hence, there is a need to improve migraine awareness among patients and medical professionals in this region.

Methods

Central America and Caribbean countries epidemioLogy study of Migraine (CALM) was a non‐interventional, cross‐sectional, multinational study in adults aged 18–65 years with a history of or current headache. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with migraine visiting medical centers due to headache disorders. Using a specially designed migraine survey questionnaire, patients self‐reported migraine characteristics, duration, and severity of attacks and impact on work and social life.

Results

Of the 313 enrolled patients, 308 (98.4%) completed the study. Approximately 75.3% (232/308) of patients with headache visiting medical centers had migraine, with episodic migraine being the most common (193 [83.2%]). Overall, 34/308 (11.0%) patients had a new diagnosis of migraine. Among patients with migraine, 66 (28.4%) had a history of migraine for ≥20 years and 59 (25.4%) experienced severe pain. Overall, 52.2% (121/232) of patients reported that migraine affected their professional life and 78.4% (182/232) reported an impact on social life.

Conclusion

The CALM study establishes that a high proportion of patients with migraine had a long duration and high severity of migraine attacks, leading to a direct impact on work/social life as well as on costs incurred by patients in these countries.

Establishing content validity for the migraine Global Impression Item (mGI-I) assessment: a modified single-item migraine symptom severity questionnaire

Objective

To establish content validity of a single-item, migraine-specific symptom severity questionnaire for completion by migraine patients, key family members (KFMs) of migraine patients, and Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) who treat migraine patients.

Background

Migraine is a common disabling primary headache disorder with high prevalence and significant socioeconomic burden and personal impacts. There is a need for a global assessment of migraine symptom severity to evaluate potential new therapies from multiple perspectives.

Methods

The migraine Global Impression Item (mGI-I) was drafted and tested in a non-interventional, qualitative study comprising telephone interviews with 15 migraine patients, 15 KFMs of migraine patients, and 15 migraine treating HCPs. The mGI-I was drafted with two different item stem options and two different response scale options to ask about the patient’s migraine from the perspective of each respondent. Cognitive interviews were conducted to test comprehensiveness, clarity and ease of completion of the different versions of the mGI-I iteratively in three sequential waves of respondents.

Results

Revisions were made to the draft mGI-I after Wave 1 and Wave 2 of the interviews. Changes were made to simplify the item stem (removing unnecessary text), make language more patient-friendly (e.g. use of “migraine attack”), and add clarity to the item stem for consistent interpretation (include descriptive language of migraine attacks). Across both waves there was a preference for a 5-point response scale compared to a 7-point scale. In Wave 3, all respondents found the revised instructions, item stem, and 5-point response scale comprehensive, easy to understand and to answer. No further changes to the mGI-I were made after Wave 3.

Conclusions

This qualitative study of 45 total respondents across 3 subpopulations, established the content validity and appropriateness of the mGI-I in migraine patients, KFMs, and migraine-treating HCPs. The study specifically confirmed that the mGI-I is comprehensive, easily understood and answered for each respondent population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02626-0.

Assessing Multisensory Sensitivity Across Scales: Using the Resulting Core Factors to Create the Multisensory Amplification Scale

Multisensory sensitivity (MSS), observed in some chronic pain patients, may reflect a generalized central nervous system sensitivity. While several surveys measure aspects of MSS, there remains no gold standard. We explored the underlying constructs of 4 MSS-related surveys (80 items in total) using factor analyses using REDCap surveys (N = 614, 58.7% with pain). Four core- and 6 associated-MSS factors were identified from the items assessed. None of these surveys addressed all major sensory systems and most included additional related constructs. A revised version of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale was developed, encompassing 5 core MSS systems: vision, hearing, smell, tactile, and internal bodily sensations: the 12-item Multisensory Amplification Scale (MSAS). The MSAS demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.82), test-retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.90), and construct validity in the original and in a new, separate cohort (R = 0.54-0.79, P < .0001). Further, the odds of having pain were 2-3.5 times higher in the highest sex-specific MSAS quartile relative to the lowest MSAS quartile, after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and pain schema (P < .03). The MSAS provides a psychometrically comprehensive, brief, and promising tool for measuring the core-dimensions of MSS. PERSPECTIVE: Multiple multisensory sensitivity (MSS) tools are used, but without exploration of their underlying domains. We found several measures lacking core MSS domains, thus we modified an existing scale to encompass 5 core MSS domains: light, smell, sound, tactile, and internal bodily sensations using only 12 items, with good psychometric properties.

Increased migraine-free intervals with multifocal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

INTRODUCTION

Episodic migraine is a debilitating condition associated with vast impairments of health, daily living, and life quality. Several prophylactic treatments exist, having a moderate ratio of action related to side effects and therapy costs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence based therapy in several neuropsychiatric conditions, showing robust efficacy in alleviating specific symptoms. However, its efficacy in migraine disorders is unequivocal and might be tightly linked to the applied rTMS protocol. We hypothesized that multifocal rTMS paradigm could improve clinical outcomes in patients with episodic migraine by reducing the number of migraine days, frequency and intensity of migraine attacks, and improve the quality of life.

METHODS

We conducted an experimental, double-blind, randomized controlled study by applying a multifocal rTMS paradigm. Patients with episodic migraine with or without aura were enrolled in two centers from August 2018, to December 2019, and randomized to receive either real (n = 37) or sham (sham coil stimulation, n = 28) multifocal rTMS for six sessions over two weeks. Patients, physicians, and raters were blinded to the applied protocol. The experimental multifocal rTMS protocol included two components; first, swipe stimulation of 13 trains of 140 pulses/train, 67 Hz, 60% of RMT, and 2s intertrain interval and second, spot burst stimulation of 33 trains of 15 pulses/train, 67 Hz, 85% of RMT, and 8s intertrain interval. Reduction >50% from the baseline in migraine days (as primary outcome) and frequency and intensity of migraine attacks (as key secondary outcomes) over a 12-week period were assessed. To balance the baseline variables between the treatment arms, we applied the propensity score matching through the logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 65 randomized patients, sixty (age 39.7 ± 11.6; 52 females; real rTMS n = 33 and sham rTMS n = 27) completed the trial and five patients dropped out. Over 12 weeks, the responder's rate in the number of migraine days was significantly higher in the real rTMS compared to the sham group (42% vs. 26%, p < 0.05). The mean migraine days per month decreased from 7.6 to 4.3 days in the real rTMS group and from 6.2 to 4.3 days in the sham rTMS group, resulting in a difference with real vs. sham rTMS of -3.2 days (p < 0.05). Similarly, over the 12-week period, the responder's rate in the reduction of migraine attacks frequency was higher in the real rTMS compared to the sham group (42% vs 33%, p < 0.05). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot study shows compelling evidence in a double placebo-controlled trial that multifocal rTMS is an effective and well-tolerated preventive treatment in patients with episodic migraine.

Relevant factors for neurologists to define effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs and take decisions on treatment. My-LIFE European Delphi survey

Background

Clinical guidelines agree that preventive treatment should be considered in patients with uncontrolled migraine despite acute medications or patients with ≥4 migraine days per month. However, the criteria to define the effectiveness of treatment and the factors that inform the decision to (dis)continue it are not clearly defined in clinical practice.

Methods

Overall, 148 healthcare practitioners from five European countries completed a two‐wave questionnaire. The Steering Committee defined a simulated set of 108 migraine patient profiles based on the combination of five factors (frequency of the attacks, intensity of the attacks, use of acute migraine medications, patient perception and presence/absence of tolerable side effects). These profiles were used in a Delphi survey among European neurologists to identify the criteria that should be used to decide treatment response and continuation using a conjoint analysis approach.

Results

Consensus was reached for 82/108 (76%) of profiles regarding treatment response, and for 86/108 (80%) regarding treatment continuation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that a ≥50% reduction in the use of acute migraine medications and positive patient's perception of treatment were the most important factors that lead to the decision of continuing (combined factors, OR = 18.3, 95% CI 13.4–25.05).

Conclusions

This survey identifies two relevant outcome measures: one objective (use of acute migraine treatment medications) and one subjective (positive patient perception) that guide the clinician decision to continue preventive treatment in migraine patients.

Significance

In clinical practice, criteria to define the effectiveness of migraine preventive treatment and factors that guide treatment stop or continuation are not clearly defined. In this simulated clinical setting study, a reduction in the use of acute migraine medications was the factor associated with preventive treatment effectiveness definition. This study also revealed that factors strongly associated with the decision of treatment continuation in real life are the acute migraine medications use and a positive patient's perception of treatment effectiveness.

Severe migraine and its control: A proposal for definitions and consequences for care

Currently many patients with severe migraine do not receive appropriate treatment and are never referred to specialist headache centres. On the other hand, specialist headache centres are frequently attended by patients whose migraines could be managed adequately in the community. One reason for this may be the absence of standardised definitions of migraine severity and control and of a treatment algorithm for orientating difficult-to-treat patients to specialist headache centres. Based on a review of the relevant literature and consensus meetings, proposals have been made for these items. We propose that migraine should be considered severe if headache frequency is at least eight migraine days per month or, if headaches are less frequent, the HIT-6 score is ≥60 or ≥50% of headaches require complete interruption of activity. The proposed definition of migraine control is defined on the basis of appropriate response to acute headache therapy and to preventative therapy. A treatment algorithm is proposed to assess migraine control regularly and to adapt therapy accordingly. These proposals may contribute to developing and testing strategies for management of severe disease with appropriate and effective preventive treatment strategies. With the anticipated introduction of new possibilities for migraine prevention in the near future, the time is ripe for a holistic approach to migraine management.

Patients with episodic migraine show increased T2 values of the trapezius muscles - an investigation by quantitative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Neck pain is frequent in patients with migraine. Likewise, evidence for inflammatory processes in the trapezius muscles is accumulating. However, non-invasive and objectively assessable correlates are missing in vivo.

Methods

Twenty-one subjects with episodic migraine (mean age: 24.6 ± 3.1 years, 18 females) and 22 controls (mean age: 23.0 ± 2.2 years, 17 females) without any history of headache prospectively underwent physical examination and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the trapezius muscles. A T2‐prepared turbo spin-echo sequence was acquired for manual segmentation of the trapezius muscles and extraction of mean T2 values.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences regarding age, sex, body mass index, or number of myofascial trigger points (mTrPs) between groups. All patients with migraine presented with mTrPs in the trapezius muscles. T2 of the entire trapezius muscles was significantly higher in the migraine group when compared to controls (31.1 ± 0.8 ms vs. 30.1 ± 1.1 ms; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Elevated T2 values of the trapezius muscles may indicate subtle inflammatory processes within musculature among patients with migraine because T2 increase is likely to stem from edematous changes. Future work may validate this finding in larger cohorts, but muscle T2 might have potential to develop into a viable in vivo biomarker for muscular affection in migraine.

Migraine-Related Disabilities Among Saudi Migraine Patients and Its Association with Social Factors

Background: Migraine is a complex disorder triggered by an interaction of multiple abnormalities involving genes, blood vessels, and brain structures. It is characterized by throbbing headaches, mostly on one side of the head. It is one of the most common causes of disability, as announced by the Global Burden of the Diseases (GBD). Objectives: We aimed at assessing disabilities in Saudi migraine patients and addressing the relation between migraine-associated disabilities and social factors in Saudi Arabia. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey randomly through social media channels to the general population around Saudi Arabia. Basic personal information, along with a confirmation of the migraine diagnosis, were included in the first part of the questionnaire, and the respondent’s eligibility was determined to complete the survey. Specified questions about the sociodemographic characteristics, migraine attacks and medications, and the items of Migraine Disability Assessment score (MIDAS), were included in the next parts of the survey. Results: Of the 480 total responses, 250 (52.1%) eligible participants were included (mean age of 34.84 ± 10.14 years; 83.2% females). Most of the participants were married (59.6%), had three or more kids (50.7%), had a bachelor’s degree (60.8%), and 52.8% were employed. Only 16.4% of the subjects did regular exercise, and 16.8% were current smokers. No significant association was detected between the MIDAS score and most of the social characteristics, including marital status, number of kids, education level, occupation, and smocking. Conclusions: Most of the migraineurs in Saudi Arabia had a severe disability according to the MIDAS score. Gender, regular exercise, the severity of the disease, and frequency of attack had a statistically significant relationship with migraine-related disabilities. Migraine treatment and prophylaxis were incompetent in decreasing migraine severity and related disabilities in our selected participants.

Mapping Assessments Instruments for Headache Disorders against the ICF Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disability

Headache disorders have a strong impact on sufferers’ lives. However, the “content” of assessment instruments addressing concepts, such as disability and quality of life (QoL), has not comprehensively been addressed. We searched SCOPUS for research papers in which outcome measures were used in adult populations of patients with migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH). The content of single instruments was then mapped against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. A total of 150 papers and 26 instruments were included: 15 addressed disability or impact, two addressed work-related difficulties, and nine addressed QoL. Few instruments were commonly used across the conditions and covered domains of functioning were impact on daily life activities, homework, school, and work-related tasks, leisure time, informal and family relations, pain, emotional difficulties, energy level, and impulse control. Most of the research is based on instruments that were developed for migraine, which is critical for CH, and the impact of headache disorders on work-related activities is poorly acknowledged. Further research is needed to expand the scope of headaches impact on daily life activities, and on environmental factors relevant to headache disorders to raise knowledge on the less represented areas, e.g., TTH impact.

Impact of quarantine due to COVID infection on migraine: a survey in Genova, Italy

Quarantine is a well-known risk factor for psychological and psychiatric disturbances. We evaluated burden of migraine during lockdown due to COVID 19 pandemia. Forty-nine subjects followed in our headache clinic for migraine were evaluated for migraine burden by means of global assessment of migraine severity (GAMS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) by phone interview. Moreover, depression and anxiety were quantified by Beck depression inventory (BDI) and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). We evaluated changes in the value of migraine score from the 2 months immediately before lockdown (from January 1 to March 9) to the 2 months of quarantine (from March 10 to May 3). Value of GAMS was 5.61 ± 0.76 before and 4.16 ± 1.46 during quarantine (p < .001). VAS was 7.49 ± 1.10 before and 5.47 ± 1.88 during quarantine (p < .001). We also found a time by depression level interaction, F(1,47) = 6.21, p = .016, F(1,47) = 14.52, p < .006, respectively, showing that subjects with lower level of depression had better course of migraine. In conclusion, we showed that, during quarantine due to COVID pandemia, subjects with migraine had fewer migraine attacks and lesser pain and show moderate level of depression, correlated to migraine burden.