Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical disc arthroplasty is safe across various obesity levels

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As surgical indications for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) continue to expand, a growing patient population is now becoming indicated for this procedure. Little is known about whether CDA is safe in the overweight and obese populations, and how this procedure compares to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in this particular demographic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of CDA across varying levels of body mass indices and to compare these to ACDF.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 12,454 patients who underwent CDA and 45,513 patients who underwent ACDF between 2011 and 2020 were included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, complications, revisions.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was queried to identify all adults who underwent single-level CDA. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI), defined as Healthy Weight (<25kg/m2), Overweight (25-30kg/m2), Obese (30-40kg/m2), and Morbidly Obese (>40kg/m2). Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared before matching, and medical and surgical complications were compared after matching for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Similar comparative analyses were performed on all obese patients (>30kgm/2) who underwent single-level CDA and single-level ACDF.

RESULTS

In total, 1907 Healthy Weight, 3295 Overweight, 5431 Obese, and 1821 Morbidly Obese patients were included. The mean age was between 45.43 and 47.41 years, 57.12% and 71.68% were female, and mean CCI was 1.16-1.73 across groups (all p<.001). Mean CCI (Healthy Weight=1.16, Overweight=1.31, Obese=1.47, Morbidly Obese=1.63) and rate of comorbidities, such as diabetes (19.19%, 25.74%, 37.51%, 48.65%), hypertension (45.20%, 56.18%, 69.21%, 76.22%), and hyperlipidemia (49.34%, 60.61%, 65.33%, 64.96%), generally increased with increasing BMI (p<.001). After matching, mean age was 44.59 years, 70.98% were female, and mean CCI was 1.07 for all groups. At 90 days postoperatively, medical complications, including infection, wound dehiscence, and readmissions, were comparable (p>.05). At 2 years postoperatively, anterior revision was higher in Healthy Weight patients (30.27%, 28.11%, 24.71%, 24.96%, p=.005) but other surgical complications, including dysphagia, dysphonia, and implant failure, were otherwise comparable (p>.05). Comparison of all obese patients across cervical procedures revealed higher rates of 90-day emergency department visits (ACDF=21.56% vs 16.65%, p<.001) and 1-year hardware removal (1.49% vs 0.81%, p=.002), wound exploration (0.73% vs 0.35%, p=.018), and posterior fusion (1.14% vs 0.44%, p<.001) and lower rates of anterior revision (18.82% vs 23.68%, p<.001) in ACDF patients compared to CDA patients.

CONCLUSION

CDA may be safe across varying levels of obesity without any appreciable change in medical and surgical complications. In addition, single-level ACDF may result in higher complications than single-level CDA in the obese population.

Reasons for Revision Surgery After Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Based on Medical Device Reports Maintained by the US Food and Drug Administration

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze revisions of CDAs reported to the MAUDE database.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) has emerged as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical disease, demonstrating comparable outcomes. Despite the availability of variable CDA designs, there is limited data on the specific complications of individual CDAs. The Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database has been used to systematically report complications associated with CDAs. However, data on specific reasons for CDA revision remains scarce. The purpose of this study is to compare common complications associated with revision for different CDAs.

METHODS

The MAUDE database was queried from January 2005 to September 2023, including all nine FDA-approved CDAs. The full-text reports of each complication were categorized based on whether revision surgery was performed, the complications and the type of CDA collected and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 678 revisions for nine CDAs were reported: Mobi-C (239), M6 (167), Prodisc-C (88), Prestige (60), PCM (44), Bryan (35), Secure (23), Simplify (21), and Discover (1). The top three complications associated with revision were migration (23.5%), neck pain (15.5%), and heterotopic ossification (6.6%). The most common complications per device were migration for Mobi-C (26.4%), Prodisc-C (21.3%), Prestige (24.6%), PCM (84.1%), Bryan (48.6%), Secure (30.4%), and Discover (100%). For M6, the most common complications associated with revision surgery were osteolysis (18.6%) and neck pain (18.6%), while neck pain (23.8%) was the most common for the Simplify.

CONCLUSIONS

The MAUDE database highlights complications related to CDA revision in which the primary complications consistently include implant migration, neck pain, and heterotopic ossification, varying in their rerelvance depending on the CDA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

A pragmatic single centre retrospective comparative review of complication profile between PEEK cages and Zero-P cage screw constructs

BACKGROUND

Anterior Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) is a common surgery recommended for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease after failed conservative care. There is no consensus on the choice of implants, and it varies between surgeons. This study aims to analyse the early complications following ACDF performed using a standalone cage versus a Zero-P (Cage Screw - (CS)) construct for patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

A total of 162 patients underwent an ACDF between August 2016 and July 2018. There were 83 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with standalone cage (SA) and 79 patients (111 cervical disc levels) with cage-screw (CS) fixation. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, and levels of surgery. The follow-up ranged from 2 months to 24 months. Complications, both clinical and radiological, were assessed between the groups.

RESULTS

Both the SA and Zero-P (CS) groups were subdivided into single and multilevel surgery. Complications encountered in the SA group were temporary swallowing problems 10, hoarseness of voice 3, cage migration 1, delayed union 1, Horner's syndrome 1, cage subsidence 2. In the CS group swallowing problems 4, hoarseness of voice 4, CSF leak 1, recurrent symptoms 1. The observed difference in the incidence of complications between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Univariate analysis between the groups did not show any difference in the improvement of cervical sagittal balance, fusion rate, subsidence, and complications encountered. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for complications showed no difference between the groups when assessed for smoking, gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, levels of surgery, fusion status, Odom score, or the type of implant.

CONCLUSION

In this short-term study, the standalone (SA) cages showed no difference in their complication profile in comparison to a cage-screw construct for both single and multilevel ACDF. Standalone cages might be a cost-effective option without increased complication risks. Nevertheless, we propose a longer-term follow-up with a prospective randomized trial for further evaluation of this finding.

Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Effect of Procedural Variant on Patients With a Prolonged Preoperative Duration of Symptoms From Disk Herniation

INTRODUCTION

Patients with a prolonged preoperative symptom duration (PSD) in the setting of cervical disk herniation (DH) may suffer inferior outcomes after surgical intervention. Comparison between anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) in this at-risk population has not yet been conducted.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ACDF or CDA for DH with a PSD > 180 days were selected. Six-week (6W) and final follow-up (FF) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as well as magnitude of postoperative improvements (∆PROM) were compared between cohorts using multivariable linear regression. Intercohort achievement rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in each PROM were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven of 190 patients were in the CDA cohort. 6W Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was superior in the CDA cohort. The ACDF cohort demonstrated notable improvements in the 6W Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analog scale-neck pain (VAS-N), visual analog scale-arm pain (VAS-A), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The CDA cohort demonstrated notable improvements in 6W PROMIS-PF, NDI, VAS-N, and VAS-A. FF VAS-A was better in the CDA cohort. The ACDF cohort demonstrated notable improvements in FF PROMIS-PF, NDI, VAS-N, and VAS-A. The CDA cohort demonstrated notable improvements in all FF PROMs. ∆PROM-6W in PROMIS-PF was greater in the CDA cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with prolonged PSD due to cervical DH demonstrated notable improvements in physical function, disability, pain, and mental health regardless of fusion versus arthroplasty techniques. Accounting for demographic variations, patients undergoing CDA demonstrated a greater magnitude of improvement and superior scores in physical function at the first postoperative follow-up. Rates of clinically tangible improvements in PROMs did not markedly vary by surgical procedure. Patients undergoing CDA may perceive greater early improvements to physical function compared with patients undergoing ACDF for prolonged PSD due to DH.

The Statistical Fragility of Trials Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative cervical pathology by using fragility indices.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

RCTs comparing these surgical approaches have shown that CDA may be equivalent or even superior to ACDF due to better preservation of normal spinal kinematics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RCTs reporting clinical outcomes after CDA versus ACDF for degenerative cervical disc disease were evaluated. Data for outcome measures were classified as continuous or dichotomous. Continuous outcomes included: Neck Disability Index, overall pain, neck pain, radicular arm pain, and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores. Dichotomous outcomes included: any adjacent segment disease (ASD), superior-level ASD, and inferior-level ASD. The fragility index (FI) and continuous FI (CFI) were determined for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The corresponding fragility quotient (FQ) and continuous FQ were calculated by dividing FI/CFI by sample size.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (78 outcome events) were included. Thirteen dichotomous events had a median FI of 7 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-10], and the median FQ was 0.043 (IQR: 0.035-0.066). Sixty-five continuous events had a median CFI of 14 (IQR: 9-22) and a median continuous FQ of 0.145 (IQR: 0.074-0.188). This indicates that, on average, altering the outcome of 4.3 patients out of 100 for the dichotomous outcomes and 14.5 out of 100 for continuous outcomes would reverse trial significance. Of the 13 dichotomous events that included a loss to follow-up data, 8 (61.5%) represented ≥7 patients lost. Of the 65 continuous events reporting the loss to follow-up data, 22 (33.8%) represented ≥14 patients lost.

CONCLUSION

RCTs comparing ACDF and CDA have fair to moderate statistical robustness and do not suffer from statistical fragility.

Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the Baguera®C Prosthesis

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an accepted alternative that preserves the structure and flexibility of the cervical spine. This study aimed to explore the dynamic changes in the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine after CDA using a viscoelastic artificial disc, as well as the factors affecting mobility restoration. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 132 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and CDA from January 2015 to June 2022. Result: Analysis of data from 132 patients revealed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. The mean ROM of C2-C7 and functional spinal unit (FSU) segments significantly increased from 2 to 36 months post-operatively. Cervical spine flexibility was preserved and enhanced after prosthesis implantation. However, it took six months for the cervical spine motility to stabilize. In addition, sex and age were found to impact motility restoration, with female and younger patients exhibiting larger ROMs post-surgery. Additionally, CDA at the C5-C6 level resulted in the greatest increase in ROM, potentially improving overall kinematic ability. Conclusions: Single-segment artificial disc arthroplasty effectively restores the ROM in degenerative cervical spine conditions.

[Translated article] Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91° was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.

One-Year Follow-Up Study on Assessing the Range of Segmental Motion and Clinical Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Treatment of Severe Cervical Disc Degeneration

BACKGROUND

Though previous studies have documented various clinical outcomes after cervical arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease, none of them reported the impact of cervical arthroplasty on severe cervical disc degeneration (CDD).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included severe 40 CDD (C3-C7) patients who underwent single-level cervical arthroplasty using ProDisc-C between January 2017 and December 2019. After surgical intervention, the range of motion (ROM) was determined, whereas clinical outcomes were measured in terms of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) to evaluate neck pain and disability, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to the mean preoperative ROM (6.57 ± 4.85°), the cervical dynamic ROM was increased 3 months after cervical arthroplasty, and the increment was maintained for at least 1 year. The increased ROM is attributed to the extension and not flexion components. The mean preoperative ROM of 6.57 ± 4.85° significantly increased to 11.67 ± 4.98° (P = 0.0005), 10.05 ± 5.18° (P = 0.0426) and 10.46 ± 4.73° (P = 0.0247) after 3 months, 6 months and 1 year, respectively. The extension ROM also revealed a similar trend. VAS for neck and arm decreased from 7.4 and 6.6 to 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. Consistently, the preoperative mean Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 27.6 decreased to 14.6. We recorded a case of device subsidence, but without extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical arthroplasty can improve clinical outcomes and restore ROM in severe CDD patients.

Less superior adjacent syndrome and lower reoperation rate. Medium- and long-term results of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare medium- and long-term postoperative surgical results, especially the adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, and reoperation rate, of patients operated on with cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical arthrodesis in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), at one cervical level.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thirteen RCTs were selected. The clinical, radiological and surgical results were analyzed, taking the adjacent syndrome rate and the reoperation rate as the primary objective of the study.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred and sixty three patients were analyzed. The cervical arthroplasty group showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome (P<0.001), lower reoperation rate (P<0.001), less radicular pain (P=0.002), and a better score of neck disability index (P=0.02) and SF-36 physical component (P=0.01). No significant differences were found in the lower adjacent syndrome rate, adverse event rate, neck pain scale, or SF-36 mental component. A range of motion of 7.91 degrees was also found at final follow-up, and a heterotopic ossification rate of 9.67% in patients with cervical arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In the medium and long-term follow-up, cervical arthroplasty showed a lower rate of superior adjacent syndrome and a lower rate of reoperation. No statistically significant differences were found in the rate of inferior adjacent syndrome or in the rate of adverse events.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Replacement for a Workers' Compensation Population in an Ambulatory Surgical Center

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (CDR) in the Workers' Compensation (WC) population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No studies to our knowledge have compared PROMs and MCID attainment between ACDF and CDR among patients with WC insurance undergoing surgery in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center (ASC).

METHODS

WC insurance patients undergoing primary, single/double-level ACDF/CDR in an ASC were identified. Patients were divided into ACDF versus CDR. PROMs were collected at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year timepoints, including PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS/MCS, VAS neck/arm, and NDI.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included, 51 ACDF/28 CDR. While operative time (56.4 vs. 54.4 min), estimated blood loss (29.2 vs. 25.9 mL), POD0 pain (4.9 vs. 3.8), and POD0 narcotic consumption (21.2 vs. 14.5 oral morphine equivalents) were higher in ACDF patients, none reached statistical significance ( P >0.050, all). One-year arthrodesis rate was 100.0% among ACDF recipients with available imaging (n=36). ACDF cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF from 12 weeks to 1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 months, all timepoints for VAS neck/arm, and 12 weeks/6 months for NDI ( P ≤0.044, all). CDR cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF at 6 months, VAS neck/arm from 12 weeks to 1 year, and NDI at 12 weeks/6 months ( P ≤0.049, all). CDR cohort reported significantly lower VAS neck at 12 weeks/1 year and VAS arm at 12 weeks ( P ≤0.039, all). MCID achievement rates did not differ.

CONCLUSION

While operative duration/estimated blood loss/acute postoperative pain/narcotic consumption were, on average, higher among ACDF recipients, these were not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. ACDF and CDR ASC patients generally demonstrated comparable arm pain/disability/physical function/mental health, though neck pain was significantly lower at multiple timepoints among CDR patients. Clinically meaningful PROM improvements were comparable. Larger, multicentered studies are required to confirm our results.

Mid-term and Long-term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare mid-term to long-term outcomes of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

After ACDF to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease, the loss of motion at the index level due to fusion may accelerate adjacent-level disk degeneration. CDA was developed to preserve motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Early-term to mid-term clinical outcomes from RCTs suggest noninferiority of CDA compared with ACDF, but it remains unclear whether CDA yields better mid-term to long-term outcomes than ACDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs with at least 60 months of follow-up. The risk ratio or standardized mean difference (and 95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighteen reports of 14 RCTs published in 2014-2023 were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the CDA group had a significantly greater improvement in neurological success and Neck Disability Index than the ACDF group. The ACDF group exhibited a significantly better improvement in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary than the CDA group. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the CDA group at 60- and 84-month follow-ups; at 120-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the overall rate of secondary surgical procedures was significantly lower in the CDA group, we did not observe any significant difference at 60-month follow-up between the CDA and ACDF group and appreciated statistically significant lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery at 84-month and 108- to 120-month follow-up. The rate of adverse events and the neck and arm pain scores in the CDA group were not significantly different from those of the ACDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 5- to 10-year follow-up data, CDA resulted in significantly better neurological success and Neck Disability Index scores and lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, secondary surgical procedures, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery than ACDF. ACDF resulted in improved Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores. However, the CDA and ACDF groups did not exhibit significant differences in overall changes in neck and arm pain scores or rates of adverse events.

Revision Strategies for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To review indications and strategies for revision of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No data were generated as part of this review.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was performed.

RESULTS

No results were generated as part of this review.

CONCLUSIONS

CDA is a proven, motion-sparing surgical option for the treatment of myelopathy or radiculopathy secondary to cervical degenerative disc disease. As is the case with any operation, a small percentage of CDA will require revision, which can be a technically demanding endeavor. Here we review available revision strategies and associated indications, a thorough understanding of which will aid the surgeon in finely tailoring their approach to varying presentations.

Short-term and Long-term Complications of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the short and long-term complications associated with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CDA is a safe and effective motion-sparing alternative to fusion for the treatment of cervical disc pathology in patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Although CDA offers advantages over fusion within a narrower set of indications, it introduces new technical challenges and potential complications.

METHODS

A systematic search of several large databases, including Cochrane Central, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, was conducted from January 2005 to August 2023 to identify published studies and clinical trials evaluating cervical disc replacement complications and outcomes.

RESULTS

Short-term complications are primarily related to surgical approach and include dysphagia reported as high as ~70%, laryngeal nerve injury ~0%-1.25%, Horner syndrome ~0.06%, hematoma ~0.01%, gross device extrusion ~0.3%, whereas long-term complications include adjacent segment disease reported at ~3.8%, osteolysis ~44%-64%, heterotopic ossification ~7.3%-69.2%, implant failure ~3.3%-3.7%, and implant wear, which varies depending on design.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches for mitigating complications broadly include meticulous dissection, intraoperative techniques, and diligent postoperative follow-up. This review emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding and management of complications to enhance the safety, reproducibility, and success of CDA. As CDA continues to evolve, there remains a critical need for ongoing research to delve deeper into evaluating risk for complications and long-term patient outcomes.

Surgical Technique of Central and Over-the-Top Full-Endoscopic Decompression of the Cervical Spine: A Technical Note

Endoscopic surgery of the cervical spine is constantly evolving and the spectrum of its indications has expanded in recent decades. Full-endoscopic techniques have standardized the procedures for posterior and anterior access. The full-endoscopic approach was developed to treat degenerative diseases with the least possible invasion and without causing instability of the cervical spine. The posterior full-endoscopic approach is indicated for the treatment of diseases of the lateral part of the vertebral segment, such as herniations and stenoses of the lateral recess and vertebral foramen. There has been little discussion of this approach to the treatment of central stenosis of the cervical spine. This technical note describes a step-by-step surgical technique for central and over-the-top full-endoscopic decompression in the cervical spine, using a 3.7 mm working channel endoscope. This technique has already been shown to be effective in a recent case series with a 4.7 mm working channel endoscope, and may represent a new treatment option for central or bilateral lateral recess stenosis. There is also the possibility of a bilateral full-endoscopic approach, but this may be associated with greater muscle damage and a longer operative time. Case series and comparative studies should be encouraged to confirm the safety and utility of this technique.

Disc prosthesis versus fusion with cage in single level cervical degenerative spine disease - A retrospective case-control patient reported outcome study

AIM

To compare the clinical outcome of single level cervical degenerative spine disease treated surgically with motion preserving anterior cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Patients treated with cervical disc arthroplasty at Aalborg University Hospital and ACDF at Aarhus University Hospital were matched 1:2. Primary outcome measures were Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D-3 L and Numeric rating scale (NRS) for arm- and neck pain. Data was collected by telephone interviews regarding present and retrospective data.

RESULTS

50 patients treated with cervical disc arthroplasty were matched to 100 ACDF patients covering November 2011 to December 2018. Mean improvements for NRS neck pain three-months postoperative, and NDI were significantly better in the cervical disc arthroplasty group, with intergroup differences of 1.56 (p = 0.02) and 5.01 (p = 0.01) respectively. A subgroup analysis of the half of the cohort with the longest follow-up (mean 7.6 years) showed, in favour of cervical disc arthroplasty, mean improvements of NDI: 8.80 (p = 0.00), EQ5D: - 0.19 (p = 0.04), NRS neck three months follow-up: 3.70 (p = 0.00) and long follow-up: 2.54 (p = 0.01) and NRS arm three months follow-up: 2.02 (p = 0.01). Radiologic examination indicated preserved mobility in 80% of the implanted protheses at 24-month post-surgical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of one level degenerative cervical spine disease with cervical disc arthroplasty or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a similar good clinical outcome after a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. However, cervical disc arthroplasty displayed long-term superiority in the half of the cohort with the longest follow-up time averaging 7.6 years.

Restore cervical sagittal alignment by cervical disc arthroplasty and systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy in severe spondylosis: A prospective study

Introduction

Severe spondylosis is common and represents contraindication to achieve cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

Research question

Is it possible to restore cervical sagittal alignment using an adequate prosthetic model and performing systematic bilateral total uncuscectomy (or uncinectomy), even in cases of severe spondylosis ?

Material and methods

We propose a prospective clinical and radiological study comparing the evolution of preoperative and postoperative cervical sagittal balance 1 year after the interposition of a prosthesis with mobile bearing and systematic total uncuscectomy. VAS for brachialgia and cervicalgia, NDI, Odom's criteria, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope, C2 slope, C1-C2 Cobb angle, and segmental Cobb angle were analyzed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

Results

73 patients for a total of 129 levels treated were analyzed. Patients showed significant improvements in VASb, VASc, NDI, and Odom's criteria one year after surgery without clinical differences in the severe spondylosis subgroup (41 patients for 77 levels treated). Our results showed an increase in the C2-C7 Cobb angle postoperatively and a better correlation between T1 slope and C2-C7 Cobb angle postoperatively than preoperatively. Postoperative radiological results were similar between the spondylosis and non-spondylosis subgroups. However preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and preoperative ROM were lower in the severe spondylosis subgroup.

Discussion and conclusion

This study showed the possibility of restoring cervical sagittal balance by performing cervical disc arthroplasty with systematic uncuscectomy, even in cases of severe spondylosis. Moreover, we propose a simplified mathematical formula to preoperatively evaluate the lack of angulation to restore sagittal cervical alignment.

Cervical disc arthroplasty with systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy - Adapted technique particularly in severe spondylosis: A prospective study

Introduction

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is mainly used in young patients with soft herniated discs and seems to have several advantages over anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Severe spondylosis is common and represents a contraindication for performing CDA.

Research question

Is it possible to expand the indications for the implantation of cervical prostheses by adapting the surgical technique, particularly for severe spondylosis, to benefit from the advantages of prostheses over ACDF ?

Materials and methods

We propose a prospective two-center study to compare the possible clinical benefit of the placement of a cervical prosthesis with systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy (or uncinectomy) compared to the classical technique of ACDF, particularly for severe spondylosis. Visual analog scales for brachialgia, cervicalgia, and neck disability index were measured before and one year after surgery. Odom's criteria were assessed one year after surgery.

Results

We compared 81 patients treated with CDA and systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy versus 42 patients treated with ACDF for symptomatic radicular or medullary compression. Patients treated with CDA and uncuscectomy showed greater improvements in VASb, VASc, NDI, and Odom's criteria than those treated with ACDF, with statistically significant results. Moreover, no difference was found between the severe spondylosis subgroup and the non-severe spondylosis subgroup treated with CDA and uncuscectomy.

Discussion and conclusion

This study assessed the value of systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy for cervical arthroplasty. Our prospective clinical results suggest a surgical technique to reduce cervical pain and improve function one year after surgery, even in cases of severe spondylosis.

Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety between Discover cervical disc arthroplasty (DCDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in Cervical degenerative disc diseases.

Methods

Two researchers independently conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) following the Cochrane methodology guidelines. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was applied based on different heterogeneity. Review Manager (Version 5.4.1) software was used to perform data analysis.

Results

A total of 8 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that the DCDA group had a higher incidence of reoperation (P = 0.03) and a lower incidence of ASD (P = 0.04) than the CDA group. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding NDI score (P = 0.36), VAS ARM score (P = 0.73), VAS NECK score (P = 0.63), EQ-5D score (P = 0.61) and dysphagia incidence (0.18).

Conclusion

DCDA and ACDF have similar results in terms of NDI scores, VAS scores, EQ-5D scores, and dysphagia. In addition, DCDA can reduce the risk of ASD but increases the risk of reoperation.

Influence of the deviated center of rotation on the range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty -an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Short-term researches have studied the change of the center of rotation (COR) after the Bryan Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). But there is a lack of long-term studies focusing on the location of COR and its influence after surgery.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic materials of patients who received CDA were retrospectively reviewed. Written informed consents were obtained. Clinical outcome was accessed by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Odom's scale. Radiographic evaluation underwent before surgery, at early (3 months) follow-up and final (minimal 10 years) follow-up. The ROM of the global cervical spine and index level, the functional spine unit (FSU) angle and C2-C7 angle were measured. COR was identified and its coordinates were calculated. The absolute change of COR-x and COR-y were compared in subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included, with an average age of 55.9 ± 8.1 years old. The mean duration of follow up was 135.1 ± 16.1 (120-155) months. JOA, NDI and Odom's scale showed significant improvements at 10 years after surgery. The COR of index level was located in the posterior superior half of the caudal vertebral body. Following the implant of Bryan Disc, the COR shifted forward and downward. During the 10-year follow-up, the location of COR remained stable. ROM at the index level decreased from 10.6 ± 4.0° preoperatively to 9.3 ± 4.0° at the early follow-up (p = 0.03). The ROM at the index level remained unchanged from early follow-up to the final follow-up (9.3 ± 4.0° vs 9.5 ± 5.2°, p = 0.80). In subgroup analysis, larger changes of both COR-x and COR-y were related with decreased ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study illustrated that Bryan CDA could achieved favorable clinical and radiographic outcome over a minimal 10-year follow-up. The reduction of the flexion-extension ROM may be correlated with a more deviated postoperative COR. More attention should be paid to preoperative design and intraoperative technique to obtain a more native COR.

Revision Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A National Analysis of the Associated Indications, Procedures, and Postoperative Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associated indications, procedures, and postoperative outcomes after revision ACDA.

METHODS

We utilized a national database to identify adult(≥18 years) patients who underwent either a primary ACDA or removal of ACDA over a 10-year period(2008-2017). An in-depth assessment of the reasons for revision surgery and the subsequent procedures performed after the removal of ACDA was done by using both Current Procedural Terminology(CPT) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-9,10) coding.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2017, a total of 3,350 elective, primary ACDA cases were performed. During this time, 69 patients had a revision surgery requiring the removal of ACDA. The most common reasons for revision surgery included cervical spondylosis(59.4%) and mechanical complications(27.5%). After removal of ACDA, common procedures performed included anterior cervical fusion with or without decompression(69.6%), combined anterior/posterior fusion/decompression (11.6%), and replacement of ACDA (7.2%). The indications for surgery did not vary significantly among the different procedures performed (p = 0.318). Patients requiring revision surgery for mechanical complications or those who underwent a combined surgical approach were at significantly higher risk for subsequent short-term complications (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Over a 10-year period, the rate of revision surgery for ACDA was low (2.1%). Nearly 90% of revision cases were due to either cervical spondylosis or mechanical complications. These indications for surgery did not vary significantly among the different procedures performed. These findings will be important during the shared-decision making process for patients undergoing primary or revision ACDA.

Outcomes of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical arthrodesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 7-year

PURPOSE

Compare the outcomes of randomized clinical trials of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), with a minimum follow-up of 7 years.

METHODS

Nine randomized clinical trials were selected. The clinical, radiological, and surgical outcomes were analyzed, including functional and pain scores, range of motion, adjacent segment degeneration, adverse events, and need for reoperation.

RESULTS

2664 patients were included in the study. Pooled results indicated that the CDA group had a significantly higher overall success rate (p < 0.001), a higher improvement in the neck disability index (NDI) (p = 0.002), less VAS arm pain (p = 0.01), and better health questionnaire SF-36 physical component (p = 0.01) than ACDF group. Likewise, the pooled results indicated a significantly higher motion rate (p < 0.001), less adjacent syndrome (p < 0.05), and a lower percentage of reoperation (p < 0.001) in the CDA group. There were no significant differences between the CDA and ACDF groups in the neck pain scale (p = 0.11), the health questionnaire SF-36 mental component (p = 0.10), and in adverse events (p = 0.42).

CONCLUSION

In long-term follow-up, CDA showed a better overall success rate, better improvement in NDI, less VAS arm pain, better health questionnaire SF-36 physical component, a higher motion rate, less adjacent syndrome, and less reoperation rate than ACDF. No significant differences were found in the neck pain scale, SF-36 mental component, and in adverse events.

Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Radiculopathy After Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Technique Description and Case Report

BACKGROUND

Patients may occasionally have persistent or recurrent radicular symptoms after cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. We describe our approach using anterior cervical foraminotomy (ACF) to provide symptom relief in such patients without the need to convert to a fusion or remove the ADR implant.

METHODS

Our operative technique for ACF after cervical ADR begins by starting at the lateral edge of the ADR at the superior end plate of the inferior vertebral body. The ipsilateral uncovertebral joint is drilled with a combination of a high-speed burr and diamond-coated burr to minimize the risk of injury to the vertebral artery. The neuroforamen is entered after drilling through the posterior aspect of the uncinate process. The exiting cervical nerve root should be directly visualized, and a Kerrison rongeur may be used to trace along the nerve root laterally to remove any remaining uncinate osteophyte or process. We queried our internal database for patients with recurrent or new radicular pain following cervical ADR who underwent ACF. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Five patients with recurrent radicular symptoms after ADR were reviewed. Two ACFs were performed at C5-6, and 2 were performed at C6-7. Four patients developed ipsilateral recurrent radicular symptoms, and only 1 patient developed contralateral new radicular symptoms. Three patients reported complete resolution of their new or recurrent radicular symptoms following ACF, and 2 patients reported only partial resolution. No patients required conversion to a fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent symptoms of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy following ADR, ACF with uncovertebral joint resection can be used to provide direct foraminal decompression without the need for implant removal. This approach also preserves motion at the affected level, preserves cervical spinal stability, and prevents the need for spinal fusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with persistent or recurrent radicular symptoms after cervical ADR may achieve resolution of symptoms through a modified ACF technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Posterior intraprosthetic dislocation of cervical arthroplasty: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Cervical disc herniation is a common condition usually treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or, more recently, with cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). Both treatments offer similar clinical results. However, CDA has been found to offer fewer medium- to long-term complications as well as potential reduction of long-term adjacent disc degeneration.

OBSERVATIONS

A 40-year-old man was treated with cervical discectomy and arthroplasty due to a C6-C7 disc herniation with left C7 radiculopathy. After the treatment, his postoperative follow-up appointments were uneventful for 9 months. However, after 9 months, he reported cervical pain and a right C7 radiculopathy after neck extension. Imaging confirmed a posterior intraprosthetic dislocation, the first case reported to date. The patient was received emergency surgery under neuromonitoring, and the prosthesis was replaced by an ACDF and anterior plate. The insert presented a rupture of the anterior horn. The patient presented no preoperative or postoperative neurological deficit, and his follow-up review revealed no issues.

LESSONS

Posterior intraprosthetic dislocation is an extremely rare complication. It may occur with Mobi-C cervical arthroplasty in the case of rupture and oxidation of the polyethylene insert. Spine surgeons should be aware of this potential major complication.

Effect of Arthroplasty vs Fusion for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy is increasing. Treatment with motion preserving anterior cervical disc arthroplasty was introduced to prevent symptomatic adjacent segment disease, and there is need to evaluate results of this treatment compared with standard anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical outcomes at 5 years for arthroplasty vs fusion in patients who underwent surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial included patients aged 25 to 60 years with C6 or C7 radiculopathy referred to study sites' outpatient clinics from 2008 to 2013. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to December 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to arthroplasty or fusion. Patients were blinded to which treatment they received. The surgical team was blinded until nerve root decompression was completed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. Secondary outcomes were arm and neck pain, measured with numeric rating scales (NRS); quality of life, measured with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D); reoperation rates; and adjacent segment disease.

RESULTS

Among 147 eligible patients, 4 (2.7%) declined to participate and 7 (4.8%) were excluded. A total of 136 patients were randomized (mean [SD] age, 44.1 [7.0] years; 73 (53.7%) women), with 68 patients randomized to arthroplasty and 68 patients randomized to fusion. A total of 114 patients (83.8%) completed the 5-year follow-up. In the arthroplasty group, the mean NDI score was 45.9 (95% CI, 43.3 to 48.4) points at baseline and 22.2 (95% CI, 18.0 to 26.3) points at 5 years follow-up, and in the fusion group, mean NDI score was 51.3 (95% CI, 48.1 to 54.4) points at baseline, and 21.3 (95% CI, 17.0 to 25.6) points at 5 years follow-up. The changes in mean NDI scores between baseline and 5 years were statistically significant for arthroplasty (mean change, 24.8 [95% CI, 19.8 to 29.9] points; P < .001) and fusion (mean change, 29.9 [95% CI, 24.0 to 35.9] points; P < .001), but the change in mean NDI scores was not significantly different between groups (difference, 5.1 [95% CI, -2.6 to 12.7] points; P = .19). There were no significant differences in changes in arm pain (mean [SE] change, 3.5 [0.5] vs 3.1 [0.4]; P = .47), neck pain (mean [SE] change, 3.0 [0.5] vs 3.4 [0.5]; P = .50), EQ-5D (mean [SE] change, 0.39 [0.4] vs 0.45 [0.6]; P = .46), patients requiring reoperation (10 patients [14.7%] vs 8 patients [11.8%]; P = .61), and adjacent segment disease (0 patients vs 1 patient [1.5%]; P = .32) between the arthroplasty and fusion groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, patients treated with arthroplasty and fusion reported similar and substantial clinical improvement at 5 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00735176.

Revision Surgeries at the Index Level After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty - A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic literature review on revision surgeries at the index level after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) failure.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Prospective studies on patients who required a secondary surgery after CDA failure were included for analysis. The minimum follow-up for these studies was 5 years.

RESULTS

Out of 864 studies in the original search group, a total of 20 studies were included. From a total of 4,087 patients, 161 patients required a reoperation at the index level. A total of 170 surgeries were performed, as some patients required multiple surgeries. The most common secondary procedures were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) (68%, N = 61) and posterior cervical fusion (15.5%, N = 14), followed by other reoperation (13.3%, N = 12). The associated outcomes for those who required a revision surgery were rarely mentioned in the included literature.

CONCLUSION

The long-term revision rate at the index level of failed CDA surgery was 3.9%, with a minimum 5-year follow-up. ACDF was the most commonly performed procedure to salvage a failed CDA. Some patients who required a new surgery after CDA failure may require a more extensive salvage procedure and even subsequent surgeries.