1
|
Wang T, Lu Q, Tang L. Assessment tools for patient-reported outcomes in multiple myeloma. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:431. [PMID: 37389673 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07902-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multiple myeloma experience severe symptom burden. Patient participation in self-reporting is essential as medical staff's assessment of patient symptom severity is often lower than patient self-reporting. This article reviews patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment tools and their application in the field of multiple myeloma. RESULTS The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is the universal patient-reported outcome assessment tool most frequently used to evaluate the life quality in people with multiple myeloma. Among the specific patient-reported outcome assessment tools, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM), and the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Multiple Myeloma Module (MDASI-MM) are the most widely used, with some scholars using the EORTC QLQ-MY20 as a calibration correlate for scale development. Most current assessment instruments were developed using classical measurement theory methods; future researchers could combine classic theory tests and item response theory to create scientific assessment instruments. In addition, researchers select the appropriate assessment tool based on the purpose of the study. They can translate high-quality assessment tools into different languages and consider applying them more often to assessing multiple myeloma patients. Finally, most existing PROs focus on measuring life quality and symptoms in people with multiple myeloma, with less research on outcomes such as adherence and satisfaction, thus failing to comprehensively evaluate the patient treatment and disease management. CONCLUSIONS Research has shown that the field of PROs in multiple myeloma is in an exploratory phase. There is still a need to enrich the content of PROs and develop more high-quality PRO scales for multiple myeloma based on the strengths and weaknesses of existing tools. With the successful advancement of information technology, PROs for people with multiple myeloma could be integrated with electronic information systems, allowing patients to report their health status in real time and doctors to track their condition and adjust their treatment, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wang
- Department of Haematology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Qin Lu
- Department of Haematology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - LeiWen Tang
- Department of Nursing, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolzani A, Kupf S, Hodiamont F, Burner-Fritsch I, Bausewein C, Ramsenthaler C. Measurement equivalence of the paper-based and electronic version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS): A randomised crossover trial. Palliat Med 2023; 37:760-770. [PMID: 36856258 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231157871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) validly and reliably measures symptoms and concerns of those receiving palliative care. AIM To determine the equivalence of the paper version with an electronic version of the IPOS (eIPOS). DESIGN Multicentre randomised crossover trial (NCT03879668) with a within-subject comparison of the two modes (washout period 30 min). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of specialist inpatient and palliative home care patients aged over 18 years with cancer and non-cancer conditions was recruited. Scores were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and via a mixed-effects analysis of variance. RESULTS Fifty patients were randomised to complete paper-electronic (n = 24) and electronic-paper (n = 26) IPOS with median age 69 years (range 24-95), 56% male, 16% non-cancer. The ICCs showed very high concordance for the total score (ICC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00), lowest ICCs being observed for symptoms 'Appetite loss' and 'Drowsiness' (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Nine of seventeen items had ICCs above 0.98, as did all subscales. No statistically significant mode, order, age, and interaction effects were observed for IPOS total score and subscales, except for 'Communication' (Fmode = 5.9, p = 0.019). Fifty-eight percent preferred the electronic version. In the group 75+ years, 53% preferred the paper version. Only three entries in the free-text main problems differed between the versions. CONCLUSION The very high equivalence in scores and free text between the IPOS and the eIPOS demonstrates that eIPOS is feasible and reliable in an older palliative population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bolzani
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie Kupf
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Farina Hodiamont
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Burner-Fritsch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Ramsenthaler
- School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, Switzerland.,Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jia M, Gu Y, Chen Y, Tu J, Liu Y, Lu H, Huang S, Li J, Zhou H. A methodological study on the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross-cultural adaptation. Nurs Open 2021; 9:705-713. [PMID: 34719124 PMCID: PMC8685835 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study is to explore the use of the Questionnaire Appraisal System with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods in cognitive interviewing for cross‐cultural adaptation. Design This is a descriptive methodological study. Methods Using the Mandarin version of the Post‐Stroke Checklist as an example, cognitive interviews were conducted with 27 stroke survivors in Guangzhou between November 2020 and February 2021. The Questionnaire Appraisal System was applied as a codebook in focus group discussions to perform quantitative data collections and quantitative content analysis. Results Thirty‐eight problems were proposed in focus group discussions and identified all but four of the 30 questions that emerged in the cognitive interviews. A new item was added to the Questionnaire Appraisal System for better categorization. Four categories and six subcategories of problems in the checklist were revealed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Jia
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yao Gu
- Rehabilitation department of traditional Chinese medicine, Baiyunshan Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanhua Chen
- Chronic disease management outpatient, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinyi Tu
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yue Liu
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiqi Lu
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Simin Huang
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinjun Li
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongzhen Zhou
- Department of Nursing, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hodiamont F, Hock H, Ellis-Smith C, Evans C, de Wolf-Linder S, Jünger S, Diehl-Schmid J, Burner-Fritsch I, Bausewein C. Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:962-971. [PMID: 33863246 PMCID: PMC8114430 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211004403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is a life-limiting disease with high symptom burden. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) is the first comprehensive person-centered measure to identify and measure palliative care needs of people with dementia. However, such a measure is missing in the German health care system. AIM To develop a culturally adapted German version of the IPOS-Dem and determine its content validity as a foundation for comprehensive psychometric testing. DESIGN Cognitive interview study with intermittent analysis and questionnaire adaptation. Interview guide and coding frame followed thematic analysis according to Willis complemented by Tourangeau's model of cognitive aspects of survey methodology: comprehension, retrieval, judgment, response. PARTICIPANTS Purposive sample with professionals (n = 29) and family carers (n = 6) of people with advanced dementia in seven nursing homes and person's own home care in four interview rounds (n = 11; 10; 7; 7). RESULTS IPOS-Dem was regarded as comprehensive and accessible. Cultural adaption pertained to issues of comprehension and judgment. Comprehension challenges referred to the person-centered concept of "being affected by" used in the POS-measures. Judgment problems related to persons with limited communication causing challenges in assessment. CONCLUSION Most issues of cultural adaptation could be addressed by questionnaire modifications. However, interviews unveiled fundamental challenges for using proxy reported person-centered assessments. Continuous training on how to use the instrument is imperative to integrate the person-centered approach of palliative care into nursing homes as a key provider of generalist palliative care for people with dementia. The refined version is ready for psychometric testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farina Hodiamont
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helena Hock
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Susanne de Wolf-Linder
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Nursing, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Saskia Jünger
- Department of Community Health, University of Applied Health Sciences, Bochum, Germany
| | - Janine Diehl-Schmid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Burner-Fritsch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|