1
|
van Dorp M, Gonzalez M, Ojanguren A, Brunelli A. Transcontinental Differences in Management of Pulmonary Metastatic Disease: Europe. Thorac Surg Clin 2025; 35:233-247. [PMID: 40246413 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2024.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Several international registries, including 4 from Europe-Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons-are dedicated to addressing deficiencies in pulmonary metastasectomy research. The randomized PulMiCC and SABR-COMET trials provide contradictory outcomes and new randomized trials have been initiated. Europe's metastasectomy approach transitioned from open thoracotomy to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with 72% of surgeons favoring minimally invasive methods by 2023. European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend surgery for completely resectable lesions and propose ablative approaches as supplementary or alternative treatments for inoperable cases due to frailty or unfavorable anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn van Dorp
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center - Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel Gonzalez
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Amaia Ojanguren
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Brunelli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qian X, Fang Z, Jiang W, Chou J, Lu Y, Jabbour SK, Ramirez RA, Lu Y. The optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy dose with immunotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a retrospective cohort study. J Thorac Dis 2024; 16:7072-7085. [PMID: 39552865 PMCID: PMC11565358 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-1624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a precise and effective treatment for pulmonary oligometastases, offering high local control (LC) rates. However, the optimal SBRT dose when combined with immunotherapy remains unclear, and there is a lack of comprehensive studies focusing on dose optimization in this setting. This study addresses this knowledge gap by exploring different SBRT dose regimens and their impact on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and LC in patients receiving concurrent immunotherapy, offering novel insights into the synergistic effects of these treatments. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 101 patients with 141 pulmonary oligometastases treated from April 2018 to April 2022. Inclusion criteria included patients with a maximum of five lung metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2. Patients received SBRT with doses ranging from 50-70 Gy in 5-10 fractions. Follow-up was performed quarterly, and the best dose was determined by comparing survival outcomes across different dose groups. The patients received SBRT with doses ranging from 50-70 Gy in 5-10 fractions. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the survival analysis, and Cox regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for LC, PFS, and OS. Results The median follow-up for the 101 patients was 22.4 months (range, 1-58 months). The cohort comprised 82.2% male patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 36-81 years). The majority of the patients (64.4%) had primary tumors originating from non-lung sites, with adenocarcinoma being the predominant histological subtype (47.5%). The median tumor size was 13.5 mm. Across the entire cohort, the median OS was 39 months, and the median PFS was 11 months. Pre-treatment with immunotherapy significantly improved outcomes: the PFS increased to 13 months compared to 7 months for those who did not receive immunotherapy [P=0.02, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.523, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.302-0.906], and the OS was also significantly improved (P=0.008, HR =0.411, 95% CI: 0.214-0.792). The SBRT regimen of 60 Gy in 10 fractions provided the best outcomes, with a median OS of 39 months, a median PFS of 10 months, and a LC rate of 92.4%, with relatively low toxicity compared to other regimens. Conclusions SBRT is a potent, minimally invasive option for managing pulmonary oligometastases, especially when preceded by immunotherapy. The 60 Gy in 10 fractions regimen demonstrated significant efficacy in terms of OS and LC, while maintaining manageable toxicity. Although the retrospective nature of the study introduces some selection bias, this dose regimen appears to offer a promising therapeutic option for pulmonary oligometastases. Further validation through well-designed prospective studies would help confirm the optimal SBRT dose and clarify the role of immunotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiajing Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Zhengxuying Fang
- Department of Oncology, The Ningbo Zhenhai People’s Hospital (Ningbo No.7 Hospital), Ningbo, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Jianbo Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Yunyun Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Salma K. Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Yi Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verma N, Laird JH, Moore NS, Hayman TJ, Housri N, Peters GW, Knowlton CA, Jairam V, Campbell AM, Park HS. Radioresistant Pulmonary Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Lesions From Nonlung Primaries: Impact of Histology and Dose-Fractionation on Local Control After Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101500. [PMID: 38699671 PMCID: PMC11063223 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose We investigated whether pulmonary metastases from historically considered radioresistant primaries would have inferior local control after radiation therapy than those from nonradioresistant nonlung primaries, and whether higher biologically effective dose assuming alpha/beta=10 (BED10) would be associated with superior local control. Methods and Materials We identified patients treated with radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive pulmonary disease to 1 to 5 lung metastases from nonlung primaries in 2013 to 2020 at a single health care system. Radioresistant primary cancers included colorectal carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and sarcoma. Nonradioresistant primary cancers included breast, bladder, esophageal, pancreas, and head and neck carcinomas. The Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), new metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Among 114 patients, 73 had radioresistant primary cancers. The median total dose was 50 Gy (IQR, 50-54 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 5 (IQR, 3-5). Median follow-up time was 59.6 months. One of 41 (2.4%) patients with a nonradioresistant metastasis experienced local failure compared with 18 of 73 (24.7%) patients with radioresistant metastasis (log-rank P = .004). Among radioresistant metastases, 12 of 41 (29.2%) patients with colorectal carcinoma experienced local failure compared with 6 of 32 (18.8%) with other primaries (log-rank P = .018). BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. On univariable analysis, BED10 ≥100 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.263; 95% CI, 0.105-0.656; P = .004) was associated with higher LRFS, and colorectal primary (HR, 3.060; 95% CI, 1.204-7.777; P = .019) was associated with lower LRFS, though these were not statistically significant on multivariable analysis. Among colorectal primary patients, BED10 ≥100 Gy was associated with higher LRFS (HR, 0.266; 95% CI, 0.072-0.985; P = .047) on multivariable analysis. Conclusions Local control after radiation therapy was encouraging for pulmonary metastases from most nonlung primaries, even for many of those classically considered to be radioresistant. Those from colorectal primaries may benefit from testing additional strategies, such as resection or systemic treatment concurrent with radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nipun Verma
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James H. Laird
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nicholas S. Moore
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Thomas J. Hayman
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nadine Housri
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gabrielle W. Peters
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christin A. Knowlton
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Vikram Jairam
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Allison M. Campbell
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Henry S. Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oshiro Y, Mizumoto M, Kato Y, Tsuchida Y, Tsuboi K, Sakae T, Sakurai H. Single isocenter dynamic conformal arcs-based radiosurgery for brain metastases: Dosimetric comparison with Cyberknife and clinical investigation. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100235. [PMID: 38299171 PMCID: PMC10827586 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare the dosimetric quality of automatic multiple brain metastases planning (MBM) with that of Cyberknife (CK) based on the clinical tumor condition, such as the tumor number, size, and location. Methods 76 treatment plans for 46 patients treated with CK were recalculated with the MBM treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g) and mean dose to normal organs were compared between CK and MBM for tumor number, size, shape and distance from the brainstem or chiasm. Results The results showed that the mean brain dose was significantly smaller in MBM than CK. CI did not differ between MBM and CK; however, HI was significantly more ideal in CK (p = 0.000), and GI was significantly smaller in MBM (P = 0.000). LUF was larger in CK (p = 0.000) and HTOF and g was larger in MBM (p = 0.003, and 0.012). For single metastases, CK had significantly better HTOF (p = 0.000) and g (p = 0.002), but there were no differences for multiple tumors. Brain dose in MBM was significantly lower and CI was higher for tumors < 30 mm (p = 0.000 and 0.000), whereas HTOF and g for tumors < 10 mm were significantly smaller in CK (p = 0.041 and p = 0.016). Among oval tumors, brain dose, GI and LUF were smaller in MBM, but HTOF and g were smaller in CK. There were no particular trends for tumors close to the brainstem, but HTOF tended to be smaller in CK (0.03 vs. 0.29, p = 0.068) for tumors inside the brainstem. Conclusions MBM can reduce the brain dose while achieving a dose distribution quality equivalent to that with CK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsukuba Central Hospital, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Tsukuba, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Yuichi Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Tsuchida
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsukuba Central Hospital, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Koji Tsuboi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tsukuba Central Hospital, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Takeji Sakae
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Tsukuba, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Tsukuba, Amakubo 1-3-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bourbonne V, Lévy A, Khalifa J, Antoni D, Blais E, Darréon J, Le Péchoux C, Lerouge D, Giraud P, Marguerit A, Pourel N, Riet FG, Thureau S. Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:36-48. [PMID: 38228422 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Bourbonne
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU de Brest, Brest, France; LaTim, Inserm, UMR 1101, université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, France
| | - A Lévy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre international des cancers thoraciques (CICT), Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - J Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Claudius-Regaud, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - D Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Blais
- Department of Radiation Oncology, polyclinique Marzet, Pau, France
| | - J Darréon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - C Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre international des cancers thoraciques (CICT), Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France; Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - D Lerouge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - P Giraud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Marguerit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - N Pourel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - F-G Riet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier privé Saint-Grégoire, 35760 Saint-Grégoire, France
| | - S Thureau
- Radiotherapy Department, centre Henri-Becquerel, Rouen, France; QuantIF-Litis EA4108, université de Rouen, Rouen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang HH, Chen Y, Liu X, Zaorsky NG, Mani K, Niu ZM, Zheng BY, Zeng HY, Yan YY, Li YJ, He Y, Ji CZ, Sun BS, Meng MB. Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary or secondary lung malignancies: Tumor control probability and safety analyses. Radiother Oncol 2023; 187:109817. [PMID: 37480993 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reirradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with primary or secondary lung malignancies represents an appealing definitive approach, but its feasibility and safety are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tumor control probability (TCP) and toxicity for patients receiving reirradiation with SBRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with recurrence of primary or secondary lung malignancies from our hospital were subjected to reirradiation with SBRT, and PubMed- and Embase-indexed articles were reviewed. The patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric details, local tumor control, and toxicities were extracted. The logistic dose-response models were compared for TCP and overall survival (OS) in terms of the physical dose and three-, four-, and five-fraction equivalent doses. RESULTS The data of 17 patients from our hospital and 195 patients extracted from 12 articles were summarized. Reirradiation with SBRT yielded 2-year estimates of 80% TCP for doses of 50.10 Gy, 55.85 Gy, and 60.54 Gy in three, four, and five fractions, respectively. The estimated TCP with common fractionation schemes were 50%, 60%, and 70% for 42.04 Gy, 47.44 Gy, and 53.32 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the 2-year estimated OS was 50%, 60%, and 70% for 41.62 Gy, 46.88 Gy, and 52.55 Gy in five fractions, respectively. Central tumor localization may be associated with severe toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation with SBRT doses of 50-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions is feasible for appropriately selected patients with recurrence of peripheral primary or secondary lung malignancies, but should be carefully considered for centrally-located tumors due to potentially severe toxicity. Further studies are warranted for optimal dose/fractionation schedules and more accurate selection of patients suitable for reirradiation with SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan-Huan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kyle Mani
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Zhi-Min Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Bo-Yu Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Hong-Yu Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Yuan-Yuan Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Yan-Jin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Yuan He
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Chao-Zhi Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Bing-Sheng Sun
- Department of Lung Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin 's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China
| | - Mao-Bin Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and CyberKnife Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mayinger M, Kotecha R, Sahgal A, Kim MS, Lo SS, Louie AV, Scorsetti M, Slotman B, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Oligo-metastases: Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines. Lung Cancer 2023; 182:107284. [PMID: 37390723 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A systematic review of treatment characteristics, outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases served as the basis for development of this International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline. METHODS In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed of retrospective series with ≥50 patients/lung metastases, prospective trials with ≥25 patients/lung metastases, analyses of specific high-risk situations, and all randomized trials published between 2012 and July 2022 in the MEDLINE or Embase database using the key words "lung oligometastases", "lung metastases", "pulmonary metastases", "pulmonary oligometastases", "stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)" and "stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT)". Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled outcomes estimates. RESULTS Of the 1884 articles screened, 35 analyses (27 retrospective-, 5 prospective, and 3 randomized trials) reporting on treatment of >3600 patients and >4650 metastases were included. The median local control was 90 % (Range: 57-100 %) at 1 year and 79 % (R: 70-96 %) at 5 years. Acute toxicity ≥3 was reported for 0.5 % and late toxicity ≥3 for 1.8 % of patients. A total of 21 practice recommendations covering the areas of staging & patient selection (n = 10), SBRT treatment (n = 10), and follow-up (n = 1) were developed, with agreements rates of 100 %, except for recommendation 13 (83 %). CONCLUSION SBRT represents an effective definitive local treatment modality combining high local control rates with low risk of radiation-induced toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Nowon-gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Ben Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Colin G, Ben Mustapha S, Jansen N, Coucke P, Seidel L, Berkovic P, Janvary L. Interval From Simulation Imaging to Treatment Delivery in SABR of Lung Lesions: How Long is Too Long for the Lung? Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101132. [PMID: 36845615 PMCID: PMC9943770 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of delay between planning computed tomography (CT) used as a basis for treatment planning and the start of treatment (delay planning treatment [DPT]), on local control (LC) for lung lesions treated by SABR. Methods and Materials We pooled 2 databases from 2 monocentric retrospective analysis previously published and added planning CT and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT dates. We analyzed LC outcomes based on DPT and reviewed all available cofounding factors among demographic data and treatment parameters. Results A total of 210 patients with 257 lung lesions treated with SABR were evaluated. The median DPT was 14 days. Initial analysis revealed a discrepancy in LC as a function of DPT and a cutoff delay of 24 days (21 days for PET-CT almost systematically done 3 days after planning CT) was determined according to the Youden method. Cox model was applied to several predictors of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Univariate analysis showed LRFS decreasing significantly related to DPT ≥24 days (P = .0063), gross tumor volume, and clinical target volume (P = .0001 and P = .0022), but also with the presence of >1 lesion treated with the same planning CT (P = .024). LRFS increased significantly with higher biological effective dose (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, LRFS remained significantly lower for lesions with DPT ≥24 days (hazard ratio, 2.113; 95% confidence interval, 1.097-4.795; P = .027). Conclusions DPT to SABR treatment delivery for lung lesions appears to reduce local control. Timing from imaging acquisition to treatment delivery should be systematically reported and tested in future studies. Our experience suggests that the time from planning imaging to treatment should be <21 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Colin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium,Corresponding author: Gilles Colin, MD
| | - Selma Ben Mustapha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Jansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe Coucke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Laurence Seidel
- Department of Biostatistics, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Patrick Berkovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Levente Janvary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic lung metastases. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:995-1005. [PMID: 36097233 PMCID: PMC9529709 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01323-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Although systemic therapy is standard management for patients with metastatic disease, several recent reports have indicated that an addition of local therapies including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) could improve survival. The lung is the most common site of distant metastasis from many solid tumors, and the strategy of SBRT, such as dose-fraction schedules, timing, etc., would be different depending on the type of primary tumor, location, and patterns of OMD. This review describes the role of SBRT with curative-intent for patients with pulmonary OMD for each of these variables. First, differences according to the type of primary tumor, for which many studies suggest that SBRT-mediated local control (LC) for patients with pulmonary OMD from colorectal cancer (CRC) is less successful than for those from non-CRC tumors. In addition, higher dose-fraction schedules seemed to correlate with higher LC; hence, different SBRT treatment strategies may be needed for patients with pulmonary OMD from CRC relative to other tumors. Second, differences according to location, where the safety of SBRT for peripheral pulmonary tumors has been relatively well established, but safety for central pulmonary tumors including pulmonary OMD is still considered controversial. To determine the optimal dose-fraction schedules, further data from prospective studies are still needed. Third, differences according to the patterns of OMD, the number of metastases and the timing of SBRT whereby 1–5 lesions in most patients and patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD are considered good candidates for SBRT. We conclude that there are still several problems in defining suitable indications for local therapy including SBRT, and that further prospective studies are required to resolve these issues.
Collapse
|
10
|
Virbel G, Cox DG, Olland A, Falcoz PE, Le Fevre C, Schott R, Antoni D, Noel G. Outcome of lung oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body irradiation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:945189. [PMID: 36003767 PMCID: PMC9393880 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.945189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The oligometastatic stage is an intermediate stage of cancer between the localized stage and polymetastatic stage. The prognosis of patients in this stage also appears to be intermediate. Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy is a possible tool for treating oligometastatic lung sites. The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in terms of local control, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity of SBRT in oligometastatic patients with lung metastases from any solid primary tumor. Materials and methods Clinical records of consecutive lung oligometastatic patients treated between January 2010 and December 2020 for lung SBRT at 60 Gy in 3- or 8-fraction schedules and a controlled primary tumor were retrospectively analyzed. Results After a median follow-up of 20.3 months, local failure occurred for 14 lesions, 57 patients experienced lung progression, and 64 patients experienced disease progression. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 85.6 and 69.7%, respectively. Fifty-two patients experienced radiation pneumonitis, but only 2 patients were symptomatic and presented grade 2 late pneumonitis. No grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. ECOG 0 was the only prognostic factor for overall survival (HR = 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.8; p < 0.01). Conclusion SBRT with a 60-Gy schedule in 8 fractions is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with lung oligometastases from any solid primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Virbel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - David G. Cox
- IRFAC – Statistic Department, INSERM U1113, Strasbourg, France
- Research and Development in Precision Medicine, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Anne Olland
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Clara Le Fevre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Roland Schott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eriguchi T, Tsukamoto N, Kumabe A, Ogata T, Inoue Y, Sugawara A. Suitability of Metastatic Lung Tumors for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancer Invest 2021; 40:378-386. [PMID: 34894945 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2021.2017950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We investigated factors influencing local control of lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determined the type of lesions for which SBRT is more suitable. Ninety-six patients and 196 tumors were included. Median follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range 4.7-95.8). The two-year local recurrence rate was 15.2% (95% confidence interval: 10.2-21.3). Multivariate analysis revealed biological effective dose, ultracentral tumor location, reirradiation, and prior chemotherapy as significant factors. SBRT is suitable for lung metastases, especially for peripheral tumors and those located in the inner lung parenchyma. For ultracentral lesions and recurrent lesions after SBRT, metastasectomy is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahisa Eriguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.,Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, Kamakura, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Tsukamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Kumabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Takeru Ogata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Inoue
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Akitomo Sugawara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Virbel G, Le Fèvre C, Noël G, Antoni D. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients with Lung Oligometastatic Disease: A Five-Year Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3623. [PMID: 34298836 PMCID: PMC8303507 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
For several years, oligometastatic disease has represented an intermediate state between localized disease accessible to local treatment and multimetastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. The lung represents one of the most common metastatic locations. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) appears to be the treatment of choice for these patients. There are few data defining the place of radiotherapy and reporting outcome after SBRT in lung metastases. This 5-year review aimed to determine areas of SBRT usefulness and methods for the management of pulmonary metastasis in oligometastatic patients. A search for articles on PubMed allowed selection of the most relevant studies. Eighteen articles were selected according to pre-established criteria for this purpose. The analysis concludes that SBRT is an effective and safe treatment in selected patients when the disease remains localized from one to three organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Georges Noël
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, BP 23025, 67033 Strasbourg, France; (G.V.); (C.L.F.); (D.A.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ricco A, Barlow S, Feng J, Jacob J, Lozano A, Hanlon A, Arrigo S, Obayomi-Davies O, Lamond J, Yang J, Lanciano R. Repeat Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes, Toxicity, and Dosimetric Considerations. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:984-993. [PMID: 33083662 PMCID: PMC7557141 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lung reirradiation for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common for either recurrent disease or new primary cancer. Dose volume tolerance of the lung after multiple courses of radiation therapy (RT) is unknown. We review our experience with lung reirradiation for patients with NSCLC in a single community setting using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to report lung cumulative doses, survival, and toxicity. Methods and Materials Forty-four patients who received at least 2 curative courses of lung RT with the second course delivered between January 2012 and December 2017 were eligible. All patients had NSCLC and were treated with SBRT for reirradiation. Cumulative lung dose volume histograms for all courses were generated, summated, and converted into cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). Actuarial overall survival (OS), local control, and toxicity is reported, including a subset of patients who received more than 2 courses of SBRT. Results Median age of the group was 71 years (range, 51-87). Median survival of the entire group from diagnosis, first, and second courses of RT was 3.94, 3.03, and 2.03 years. Three-year actuarial OS for the entire group was 34.1% from second course of RT. The mean EQD2 Gy3 mean lung dose for all courses was 12.35 Gy (range, 2.7-26.52). The mean EQD2 Gy3 V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, V30Gy, and V40Gy were 40.9%, 25.5%, 14.7%, 10.2%, and 7.7%. Six-year actuarial freedom from grade ≥3 complications was 86.3%. The rate of grade ≥3 lung toxicity was 4.5% (2 of 44). Other late toxicities included grade 3 recurrent laryngeal nerve damage (n = 1) and grade 3 chest wall pain/rib fracture (n = 1). Overall, 32% of patients had more than 2 courses of RT to the lung (range, 3-7). Conclusions Long-term OS is possible with multiple RT courses to the lung for NSCLC with low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Ricco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Sara Barlow
- Drexel College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jing Feng
- Philadelphia CyberKnife, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Havertown, Pennsylvania
| | - Janson Jacob
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Alexandra Hanlon
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Stephen Arrigo
- Philadelphia CyberKnife, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Havertown, Pennsylvania
| | | | - John Lamond
- Philadelphia CyberKnife, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Havertown, Pennsylvania
| | - Jun Yang
- Philadelphia CyberKnife, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Havertown, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachelle Lanciano
- Philadelphia CyberKnife, Crozer-Keystone Health System, Havertown, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Cathail SM, Smith T, Owens R, Zeniou A, Tsang Y, Holyoake DLP, Murray L, Harrison M, Hawkins MA. Superior outcomes of nodal metastases compared to visceral sites in oligometastatic colorectal cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 151:280-286. [PMID: 32866563 PMCID: PMC7689579 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) is a radical option for oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but most data relate to visceral metastases. METHODS A prospective, multi-centre database of CRC patients treated with SBRT was interrogated. Inclusion criteria were ECOG PS 0-2, ≤3 sites of disease, a disease free interval of >6 months unless synchronous liver metastases. Primary endpoints were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS 163 patients (172 metastases) were analysed. The median FU was 16 months (IQR 12.2-22.85). The LC at 1 year was 83.8% (CI 76.4%-91.9%) with a PFS of 55% (CI 47%-64.7%) respectively. LC at 1 year was 90% (CI 83%-99%) for nodal metastases (NM), 75% (63%-90%) for visceral metastases (VM). NM had improved median PFS (9 vs 19 months) [HR 0.6, CI 0.38-0.94, p = 0.032] and median OS (32 months vs not reached) [HR 0.28, CI 0.18-0.7, p = 0.0062] than VM, regardless of whether the NM were located inside or outside the pelvis. On multivariate analysis, NM and ECOG PS 0 were significant good prognostic factors. An exploratory analysis suggests KRAS WT is also a good prognostic factor. CONCLUSION Nodal site is an important prognostic determinant of SBRT that should incorporated into patient selection. We hypothesise this may have an immunoediting basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rob Owens
- Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|