Impact of early tumor shrinkage on quality of life in patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: results of Phase II QUACK trial

Impact of early tumor shrinkage on survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan in third- or later-line settings

Background

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been approved for a third- or later-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan. However, clinical data on the use of T-DXd in real-world practice remain insufficient. Although early tumor shrinkage (ETS) serves as an early on-treatment indicator of high treatment sensitivity, the use of ETS in predicting T-DXd efficacy remains unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of T-DXd and investigate the clinical utility of ETS as a predictor of long-term efficacy and survival.

Design

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This study consecutively enrolled patients with HER2-positive AGC who received T-DXd as a third- or later-line treatment between March 2018 and December 2023. Data on patient characteristics, adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. Clinical efficacy was assessed using progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In patients with measurable lesions, the overall response rate (ORR), ETS, and depth of response (DpR) were evaluated. Prognostic outcomes were assessed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 65 patients received T-DXd, with a median age of 66 years (range, 31-82 years); 77% had HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 3+, 71% received T-DXd as a third-line treatment, and 32% required initial dose reduction. At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, the median PFS and OS were 4.5 months and 7.7 months, respectively. Among the 47 patients with measurable lesions, the ORR was 36%. A median DpR of 15.8% was observed, with higher DpR correlating with longer OS. ETS was achieved in 38% of the patients and was an independent predictor of favorable PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09-0.49; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.52; p < 0.01). Longer second-line treatment duration was independently associated with improved OS. Overall, grade ⩾ 3 AEs occurred in 37% of the patients. Initial dose reduction reduced AE-induced discontinuation of treatment without compromising efficacy.

Conclusion

T-DXd demonstrated notable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Rapid and deep tumor shrinkage may have a significant impact on survival.

Outcomes of upfront primary tumor resection in patients with synchronous RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of upfront PTR in 582 patients with synchronous RAS wild-type mCRC who received cetuximab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment between November 2016 and August 2020. Of these patients, 364 (62.5%) underwent upfront PTR (PTR group) and 218 (37.5%) did not (non-PTR group). Relevant data were collected from 14 medical institutions in Taiwan. No significant differences were discovered between the PTR and non-PTR groups in median overall survival (37.9 vs. 31.7 months; P = 0.079) or progression-free survival (13.70 vs. 13.29 months; P = 0.62). Compared with patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, those who underwent this surgery exhibited significantly longer median overall survival (29.2 vs. 54.18 months; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (12.8 vs. 15.60 months; P = 0.013). Our findings suggest that upfront PTR may not improve oncological outcomes in patients with synchronous RAS wild-type mCRC. Cetuximab-based targeted therapy plus chemotherapy appears to be suitable as first-line treatment for these patients. This study indicates that upfront PTR should be considered only for patients exhibiting symptoms such as tumor bleeding, perforation, or obstruction.

Impact of Systemic Treatments on Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients with RAS-Positive Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

This systematic review critically evaluates the impact of systemic treatments on outcomes and quality of life (QoL) in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, with studies published up to December 2023 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. From an initial pool of 1345 articles, 11 relevant studies were selected for inclusion, encompassing a diverse range of systemic treatments, including panitumumab combined with FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRI, irinotecan paired with panitumumab, regorafenib followed by cetuximab ± irinotecan and vice versa, and panitumumab as a maintenance therapy post-induction. Patient demographics predominantly included middle-aged to elderly individuals, with a slight male predominance. Racial composition, where reported, showed a majority of Caucasian participants, highlighting the need for broader demographic inclusivity in future research. Key findings revealed that the addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI) did not significantly compromise QoL while notably improving disease-free survival, with baseline EQ-5D HSI mean scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 and VAS mean scores from 70.1 to 74.1. Improvements in FACT-C scores and EQ-5D Index scores particularly favored panitumumab plus best supportive care in KRAS wild-type mCRC, with early dropout rates of 38-42% for panitumumab + BSC. Notably, cetuximab + FOLFIRI was associated with a median survival of 25.7 months versus 16.4 months for FOLFIRI alone, emphasizing the potential benefits of integrating targeted therapies with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the review underscores the significant impact of systemic treatments, particularly targeted therapies and their combinations with chemotherapy, on survival outcomes and QoL in patients with RAS-positive stage IV colorectal cancer, and the need for personalized treatment.

Survival benefit of metastasectomy in first-line cetuximab therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide registry

This multicenter study aimed to explore the survival benefit of metastasectomy by first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy in real-world patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and metastasectomy rate. The exploratory endpoint was the optimal treatment cycle for better OS and PFS. Receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal cut-off cycle for survival outcomes. A total of 758 mCRC patients were enrolled in this study, with a median OS of 35.1 months, median PFS of 14.6 months, and metastasectomy rate of 21.4%. Left-sided mCRC had a significantly higher DCR (88.9% vs. 73.1%, P<0.001) and better OS (36.4 vs. 19.6 months, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in PFS and metastasectomy rate between left-sided and right-sided mCRC. However, mCRC patients who underwent metastasectomy over the course of treatment had better OS (54.9 vs. 28.6 months, P<0.001) and PFS (21.0 vs. 13.1 months, P<0.001) than those who did not. Notably, right-sided mCRC who benefited from first-line cetuximab-based chemotherapy to underwent metastasectomy also had favorable outcomes, on a par with left-sided mCRC. The optimal treatment cycle was 14 cycles (AUC: 0.779, P<0.001). Patients who received ≥14 cycles had higher metastasectomy rates (27.5% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001), favorable OS (42.6 vs. 23.4 months, P<0.001) and PFS (18.1 vs. 8.6 months, P<0.001), and, importantly, had comparable adverse events compared with patients who received <14 cycles of treatment. Patients who underwent metastasectomy after or during first-line cetuximab therapy have an improved OS in both left-sided and right-sided mCRC. Furthermore, patients receive ≥14 cycles of treatment whenever possible to achieve a higher likelihood of metastasectomy was associated with favorable survival outcomes.

The impact of clinical and translational research on the quality of life during the metastatic colorectal cancer patient journey

The journey of metastatic colorectal cancer patients is complex and challenging, requiring coordination and collaboration between multiple healthcare providers. Understanding patients' needs, fears, feelings, concerns, and behaviors is essential for providing individualized patient-centered care. In recent years, mCRC patients have experienced improvements in clinical outcomes, from 16 months of overall survival to 32 months, thanks to research. However, there is still room for improvement, and integrating clinical and translational research into routine practice can help patients benefit from treatments and techniques that would not be an option. In the Journey of mCRC patients, living well with cancer and quality of life becomes a priority given the outcomes of the disease. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are becoming therefore new estimands in Oncology. Patient advocates represent important figures in this process by prioritizing issues and research questions; evaluating research designs and the performance of the research; the analysis and interpretation of data; and how results are disseminated. Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards and shared decision-making is essential for designing treatment strategies for individual patients. Quality of Life is often prioritized only when it comes to refractory advanced disease and end-of-life care, but it has to be integrated from the beginning, as the emotional impact of diagnosis leads to a vulnerable situation where patients' needs and preferences can be easily overseen. First-line treatment will be chosen among more treatment options than subsequent lines, with longer progression-free survival and a bigger impact on the outcomes. Practicing patient-centered care and optimizing first-line treatment for colorectal cancer patients requires a comprehensive understanding of patient experience and treatment outcomes, which can guide clinical practice and inform regulatory decisions for the benefit of patients.