Ring finger sensory latency difference in the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

Occupational and non-occupational risk factors correlating with the severity of clinical manifestations of carpal tunnel syndrome and related work disability among workers who work with a computer

The contribution of certain occupational and personal factors to the development of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is still uncertain. We investigated which specific occupational and non-occupational factors correlate with the level of clinical manifestations and work disability related to CTS. The study included 190 workers who work with a computer and have diagnosed CTS (100 men, 90 women, aged 20-65 years). Subjective experience of CTS-related impairments was assessed with the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). The objective, neural impairments were tested with electrodiagnostics (EDX), whereas CTS-related work disability data were collected from medical records. We found a high inter-correlation between BCTQ, EDX, and work disability data. These also showed high correlations with certain occupational factors (duration of computer-working in months and hours spent daily in computer-working, certain ergonomic, microclimatic, and other occupational conditions) and non-occupational factors (demographic and lifestyle factors: nutritional status, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity). Despite its limitations, our study has identified occupational and non-occupational risk factors that can aggravate CTS and work disability, but which can also be improved with workplace and lifestyle preventive and corrective measures. More research is needed, though, to establish the possible causal relationships and the independent influence of each of those risk factors.

Evaluation of the Existing Electrophysiological Severity Classifications in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Electrophysiological examination is important for the diagnosis and evaluation of nerve function in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Electrophysiological severity classifications of CTS using a nerve conduction study (NCS) have been reported, and there are many reports on the relationship between severity classifications and clinical symptoms. The existing electrophysiological severity classifications have several problems, such as cases that do not fit into a classification and unclear reasons for the boundary value. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between sensory nerve conduction velocity (SCV) and distal motor latency (DML) and to evaluate whether the existing severity classification method is appropriate. We created a scatter diagram between SCV and DML for our NCSs and found a negative correlation between SCV and DML (correlation coefficient, −0.786). When we applied our NCSs to the existing classifications (Padua and Bland classifications), there were many unclassifiable cases (15.2%; Padua classification), and the number of Grade 3 cases was significantly higher than that of Grade 2 or 4 cases (Bland classification). Our large dataset revealed a strong negative correlation between SCV and DML, indicating that the existing severity classifications do not always accurately reflect the severity of the disease.