Remote care and triage of obstetric patients with COVID-19 in the community: operational considerations

Maternal COVID-19 infection and risk of respiratory distress syndrome among newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted public health, with emerging evidence suggesting substantial effects on maternal and neonatal health. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the prevalence and risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in newborns born to mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science up to April 20, without language or date restrictions. Observational studies reporting on the prevalence or risk of RDS among newborns from mothers with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Quality assessment was performed using the JBI tool. Statistical analysis was performed by using R software version 4.3.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of RDS among newborns born to COVID-19-infected mothers was 11.5% (95% CI: 7.4-17.3%), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 93%). Newborns from infected mothers had a significantly higher risk of developing RDS, with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 2.69 (95% CI: 1.77 to 4.17).

CONCLUSION

Newborns born to mothers with COVID-19 have a substantially increased risk of developing RDS. These findings emphasize the need for vigilant monitoring and appropriate management of pregnant women with COVID-19 to mitigate adverse neonatal outcomes.

Evaluation of a virtual ward model of care and readmission characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic within an Australian tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Virtual ward (VW) models of care established during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provided safe and equitable provision of ambulatory care for low-risk patients; however, little is known about patients who require escalation of care to hospitals from VWs.

AIM

To assess our VW model of care and describe the characteristics of patients admitted to the hospital from the VW.

METHODS

Observational study of all patients admitted to a tertiary hospital COVID-19 VW between 1 December 2021 and 30 June 2022. Utilisation and epidemiological characteristics were assessed for all patients while additional demographics, assessments, treatments and outcomes were assessed for patients admitted to the hospital from the VW.

RESULTS

Of 9494 patient admissions, 269 (2.83%) patients identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and 1774 (18.69%) were unvaccinated. The median length of stay was 5.10 days and the mean Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage decile was 5.73. One hundred sixty (1.69%) patients were admitted to the hospital from the VW, of which 25 were adults admitted to medical wards. Of this cohort, prominent comorbidities were obesity, hypertension, asthma and frailty, while the main symptoms on admission to the VW were cough, fatigue, nausea and sore throat. High Pandemic Respiratory Infection Emergency System Triage (PRIEST), Veterans Health Administration COVID-19 (VACO), COVID Home Safely Now (CHOSEN) and 4C mortality scores existed for those readmitted.

CONCLUSIONS

This VW model of care was both safe and effective when applied to a broad socioeconomic population during the COVID-19 pandemic. While readmission to the hospital was low, this study identified key characteristics of such presentations, which may assist future triaging, escalation and resource allocation within VWs during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Telemedicine Implementation for Safety Net Populations: A Systematic Review

Background: Telemedicine systems were rapidly implemented in response to COVID-19. However, little is known about their effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability for safety net populations. This study systematically reviewed primary care telemedicine implementation and effectiveness in safety net settings. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed articles on telemedicine implementation from 2013 to 2021. The search was done between June and December 2021. Included articles focused on health care organizations that primarily serve low-income and/or rural populations in the United States. We screened 244 articles from an initial search of 343 articles and extracted and analyzed data from N = 45 articles. Results: Nine (20%) of 45 articles were randomized controlled trials. N = 22 reported findings for at least one marginalized group (i.e., racial/ethnic minority, 65 years+, limited English proficiency). Only n = 19 (42%) included African American/Black patients in demographics descriptions, n = 14 (31%) LatinX/Hispanic patients, n = 4 (9%) Asian patients, n = 4 (9%) patients aged 65+ years, and n = 4 (9%) patients with limited English proficiency. Results show telemedicine can provide high-quality primary care that is more accessible and affordable. Fifteen studies assessed barriers and facilitators to telemedicine implementation. Common barriers were billing/administrative workflow disruption (n = 9, 20%), broadband access/quality (n = 5, 11%), and patient preference for in-person care (n = 4, 9%). Facilitators included efficiency gains (n = 6, 13%), patient acceptance (n = 3, 7%), and enhanced access (n = 3, 7%). Conclusions: Telemedicine is an acceptable care modality to deliver primary care in safety net settings. Future studies should compare telemedicine and in-person care quality and test strategies to improve telemedicine implementation in safety net settings.

Telemedicine in specialist outpatient care during COVID-19: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 accelerated healthcare changes, introducing various telehealth services. Work is needed to determine the suitability of telemedicine in the post-pandemic era.

AIMS

To explore perceptions and experiences of telemedicine among patients and providers (clinicians and health administrators) who were involved in telemedicine appointments in hospital outpatient clinics in 2020-2022.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Qualitative study: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 37 participants (16 patients and 21 providers) in various hospital specialist outpatient clinics in a New South Wales local health district.

RESULTS

Patients were generally satisfied with telemedicine consultations, especially during COVID restrictions, because of the convenience of accessing care from home and minimising the risk of COVID exposure. However, patients considered that the inability to receive a physical examination was a significant disadvantage of telemedicine. Providers had ambivalent perceptions and expressed concerns about mis- and under-diagnoses because of the inability to conduct physical examinations. They considered telemedicine suitable for review appointments but noted an associated increased workload and stressed the need for sustainable funding models (Medicare items). Both patients and providers recognised the need for education/training and better integration of telemedicine platforms into existing infrastructure to facilitate an optimal hybrid model of care.

CONCLUSION

Despite expressing some concerns over its limitations, patients valued telemedicine for its convenience and for meeting their needs during the pandemic. While acknowledging that patients experienced some benefits from telemedicine, clinicians expressed concerns about potential missed diagnoses, uncertain clinical outcomes and lack of administrative and technological infrastructure. The ultimate test of telemedicine will be its impact on clinical outcomes versus longstanding models of in-person care.

Home oxygen monitoring and therapy: learning from the pandemic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Home oxygen monitoring and therapy have been increasingly used in the management of patients with chronic diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the rapid uptake of remote monitoring programmes to support people with COVID-19 at home. This review discusses the recent evidence and learning in home oxygen monitoring and therapy from the pandemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many home oxygen monitoring programmes were established around the world during the pandemic, mostly in high-income countries to support early detection of hypoxaemia and/or early hospital discharge. The characteristics of these programmes vary widely in the type of monitoring (self-monitoring or clinician-monitoring) and the patient risk groups targeted. There is a lack of evidence for benefits on clinical outcomes, including mortality, and on reductions in healthcare utilisation or cost-effectiveness, but programmes are viewed positively by patients. Recent studies have highlighted the potential bias in pulse oximetry in people with darker skin.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence indicates that home oxygen monitoring therapy programmes are feasible in acute disease, but further research is needed to establish whether they improve patient outcomes, are cost-effective and to understand their equity impact.