The efficiency of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging and 18- FDG PET/CT in response assessment in rectosigmoid carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging (IVIM- DKI) in response assessment of rectosigmoid carcinoma to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) and compare with 18-FDG PET/CT parameters.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients of recto-sigmoid cancer on CRT underwent baseline staging and follow-up with IVIM - DKI. Out of this cohort, 20 patients underwent 18-FDG PET/CT. IVIM- DKI MRI and PET/CT parameters were noted from both pre and post-chemoradiotherapy (done at 6 weeks after completion) scans. Quantitative IVIM-DKI parameters, viz. apparent (ADC) and molecular (D) diffusion coefficient, perfusion coefficient (f), and kurtosis (K) were measured from non-necrotic areas and semi-quantitative PET parameters including SUV max, SUV ratio, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were also measured. All these parameters correlated with the patient's response keeping RECIST 1.1 criteria as reference standard.

RESULTS

A statistically significant increase in D and ADC with a significant decline in K was noted after therapy in the entire cohort. These changes were observed in both responders as well as non-responders. No significant differences were observed in the percentage changes of these parameters post therapy amongst both groups. Among 20 patients with follow-up PET/CT imaging, a significant decline in all parameters of primary lesion was seen post-therapy. Responders (n = 12) showed a significant decline in MTV and TLG from baseline after therapy, whereas non-responders did not show any such decline. Change in TLG (ɗ TLG), followed by ɗ MTV had the strongest correlation with a positive response. A ɗ TLG value of ≥ 54.19 carried a 79% sensitivity and 83% specificity in differentiating responders from non responders.

CONCLUSION

18-FDG PET/CT is a more accurate single modality for assessing both response and tumor burden post therapy, while ADC and D from IVIM MRI are useful adjuncts to response assessment.

Role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Evaluation of Tumor Response to Chemoradiation Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Objectives

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative/palliative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for advanced colorectal cancer; including metastatic cancer at primary presentation and recurrent cancers with local and/or distant metastasis.

Materials and Methods

Fifty patients with advanced rectal cancer underwent two point imaging with 18 FDG PET-CT before and after 3 weeks of completion of preoperative/palliative CRT in between 2016 and 2022. Patients with locally recurrent cancer also underwent radical surgery. The assessment consisted of the evaluation of the following metabolic PET parameters: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVratio, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Response was assessed among the followed patients using RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Observations and Results

There was a significant decline in the mean post therapy SUVmax and SUVratio as compared to baseline (P = 0.0001). Twenty-six out of 50 (52%) patients were classified as responders. A significant decrease in all parameters (SUVmax, SUVratio, TLG, and MTV) from baseline was observed in responders of the study when comparing with nonresponders (P < 0.05). Besides SUVmax and SUVratio, the mean posttherapy TLG was significantly reduced in responders than nonresponders (P = 0.0065).

Conclusion

PET-CT is a useful combined anatomic and functional imaging modality in monitoring tumor response to preoperative/palliative CRT in advanced rectal cancer, whether primary or recurrent, including metastatic cancers at presentation. Posttherapy SUV and TLG in particular are significantly associated with treatment response.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Treated With Proton Beam Therapy

Purpose

Our objective was to report the outcome and prognostic factors for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) at our institution.

Methods and Materials

The study included PBT-treated patients with LRRC between December 2008 and December 2019. Treatment response was stratified using an initial imaging test after PBT. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Each outcome's prognostic factors were verified using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled (median follow-up, 37.4 months). There were 11 patients with complete response (CR) or complete metabolic response (CMR), 8 with partial response or partial metabolic response, 2 with stable disease or stable metabolic response, and 2 with progressive disease or progressive metabolic disease. Three- and 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 72.1% and 44.6%, 37.9% and 37.9%, and 55.0% and 47.2%, respectively, with 54.4 months' median survival time. The maximum standardized uptake value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) before PBT (cutoff value, 10) showed significant differences in OS (P = .03), PFS (P = .027), and LC (P = .012). The patients who achieved CR or CMR after PBT had significantly better LC than those with non-CR or non-CMR (hazard ratio, 4.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-17.63; P = .021). Older patients (aged ≥65 years) had significantly higher LC and PFS rates. Patients with pain before PBT and larger tumors (≥30 mm) also had significantly lower PFS. Of 23 patients, 12 (52%) experienced further local recurrence after PBT. One patient developed grade 2 acute radiation dermatitis. Regarding late toxicity, grade 4 late gastrointestinal toxic effects were recorded in 3 patients, in 2 of whom reirradiation was associated with further local recurrence after PBT.

Conclusions

The results showed that PBT may have potential to be a good treatment option for LRRC. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT before and after PBT may be useful for assessing tumor response and predicting outcomes.

MRI VS. FDG-PET for diagnosis of response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Aim

In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic values of MRI and FDG-PET for the prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACT) of patients with locally advanced Rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library, were systematically searched through December 2021 for studies that investigated the diagnostic value of MRI and FDG-PET in the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT. The quality of the included studies was assessed using QUADAS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), and the area under the ROC (AUC) of MRI and FDG-PET were calculated using a bivariate generalized linear mixed model, random-effects model, and hierarchical regression.

Results

A total number of 74 studies with recruited 4,105 locally advanced RC patients were included in this analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and AUC for MRI were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.88), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89), 5.50 (95% CI: 4.11-7.35), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), respectively. The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and AUC for FDG-PET were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.70-0.80), 3.29 (95% CI: 2.64-4.10), 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20-0.31), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), respectively. Moreover, there were no significant differences between MRI and FDG-PET in sensitivity (P = 0.565), and NLR (P = 0.268), while the specificity (P = 0.006), PLR (P = 0.006), and AUC (P = 0.003) of MRI was higher than FDG-PET.

Conclusions

MRI might superior than FGD-PET for the prediction of the response of patients with locally advanced RC to NACT.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by selective inguinal lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision for metastasized low rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with inguinal lymph node metastasis (ILNM) is rare and is associated with poor prognostic outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of neoadjuvant therapy followed by selective inguinal lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision for rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with clinically suspected ILNM.

METHODS

This study enrolled 15 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and curative resection for rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma with clinically suspected ILNM between 2005 and 2019 at a single institution. Inguinal lymph node dissection was selectively performed on the side of suspected metastasis before neoadjuvant therapy. Short- and long-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Out of the15 patients, 11 were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, three with chemotherapy, and one with chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scans were performed after neoadjuvant therapy in 14 patients. Five patients had negative FDG accumulation in inguinal lymph nodes on FDG-PET scan, and their inguinal lymph nodes were also pathologically negative for metastasis. Of the nine patients who had positive FDG accumulation, four had pathologically positive inguinal lymph nodes. Seven patients (46.7%) had inguinal seroma postoperatively. Five-year-overall survival was 77.5%, and 5-year-relapse-free survival was 64.2%. No patient had a recurrence in the inguinal region.

CONCLUSION

In patients with rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma associated with clinical ILNM, radical resection with neoadjuvant therapy provides a good long-term survival.