Monoclonal immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement in Fuchs' uveitis

Diagnosing Vitreoretinal Lymphomas-An Analysis of the Sensitivity of Existing Tools

Simple Summary

Diagnostics of vitreoretinal lymphoma is very challenging, as the possibility of receiving false negative results is common. We retrospectively analyzed the sensitivity of the most commonly used diagnostic methods including ancillary immunohistochemistry, Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 (MyD88) L256P mutation analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and T-cell Receptor (TCR) genes, flow cytometry, and IL10 and IL6 analysis, to diagnose vitreoretinal lymphomas from published data in the literature. MyD88 mutation analysis caused by a hotspot mutation in MyD88 was the most sensitive and had the lowest coefficient of variation.

Abstract

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare ocular pathology that is notorious for mimicking chronic uveitis, which is a seemingly benign condition in comparison. The most common form of VRL is the diffuse large B-cell type, and there has been a high mortality rate. This dismal prognosis can be improved significantly if the disease is diagnosed early, but until now there is no consensus on an appropriate diagnostic algorithm. We conducted a retrospective search of PubMed Central^® and analyzed results from thirty-three studies that were published between 2011–2021. The chosen studies incorporated some popular testing tools for VRL, and our analyses focused on comparing the average sensitivity of five diagnostic methods. The methods included cytology including ancillary immunohistochemistry, Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 (MyD88) mutation analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and T-cell Receptor (TCR) genes, flow cytometry, and IL10 and IL6 analysis. Across the varied diagnostic methods employed in thirty-three studies explored in this analysis, MyD88 mutation assay emerged as a strong contender given its sensitivity and low coefficient of variation. There is an imminent need for the introduction of newer assays that can further improve the sensitivity of identifying MyD88 mutation in cancer cells seen in the vitreous.

Cytological diagnosis of vitreoretinal lymphomas: A case series

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cytological diagnosis and follow-up of patients suffering from vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) diagnosed in our institution.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 2010 to June 2017, we collected 15 patients with VRL. Twelve patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); of these, 11 had primary central nervous system (CNS) DLBCL, one had ocular localisation of follicular lymphoma, one had extranodal NK/T-cell nasal type lymphoma and one had chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The results of the cytological examination (cell morphology and immunocytochemistry) of the vitreous fluid were available for 9/15 VRL. The interleukin-10/-6 ratio was >1 in eight of 12 DLBCL. Molecular testing was useful in 6/15 cases (clonality evaluation or MYD88 L265P mutation testing). Eight out of 11 primary CNS DLBCL patients had CNS involvement, with 22-month progression-free survival. In our series, only two out of 11 CNS DLBCL patients died of disease after 2 and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The short delay to assert the diagnosis of VRL could explain the quite good prognosis in our series, which highlights the need to consider a diagnosis of DLBCL as first step. The cytological features, as a reliable way to identify VRL, must always guide the choice of techniques for further investigations given the small amount of vitreous fluid available for analysis.