1
|
Zheng X, Zhang L, Wu L, Zhao J, Sun J, Fang Y, Zhou J, Chu Q, Shen Y, Yang Z, Chen L, Huang M, Lin X, Liu Z, Shen P, Wang Z, Wang X, Wang H, Han Z, Liu A, Zhang H, Ye F, Gao W, Wu F, Song Z, Chen S, Zhou C, Wang Q, Xu C, Huang D, Zheng X, Miao Q, Jiang K, Xu Y, Wu S, Wang H, Zhang Q, Yang S, Li Y, Chen S, Lin G. Baseline C-reactive protein predicts efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1244. [PMID: 38104105 PMCID: PMC10725584 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11737-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the predictive value of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study spanning from January 2016 to December 2020, advanced LSCC patients initially treated with chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and ICI were categorized into normal and elevated CRP subgroups. The relationship between CRP levels and treatment outcomes was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and multivariate logistic regression, focusing primarily on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint, and secondarily on overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) endpoints. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test used for comparison between groups. RESULTS Of the 245 patients evaluated, the 105 who received a combination of chemotherapy and ICI with elevated baseline CRP levels exhibited a significant reduction in PFS (median 6.5 months vs. 11.8 months, HR, 1.78; 95% CI: 1.12-2.81; p = 0.013) compared to those with normal CRP levels. Elevated CRP was identified as an independent risk factor for poor PFS through multivariate-adjusted analysis. However, among the 140 patients receiving chemotherapy alone, baseline CRP levels did not significantly influence PFS. Furthermore, within the combination therapy group, there was a notable decrease in the ORR (51% vs. 71%, p = 0.035), coupled with a significantly shorter OS (median 20.9 months vs. 31.5 months, HR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.13-4.44; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION In patients with advanced LSCC, elevated baseline CRP levels were identified as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of combination therapy with chemotherapy and ICI, but not in chemotherapy alone. This suggests that CRP may be a valuable biomarker for guiding treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinlong Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Longfeng Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lin Wu
- The Second Department of Thoracic Oncology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Sun
- Cancer Institute, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jin Zhou
- School of Medicine, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qian Chu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yihong Shen
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhenzhou Yang
- Department of Cancer Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lijin Chen
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Quanzhou First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Meijuan Huang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoyan Lin
- Department of Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Provincial Clinical College, Fujian Medical University, Fujian provincial hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Peng Shen
- Department of Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijie Wang
- Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Huijuan Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhengbo Han
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Anwen Liu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Airforce Military Medical University, Xian, Shanxi, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fang Wu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhengbo Song
- Department of Clinical Trial, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shengchi Chen
- Department of Oncology, Nanping First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China
| | - Chenzhi Zhou
- Respiratory Medicine Department, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chunwei Xu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University Nanjing, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Dingzhi Huang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaobin Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qian Miao
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Kan Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yiquan Xu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shiwen Wu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Haibo Wang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiuyu Zhang
- Institute of Immunotherapy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shanshan Yang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yujing Li
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Sihui Chen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Gen Lin
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis, Fuzhou, China.
- Interdisciplinary Institute for Medical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Piggott LM, Hayes C, Greene J, Fitzgerald DB. Malignant pleural disease. Breathe (Sheff) 2023; 19:230145. [PMID: 38351947 PMCID: PMC10862126 DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0145-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural disease represents a growing healthcare burden. Malignant pleural effusion affects approximately 1 million people globally per year, causes disabling breathlessness and indicates a shortened life expectancy. Timely diagnosis is imperative to relieve symptoms and optimise quality of life, and should give consideration to individual patient factors. This review aims to provide an overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis and suggested diagnostic pathways in malignant pleural disease, to outline management options for malignant pleural effusion and malignant pleural mesothelioma, highlighting the need for a holistic approach, and to discuss potential challenges including non-expandable lung and septated effusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Piggott
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Conor Hayes
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- These authors contributed equally
| | - John Greene
- Department of Oncology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong T, Fuld AD, Feller-Kopman DJ. Malignant Pleural Effusions in the Era of Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenic Therapy. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2023. [PMID: 37308114 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) have historically been associated with a poor prognosis, and patients often require a series of invasive procedures and hospitalizations that significantly reduce quality of life at the terminus of life. However, advances in the management of MPE have coincided with the era of immunotherapies, and to a lesser extent, antiangiogenic therapies for the treatment of lung cancer. Landmark studies have shown these drugs to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with lung cancer, but a paucity of phase III trial data exists for the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on lung cancers associated with MPE. This review will focus on the leading studies investigating the impact of ICI and antiangiogenic therapies in patients with lung cancer and MPE. The diagnostic and prognostic values of vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin expression levels in malignancy will also be discussed. These advancements are changing the paradigm of MPE management from palliation to treatment for the first time since 1767 when MPE was first reported. The future holds the promise of durable response and extended survival in patients with MPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terrence Wong
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Alexander D Fuld
- Department of Medicine and Medical Education, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - David J Feller-Kopman
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goto Y, Tamura A, Matsumoto H, Isobe K, Ozaki T, Santorelli ML, Taniguchi K, Kamitani T, Irisawa M, Kanda K, Abe M, Burke T, Nokihara H. First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression Greater Than or Equal to 50%: Real-World Study Including Older Patients in Japan. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022; 3:100397. [PMID: 36065450 PMCID: PMC9440307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pembrolizumab became available in Japan in February 2017 for first-line monotherapy of unresectable advanced and metastatic NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than or equal to 50%. This retrospective chart review study aimed to describe real-world clinical outcomes of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, including for patients 75 years or older, who are under-represented in clinical trials. Methods We identified patients (≥20 y old) at 23 sites initiating first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy from July 1, 2017, to December 20, 2018, for stages IIIB, IIIC, and IV NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS greater than or equal to 50% and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 or unknown. Patients with actionable genomic alterations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF) and clinical trial participants were excluded. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier, with data cutoff on September 30, 2019. Results Of 441 eligible patients (78% men), 303 (69%) were younger than 75 years and 138 (31%) were 75 years or older; median age was 70 years. With median follow-up of 13.5 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR); 12- and 24-month OS rates were 72% and 58%, respectively. For ages younger than 75 and 75 years or older, median OS was NR and 23.5 months (95% confidence interval: 16.2–NR), respectively; 12-month OS rates were 74% and 67% and 24-month OS rates were 62% and 48%, respectively. Median real-world progression-free survival was similar in the two age groups (10.1 and 9.5 mo, respectively), as was median real-world time on treatment with pembrolizumab (5.7 and 5.6 mo). Conclusions These findings complement clinical trial results, adding real-world evidence supporting benefits of first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS greater than or equal to 50%, including for patients 75 years or older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Goto
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Corresponding author. Address for correspondence: Yasushi Goto, MD, PhD, Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Atsuhisa Tamura
- Center for Pulmonary Diseases, National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Matsumoto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Isobe
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Ozaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Kishiwada City Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Melissa L. Santorelli
- Center for Observational & Real World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Burke
- Center for Observational & Real World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey
| | - Hiroshi Nokihara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
- Present Address: Respiratory Medicine, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakagawa N, Kawakami M. Choosing the optimal immunotherapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical factors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:952393. [PMID: 36033471 PMCID: PMC9414869 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.952393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically since the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although some patients achieve long survival with relatively mild toxicities, not all patients experience such benefits from ICI treatment. There are several ways to use ICIs in NSCLC patients, including monotherapy, combination immunotherapy, and combination chemoimmunotherapy. Decision-making in the selection of an ICI treatment regimen for NSCLC is complicated partly because of the absence of head-to-head prospective comparisons. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is currently considered a standard biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs, although some limitations exist. In addition to the PD-L1 tumor proportion score, many other clinical factors should also be considered to determine the optimal treatment strategy for each patient, including age, performance status, histological subtypes, comorbidities, status of oncogenic driver mutation, and metastatic sites. Nevertheless, evidence of the efficacy and safety of ICIs with some specific conditions of these factors is insufficient. Indeed, patients with poor performance status, oncogenic driver mutations, or interstitial lung disease have frequently been set as ineligible in randomized clinical trials of NSCLC. ICI use in these patients is controversial and remains to be discussed. It is important to select patients for whom ICIs can benefit the most from these populations. In this article, we review previous reports of clinical trials or experience in using ICIs in NSCLC, focusing on several clinical factors that are associated with treatment outcomes, and then discuss the optimal ICI treatment strategies for NSCLC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Scheiner B, Pomej K, Kirstein MM, Hucke F, Finkelmeier F, Waidmann O, Himmelsbach V, Schulze K, von Felden J, Fründt TW, Stadler M, Heinzl H, Shmanko K, Spahn S, Radu P, Siebenhüner AR, Mertens JC, Rahbari NN, Kütting F, Waldschmidt DT, Ebert MP, Teufel A, De Dosso S, Pinato DJ, Pressiani T, Meischl T, Balcar L, Müller C, Mandorfer M, Reiberger T, Trauner M, Personeni N, Rimassa L, Bitzer M, Trojan J, Weinmann A, Wege H, Dufour JF, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Vogel A, Pinter M. Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy - development and validation of the CRAFITY score. J Hepatol 2022; 76:353-363. [PMID: 34648895 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Immunotherapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic front-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, biomarkers that predict treatment success and survival remain an unmet need. METHODS Patients with HCC put on PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy were included in a training set (n = 190; 6 European centers) and a validation set (n = 102; 8 European centers). We investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on overall survival using a Cox model in the training set and developed the easily applicable CRAFITY (CRP and AFP in ImmunoTherapY) score. The score was validated in the independent, external cohort, and evaluated in a cohort of patients treated with sorafenib (n = 204). RESULTS Baseline serum alpha-fetoprotein ≥100 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 1.7; p = 0.007) and C-reactive protein ≥1 mg/dl (HR, 1.7; p = 0.007) were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis and were used to develop the CRAFITY score. Patients who fulfilled no criterion (0 points; CRAFITY-low) had the longest median overall survival (27.6 (95% CI 19.5-35.8) months), followed by those fulfilling 1 criterion (1 point; CRAFITY-intermediate; 11.3 (95% CI 8.0-14.6) months), and patients meeting both criteria (2 points; CRAFITY-high; 6.4 (95% CI 4.8-8.1) months; p <0.001). Additionally, best radiological response (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease) was significantly better in patients with lower CRAFITY score (CRAFITY-low: 9%/20%/52%/20% vs. CRAFITY-intermediate: 3%/25%/36%/36% vs. CRAFITY-high: 2%/15%/22%/61%; p = 0.003). These results were confirmed in the independent validation set and in different subgroups, including Child-Pugh A and B, performance status 0 and ≥1, and first-line and later lines. In the sorafenib cohort, CRAFITY was associated with survival, but not radiological response. CONCLUSIONS The CRAFITY score is associated with survival and radiological response in patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. The score may help with patient counseling but requires prospective validation. LAY SUMMARY The immunotherapy-based regimen of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab represents the new standard of care in systemic first-line therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Biomarkers to predict treatment outcome are an unmet need in patients undergoing immunotherapy for HCC. We developed and externally validated a score that predicts outcome in patients with HCC undergoing immunotherapy with immune checkpoint blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Scheiner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Pomej
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Florian Hucke
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG), Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology and Nephrology including Centralized Emergency Department (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Fabian Finkelmeier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Oliver Waidmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Vera Himmelsbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Kornelius Schulze
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johann von Felden
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thorben W Fründt
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Stadler
- Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Harald Heinzl
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kateryna Shmanko
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephan Spahn
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Pompilia Radu
- Hepatology-Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander R Siebenhüner
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
| | - Joachim C Mertens
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery at University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Fabian Kütting
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Matthias P Ebert
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPDBW), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Teufel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPDBW), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Hepatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sara De Dosso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, UK; Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Tiziana Pressiani
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Tobias Meischl
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lorenz Balcar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Müller
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mattias Mandorfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Christian-Doppler Laboratory for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases, Vienna, Austria; CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicola Personeni
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Henning Wege
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Cancer Center Esslingen, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 Esslingen am Neckar, Germany
| | - Jean-François Dufour
- Hepatology-Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG), Hepatology, Endocrinology, Rheumatology and Nephrology including Centralized Emergency Department (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prognostic value of total tumour volume, adding necrosis to metabolic tumour volume, in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:224-234. [DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
8
|
Healey Bird B, Nally K, Ronan K, Clarke G, Amu S, Almeida AS, Flavin R, Finn S. Cancer Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Biomarkers of Response and Toxicity; Current Limitations and Future Promise. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:124. [PMID: 35054292 PMCID: PMC8775044 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies that are used to treat over one in three cancer patients. While they have changed the natural history of disease, prolonging life and preserving quality of life, they are highly active in less than 40% of patients, even in the most responsive malignancies such as melanoma, and cause significant autoimmune side effects. Licenced biomarkers include tumour Programmed Death Ligand 1 expression by immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and tumour mutational burden, none of which are particularly sensitive or specific. Emerging tumour and immune tissue biomarkers such as novel immunohistochemistry scores, tumour, stromal and immune cell gene expression profiling, and liquid biomarkers such as systemic inflammatory markers, kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, circulating immune cells, cytokines and DNA are discussed in this review. We also examine the influence of the faecal microbiome on treatment outcome and its use as a biomarker of response and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Healey Bird
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
- Bon Secours Hospital, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
| | - Ken Nally
- School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland;
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland; (G.C.); (A.S.A.)
| | - Karine Ronan
- Department of Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Gerard Clarke
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland; (G.C.); (A.S.A.)
- Department of Psychiatry, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
| | - Sylvie Amu
- Cancer Research at UCC, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland;
| | - Ana S. Almeida
- APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland; (G.C.); (A.S.A.)
| | - Richard Flavin
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland; (R.F.); (S.F.)
- St. James’s Hospital Dublin, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Stephen Finn
- Department of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland; (R.F.); (S.F.)
- St. James’s Hospital Dublin, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boudou-Rouquette P, Arrondeau J, Gervais C, Durand JP, Fabre E, De Percin S, Villeminey CV, Piketty AC, Rassy N, Ulmann G, Damotte D, Mansuet-Lupo A, Giraud F, Alifano M, Wislez M, Alexandre J, Jouinot A, Goldwasser F. Development and validation of a host-dependent, PDL1-independent, biomarker to predict 6-month progression-free survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the CERTIM Cohort: The ELY study. EBioMedicine 2021; 73:103630. [PMID: 34688030 PMCID: PMC8536532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are dramatically active in a minority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We studied here the relationship between patients's metabolism and outcome under ICI. Methods Metastatic NSCLC patients underwent a nutritional assessment prior to initiating immunotherapy. Resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured (mREE) using ambulatory indirect calorimetry and compared with the theoretical value (tREE) provided by the Harris and Benedict formula. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) based on investigator review per RECIST v1.1. and overall survival (OS). The association of patient's metabolism with 6-month PFS was first explored in a single-center training cohort to estimate the effect size. The relationship between patient's metabolism and 6-month PFS was then tested in an independent non interventional observational prospective cohort (ELY) of 100 patients recruited in two tertiary university centers. Findings In the entire cohort, the ORR was 14% for the hypermetabolic group (n = 10/74) vs 38% for the normometabolic group (n = 26/68), respectively (estimated difference 25%, 95CI 9–40%, p = 0.001). The DCR was 28% for the hypermetabolic group (n = 21/74) vs 53% for the normometabolic group (n = 36/68), respectively (estimated difference 25%, 95CI 7–42%, p = 0.005). In the validation cohort (100 patients, 2 centers), normometabolic patients (defined as mREE/tREE < 110%) had increased 6-month PFS (57% versus 22%; odds ratio: 4.76; IC95 [1.87 – 12.89]; p<0.001) and improved overall survival (HR 2.20; IC95: 1.41–3.44; p<0.001). The positive and negative predictive values of normometabolism to identify non-progressive patients at 6 months, were 57% and 78% respectively, sensitivity was 72% and specificity was 66%. In multivariate analysis including PD-L1 tumor status, basal metabolism was an independent predictive factor for 6-month PFS. Interpretation Normometabolism is a new independent parameter to identify mNSCLC patients who will benefit from ICI, with both improved tumor response, 6-month PFS, and survival. Funding This work was supported by Baxter (04012016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - Jennifer Arrondeau
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Claire Gervais
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Durand
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Thoracic Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM); Paris University, France
| | - Elizabeth Fabre
- Thoracic Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM); Paris University, France
| | - Sixtine De Percin
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Clémentine Vaquin Villeminey
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Anne-Catherine Piketty
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Rassy
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Ulmann
- Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Clinical Chemistry, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France; URP 4466 PRETRAM, AP-HP, Paris University, France
| | - Diane Damotte
- Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Pathology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France; Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM U1138, Paris University, France
| | - Audrey Mansuet-Lupo
- Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Pathology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France; Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM U1138, Paris University, France
| | - Frédérique Giraud
- Molecular Genetics Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France
| | - Marco Alifano
- Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Thoracic Surgery Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France
| | - Marie Wislez
- Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; Pneumology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris University, France
| | - Jérôme Alexandre
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Anne Jouinot
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Goldwasser
- Medical Oncology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP; Cancer Research for PErsonalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris, France; Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study group (CERTIM), Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France; URP 4466 PRETRAM, AP-HP, Paris University, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moeller M, Adner J, Schuette W, Krueger M. [30- and 90-day Lethality in Patients with Stage IV Lung Cancer Depending on the Primary Therapy]. Pneumologie 2021; 75:950-959. [PMID: 34298565 DOI: 10.1055/a-1534-1339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Early lethality after initiation of therapy in patients with stage IV lung cancer has rarely been the focus of scientific studies yet. The little time remaining between diagnosis, start of therapy and onset of death, as well as any influencing factors, are of special interest for both, patients and physician. Accordingly, the aim of this work was to analyze the 30- and 90-day morbidity after initiation of systemic therapy and to determine possible factors influencing early lethality. For this purpose, the data of 225 patients with stage IV lung cancer and treatment at the Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau Lung Cancer Center between 01/01/2017 and 05/18/2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Forms of therapy and patient characteristics were analyzed with a frequency distribution and the probability of survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The analysis of the early morbidity of all tumor-specifically treated patients showed a morbidity of 8.5 % at day 30 after the start of therapy and a rate of 23.5 % after 90 days. In a direct comparison of the different therapy groups, the patients receiving mono-checkpointinhibition had higher lethality (16.6 % after 30 days and 44.3 % after 90 days). In contrast, the morbidity of patients in the other therapy groups remained below 10 % after 30 days and below 23.3 % after 90 days. A poor general condition, an advanced tumor disease, polymetastasis and a positive history of smoking could be determined as predictors for higher early lethality. In contrast, there was no relevant difference in morbidity between the different tumor entities, gender, PD-L1 and mutation status. With this analysis, very high early lethality, comparable to other studies, could be detected in patients with lung cancer. Relevant differences between the forms of therapy illustrate the importance of individual patient selection for the respective therapy options and the rapid decision to initiate therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Moeller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau
| | - Juliane Adner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau
| | | | - Marcus Krueger
- Klinik für Thorxchirurgie, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tomasik B, Bieńkowski M, Braun M, Popat S, Dziadziuszko R. Effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with ECOG PS score ≥2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2021; 158:97-106. [PMID: 34144405 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard of care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however their status in patients with poor performance status (PS) is poorly defined. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs in NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational studies, which reported efficacy and safety data on ICIs in PS ≥ 2 comparing to PS ≤ 1 NSCLC patients. Efficacy endpoints included: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease-Control Rate (DCR), Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Safety endpoint was the incidence of severe (grade≥3) Adverse Events (AE). Random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020162668). FINDINGS Sixty-seven studies (n = 26,442 patients) were included. In PS ≥ 2 vs. PS ≤ 1 patients, the pooled odds ratios were: for ORR 0.46 (95 %CI: 0.39-0.54, I2:0 %); for DCR 0.39 (95 %CI: 0.33-0.48, I2:50 %) and for AEs 1.12 (95 %CI: 0.84-1.48, I2:39 %). The pooled hazard ratio for PFS was 2.17 (95 %CI: 1.96-2.39, I2:65 %) and for OS was 2.76 (95 %CI: 2.43-3.14, I2:76 %). The safety profile was comparable regardless of the PS status. INTERPRETATION Patients with impaired PS status are, on average, twice less likely to achieve a response when exposed to ICIs when compared with representative PS ≤ 1 population. For lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, the impaired PS is not only prognostic, but also predictive for response, while the safety profile is not affected. Prospective randomized studies are indispensable to determine whether poor PS patients derive benefit from ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartłomiej Tomasik
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, 15 Mazowiecka Street, 92-215 Łódź, Poland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michał Bieńkowski
- Department of Pathomorphology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 17 Smoluchowskiego Street, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Marcin Braun
- Department of Pathology, Chair of Oncology, Medical University of Łódź, Pomorska 251 Street, 92-213 Łódź, Poland
| | - Sanjay Popat
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK; National Hearth and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK
| | - Rafał Dziadziuszko
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 7 Debinki Street, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Facchinetti F, Di Maio M, Perrone F, Tiseo M. First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2917-2936. [PMID: 34295688 PMCID: PMC8264315 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) patients is limited. METHODS We search PubMed and the proceedings of international oncology meetings to perform a systematic review to assess the outcomes poor PS NSCLC patients who received ICIs as first-line treatment. A meta-analysis included retrospective studies focusing on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC. We reported the global objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and landmark progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) in ECOG PS ≥2 and 0-1 patients, respectively. RESULTS Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-two retrospective studies focused on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% cases. In total, 1,030 out of 5,357 (19%) of patients across 30 studies presented with a PS ≥2 at pembrolizumab initiation. In 18 studies with detailed clinical information, worse outcomes in poor PS compared to good PS patients were documented. The meta-analysis revealed that ORR and DCR within the PS ≥2 patient population were 30.9% and 41.5% respectively (55.2% and 71.5% in PS 0-1 patients). The rates of PFS (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) and OS (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) were approximately double in the good PS compared to the poor PS group of patients. In the three prospective trials where of ICIs in PS 2 populations, the diverse strictness in PS definition likely contributed to the differential outcomes observed. Six retrospective studies dealt with chemo-immunotherapy combinations. CONCLUSIONS Still with limited prospective evidence sustaining the role of immunotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC with poor PS, 19% of patients in retrospective series dealing with pembrolizumab in PD-L1 ≥50% tumors had an ECOG PS ≥2. Clinical effort encompassing the definition of poor PS, of the factors conditioning it, and the development of dedicated treatment strategies is required to improve the outcomes in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Facchinetti
- Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs et Nouvelles, Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, Villejuif, France
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabiana Perrone
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy;,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tumor metabolic volume by 18F-FDG-PET as a prognostic predictor of first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50. Sci Rep 2020; 10:14990. [PMID: 32929123 PMCID: PMC7490347 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71735-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a lack of markers for predicting favorable outcomes after pembrolizumab therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. This retrospective study examined the prognostic significance of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) uptake as a predictive marker of first-line pembrolizumab. Forty-eight patients with previously untreated NSCLC and PD-L1 expression levels ≥ 50% who underwent 18F-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) just before administration of pembrolizumab monotherapy were eligible and underwent assessment of metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and maximum of standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-FDG uptake. The objective response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 51.1%, 7.1 months, and 18.6 months, respectively. In univariate survival analyses, high MTV was barely a significant prognostic predictor and was confirmed as an independent factor linked to worse outcomes in multivariate analysis, predominantly in patients with a histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. A high MTV was significantly associated with distant metastases (especially bone metastasis), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and PD-L1 expression ≥ 75%. Metabolic tumor activity assessed as MTV from 18F-FDG uptake predicted the prognosis after first-line pembrolizumab treatment in patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, especially for adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|