Reduced toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy

Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update

PURPOSE

With the results of several recently published clinical trials, this guideline focused update provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications and dose-fractionation regimens for neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT), optimal sequencing of RT and systemic therapy in the context of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and considerations for selective omission of RT and surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a multidisciplinary task force to update 3 key questions that focused on the role of RT for patients with operable rectal cancer. The key questions addressed (1) indications for neoadjuvant RT, (2) selection of neoadjuvant regimens, and (3) indications for consideration of a nonoperative management (NOM) or local excision approach after definitive/preoperative chemoradiation. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for quality of evidence grading and strength of recommendation.

RESULTS

For patients with stage II-III rectal cancer, neoadjuvant RT was strongly recommended; however, among patients deemed at lower risk of locoregional recurrence, consideration of omission of neoadjuvant RT was conditionally recommended in favor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a favorable treatment response or upfront surgery. For patients with T3-T4 and node-positive rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant RT, a TNT approach was strongly recommended. Among patients with higher risk of locoregional recurrence, TNT with chemotherapy before or after long-course chemoradiation was strongly recommended, whereas TNT with short-course RT followed by chemotherapy was conditionally recommended. For patients with rectal cancer for whom NOM is a priority, concurrent chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy was strongly recommended. Selection of RT dose-fractionation regimen, sequencing of therapies, and consideration of NOM should be determined by multidisciplinary consensus and based on disease extent, disease location, patient preferences, and quality of life considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of RT for rectal cancer with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care. Future studies should focus on further addressing optimal treatment regimens to allow for more personalized recommendations based on individual risk stratification and patient priorities regarding quality of life.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can reduce acute toxicities in long-course neoadjuvant radiation therapy combined with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and adverse events between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients undergoing long-course neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NA-RT) for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 47 consecutive patients who received NA-RT for LARC between January 2011 and September 2022. Seven and 40 patients were diagnosed with clinical stages II and III, respectively. The prescribed dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy for total doses of 45 or 50.4 Gy. Seventeen and 30 patients received 3D-CRT and IMRT, respectively. NA-RT was delivered with concurrent chemotherapy of oral administration of S-1.

RESULTS

Planned NA-RT was completed without any treatment interruption in 43 of the 47 patients. Two patients experienced treatment interruption, and two patients discontinued due to grade ≥ 3 toxicities. No significant differences were observed between patients receiving 3D-CRT and IMRT in local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival (P = 0.488, 0.259, and 0.636, respectively). Patients receiving IMRT showed significantly fewer non-hematological grade ≥ 2 acute toxicities than those receiving 3D-CRT (33.3% vs. 70.6%, P = 0.018). In addition, patients who received IMRT tended to have less intestinal toxicity of grade ≥ 2 than those who received 3D-CRT (P = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

IMRT significantly reduced grade ≥ 2 acute toxicities without compromising oncologic outcomes compared to 3D-CRT. Therefore, IMRT may be considered as a current standard treatment in the total neoadjuvant therapy era.

Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for rectal cancer-A prospective nationwide study

AIM

While modern treatment has improved rectal cancer (RC) survival, it can cause late side effects that impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQoL and late effects 1 year after diagnosis in patients who underwent major resection for Stage I-III RC.

METHOD

All patients with RC registered in the Cancer Registry of Norway between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020, aged ≥ 18 years, and a control group without colorectal cancer were invited to participate in the study by answering a questionnaire on HRQoL and late effects. Functional domains and symptoms were compared in different patient groups and between patients and controls.

RESULTS

There were 558 patients and 1693 controls eligible for analysis. Response rates were 41% for patients and 23% for controls. Some differences in HRQoL were observed between treatment modalities. Major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was prevalent in 60.8% of patients, and was associated with lower functional and higher symptom scores compared with patients with no/minor LARS. Patients with major chronic pain [n = 86 (15.4%)] had significantly lower scores for most of the functional items and higher symptom scores than patients with no/minor chronic pain. Patients had some lower functional scores and several higher symptoms score compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients who suffered from major LARS or major chronic pain had significantly impaired functions and more symptoms beyond change in bowel function and pain, respectively. Identification and treatment of these patient may hopefully be beneficial for their HRQoL.

Cross-Sectional National Survey of Practice Patterns in Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Snapshot of India

PURPOSE

The information on the practice of radiotherapy, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) use for rectal cancer in India, is lacking. This national survey was planned to understand the current status of knowledge, attitudes, and practice among radiation oncologists, specifically concerning the practice of IMRT for rectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national survey was sent to radiation oncologists through e-mail or a WhatsApp message, where feasible, with a request letter containing the link to the survey questionnaire. The survey questionnaire was adapted from the UK IMRT survey with permission from the authors. It explored rectal cancer management, IMRT use, reasons for nonadoption, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), dose fractionation schedules and radiotherapy processes like radiotherapy simulation, target volume/organ at risk definition, and treatment planning, evaluation, and verification. Descriptive statistics is used to present the results.

RESULTS

Over 300 radiation oncologists were approached, and 182 (60.6%) of the 153 institutes responded. Around 88% (160 of 182) indicated using IMRT or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to treat rectal cancer, of whom 32% used exclusively IMRT/VMAT in all their patients. The reasons for not adopting IMRT were affordability/lack of insurance, resource constraints, and lack of guidelines. Long-course chemoradiation (capecitabine-based) followed by surgery was the most common neoadjuvant approach, with short course and TNT in less than a third of patients. Daily verification feasibility was reported by 60%. Seventy-three percent emphasized the need for a national IMRT guidance document.

CONCLUSION

This national survey from India indicates a scope of routine implementation of IMRT in rectal cancer, highlighting the urgent need for a national IMRT guidance document, which could significantly enhance the quality of care for patients with rectal cancer in India.

The effect of Inc parameter on VMAT radiotherapy plans quality for rectal cancer using Monaco TPS

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of the Increment of gantry angle (Inc) parameter setting of the Monaco Treatment planning system (Monaco TPS) on the dosimetry and quality parameters of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) program for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 50 patients with rectal cancer who underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy using the Monaco TPS system from 2020 to 2021. Under the same optimization function configuration and other parameter settings, the Inc parameters in the VMAT radiotherapy plan were set to 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) was used to evaluate the dose distribution of the target area and the radiation dose of the organs at risk (OAR). The differences in the dosimetry of the planning target volume (PTV) and OAR, as well as the gamma pass rate (GPR) were compared.

RESULTS

In terms of target dose, D98, Dmin, HI, and conformity index (CI) of Inc10 group was significantly lower than those of Inc20, 30, and 40 groups (P < 0.05), and D2 of Inc10 group was significantly higher than that of Inc20 group (P = 0.009). We also found CI of Inc20 and 30 were significantly better than that of Inc40 (both P < 0.05). In terms of OAR dose, the study found that the Dmean, Dmin, V50%, V45%, and V40% for the bladder of the Inc10 group were lower than those of the other groups (all P < 0.05), the Dmean for femoral head of the Inc20 group was lower than that of the Inc30 group (P < 0.05), and Inc20 showed a better protective effect on the femoral head. The MUs tend to decrease as the Inc parameter setting is increased. The monitor unit (MU) in Inc10 group were significantly higher than those in Inc20, Inc30, and Inc40 groups, and the MU of Inc20 group was significantly higher than that of Inc40 group (both P < 0.05). We found that for the 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm standards, the GPRs of each plan were > 90%, which met clinical requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Different settings of Inc parameters have varying degrees of impact on target dose, OAR dose, and machine MU. It is important for doctors to choose different Inc parameters according to different clinical needs.

Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for locally advanced rectal cancer: feasibility and efficiency

BACKGROUND

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has emerged as a promising technique, but the planning process can be time-consuming and dependent on planner expertise. We aimed to develop a fully automated VMAT planning program for LARC and evaluate its feasibility and efficiency.

METHODS

A total of 26 LARC patients who received VMAT treatment and the computed tomography (CT) scans were included in this study. Clinical target volumes and organs at risk were contoured by radiation oncologists. The automatic planning program, developed within the Raystation treatment planning system, used scripting capabilities and a Python environment to automate the entire planning process. The automated VMAT plan (auto-VMAT) was created by our automated planning program with the 26 CT scans used in the manual VMAT plan (manual-VMAT) and their regions of interests. Dosimetric parameters and time efficiency were compared between the auto-VMAT and the manual-VMAT created by experienced planners. All results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

RESULTS

The auto-VMAT achieved comparable coverage of the target volume while demonstrating improved dose conformity and uniformity compared with the manual-VMAT. V30 and V40 in the small bowel were significantly lower in the auto-VMAT compared with those in the manual-VMAT (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively); the mean dose of the bladder was also significantly reduced in the auto-VMAT (p < 0.001). Furthermore, auto-VMAT plans were consistently generated with less variability in quality. In terms of efficiency, the auto-VMAT markedly reduced the time required for planning and expedited plan approval, with 93% of cases approved within one day.

CONCLUSION

We developed a fully automatic feasible VMAT plan creation program for LARC. The auto-VMAT maintained target coverage while providing organs at risk dose reduction. The developed program dramatically reduced the time to approval.

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy increases pelvic fracture risk in rectal cancer

Introduction

Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) are adverse events associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) administered preoperatively in rectal cancer, with incidences of 0-33.6% reported in the literature. Data on PIFs after 5 × 5 Gy fractionated short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) using highly conformal radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is limited.

Methods

The Turku University Hospital colorectal cancer database was searched for patients operated on for stage I-III rectal cancer during the years 2014-2018. The hospital's routine follow-up includes a 2-year computed tomography (CT) scan, which was systemically re-evaluated to detect PIFs. Only radiotherapy delivered using VMAT and image-guided approaches was included. Baseline demographics, tumor data, and dose-volume data were collected to identify risk factors for PIFs.

Results

Median time to CT scan was 24 months. Among the 164 patients analyzed, the 2-year PIF incidence was 22.2% for SCRT (n = 12/54, OR 9.1 (CI95% 1.9-42.9), p = 0.004), 9.1% for CRT (n = 4/44, OR 3.2 (CI95% 0.6-18.3), p = 0.13) and 3.0% (n = 2/66, reference) for those operated on without radiotherapy. The PIF incidence was not explained by differences in dose-volume data in either the SCRT or CRT groups. Fracture risk was higher in women, up to 50% after SCRT.

Conclusions

Every fifth patient treated with SCRT and rectal surgery presented with a PIF. Critical bony structures to be avoided during radiotherapy contouring could not be identified. Clinicians, especially those involved with the follow-up of rectal cancer, should be aware of this potentially debilitating and surprisingly common adverse event.

Current and emerging therapeutic approaches for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects 1 in 23 males and 1 in 25 females, making it the third most common cancer. With roughly 608000 deaths worldwide, CRC accounts for 8% of all cancer-related deaths, making it the second most common cause of death due to cancer. Standard and conventional CRC treatments include surgical expurgation for resectable CRC and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and their combinational regimen for non-resectable CRC. Despite these tactics, nearly half of patients develop incurable recurring CRC. Cancer cells resist the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs in a variety of ways, including drug inactivation, drug influx and efflux modifications, and ATP-binding cassette transporter overexpression. These constraints necessitate the development of new target-specific therapeutic strategies. Emerging therapeutic approaches, such as targeted immune boosting therapies, non-coding RNA-based therapies, probiotics, natural products, oncolytic viral therapies, and biomarker-driven therapies, have shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. We tethered the entire evolutionary trends in the development of CRC treatments in this review and discussed the potential of new therapies and how they might be used in conjunction with conventional treatments as well as their advantages and drawbacks as future medicines.

Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline

This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.

[Impact of IMRT for neoadjuvant rectal cancer?]

The standard management of locally advanced rectal tumors as cT3-T4 and/or N0/N1 is based on preoperative treatment combining radiotherapy of 45 to 50Gy and chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has already shown its interest compared to conformal radiotherapy in other locations, like in pelvic cancer. The role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the pre/postoperative treatment of rectal cancers is not a standard of care. Published studies showed its feasibility with the objective of less toxicity with equivalent efficacy.

The in-silico feasibility of dose escalated, hypofractionated radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background and purpose

Short course radiotherapy (SCRT) has a low biological prescription dose. Rectal cancer has a dose response relationship and moderate α/β ratio (∼5). We hypothesise hypofractionated dose escalation has radiobiological advantages. We assessed in-silico dose escalation to the primary tumour using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique.

Materials and methods

Patients who had received 25 Gy/5# were enrolled. GTV was macroscopic tumour including lumen. CTVA was GTV + 10 mm. CTVB included elective nodes. PTV_Low was created from CTVF (CTVA + CTVB) + 7 mm. PTV_High (SIB) was GTV + 5 mm margin. OAR were as per RTOG guidelines. Each patient had 4 plans created at increasing dose levels (27.5 Gy, 30 Gy, 32.5 Gy and 35 Gy) to PTV_High. PTV_Low was 25 Gy/5#.5 test plans were created for each patient in Eclipse™ v15.5 and consisted of 2 VMAT full arcs (6 MV), Varian Truebeam (2.7). Planning objectives were set in the Photon optimiser (PO) and recalculated using Acuros v15.5. A priori feasibility was defined as 90% of plans achieving the planning objectives at 32.5 Gy dose level (EqD2 53.4 Gy).

Results

20 SCRT patients median age 70, F (n = 5), M (n = 15). Rectum level; low (n = 12), mid (n = 3) and upper (n = 5). 100 plans were analysed. Mean volume of PTV_High was 130 cm3 (SD 81.5) and PTV_Low 769.6 cm3 (SD 241.1). 100% plans complied with mandatory planning dose metrics for each structure at the 25 Gy/5# plan and each dose level.

Conclusion

Hypofractionated dose escalation to the primary tumour up to 35 Gy/5# is technically feasible in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

Strategies for the treatment of colorectal cancer caused by gut microbiota

Colorectal cancer (CRC), also named as colon and rectal or bowel cancer, is one of the leading neoplasia diagnosed in the world. Genetic sequencing studies of microorganisms from the intestinal microbiota of patients with CRC revealed that changes in its composition occur with the development of the disease, which can play a fundamental role in its development, being mediated by the production of metabolites and toxins that damage enterocytes. Some microorganisms are frequently reported in the literature as the main agents of this process, such as the bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum, Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Thus, understanding the mechanisms and function of each microorganism in CRC is essential for the development of treatment tools that focus on the gut microbiota. This review verifies current research aimed at evaluating the microorganisms present in the microbiota that can influence the development of CRC, as well as possible forms of treatment that can prevent the initiation and/or spread of this disease. Due to the incidence of CRC, alternatives have been launched considering factors beyond those already known in the disease development, such as diet, fecal microbiota transplantation, use of probiotics and antibiotics, which have been widely studied for this purpose. However, despite being promising, the studies that focus on the development of new therapeutic approaches targeting the microorganisms that cause CRC still need to be improved and better developed, involving new techniques to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of these new methods.

Is There a Benefit of Oxaliplatin in Combination with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer? An Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine (5FU or capecitabine)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Whether addition of oxaliplatin (OXP) will further improve clinical outcomes is still unclear.

METHODS

To identify clinical trials combining oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT or perioperative chemotherapy for LARC published until March 2021, we searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library. We also searched for relevant ASCO conference abstracts. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Data were extracted from every study to perform a meta-analysis using Review Manager (version 5.3).

RESULTS

A total of seven randomized clinical trials (ACCORD-12, CARO-AIO-04, FOWARC, JIAO, NSABP, PETACC-6, and STAR-01) with 5782 stage II or III rectal cancer patients were analyzed, including 2727 patients with OXP + 5FU regimen and 3055 patients with 5FU alone. Compared with the 5FU alone group, the OXP + 5FU regimen improved DFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99, p = 0.03) and pathologic complete response (pCR) (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07-1.37, p = 0.002). Patients treated with the OXP + 5FU regimen had significantly less metastatic progression (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.007). Considering adverse events (AEs), there was more grade 3-4 diarrhea with OXP + 5FU (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.74-3.32, p < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87-1.57, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis with long-term results from the randomized studies showed a benefit of the addition of OXP + 5FU regiment in terms of DFS, metastatic progression, and pCR rate that did not translate to improved OS.

Mesorectal shape variation in rectal cancer radiotherapy in prone position using a belly board

•

Mesorectal shape variation is diverse and largest in the upper-anterior region.

•

Derived planning target volume margins for the upper-anterior region were larger in female patients.

•

Planning target volume margins are comparable for radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups.

Background and purpose

In rectal cancer patients, radiotherapy in prone position using a belly board can reduce the dose to organs at risk. For this patient group we investigated inter-fraction shape variation of the mesorectal part of the clinical target volume (CTV) and determined planning target volume (PTV) margins.

Materials and methods

Patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy were eligible. For each patient a planning computed tomography (pCT) and five cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired in prone position using a belly board. The mesorectal CTV was delineated on all scans. Mesorectal shape variation was quantified relative to the pCT. PTV margins were derived locally and averaged for separate subregions of the mesorectal CTV. For each patient a total PTV was constructed using our clinical margins for mesorectal and lymph node CTVs. An artificial dose distribution conforming to this PTV was used to calculate the coverage for the mesorectal CTV using the CBCT delineations.

Results

In 19 rectal cancer patients the derived PTV margins were smallest in the upper-lateral region (6 mm) and largest in the upper-anterior region (16 mm). PTV margins for the upper-anterior region were larger for female patients (19 mm) compared to male patients (14 mm). Clinical margins for the total PTV were sufficient for a coverage of at least 97% of the mesorectal CTV for all patients.

Conclusions

Mesorectal shape variation is heterogeneous and largest in the upper-anterior region, in rectal cancer patients irradiated in prone position and using a belly board.

Dosimetric comparison of organs at risk in 5 different radiotherapy plans in patients with preoperatively irradiated rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a widely used irradiation technique in rectal cancer patients. We aimed to compare 4 different IMRT plans with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) considering organs at risk (OARs) in patients with rectal carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 27 rectal cancer patients who were irradiated preoperatively between January 2016 and December 2018. Five different plans (4-field 3D-CRT in 2 phases, 7-field IMRT in 2 phases, 9-field IMRT in 2 phases, 7-field simultaneous integrated boost [SIB] IMRT, and 9-field SIB IMRT) were generated for each patient. Comparison of 5 different plans according to bladder and bilateral femoral head mean doses, bladder V40, bilateral femoral head V40, and small bowel V35 values were evaluated.

RESULTS

Most of the OAR parameters significantly favored IMRT plans compared to the 3D-CRT plan. The largest difference was observed in bladder V40 values (reduction of V40 value up to 51.2% reduction) in favor of IMRT. In addition, SIB plans showed significantly better reduction in OARs than phase plans except for small bowel V35 values.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT plans reduced almost all the OARs doses compared with the 3D-CRT plan in rectal cancer patients. Furthermore, SIB plans demonstrated lower OAR doses than the phase plans. IMRT techniques, especially SIB plans, reduce OAR doses and provide safer doses for the treatment of rectal carcinoma.

Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline reviews the evidence and provides recommendations for the indications and appropriate technique and dose of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of localized rectal cancer.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the use of RT in preoperative management of operable rectal cancer. These questions included the indications for neoadjuvant RT, identification of appropriate neoadjuvant regimens, indications for consideration of a nonoperative or local excision approach after chemoradiation, and appropriate treatment volumes and techniques. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant RT is recommended for patients with stage II-III rectal cancer, with either conventional fractionation with concurrent 5-FU or capecitabine or short-course RT. RT should be performed preoperatively rather than postoperatively. Omission of preoperative RT is conditionally recommended in selected patients with lower risk of locoregional recurrence. Addition of chemotherapy before or after chemoradiation or after short-course RT is conditionally recommended. Nonoperative management is conditionally recommended if a clinical complete response is achieved after neoadjuvant treatment in selected patients. Inclusion of the rectum and mesorectal, presacral, internal iliac, and obturator nodes in the clinical treatment volume is recommended. In addition, inclusion of external iliac nodes is conditionally recommended in patients with tumors invading an anterior organ or structure, and inclusion of inguinal and external iliac nodes is conditionally recommended in patients with tumors involving the anal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for rectal cancer. Future studies will look to further personalize treatment recommendations to optimize treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Although the multimodal cancer treatment techniques have greatly improved over the years, irradiation-induced late gastrointestinal toxicity remains a great concern as it may highly affect the quality of life of a patient. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of late gastrointestinal toxicities.

METHODS

Electronic databases of Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL and PubMed were searched until September 2019. We used the following keywords: radiotherapy, radiation therapy, irradiation, rectal cancer, gastrointestinal toxicity, adverse effects, late effects, pelvic radiation and pelvic radiation disease.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included into this review out of 4785 that were preidentified as potentially relevant. Overall prevalence of severe (Grade 3 or higher) late irradiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicities was up to 19%. Most frequent toxicities of any grade were reported to be diarrhoea (up to 35%), faecal incontinence (22%), incontinence to gas (71%), rectal bleeding (9%), rectal pain (13%) and obstruction (7.4%). Preoperative treatment approaches and more advance radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) turn out to result in lower late gastrointestinal toxicity rates.

CONCLUSION

After great improvements in rectal cancer treatment, late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy is experienced less frequent and less severe; however, it remains a great concern associated with worse quality of life.

Rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report of a rare entity and perspective review of promising agents

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumours, which can be classified into neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). To date, there is no consensus regarding the optimal therapy, which usually depends on the primary location and classification, according to morphological features of differentiation and proliferation rates. Nevertheless, multidisciplinary strategies combining medical treatments and locoregional strategies have yielded better efficacy results. Here, we report the case of a patient diagnosed with a nonfunctional rectal NECs with metastatic widespread to pelvic lymph nodes and bilateral lung metastases. The patient received three cycles of platinum-etoposide, concomitantly with palliative radiotherapy. Although CT scan after three cycles showed a significant partial response, there was an early fatal progression only 3 months after having stopped systemic therapy. As formerly described in the literature, this case highlights the aggressive behaviour of NECs, rare tumours that often present in advanced stages at diagnosis. Lately, new insights into the molecular biology of NECs have unveiled the possibility of using novel drugs, such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, in molecularly selected subgroups of patients. In this review, we discuss the current management of this rare entity and provide an overview of the most relevant molecular findings, whilst illustrating the potential value that prescreening panels can offer, searching for actionable targets (MSI/dMMR, PD-L1, BRAF^v600E) to guide therapy with promising agents that could fill a void in this disease.

[Preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy of rectal cancers: Relevance and modalities]

Preoperative radiotherapy boosted by chemotherapy is a recommended treatment in locally advanced rectal cancers. This treatment is delivered by three dimensional conformal irradiation, which is usually well tolerated but can induce potential toxicity such as rectitis, cystitis and hematologic adverse effects. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, widely available nowadays, allows optimization of volume covering and sparing of organs at risk such as bladder and bone marrow. This review presents relevant clinical situations and requirements for a beneficial and safe preoperative irradiation of rectal cancers by intensity-modulated technique. This technique is compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Dose-time fractionation schedules of preoperative radiotherapy and timing to surgery for rectal cancer

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is extensively used prior to surgery for rectal cancer to provide significantly better local control, but the radiotherapy (RT), as the other component of CRT, has been subject to less interest than the drug component in recent years. With considerable developments in RT, the use of advanced techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in rectal cancer, is garnering more attention nowadays. The radiation dose can be better conformed to the target volumes with possibilities for synchronous integrated boost without increased complications in normal tissue. Hopefully, both local recurrence and toxicities can be further reduced. Although those seem to be of interest, many issues remain unresolved. There is no international consensus regarding the radiation schedule for preoperative RT for rectal cancer. Moreover, an enormous disparity exists regarding the RT delivery. With the advent of IMRT, variations will likely increase. Moreover, time to surgery is also quite variable, as it depends upon the indication for RT/CRT in the clinical practices. In this review, we discuss the options and problems related to both the dose-time fractionation schedule and time to surgery; furthermore, it addresses the research questions that need answering in the future.

Robust dose planning objectives for mesorectal radiotherapy of early stage rectal cancer - A multicentre dose planning study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Organ preservation strategies are increasingly being explored for early rectal cancer. This requires revision of target volumes according to disease stage, as well as new guidelines for treatment planning. We conducted an international, multicentre dose planning study to develop robust planning objectives for modern radiotherapy of a novel mesorectal-only target volume, as implemented in the STAR-TReC trial (NCT02945566).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The published literature was used to establish relevant dose levels for organ at risk (OAR) plan optimisation. Ten representative patients with early rectal cancer were identified. Treatment scans had mesorectal target volumes as well as bowel cavity, bladder and femoral heads outlined, and were circulated amongst the three participating institutions. Each institution produced plans for short course (SCRT, 5 × 5 Gy) and long course (LCRT, 25 × 2 Gy) treatment, using volumetric modulated arc therapy on different dose planning systems. Optimisation objectives for OARs were established by determining dose metric objectives achievable for ≥90% of plans.

RESULTS

Sixty plans, all fulfilling target coverage criteria, were produced. The planning results and literature review suggested optimisation objectives for SCRT: V 10Gy < 180 cm3, V 18Gy < 110 cm3, V 23Gy < 85 cm3 for bowel cavity; V 21Gy < 15% and V 25Gy < 5% for bladder; and V 12.5Gy < 11% for femoral heads. Corresponding objectives for LCRT: V 20Gy < 180 cm3, V 30Gy < 130 cm3, V 45Gy < 90 cm3 for bowel cavity; V 35Gy < 22% and V 50Gy < 7% for bladder; and V 25Gy < 15% for femoral heads. Constraints were validated across all three institutions.

CONCLUSION

We utilized a multicentre planning study approach to develop robust planning objectives for mesorectal radiotherapy for early rectal cancer.

mARC preoperative rectal cancer treatments vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy. A dose distribution comparative study

PURPOSE

mARC (modulated arc) is the arc therapy technique provided by Siemens. The present study analyses the dose distributions and treatment times corresponding to preoperative rectal cancer mARC treatments. The results are compared to those corresponding to 3D-CRT plans.

METHODS

The plans of 30 patients, each having one mARC and one 3D-CRT plan, were evaluated. Every plan was calculated on a sequential two-phase treatment scheme with prescription doses of 45 Gy in the initial phase and 5.4 Gy in the boost phase. Dosimetric parameters and mean DVHs corresponding to the PTVs and OARs were assessed for both techniques.

RESULTS

All mARC plans were considered valid for treatment and yielded a highly significant improvement in the CI over 3D-CRT plans (p <0.001). They also showed statistically significant advantage on the parameters D98%, D95% and D2% of the high dose PTV. Regarding the OARs, mARC plans showed reductions in the mean dose of 3.5 Gy in the bladder and greater than 4 Gy in the femoral heads. Considering the small bowel, the mARC plans resulted in a 2.7 Gy mean reduction in the mean dose and lower irradiated volumes over the entire dose range.

CONCLUSIONS

Arc therapy plans with the mARC technique for preoperative rectal cancer treatment in a sequential two-phase treatment scheme provide important advantages in the PTVs and OARs. mARC plans show superior protection of the femoral heads, bladder and small bowel, similar to the results found with other more widespread arc therapy techniques.

A Review on the Special Radiotherapy Techniques of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest cancers worldwide. Radiotherapy has been established as an indispensable component of treatment. Although conventional radiotherapy provides good local control, radiotherapy treatment side-effects, local recurrence and distant metastasis remain to be the concerns. With the recent technological advancements, various special radiotherapy treatment options have been offered. This review article discusses the recently-developed special radiotherapy treatment modalities for various conditions of colorectal cancer ranging from early stage, locally advanced stage, recurrent, and metastatic diseases. The discussion focuses on the areas of feasibility, local control, and survival benefits of the treatment modalities. This review also provides accounts of the future direction in radiotherapy of colorectal cancer with emphasis on the coming era of personalized radiotherapy.

A novel dynamic arc treatment planning solution to reduce dose to small bowel in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Preoperative radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) can cause acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects. There is thought to be a dose-volume relationship between small bowel irradiation and the development of these effects. A planning study was undertaken to compare small bowel sparing for a range of 3D conformal and dynamic arc planning solutions. A planning study was carried out for 20 LARC patients. Organs at risk (OAR) contoured included bowel loops and peritoneal space (PS). For each of the 20 patients, 5 plans were created: (1) standard 3D conformal plan; (2) standard dual dynamic arc plan; (3) dual dynamic arc plan with 90° avoidance sector through the anterior portion of the patient; (4) dual dynamic arc plan with an anterior avoidance structure in the optimizer; (5) dual dynamic arc plan with both an anterior avoidance structure and an avoidance sector. The prescription was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Five Dose Volume Levels (DVLs; V_{15 Gy}, V_{20 Gy}, V_{25 Gy}, V_{35 Gy}, V_{40 Gy}, and V_{50.4 Gy}) for bowel and PS were selected. The DVLs were compared between the plans using Friedman Tests and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. Comparison of the 5 plans revealed that a dual dynamic arc plan containing both an anterior avoidance sector and structure significantly improved the dose to the bowel compared to a standard 3D conformal plan and to a standard dual dynamic arc plan. This improvement was achieved while maintaining PTV coverage. This novel dual dynamic arc planning technique that uses both an avoidance sector and structure reduces the dose to the bowel and PS, which may lead to a reduction in GI toxicity.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation: a meta-analysis and pooled-analysis of acute toxicity

BACKGROUND

To compare the acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity profiles between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) using meta-analysis and pooled-analysis from published articles.

METHODS

Literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The odd ratios (ORs) were calculated and random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was performed for the pooled-analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies including a total of 859 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients (98.7%) received NCRT. In the meta-analysis, IMRT reduced grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis with ORs of 0.38, 0.32 and 0.60, respectively (all P < 0.05), compared to 3DCRT. IMRT also reduced acute grade ≥ 3 proctitis compared to 3D-CRT (OR, 0.24; P = 0.03). No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was detected. In the pooled-analysis, IMRT reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea, proctitis and GU toxicity (all P < 0.05). Moreover, lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 acute overall GI toxicity, diarrhea and proctitis were observed in the patients treated with IMRT (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT significantly reduced acute toxicity in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT compared to 3DCRT.

Factors affecting acute myelosuppression induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer

AIM

To identify the factors influencing acute myelosuppression induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

From June 2016 to June 2017, 64 rectal cancer patients who underwent synchronous radiotherapy and chemotherapy at our hospital were included. Univariate and Logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the relationship between pelvic dose parameters and grade 2 acute bone marrow suppression. Three parts of the pelvis, including the lower pelvis, sacrum, and ilium were delineated in the radiotherapy system. Clinical factors analyzed included clinical stage, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, age, gender, and original pigment level. Pelvic dose volume parameters included lower pelvic, sacral, iliac, and pelvic V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, V40, V45, and V50, the average dose (Dmean), and the maximum dose (Dmax).

RESULTS

There were 40 (62.5%) cases of acute myelosuppression in the 64 included patients. Univariate analysis showed that chemotherapy, sex, iliac V20 and V30, and lumbosacral V45 were the main factors associated with acute myelosuppression. Logistic regression analysis showed that iliac V30 and chemotherapy were the main risk factors for acute myelosuppression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the threshold of iliac V30 was 46%.

CONCLUSION

Iliac V30 is an independent risk factor for acute myelosuppression induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. In the treatment of colorectal cancer, the relationship between the local control rate and acute bone marrow suppression should be considered, and iliac V30 should be controlled to < 46% when formulating chemotherapy plan, which can effectively reduce the incidence rate of acute bone marrow suppression.

The effect of prone and supine treatment positions for the pre-operative treatment of rectal cancer on organ-at-risk sparing and setup reproducibility using volumetric modulated arc therapy

Background and purpose

To compare organ-at-risk doses and setup reproducibility using the prone and supine orientations in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

Seventeen consecutive rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative radiation were selected and setup in either the prone (N = 8) or supine (N = 9) position. All patients were treated using posteriorly-applied VMAT. Bladder and small bowel dose and cone beam CT (CBCT) reproducibility metrics were retrospectively collected.

Results

Dose metrics for bladder and small bowel did not show significant differences between the prone and supine orientations. The prone data had a trend for smaller irradiated volumes than supine for the small bowel at lower doses—V20 (prone: 135 ± 99 cm³; supine: 201 ± 162 cm³) and V30 (prone: 78 ± 71 cm³; supine: 105 ± 106 cm³). At higher doses, the trend reversed as exemplified by the small bowel V50.4 (prone: 20 ± 28 cm³; supine: 10 ± 14 cm³). CBCT data showed that rotational errors in pitch and roll were significantly larger for the prone vs. supine orientation (pitch: 2.0° ± 1.3° vs. 0.8° ± 1.1° p < 0.001; roll: 1.0° ± 0.9° vs. 0.3° ± 0.5°, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Bladder and small bowel doses were not significantly different when comparing VMAT plans developed for the prone and supine orientations. The supine orientation demonstrated improved setup reproducibility.

Geometric and dosimetric quality assurance using logfiles and a 3D helical diode detector for Dynamic WaveArc

PURPOSE

To conduct patient-specific geometric and dosimetric quality assurance (QA) for the Dynamic WaveArc (DWA) using logfiles and ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA).

METHODS

Twenty DWA plans, 10 for pituitary adenoma and 10 for prostate cancer, were created using RayStation version 4.7 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden). Root mean square errors (RMSEs) between the actual and planned values in the logfiles were evaluated. Next, the dose distributions were reconstructed based on the logfiles. The differences between dose-volumetric parameters in the reconstructed plans and those in the original plans were calculated. Finally, dose distributions were assessed using ArcCHECK. In addition, the reconstructed dose distributions were compared with planned ones.

RESULTS

The means of RMSEs for the gantry, O-ring, MLC position, and MU for all plans were 0.2°, 0.1°, 0.1 mm, and 0.4 MU, respectively. Absolute means of the change in PTV D_99% were 0.4 ± 0.4% and 0.1 ± 0.1% points between the original and reconstructed plans for pituitary adenoma and prostate cancer, respectively. The mean of the gamma passing rate (3%/3 mm) between the measured and planned dose distributions was 97.7%. In addition, that between the reconstructed and planned dose distributions was 99.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that the geometric accuracy and gamma passing rates were within AAPM 119 and 142 criteria during DWA. Dose differences in the dose-volumetric parameters using the logfile-based dose reconstruction method were also clinically acceptable in DWA.

Comparative Analysis of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative 3D Conformal Radiotherapy or VMAT

Background

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients are usually treated within a multimodal therapy regime, in which the tumor resection plays the major role. This treatment ideally includes 5-fluorouracile (5FU)-based chemoradiation (CRT) leading to significantly improved local control rates. Local therapy as radiotherapy (RT) is required to be adapted referring to side effects and efficacy. Purpose of this study is the comparison of dosimetric parameters, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life in terms of patient-reported outcome (PRO) in patients treated with VMAT or 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for LARC.

Methods

Pelvic RT for LARC was performed with a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy per fraction, or 50 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction. Chemotherapy included 5FU or 5FU/Oxaliplatin or Capecitabine-based RT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated via National Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version (CTCAE) v4.03 and the Scoring System Late effects of Normal Tissue. Quality of life was established via EORTC QLQCR29.

Results

After a median follow-up of 38 months (VMAT) and 78 months (3DCRT) there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (p = 0,85) but a significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.032). Regarding dose–volume parameters, patients treated with VMAT plans had a lower V20 of the bladder than 3DCRT-treated patients (p = 0.004). VMAT plans can also reduce Dmean of the right (p = 0.002) and left (p < 0.001) femoral head. Acute side effects between the VMAT and 3DCRT patients showed no significant difference. But concerning long-term effects, VMAT-treated patients had a significant lower appearance of high grade anal incontinence (p = 0.032). Quality of life (PRO) showed no significant different between the patients except of hair loss and worrying about weight.

Conclusion

VMAT treatment of LARC in preoperative CRT revealed a reduction of dose to organs at risk (OARs) as bladder and femoral heads. However, no changes in acute and long-term toxicity profiles were detectable. For late toxicity and quality of life data longer follow-up times are required.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for treatment of solid tumors: current insights

Aim

This article discusses the current use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques in clinical practice and reviews the available data from clinical outcome studies in different clinical settings. An overview of available literature about clinical outcomes with VMAT stereotactic/radiosurgical treatment is also reported.

Materials and methods

All published manuscripts reporting the use of VMAT in a clinical setting from 2009 to November 2016 were identified. The search was carried out in December 2016 using the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/Medline). The following words were searched: “volumetric arc therapy”[All Fields] OR “vmat”[All Fields] OR “rapidarc”[All Fields], AND “radiotherapy”[All Fields] AND “Clinical Trial”[All Fields].

Results

Overall, 37 studies (21 prospective and 16 retrospective) fulfilling inclusion criteria and thus included in the review evaluated 2,029 patients treated with VMAT; of these patients, ~30.8% had genitourinary (GU) tumors (81% prostate, 19% endometrial), 26.2% head-and-neck cancer (H&NC), 13.9% oligometastases, 11.2% had anorectal cancer, 10.6% thoracic neoplasms (81% breast, 19% lung), and 7.0% brain metastases (BMs). Six different clinical scenarios for VMAT use were identified: 1) BMs, 2) H&NC, 3) thoracic neoplasms, 4) GU cancer, 5) anorectal tumor, and 6) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) performed by VMAT technique in the oligometastatic patient setting.

Conclusion

The literature addressing the clinical appropriateness of VMAT is scarce. Current literature suggests that VMAT, especially when used as simultaneous integrated boost or SBRT strategy, is an effective safe modality for all cancer types.

A retrospective comparison of outcome and toxicity of preoperative image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes and toxicity between 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) administered through helical tomotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. We reviewed 144 patients with Stage II-III rectal cancer receiving preoperative fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection. Tumor responses following chemoradiotherapy were evaluated using the Dworak tumor regression grade (TRG). Of the 144 patients, 45 received IG-IMRT and 99 received 3DCRT. A significant reduction in Grade 3 or 4 acute gastrointestinal toxicity (IG-IMRT, 6.7%; 3DCRT, 15.1%; P = 0.039) was observed by IG-IMRT. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate did not differ between the IG-IMRT and the 3DCRT group (17.8% vs 15.1%, P = 0.52). Patients in the IG-IMRT group had the trend of favorable tumor regressions (TRG 3 or 4) compared with those in the 3DCRT group (66.7% vs 43.5%, P = 0.071). The median follow-up was 53 months (range, 18-95 months) in the 3DCRT group and 43 months (range, 17-69 months) in the IG-IMRT group. Four-year overall, disease-free, and local failure-free survival rates of the IG-IMRT and 3DCRT groups were 81.6% and 67.9% (P = 0.12), 53.8% and 51.8% (P = 0.51), and 88% and 75.1% (P = 0.031), respectively. LARC patients treated with preoperative IG-IMRT achieved lower acute gastrointestinal adverse effects and a higher local control rate than those treated with 3DCRT, but there was no prominent difference in distant metastasis rate and overall survival between two treatment modalities.

[Radiotherapeutic management of lymphatic fistulas : An effective but disregarded therapy option]

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic fistulas and lymphoceles are known complications after vascular surgery of the groin and after extended surgical interventions in the pelvic region. Unfortunately, conservative standard therapies are not always successful.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and related side effects of percutaneous low-dose irradiation in patients with lymphorrhea and definition of its importance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Current presentation of previously published case series, reviews and guidelines.

RESULTS

The use of low-dose irradiation therapy with single doses of 0.3-0.5 Gy leads to a cessation of the lymphatic flow in a high percentage of patients when standard therapies do not show a sufficient effect. With cessation of lymphorrhea irradiation should be terminated. Acute side effects have not been reported and the risk of tumor induction is almost negligible.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose irradiation is an effective and very well-tolerated therapeutic alternative in the treatment of lymphatic fistulas and lymphorrhea when conservative therapies are unsuccessful.

An observational study of extending FOLFOX chemotherapy, lengthening the interval between radiotherapy and surgery, and enhancing pathological complete response rates in rectal cancer patients following preoperative chemoradiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with rectal cancer who exhibit a pathologic complete response to preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy have excellent oncologic outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the potential advantages of adding oxaliplatin to preoperative fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy administered in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients with rectal cancer were enrolled. Patients were administered chemoradiotherapy, which comprised radiotherapy and chemotherapy involving a 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin regimen every 2 weeks. Surgery was performed 10-12 weeks after radiotherapy completion. Tumor regression, adverse events, surgical complications, and short-term clinical outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Two patients were excluded because of incomplete radiotherapy treatment or refusal of surgery. Eventually, 76 patients underwent total mesorectal excision and no perioperative mortality was observed. Of these, 20 patients (25.6%) developed grade 3 or 4 toxicity during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Among the 76 patients who underwent surgery, 24 (31.6%) patients achieved a pathologic complete response. The sphincter preservation rate was 96.1% (73/76) in all patients and 92.2% (39/42) in patients with tumors located less than 5 cm from the anal verge. The 2-year overall and disease-free survivals were 94% and 87.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intensified multimodality therapy was well tolerated in our cohort and resulted in a considerably high pathologic complete response rate. Regardless of favorable short-term clinical outcomes, long-term oncologic outcomes will be closely monitored among the patients with a pathologic complete response.

Preoperative Chemoradiation With VMAT-SIB in Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in preoperative combined treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Radiation therapy was performed using the VMAT-SIB technique. The dose to mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes was 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). A concomitant boost was delivered on GTV + 2-cm margin with a total dose of 57.5 Gy (2.3 Gy/fraction). The following concomitant chemotherapy was administered: capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice daily, 5 days per week) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² on days 1, 17, and 35). Efficacy was evaluated in terms of complete pathological response (pCR). Acute toxicities were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (7 women; median age 62 years; clinical stage: 4 local recurrences, 6 cT4, 5 cT3, 3 cT2, 2 cN0, 7 cN1, 9 cN2) were enrolled. Sixteen patients underwent surgical resection (9 low anterior resection, 6 abdominal perineal amputations; 1 transanal excision) and 2 patients did not undergo surgery for early metastatic progression or death from acute pulmonary edema. R0 resection was achieved in all patients who underwent surgery. Overall, 4 patients had a pCR and 7 patients only a microscopic residual of disease (pT0-Tmic: 11/18 = 61.1%; 95% CI, 36.2-86.1). Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity was as follows: 1 case of leukopenia, 1 skin toxicity, 1 genitourinary toxicity, and 5 gastrointestinal toxicities, with an overall incidence of 8 (44.4%) of 18 patients. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative local control was 100%, 68.6%, and 68.6%, respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival was 88.9%, 66.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival was 85%, 63.8%, and 63.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The regimen used in this study showed excellent results in terms of pathologic responses. However, despite the use of the VMAT technique, more than one-third of patients had severe acute toxicity.

Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Current Standards and Future Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Multimodal treatment approaches are indispensable for patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Radiotherapy has been established as essential part of perioperative concepts and was introduced as an option to face challenges such as local relapse or oligometastases.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to summarize evidence and current standards of radiotherapeutic concepts in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

For stage II/III rectal cancer, neoadjuvant radiotherapy is superior to adjuvant treatment. Two preoperative regimens have been established and are commonly used with different objectives: short-course radiotherapy (SC-RT) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (LC-CRT). Both reduce the risk of local relapse. Additionally, LC-CRT aims at downsizing the tumor to potentially reduce radicalness of surgery. There is increasing evidence that not all stage II/III rectal cancer patients need neoadjuvant irradiation but also that in some cases surgery might be omitted. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the liver shows high rates of local control in oligometastatic patients. Intraoperative and particle radiotherapy extend the spectrum of treatment options for locally recurrent patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapeutic concepts are crucial for the primary management of locally advanced colorectal cancer and can essentially contribute to treatment approaches in locally recurrent, oligometastatic or palliative patients.

Clinical application of precise radiotherapy in rectal cancer

Precise radiotherapy plays an important role in the comprehensive multidisciplinary therapy of rectal cancer. The mainstream technology is the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The technique of repetitive body positioning and the filling of the bladder and rectum are the important factors influencing the accuracy and efficacy of radiotherapy for rectal cancer. The quality of life for patients with rectal cancer is highly affected by side effects associated with radiotherapy. The application of precise positioning technique and image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can significantly contribute to the accurate delivery of radiotherapy to the region of rectal cancer to improve the local tumor control and reduce unnecessary exposure of normal tissues to irradiation. In this paper, the clinical application of precise positioning technique and the improvement of accurate delivery of radiotherapy are comprehensively reviewed.