Downregulation of CCL22 and mutated NOTCH1 in tongue and mouth floor squamous cell carcinoma results in decreased Th2 cell recruitment and expression, predicting poor clinical outcome

Deciphering a Prognostic Signature Based on Soluble Mediators Defines the Immune Landscape and Predicts Prognosis in HNSCC

BACKGROUND

The study on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and aggressive form of head and neck cancer, focuses on the often-overlooked role of soluble mediators. The objective is to leverage a transcriptome-based risk analysis utilizing soluble mediator-related genes (SMRGs) to provide novel insights into prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in HNSCC patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression and prognostic significance of 10,859 SMRGs using 502 HNSCC and 44 normal samples from the TCGA-HNSC cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The samples were divided into training and test sets in a 7:3 ratio, with an additional external validation using 40 tumor samples from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC). Key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with prognostic significance were identified through univariate and Lasso-Cox regression analyses. A prognostic model based on 20 SMRGs was developed using Lasso and multivariate Cox regression. We assessed the clinical outcomes and immune status in high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) HNSCC patients utilizing the BEST databases and single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA).

RESULTS

The 20 SMRGs were crucial in predicting the prognosis of HNSCC, with the SMRG signature emerging as an independent prognostic indicator. Patients classified in the HR group exhibited poorer outcomes compared to those in the LR group. A nomogram, integrating clinical characteristics and risk scores, demonstrated substantial prognostic value. Immunotherapy appeared to be more effective in the LR group, possibly attributed to enhanced immune infiltration and expression of immune checkpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The model based on soluble mediator-associated genes offers a fresh perspective for assessing the pre-immune efficacy and showcases robust predictive capabilities. This innovative approach holds significant promise in advancing the field of precision immuno-oncology research, providing valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies in HNSCC.

Downstream STING pathways IRF3 and NF-κB differentially regulate CCL22 in response to cytosolic dsDNA

Double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is abnormal and typically indicates the presence of pathogens or mislocalized self-DNA. Multiple sensors detect cytosolic dsDNA and trigger robust immune responses via activation of type I interferons. Several cancer immunotherapy treatments also activate cytosolic nucleic acid sensing pathways, including oncolytic viruses, nucleic acid-based cancer vaccines, and pharmacological agonists. We report here that cytosolic dsDNA introduced into malignant cells can robustly upregulate expression of CCL22, a chemokine responsible for the recruitment of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs in the tumor microenvironment are thought to repress anti-tumor immune responses and contribute to tumor immune evasion. Surprisingly, we found that CCL22 upregulation by dsDNA was mediated primarily by interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), a key transcription factor that activates type I interferons. This finding was unexpected given previous reports that type I interferon alpha (IFN-α) inhibits CCL22 and that IRF3 is associated with strong anti-tumor immune responses, not Treg recruitment. We also found that CCL22 upregulation by dsDNA occurred concurrently with type I interferon beta (IFN-β) upregulation. IRF3 is one of two transcription factors downstream of the STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING), a hub adaptor protein through which multiple dsDNA sensors transmit their signals. The other transcription factor downstream of STING, NF-κB, has been reported to regulate CCL22 expression in other contexts, and NF-κB has also been associated with multiple pro-tumor functions, including Treg recruitment. However, we found that NF-κB in the context of activation by cytosolic dsDNA contributed minimally to CCL22 upregulation compared with IRF3. Lastly, we observed that two strains of the same cell line differed profoundly in their capacity to upregulate CCL22 and IFN-β in response to dsDNA, despite apparent STING activation in both cell lines. This finding suggests that during tumor evolution, cells can acquire, or lose, the ability to upregulate CCL22. This study adds to our understanding of factors that may modulate immune activation in response to cytosolic DNA and has implications for immunotherapy strategies that activate DNA sensing pathways in cancer cells.

Identification and Biological Validation of a Chemokine/Chemokine Receptor-Based Risk Model for Predicting Immunotherapeutic Response and Prognosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Over 80% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients failed to respond to immunotherapy, which can likely be attributed to the tumor microenvironment (TME) remolding mediated by chemokines/chemokine receptors (C/CR). This study aimed to establish a C/CR-based risk model for better immunotherapeutic responses and prognosis. After assessing the characteristic patterns of the C/CR cluster from the TCGA-HNSCC cohort, a six-gene C/CR-based risk model was developed to stratify patients by LASSO Cox analysis. The screened genes were multidimensionally validated by RT-qPCR, scRNA-seq, and protein data. A total of 30.4% of patients in the low-risk group had better responses to anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the low-risk group had longer overall survival. A time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox analyses indicated that risk score served as an independent predictive indicator. The robustness of the immunotherapy response and prognosis prediction was also validated in independent external datasets. Additionally, the TME landscape revealed that the low-risk group was immune activated. Furthermore, the cell communication analysis on the scRNA-seq dataset revealed that cancer-associated fibroblasts were the main communicators within the C/CR ligand-receptor network of TME. Collectively, The C/CR-based risk model simultaneously predicted immunotherapeutic response and prognosis, potentially optimizing personalized therapeutic strategies of HNSCC.

Comprehensive analyses identify RIPOR2 as a genomic instability-associated immune prognostic biomarker in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) is a malignancy that tends to have a poor prognosis when detected at an advanced stage; however, there are few studies on the early detection of CC at the genetic level. The tumor microenvironment (TME) and genomic instability (GI) greatly affect the survival of tumor patients via effects on carcinogenesis, tumor growth, and resistance. It is necessary to identify biomarkers simultaneously correlated with components of the TME and with GI, as these could predict the survival of patients and the efficacy of immunotherapy. In this study, we extracted somatic mutational data and transcriptome information of CC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and the GSE44001 dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database was downloaded for external verification. Stromal components differed most between genomic unstable and genomic stable groups. Differentially expressed genes were screened out on the basis of GI and StromalScore, using somatic mutation information and ESTIMATE methods. We obtained the intersection of GI- and StromalScore-related genes and used them to establish a four-gene signature comprising RIPOR2, CCL22, PAMR1, and FBN1 for prognostic prediction. We described immunogenomic characteristics using this risk model, with methods including CIBERSORT, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and single-sample GSEA. We further explored the protective factor RIPOR2, which has a close relationship with ImmuneScore. A series of in vitro experiments, including immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, transwell assay, CCK8 assay, EdU assay, cell cycle detection, colony formation assay, and Western blotting were performed to validate RIPOR2 as an anti-tumor signature. Combined with integrative bioinformatic analyses, these experiments showed a strong relationship between RIPOR2 with tumor mutation burden, expression of genes related to DNA damage response (especially PARP1), TME-related scores, activation of immune checkpoint activation, and efficacy of immunotherapy. To summarize, RIPOR2 was successfully identified through comprehensive analyses of the TME and GI as a potential biomarker for forecasting the prognosis and immunotherapy response, which could guide clinical strategies for the treatment of CC patients.

An Immune-Related Gene Signature Can Predict Clinical Outcomes and Immunotherapeutic Response in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objective: Immune landscape is a key feature that affects cancer progression, survival, and treatment response. Herein, this study sought to comprehensively characterize the immune-related genes (IRGs) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and conduct an immune-related risk score (IRS) model for prognosis and therapeutic response prediction.

Methods: Transcriptome profiles and follow-up data of OSCC cohorts were curated from TCGA, GSE41613, and IMvigor210 datasets. An IRS model was established through univariate Cox, Random Survival Forest, and multivariate Cox analyses. Prognostic significance was evaluated with Kaplan–Meier curves, ROC, uni- and multivariate Cox, and subgroup analyses. A nomogram was conducted and assessed with C-index, ROC, calibration curves, and decision curve analyses. Immune cell infiltration and immune response were estimated with ESTIMATE and ssGSEA methods.

Results: An IRS model was constructed for predicting the overall survival and disease-free survival of OSCC, containing MASP1, HBEGF, CCL22, CTSG, LBP, and PLAU. High-risk patients displayed undesirable prognosis, and the predictive efficacy of this model was more accurate than conventional clinicopathological indicators. Multivariate Cox analyses demonstrated that this model was an independent risk factor. The nomogram combining IRS, stage, and age possessed high clinical application values. The IRS was positively associated with a nonflamed tumor microenvironment. Moreover, this signature enabled to predict immunotherapeutic response and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents (methotrexate and paclitaxel).

Conclusion: Collectively, our study developed a robust IRS model with machine learning method to stratify OSCC patients into subgroups with distinct prognosis and benefits from immunotherapy, which might assist identify biomarkers and targets for immunotherapeutic schemes.