1
|
Grosso F, Cerbone L, Curioni-Fontecedro A. MARS 2 trial: the future of pleurectomy decortication in pleural mesothelioma. Lancet Respir Med 2024:S2213-2600(24)00146-2. [PMID: 38740043 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00146-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma and Rare Cancers Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
| | - Luigi Cerbone
- Mesothelioma and Rare Cancers Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro
- Clinic of Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kondo N, Hasegawa S. Optimal surgery for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma in the setting of multimodality treatment. Surg Today 2023:10.1007/s00595-023-02723-8. [PMID: 37474704 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02723-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
The surgical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) involves procedures to achieve macroscopic complete resection, depending on the patient's condition. We reviewed the evolution of surgical approaches for resectable MPM. Since surgery is no more than a single step in the set of processes in multimodality treatment (MMT), we concluded that these procedures should give precedence to lung preservation and minimize resection whenever possible. Postoperative quality of life must be prioritized when the patient can receive appropriate adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyuki Kondo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
| | - Seiki Hasegawa
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paajanen J, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R. Contemporary issues in the surgical management of pleural mesothelioma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:343-354. [PMID: 36630097 PMCID: PMC9839311 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The surgical management of pleural mesothelioma (PM) can be divided into diagnostic, staging, palliation, and cytoreductive surgery. In the cytoreductive surgical setting, the combination of different treatment modalities has led to better outcomes than surgery alone. The scarcity of high-quality studies has led to heterogeneity in management of PM across the mesothelioma treatment centers. Here, we review the literature regarding the most important open questions and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juuso Paajanen
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael T. Jaklitsch
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Raphael Bueno
- The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International Mesothelioma Program (www.impmeso.org), Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung Center, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ho S, Culligan M, Friedberg J, Goloubeva O, Marchese V. Examining the impact of physical function performance in predicting patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44:6676-6683. [PMID: 34455883 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1970256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of physical function performance and pulmonary function on patient outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 54 patients with MPM from 2015 to 2020 was performed. The primary objective was to assess whether physical function, as measured by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), and pulmonary function tests were predictive of postoperative patient outcomes (ventilator days, chest tube days, hospital length of stay). A secondary objective was to explore demographic and preoperative variables that best predict postoperative physical function and patient outcomes. RESULTS Data include 54 patients who underwent extended pleurectomy-decortication. Preoperative ECOG was a significant predictor of postoperative patient outcomes while preoperative lung function lacked predictive ability. Preoperative ECOG was also predictive of preoperative lung function. Age on the day of surgery was the best predictor of postoperative physical function, which was significantly reduced postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative physical function performance was a significant predictor of postoperative outcomes. The results of our study highlight the importance of physical function in patients with MPM and support the need for early rehabilitation and further research to determine optimal rehabilitation interventions.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPreoperative physical function can predict outcomes after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).Physical function in patients with MPM should be carefully examined.To accurately reflect patients' abilities, patient assessment should include both patient-reported outcomes and performance-based measures.Patients with MPM should receive rehabilitation early after diagnosis and throughout the continuum of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Ho
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Melissa Culligan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Friedberg
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Olga Goloubeva
- University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformation, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Victoria Marchese
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah R, Klotz LV, Glade J. Current Management and Future Perspective in Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1044. [PMID: 35205798 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy arising from pleural mesothelial cell lining, predominantly associated with prior exposure to asbestos. The ban on asbestos use has led to its lower incidence in many countries, but globally the disease burden is expected to rise. Therefore, well-planned research is needed to develop more effective, tolerable and affordable drugs. The development of novel treatment has been too slow, with only two regimens of systemic therapy with robust phase 3 data approved formally to date. The treatment scenario for resectable disease remains controversial. However, recent developments in the understanding of disease and clinical trials have been encouraging, and may add better treatment options in the coming years. In this review, we discuss the current treatment options for pleural mesothelioma and shed light on some recent studies and ongoing trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
Belderbos RA, Maat APWM, Baart SJ, Madsen EVE, Bogers AJJC, Cornelissen R, Aerts JGJV, Mahtab EAF, von der Thüsen JH. Ki67 (MIB-1) as a Prognostic Marker for Clinical Decision Making Before Extended Pleurectomy Decortication in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. JTO Clin Res Rep 2021; 2:100155. [PMID: 34590009 PMCID: PMC8474452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The role of surgery for early stage malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial. Current expert opinion is only to treat patients surgically as part of multimodality therapy. It is still challenging to identify patients who will not benefit from surgery. We specifically evaluated tumor-related parameters in combination with clinical parameters to identify prognostic markers for survival. Methods Clinical data of 27 consecutive patients with MPM treated with extended pleurectomy and decortication within a multimodality approach were collected and analyzed. Several tumor (immuno-)histopathologic characteristics were determined on resected tumor material, among which MTAP and Ki67 (MIB-1). Univariable and multivariable analyses served to correlate clinical and tumor-related parameters to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The median PFS (mPFS) was 15.3, and the median OS (mOS) was 26.5 months. Patients with a Ki67 score greater than 10% had a significantly shorter PFS (mPFS = 8.81 versus 25.35 mo, p = 0.001) and OS (mOS 19.7 versus 44.5 mo, p = 0.002) than those with a Ki67 score less than or equal to 10. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for Ki67 revealed an area under the curve of 0.756 with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 71% for a cutoff of 10% for Ki67. Patients with loss of MTAP had a significantly shorter mPFS (9 versus 21.1 mo, p = 0.014) and mOS (19.7 versus 42.6 mo, p = 0.047) than those without MTAP loss. Conclusions In our study, Ki67 was prognostic for OS and PFS in patients with MPM treated with extended pleurectomy/decortication in a multimodality approach. Determination of Ki67 before surgery combined with specific clinical parameters could assist in clinical decision making by identifying patients, with high Ki67, who are unlikely to benefit from surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Belderbos
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander P W M Maat
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ad J J C Bogers
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robin Cornelissen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joachim G J V Aerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edris A F Mahtab
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klotz LV, Gruenewald C, Bulut EL, Eichhorn F, Thomas M, Shah R, Kriegsmann M, Schmidt W, Kofler O, Winter H, Eichhorn ME. Cytoreductive Thoracic Surgery Combined with Hyperthermic Chemoperfusion for Pleural Malignancies: A Single-Center Experience. Respiration 2021; 100:1165-1173. [PMID: 34384085 DOI: 10.1159/000517334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung-sparing cytoreductive surgery by extended pleurectomy and decortication (EPD) in combination with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion (HITOC) forms a promising treatment strategy for malignant pleural mesothelioma and recurrent pleural thymic malignancies. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to scrutinize the surgical procedure and perioperative patient management with emphasis on perioperative morbidity and local tumor control. METHODS In 2014, a standardized EPD and HITOC procedure was implemented at the Thoraxklinik Heidelberg. This retrospective analysis included clinical data of consecutive patients with pleural mesothelioma and pleural metastasized malignancies treated by EPD and HITOC. The surgical procedure, perioperative management, lung function data, and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS In the time range between April 2, 2014 and July 2018, 76 patients with pleural malignancies have been treated with EPD and HITOC, and were analyzed retrospectively. It included 61 patients with pleural mesothelioma and 15 patients with pleural metastases of thymic malignancies (12), non-small cell lung cancer (1), colorectal carcinoma (1), and sarcoma (1). Perioperative morbidity following EPD and HITOC treatments represented 23.7% of overall malignancies, while 30- and 90-day mortality were 0 and 1.3%, respectively. Median PFS lasted 18.4 months for mesothelioma and 72.2 months for thymic malignancies. CONCLUSION Combining EPD with HITOC can be performed in patients with either pleural mesothelioma or pleural metastases resulting in low perioperative morbidity and mortality as well as remarkable local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura V Klotz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular Thoracic Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Gruenewald
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena L Bulut
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rajiv Shah
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Kriegsmann
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Werner Schmidt
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Othmar Kofler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin E Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ke H, Kao S, Lee K, Takahashi K, Goh HP, Linton A. The minimum standard of care for managing malignant pleural mesothelioma in developing nations within the Asia-Pacific Region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:177-190. [PMID: 34161674 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable malignancy associated with high symptom burden and poor prognosis. The relationship between asbestos exposure and MPM incidence is well-established. The incidence rate of MPM in Australia and New Zealand is among the highest globally. Matching the experience of other nations with legal restrictions on asbestos, incidence is expected to fall. In contrast, the incidence of MPM is rising in the developing nations of the Asia-Pacific as consumption and mining (albeit to a lesser extent) of asbestos continues. The incidence of MPM in these nations is currently low or unknown, reflecting insufficient latency periods since industrial use of asbestos, deficient resources for accurate diagnosis, and lack of occupational disease or cancer registries. The landscape of treatment for MPM is rapidly changing with combination immunotherapy now demonstrating improved survival in the first-line setting. Considering vast global inequity in access to anticancer treatments, establishing minimum standard of care for MPM in developing nations is of greater significance. Here, we review the evidence that form the basis of our minimum-standard recommendations for diagnosis, systemic treatment, management of recurrent pleural effusions, and symptom management. We also briefly review evidence-based treatment that may be considered for those with access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Ke
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven Kao
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Lee
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Takahashi
- Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan
| | - Hui Poh Goh
- PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei
| | - Anthony Linton
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Asbestos Diseases Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nakamichi T, Hashimoto M, Nakamura A, Kuroda A, Tanaka T, Takeuchi J, Matsumoto S, Morimoto T, Kondo N, Domen K, Hasegawa S. Quality of life and lung function after pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 33:572-579. [PMID: 33963844 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Impact of pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) on quality of life (QOL) is not widely reported. We investigated QOL and lung function after P/D. METHODS A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed among patients who underwent P/D for malignant mesothelioma between June 2014 and June 2018 at Hyogo College of Medicine. Data at 4 points before and 3, 6 and 12 months on QOL and lung function were evaluated with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and pulmonary function tests. RESULTS Forty-five out of 65 patients completed SF-36. Physical function and role physical decreased from 78 to 65 and 69 to 41 and did not recover. Body pain decreased from 74 to 52. It increased to 62 at 12 months but was lower than before. General health perceptions, vitality and social function decreased from 56 to 49, 50 to 47 and 63 to 50, respectively, but returned to baseline. Role emotional decreased from 75 to 54, then once increased to 63, but decreased again to 58. Mental health tended to improve from 58 to 70. Thirty-eight patients out of 45 completed pulmonary function tests. Forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s decreased from 98% to 61% and 93% to 67% and did not increase. Right-sided surgery or complications was the risk factors of poor lung function but no significant risk factors in QOL. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that P/D had an impact on QOL. Despite the lack of recovery in lung function QOL in mental aspects tended to improve, suggesting that pulmonary function tests alone are limited in assessing QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Nakamichi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masaki Hashimoto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Akifumi Nakamura
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Kuroda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takashi Tanaka
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Jiro Takeuchi
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Seiji Matsumoto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Morimoto
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kondo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuhisa Domen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Seiki Hasegawa
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
The malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive tumor which is arising from mesothelial cells and is associated with asbestos exposure. It is a heterogeneous cancer that shows a complex pattern of molecular changes, including genetic, chromosomic, and epigenetic abnormalities. The malignant pleural mesothelioma is characterized by a silent and slow clinical progression with an average period of 20–40 years from the asbestos exposure phase to the start of the symptoms. Unfortunately, to date, the therapeutic options are very limited, especially if the tumor is detected late. This narrative review provides an extended overview of the present evidence in the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic pathways and treatment approaches of the malignant pleural mesothelioma. The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years not only from a surgical point of view but also radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy play nowadays a key role. Several surgical strategies are available ranging from extrapleural pneumonectomy to cytoreductive surgery but a multidisciplinary approach seems to be mandatory because a single approach has not proved to date to be resolutive. New non-surgical treatment options appear to be promising but the results have to be taken in account with caution because clear evidence with high-quality studies is still lacking
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregor Kocher
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Minervini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee DS, Carollo A, Alpert N, Taioli E, Flores R. VATS Pleurectomy Decortication Is a Reasonable Alternative for Higher Risk Patients in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051068. [PMID: 33802319 PMCID: PMC7959123 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy that drastically affects a patient’s quality of life. Surgery typically entails radical resection with or without the removal of the underlying lung. In an era where minimally invasive surgery is sought after, MPM remains an anomaly. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery as an alternative to more radical surgery in MPM. We examined short-term outcomes between the radical approaches and minimally invasive surgery and minimally invasive surgery had improved outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery can be considered in patients with MPM. Abstract Surgery is a mainstay of treatment allowing for debulking of tumor and expansion of the lung for improvement in median survival and quality of life for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Although optimal surgical technique remains open for debate—extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy/decortication (P/D)—minimally invasive surgery (VATS-P/D) remains underutilized in the management of MPM. We examined whether VATS-P/D is a feasible alternative to EPP and P/D. We evaluated the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2007–2017 to assess the short-term complications of EPP vs. P/D, including a subanalysis of open P/D vs. VATS-P/D. There were 331 patients with open surgery; 269 with P/D and 62 with EPP. There were 384 patients with P/D; 269 were open and 115 VATS. Rates of any complication were similar between EPP and P/D patients, but EPP had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications. After adjusting for confounders, those with a VATS approach were less likely to have any complication, compared to an open approach and significantly less likely to have a pulmonary complication. VATS-P/D remains a viable alternative to radical surgery in MPM patients allowing for improved short-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
In the absence of standardized treatment algorithms for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, one of the main difficulties remains patient allocation to therapies with potential benefit. This article discusses clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and molecular prognostic factors as well as genetic background leading to preoperative identification of benefit from surgery, which have been investigated over the past years to simplify and at the same time specify patient selection for surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
| | - Katarzyna Furrer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years. While surgery as a standalone treatment has fallen out of favor, the importance of multimodality treatment consisting of combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery have become more common in operable, fit patients. In this review, we discuss trials in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation that have shaped contemporary multimodality treatment of this difficult malignancy, and we touch on the new and emerging immunotherapeutic and targeted agents that may change the future treatment of this disease. We also review the multimodality treatment regimens, with particular attention to trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant hemithoracic radiation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Kantor
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elliot Wakeam
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Asciak R, George V, Rahman NM. Update on biology and management of mesothelioma. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/159/200226. [PMID: 33472960 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0226-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive, incurable cancer that is usually caused by asbestos exposure several decades before symptoms arise. Despite widespread prohibition of asbestos production and supply, its incidence continues to increase. It is heterogeneous in its presentation and behaviour, and diagnosis can be notoriously difficult. Identification of actionable gene mutations has proven challenging and current treatment options are largely ineffective, with a median survival of 10-12 months.However, the past few years have witnessed major advances in our understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of mesothelioma. This has also revealed the limitations of existing diagnostic algorithms and identified new treatment targets.Recent clinical trials have re-examined the role of surgery, provided new options for the management of associated pleural effusions and heralded the addition of targeted therapies. The increasing complexity of mesothelioma management, along with a desperate need for further research, means that a multidisciplinary team framework is essential for the delivery of contemporary mesothelioma care.This review provides a synthesised overview of the current state of knowledge and an update on the latest research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle Asciak
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK .,Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Vineeth George
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Najiib M Rahman
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Wolf AS. Commentary: Staying Safe on the Right-Managing the Disease of Right Pneumonectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 32:1085-1086. [PMID: 32846235 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Wolf
- New York Mesothelioma Program, Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ichiki Y, Goto H, Fukuyama T, Nakanishi K. Should Lung-Sparing Surgery Be the Standard Procedure for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma? J Clin Med 2020; 9:E2153. [PMID: 32650433 PMCID: PMC7408715 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical procedures for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) include extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), extended pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and P/D. EPP has been applied to MPM for a long time, but the postoperative status is extremely poor due to the loss of one whole lung. We compared the mortality, morbidity and median survival time (MST) of lung-sparing surgery (extended P/D or P/D) and lung-sacrificing surgery (EPP) for MPM by performing a systematic review. METHODS We extracted the number of events and patients from the literature identified in electronic databases. Ultimately, 15 reports were selected, and 2674 MPM patients, including 1434 patients undergoing EPP and 1240 patients undergoing extended P/D or P/D, were analyzed. RESULTS Our systematic review showed that lung-sparing surgery was significantly superior to lung-sacrificing surgery in both the surgical-related mortality (extended P/D vs. EPP: 3.19% vs. 7.65%, p < 0.01; P/D vs. EPP: 1.85% vs. 7.34%, p < 0.01) and morbidity (extended P/D vs. EPP: 35.7% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.01; P/D vs. EPP: 9.52% vs. 20.89%, p < 0.01). Lung-sparing surgery was not inferior to EPP in terms of MST. CONCLUSION Although no prospective randomized controlled trial has been conducted, it may be time to change the standard surgical method for MPM from lung-sacrificing surgery to lung-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinobu Ichiki
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Saitama Hospital, 2-1 Suwa, Wako, Saitama 351-0102, Japan; (H.G.); (K.N.)
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan
| | - Hidenori Goto
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Saitama Hospital, 2-1 Suwa, Wako, Saitama 351-0102, Japan; (H.G.); (K.N.)
| | - Takashi Fukuyama
- Division of Biomedical Research, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto 364-8501, Japan;
| | - Kozo Nakanishi
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Saitama Hospital, 2-1 Suwa, Wako, Saitama 351-0102, Japan; (H.G.); (K.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Migliore
- Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Medical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alpert N, van Gerwen M, Steinberg M, Ohri N, Flores R, Taioli E. Racial Disparities in Treatment Patterns and Survival Among Surgically Treated Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients. J Immigr Minor Health 2020; 22:1163-71. [PMID: 32529589 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-020-01038-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgery may improve survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients. We examined treatment and survival in black and white surgical MPM patients using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Among patients with pleurectomy/decortication (PD) or extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate racial differences in surgical extent, additional treatment, and 30-/90-day mortality. Multivariable and propensity matched models were used to assess differences in survival. We identified 2550 patients; 2462 white (96.5%), 88 black (3.5%). Black patients were significantly less likely to receive EPP (ORadj 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.78) and trended towards worse 30-/90-day mortality (ORadj 1.54, 95% CI 0.59-4.03; ORadj 1.59, 95% CI 0.80-3.17, respectively). There was no difference in survival (HRadj 0.94, 95% CI 0.71-1.25). Surgery conferred a survival benefit (HRadj 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82), but it varied by race (HRadj[white] 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81; HRadj[black] 0.93, 95% CI 0.67-1.29). With the limitation of a small proportion of surgically resected black MPM patients in this population-based analysis, black patients were noted to undergo less extensive surgery. Although there was an overall survival benefit noted with surgery, this was not consistent across races, despite trends towards worse short-term mortality in black patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy for which there is no definitive cure. The most effective multimodality treatment in prolonging survival is still matter of debate. Surgery remains one of the cornerstones in the multimodality therapy for MPM. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication are the two main curative-intent procedures; however, the superiority of one technique over the other is still debated. This review aims to assess short- and long-term results of extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM.Areas covered: This article focuses on the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in MPM. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that included patients treated by this procedure for MPM. Endpoints included overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence rate, perioperative mortality, and morbidity.Expert commentary: This paper offers an overview of the results that are currently obtained in patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM. The benefit of surgical treatments in MPM is still debated and its primary goal should be the achievement of a macroscopic complete resection. Several alternative multimodality protocols exist, with specific advantages and drawbacks; therefore, individualization of care for each patient is fundamental. The complexity of the surgical treatment mandates that patients be referred to specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Faccioli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Alice Bellini
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Mammana
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nicola Monaci
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Schiavon
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ceresoli GL, Rossi A. Approved and emerging treatments of malignant pleural mesothelioma in elderly patients. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 13:1179-1188. [PMID: 31596154 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1678386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare neoplasm with asbestos exposure as the dominant etiologic agent. Owing to the long latent period following exposure, MPM is often diagnosed late in life. Despite this, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials. To date, data regarding the tolerability and efficacy of anticancer treatments for elderly patients affected by MPM are still lacking.Areas covered: The current state-of-the-art of approved treatments employed in the treatment of MPM elderly patients is reviewed and discussed, with a look to emerging therapies. A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and of main meeting abstracts using a focused review question was undertaken.Expert opinion: Even though the median age of MPM patients enrolled in the most recent experimental trials is increasing, no specific analysis has been reported so far in the elderly. Moreover, no data are available for the 'oldest of the elderly' (>75 years). Treatment of elderly patients with MPM is one of the major challenges to the clinician. There is a clear need of large, well-conducted retrospective studies and above all of prospective investigations in this patient population, both in the first-and in the second-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Thoracic and Urologic Oncology Unit, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Antonio Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| |
Collapse
|